Chittenden (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Chittenden (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Chittenden (VT)
37,342
Total Investors in Chittenden (VT)
3,767
Investor Owned SFR in Chittenden (VT)
2,894(7.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,951
SFR Owned
2,073
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
816
SFR Owned
901
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,894 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 99% of Chittenden County's Investor Market as Institutions Remain Absent
Investors own 2,894 SFR properties in Chittenden County (7.7% of the market), with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.1% of that portfolio versus 0.0% for institutional investors. In Q4 2025, landlords were strong net buyers (2.46x buy/sell ratio) and purchased 6.6% of all homes sold, paying a narrow 0.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,894 SFR properties, with individual investors controlling 71.6% of the portfolio.
The entire investor portfolio of 2,894 properties is held in cash with zero financing recorded. Rented properties comprise 97.4% (2,818) of all landlord-owned homes, indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid just 0.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a narrow discount of $3,629 per property.
The price gap has dramatically narrowed from a 29.9% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to just 0.6% in Q4. Landlords even paid a 6.3% premium in Q3, showing significant pricing volatility throughout the year with low transaction volumes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 6.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, acquiring 24 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of landlord acquisitions this quarter (24 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases. 27 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market, holding 0.0% of the investor portfolio. The market is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 83.8% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Pricing data to compare individual and company acquisition costs is not available for this county.
Individuals constitute the majority of owners in smaller portfolio tiers, from 74.1% in the single-property tier down to 57.1% for those owning 3-5 properties. The crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs in portfolios larger than 5 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 05446 (481 properties) and 05401 (458 properties).
Additional findings pending.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remained strong net buyers in Q4 with a 2.46x buy-to-sell ratio; 0% of purchases came from other investors.
Landlords have been consistent net buyers, acquiring 134 properties while selling only 41 in 2025. However, acquisition volume in 2025 is down 38.5% compared to 2024, when 218 properties were purchased.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 5.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 32 purchases.
A significant price difference exists within the mom-and-pop segment; small landlords (3-5 properties) paid an average of $806,250, 74.0% more than single-property landlords ($463,370). No landlords purchased from other investors this quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,894 SFR properties, with individual investors controlling 71.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Chittenden County, investors own 2,894 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 7.7% of the total 37,342 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the ownership landscape, holding 2,073 properties, or 71.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 901 homes (31.1%).

A striking feature of this market is the complete absence of financing; 100% of the 2,894 investor-owned properties are designated as cash holdings. This suggests a low-leverage, financially stable investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,818 properties (97.4%) classified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores a long-term hold and income-generation strategy among local investors.

While individuals own more properties, companies manage slightly larger portfolios on average. The data shows 816 company entities own 901 properties (1.1 properties per entity), compared to 2,951 individual landlords owning 2,073 properties (0.7 per entity).

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid just 0.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a narrow discount of $3,629 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the pricing advantage for landlords nearly vanished, with their average acquisition price of $598,196 being just 0.6% ($3,629) lower than the $601,825 paid by traditional homeowners.

This represents a significant shift from earlier in the year. Landlords secured massive discounts of 29.9% ($179,547) in Q1 and 21.7% ($134,859) in Q2, indicating that their pricing power has eroded as the year progressed.

The market showed extreme volatility in Q3 2025, when landlords paid an average of $637,780, a surprising 6.3% premium over the homeowner price of $599,866.

Despite low transaction volumes reported for landlords, the long-term price appreciation trend is clear. The average investor acquisition price has climbed from $481,524 during the 2020-2023 period to an average of $512,088 in 2024 and $546,284 in 2025.

The inconsistent and shrinking discount suggests that in the current market, investors are competing more directly with traditional homebuyers on price, unable to consistently secure below-market deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 6.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, acquiring 24 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity accounted for a modest 6.6% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 24 of the 366 SFRs sold.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties). Institutional investors were completely absent, making zero acquisitions in the quarter.

New investors formed the backbone of Q4 activity, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 20 of the 24 purchases (83.3%). This activity was driven by 27 distinct entities, suggesting co-ownership is a factor among new entrants.

The data signals a market dominated by organic, small-scale growth rather than large-scale portfolio acquisitions. The remaining 16.7% of purchases (4 properties) came from landlords in the 3-5 property tier.

This concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum highlights a market characterized by local individuals and small businesses, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Chittenden County is unequivocally controlled by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) hold a combined 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This market structure defies the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint here, with a 0.0% market share.

Ownership is intensely concentrated at the very bottom of the pyramid. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 2,476 homes, representing 83.8% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Beyond the smallest tiers, ownership drops off sharply. Landlords with 11-100 properties collectively own less than 1% of the investor portfolio, further highlighting the market's fragmented nature.

This distribution indicates a market composed of thousands of individual stakeholders rather than a few dominant players, suggesting a more stable, community-integrated rental environment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Pricing data to compare individual and company acquisition costs is not available for this county.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the rental market, especially in smaller portfolios. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,887 properties, a 74.1% majority compared to 661 properties owned by companies.

As portfolio sizes increase, so does the share of company ownership, though individuals maintain their majority in the tiers for which data is available. The individual share is 60.5% for two-property landlords and 57.1% for those owning 3-5 properties.

This trend suggests that while many start as individual investors, incorporation becomes a more common strategy as portfolios scale beyond 5 properties.

The data clearly shows that even within the 'mom-and-pop' segment, there is a progressive shift towards a corporate structure for legal and financial purposes.

The overwhelming majority of landlords in the county operate as individuals, reinforcing the local, small-scale character of the investor market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 05446 (481 properties) and 05401 (458 properties).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Chittenden County, with distinct hotspots of activity. By sheer volume, the zip codes 05446 (481 properties) and 05401 (458 properties) are the clear leaders.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is found in 05404, where 21.1% of all SFRs are investor-owned. This is a significantly higher penetration rate than the county average of 7.7%.

A comparison of top zip codes reveals different market dynamics. While 05446 has the most investor-owned homes, its ownership rate (12.1%) is lower than that of 05404, which has fewer investor properties (282) but a much higher market share.

The zip code 05401 stands out as a major hub for investors, ranking in the top three for both total investor property count (458) and ownership percentage (14.1%).

These patterns show that investors are targeting specific sub-markets within the county, leading to pockets of high rental concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remained strong net buyers in Q4 with a 2.46x buy-to-sell ratio; 0% of purchases came from other investors.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Chittenden County continue to be in an accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 32 homes while selling only 13, a net gain of 19 properties.

This net-buyer trend has been consistent throughout the year, with landlords acquiring 134 properties and selling just 41 in 2025, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.27.

While investors remain bullish, the overall pace of acquisitions has slowed considerably. The 134 purchases in 2025 represent a 38.5% decrease in volume from 2024, when 218 properties were bought.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) recorded no transactions, indicating their activity is not a factor in the market's dynamics.

The persistent net-buying behavior, even amidst a slowdown, signals long-term confidence in the local rental market among the existing base of small investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 5.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 32 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 5.2% of all SFR transactions, making 32 purchases out of a total of 612 market-wide transactions.

All 32 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, with institutional investors making no purchases.

A striking pricing disparity emerged within the active mom-and-pop tiers. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid an average of $806,250, a 74.0% premium over the $463,370 average paid by new, single-property investors. This suggests larger small landlords may be targeting higher-value or multi-unit-convertible properties.

The vast majority of transaction volume (27 of 32 transactions) came from landlords in the single-property tier, reaffirming that new market entrants are the primary drivers of investor activity.

Zero percent of Q4 purchases were from other landlords, indicating that investors are acquiring their inventory from the traditional market (i.e., homeowners) rather than trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual investors dominate Chittenden's rental market, controlling 99.1% of properties while institutions remain absent.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,894 SFR properties, representing 7.7% of the market in Chittenden County. Individual investors hold a commanding 71.6% of these properties (2,072), with companies owning the remaining 31.1% (901).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $598,196, a narrow 0.6% discount ($3,629) compared to traditional homeowners ($601,825), though this gap showed extreme volatility throughout the year.
Activity
Landlords acquired 24 properties in Q4, accounting for 6.6% of all market purchases. Activity was exclusively from small investors, with 27 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 99.1% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no ownership stake (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 74.1% of single-property rentals. The data suggests companies only begin to gain a significant share in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 2.46 properties for every one sold in Q4 (32 buys vs 13 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned housing market in Chittenden County, Vermont is fundamentally defined by small, local stakeholders. Landlords own 2,894 properties, making up 7.7% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is dominated by 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), who control 99.1% of investor-held homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have zero presence. Ownership is deeply personal, with individual investors holding 71.6% of the properties, reinforcing the market's fragmented and community-based character.

Investor activity in Q4 2025, though modest at 6.6% of all sales, was driven entirely by this small landlord segment. These investors remained net buyers, acquiring 2.46 homes for every one they sold, signaling continued confidence. Their pricing power, however, has diminished; the significant discounts seen earlier in the year shrank to a negligible 0.6% by Q4. A notable finding is that the entire investor portfolio is held with cash, indicating a financially conservative and stable investor base not reliant on leverage.

The key takeaway for the Chittenden County housing market is that it operates contrary to the national narrative of corporate landlord dominance. The rental stock is controlled by a large number of local individuals and small businesses focused on long-term, income-generating strategies. While the pace of new acquisitions has slowed from 2024, the consistent net-buying from this established base suggests a stable and resilient rental market for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:13 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyChittenden (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct