Addison (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Addison (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Addison (VT)
10,757
Total Investors in Addison (VT)
1,780
Investor Owned SFR in Addison (VT)
1,250(11.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,439
SFR Owned
960
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
341
SFR Owned
333
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,250 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Addison County with 99.5% Ownership, Acquiring Homes at a 44.1% Discount
Investors own 11.6% of homes in Addison County, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a dominant 99.5% of that share. In Q4 2025, these small investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20.9% of all properties sold at a remarkable 44.1% discount compared to homeowners, while institutional investors remained completely inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,250 SFRs in Addison County, with individuals holding a 76.8% majority.
The entire investor portfolio of 1,250 properties was acquired with cash, with zero financed properties reported. Rented properties account for 1,235 of the total, indicating a 98.8% focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Addison County landlords secured a massive 44.1% discount in Q4, paying $214,825 less than homeowners.
This Q4 discount of 44.1% is a dramatic increase from prior quarters, which saw discounts of just 1.8% in Q3 and 7.0% in Q2. The data does not provide a price breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors acquired 20.9% of all single-family homes sold in Addison County during Q4 2025.
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors drove 100% of this activity, purchasing all 14 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, ceding the entire market to smaller players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Addison County, controlling 99.5% of all investor-owned homes.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just a single property, representing 0.1% of the investor market. Data on price variation by tier is not available for this county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Price differences between individual and company buyers in Addison County cannot be determined from the available data.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 57.1% of homes. Despite individual dominance overall, this indicates a strategic shift to corporate structures for larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
The 05753 and 05491 zip codes lead Addison County with the highest count of investor-owned properties.
However, the highest investor penetration rates are in smaller zip codes like 05469 (38.5%) and 05747 (33.6%). The top regions by count are not the same as top regions by ownership percentage, showing different investor strategies.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Addison County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 1 in Q4 2025.
This strong net buying trend has been consistent, with a buy/sell ratio of 11.3x in 2025 (68 buys vs. 6 sells) and 20.8x in 2024 (83 buys vs. 4 sells). Transaction volume has moderated slightly from 2024 levels.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all single-family real estate transactions in Addison County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors dominated, with single-property landlords paying an average of $253,811. Only 5.9% of their purchases came from other landlords, showing they primarily buy from homeowners. Institutional investors had zero transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,250 SFRs in Addison County, with individuals holding a 76.8% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 1,250 single-family properties in Addison County, which constitutes 11.6% of the total 10,757 SFRs in the market.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations, with individual landlords owning 960 properties (76.8%) compared to 333 (26.6%) owned by companies.

A striking feature of the Addison County investor market is its complete reliance on cash financing. All 1,250 investor-owned properties were purchased with cash, with zero properties currently financed, signaling a market of well-capitalized investors who avoid leverage.

The portfolio's primary function is generating rental income, as 1,235 of the 1,250 properties (98.8%) are classified as rented.

The market consists of 1,780 distinct landlords (1,439 individuals and 341 companies), a number higher than the property count, which underscores the prevalence of single-property owners and a highly fragmented market structure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Addison County landlords secured a massive 44.1% discount in Q4, paying $214,825 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Addison County acquired properties at a dramatically lower price point than traditional homeowners, paying an average of $272,660 compared to $487,485—a staggering 44.1% discount or $214,825 per property.

This price gap widened significantly compared to previous quarters. In Q3, the discount was a negligible 1.8% ($8,595), and in Q2 it was 7.0% ($30,060), making the Q4 price advantage an acute development rather than a consistent trend.

The dramatic increase in the discount may suggest that in Q4, landlords targeted distressed properties, off-market deals, or homes requiring significant renovation that were less appealing to traditional buyers.

Despite the low Q4 acquisition price, overall market prices have trended upward. The average landlord purchase price rose from $362,962 during the 2020-2023 period to $389,073 in 2024.

The sharp quarterly fluctuation in the price gap highlights potential volatility, likely influenced by a low volume of transactions, where a few deeply discounted purchases can heavily skew the quarterly average.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors acquired 20.9% of all single-family homes sold in Addison County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a significant portion of the housing market in Q4 2025, purchasing 14 of the 67 total SFRs sold, which amounts to a 20.9% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with 100% of acquisitions made by investors with small portfolios. Institutional investors were completely absent from the market.

Market growth is being fueled by new entrants, as 17 new single-property landlord entities were formed in Q4, acquiring 13 properties. This influx of first-time investors is the primary driver of market activity.

The focus on entry-level investing is clear, with 86.7% of all properties purchased by landlords going to those in the single-property tier. The remaining 13.3% were purchased by investors acquiring their second property.

This data confirms that the investor landscape in Addison County is not expanding due to large-scale corporate acquisitions, but through a continuous grassroots movement of new, small-scale individuals entering the rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Addison County, controlling 99.5% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Addison County is almost entirely composed of small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.5% of the investor-owned housing stock, leaving a negligible share for larger players.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, independently owning 1,162 properties. This single tier accounts for 91.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply after the first tier. Landlords with two properties hold 4.7% of the market, and those with 3-5 properties hold just 3.2%, illustrating a market with a very long tail of small portfolios.

The presence of institutional capital is virtually non-existent. A single property out of 1,250 is held by an institutional-scale investor (0.1%), directly countering any narrative of a corporate takeover of the local housing market.

This highly fragmented ownership structure, dominated by thousands of individual decision-makers, fundamentally shapes the local rental market's character, favoring long-term holds over speculative, large-scale trading.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Price differences between individual and company buyers in Addison County cannot be determined from the available data.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across the most populous tiers. They control 76.2% of the dominant single-property segment (915 properties) and 58.3% of the two-property tier (35 properties).

A distinct strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs as portfolios grow. At the 6-10 property tier, companies become the majority for the first time, owning 57.1% of the properties (4 of 7).

This crossover point suggests that while individuals are comfortable managing a few properties, the complexities and liability concerns of larger portfolios drive investors to incorporate.

Even in tiers where they are not the majority, companies maintain a significant presence. They own 23.8% of single-property portfolios and 41.7% of two-property portfolios, showing that incorporation is a viable strategy even for smaller-scale investors.

The data reveals two clear investor paths in the county: a vast base of individuals operating at a small scale and a smaller, more professionalized group that adopts corporate structures to facilitate portfolio expansion.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 05753 and 05491 zip codes lead Addison County with the highest count of investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The highest volume of investor-owned properties is concentrated in a few key zip codes, with 05753 (192 properties), 05491 (169 properties), and 05733 (149 properties) leading the county.

A clear distinction exists between areas with the most investor properties and areas where investors have the largest market share. The highest investor ownership rates are found in different zip codes: 05469 (38.5%), 05747 (33.6%), and 05733 (29.2%).

This divergence suggests two distinct investment strategies at play within the county. Some investors target larger, more populated areas, while others focus on smaller markets where they can achieve a higher penetration rate.

The zip code 05733 stands out as a critical hub for investor activity, appearing in the top five for both absolute property count and ownership percentage, indicating its central role in the local rental market.

The analysis reveals that investor presence is not uniform. Understanding the difference between high-volume and high-penetration submarkets is key to grasping the varied investment theses being pursued across Addison County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Addison County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 1 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Addison County are heavily focused on portfolio growth, as demonstrated by a Q4 2025 buy-to-sell ratio of 19-to-1. This indicates strong market confidence and an accumulation strategy.

This aggressive net-buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. Landlords have been consistent net buyers, with 68 purchases versus only 6 sales for all of 2025, and 83 purchases versus 4 sales in 2024.

While the buy-side activity remains dominant, the overall pace of acquisitions has cooled slightly. Total landlord transactions in 2025 (74) are tracking below the 2024 total (87).

The extremely low number of sales across all timeframes signals that the prevailing investor strategy is long-term holds, aimed at generating rental income rather than short-term capital gains from flipping.

With institutional investors reporting zero transactions, this sustained market accumulation is entirely attributable to the activity of small, independent landlords steadily growing their local portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all single-family real estate transactions in Addison County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 19 of the 107 total SFR transactions, representing a 17.8% share of all market activity and reinforcing their role as a significant buyer group.

All 19 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity recorded from institutional-scale landlords. This highlights a transactional market completely driven by small operators.

A distinct pricing strategy emerges among new investors. Those buying their first property paid a lower average price of $253,811, while investors buying their second property paid a significantly higher average of $480,000.

The market shows minimal churn between investors. Of the 17 purchases made by the most active group (single-property landlords), only one property (5.9%) was acquired from another landlord. This indicates that investors are primarily buying from the traditional homeowner market.

The Q4 transaction data confirms the broader ownership trends: Addison County's investor market is fueled by a steady stream of new, small-scale players who acquire properties from homeowners and employ a long-term hold strategy.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Addison County with 99.5% Ownership, Acquiring Homes at a 44.1% Discount
Holdings
In Addison County, investors own 1,250 single-family properties, representing 11.6% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who own 960 properties (76.8%), compared to 333 (26.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4 2025, paying an average of $272,660—a 44.1% discount compared to the traditional homeowner price of $487,485, saving an average of $214,825 per property.
Activity
Landlords acquired 14 single-family homes in Q4, accounting for 20.9% of all market purchases. Activity was exclusively from small investors, including 17 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.5% of the rental housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold just a single property, or 0.1% of the total.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners (57.1%) at the 6-10 property tier, suggesting incorporation is a strategy for landlords managing larger portfolios.
Transactions
Investors are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 19-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (19 buys vs. 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Addison County, Vermont, is defined by small, independent operators. Landlords own 1,250 single-family homes, making up 11.6% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.5% of all investor-held homes. Ownership is primarily held by individuals (76.8%), with institutional investors having a near-zero footprint at just 0.1% ownership, challenging any notion of a corporate-driven market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by strategic acquisition and expansion. Landlords purchased 20.9% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a small-scale investor. These buyers demonstrated remarkable deal-finding ability, securing properties at a 44.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is clearly in an accumulation phase, as evidenced by a 19-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, with investors choosing to build their portfolios rather than sell existing assets.

The data paints a clear picture of the Addison County rental market: it is built and sustained by an ecosystem of well-capitalized, local individuals. The complete absence of institutional buying, coupled with a 100% cash-financed portfolio and a constant influx of new single-property landlords, signals a stable, long-term-oriented market. The primary force shaping the local rental landscape is not Wall Street, but rather a large base of small investors expanding their holdings one property at a time.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:16 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyAddison (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions