Sevier (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sevier (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sevier (UT)
7,926
Total Investors in Sevier (UT)
4,784
Investor Owned SFR in Sevier (UT)
3,237(40.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,159
SFR Owned
2,949
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
625
SFR Owned
716
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,237 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Sevier County Market, Securing Discounts Amid Active Buying
In Sevier County, UT, landlords own 3,237 SFR properties, constituting 40.8% of the market. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.6% of this portfolio and drove 96.4% of landlord Q4 purchases. Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with an 11.25x buy-to-sell ratio, often securing a 5.2% discount against traditional homeowner prices, though price gaps fluctuate significantly.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords control 3,237 SFR properties in Sevier County, with individuals owning 91.1% of these holdings.
A dominant 99.2% of investor-owned properties are rented, highlighting a strong rental market focus. Cash purchases account for 66.5% of investor holdings, significantly outweighing the 33.5% financed properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 5.2% discount in Q4, paying $416,871 compared to homeowners at $439,517.
Landlord pricing against homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a 37.4% premium in Q2 2025 to a 24.4% discount in Q3 2025. This inconsistency suggests a dynamic market where opportunities for discounts or premiums shift rapidly quarter-over-quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 34.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, demonstrating significant market influence.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove Q4 activity, accounting for 96.4% of all landlord purchases. A notable 34 new single-property landlords entered the market, while institutional investors showed no purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Sevier County, with no institutional presence.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, owning 82.5% of all investor-held SFR. The market's structure is heavily decentralized, with 2,809 single-property landlords dominating the ownership landscape.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all tiers in Sevier County, with no company crossover point.
In the largest listed tier (11-20 properties), company ownership reaches its highest concentration at 48.6%, nearing parity with individuals. Single-property landlords are heavily individual-dominated, with 83.4% of properties owned by individuals versus 16.6% by companies.
Geographic Distribution
Sevier County zip codes 84620 and 84652 exhibit highest investor penetration, exceeding 84% ownership rates.
UT-Sevier-84701 leads by sheer volume with 893 investor-owned properties, while UT-Sevier-84657 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 85.7%. These trends highlight distinct patterns of investor concentration, some regions drawing high volumes while others show deep market penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Sevier County, with Q4 2025 exhibiting an 11.25x buy-to-sell ratio.
Overall landlord buying activity has consistently outpaced selling over the last two years, indicating continuous portfolio expansion. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintain a neutral transaction position with equal buys and sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 34.1% of all Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers driving virtually all activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 36 transactions, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) paid the highest average price at $464,436. Inter-landlord transactions remain minimal, suggesting landlords primarily acquire properties from non-investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords control 3,237 SFR properties in Sevier County, with individuals owning 91.1% of these holdings.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a substantial 40.8% of all SFR properties in Sevier County, UT, totaling 3,237 distinct properties out of 7,926. This indicates a significant presence of investor activity within the local housing market.

Individual landlords are the primary force, owning 2,949 properties and representing 91.1% of investor-owned SFR. Companies hold 716 properties, making up 22.1% of the total, suggesting substantial overlap or complex ownership structures where properties may be classified under both.

The ownership landscape is heavily skewed towards individual entities, with 4,159 individual landlords compared to just 625 company landlords, establishing a clear 6.65:1 ratio of individual to company entities in the market.

A striking 99.2% (3,210 properties) of landlord-owned SFR properties are designated as rented, underscoring a near-universal focus on generating rental income from these investments.

The majority of landlord holdings, 66.5% or 2,153 properties, were acquired through cash transactions, indicating a preference for avoiding financing or a strong capital base among investors. This contrasts with 33.5% (1,084 properties) that are financed.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 5.2% discount in Q4, paying $416,871 compared to homeowners at $439,517.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Sevier County, UT, paid an average of $416,871 for SFR properties, securing a $22,646 discount, or 5.2% less than the $439,517 paid by traditional homeowners.

The pricing dynamic between landlords and homeowners has exhibited extreme volatility throughout 2025. In Q2 2025, landlords paid a substantial $140,188 premium (37.4%) over homeowners, while in Q3 2025, they obtained a significant $90,339 discount (24.4%).

This quarter-over-quarter fluctuation reveals an opportunistic acquisition strategy by landlords, rather than a consistent discount or premium. For instance, Q1 2025 also saw landlords paying a $37,297 premium (9.1%), indicating no stable pricing advantage.

The absence of consistent pricing patterns from landlords suggests their acquisition strategies are highly responsive to immediate market conditions and property specifics, rather than adhering to a fixed pricing band relative to homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 34.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, demonstrating significant market influence.
Detailed Findings

Landlords acquired 28 SFR properties in Q4 2025, representing a substantial 34.1% of the total 82 SFR purchases in Sevier County, UT. This underscores their significant role in the local real estate market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 27 properties, which accounts for 96.4% of all landlord activity. This highlights the foundational role of smaller investors in the market's current dynamics.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, securing 21 properties, representing 75.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This indicates that entry-level investors are currently driving the bulk of new landlord-owned inventory.

A notable 34 entities entered the market as single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4, signaling a robust influx of new, small-scale investors expanding the landlord base in the county.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were entirely absent from Q4 purchase activity, recording 0 acquisitions. This starkly contrasts with the high engagement of mom-and-pop landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Sevier County, with no institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Sevier County, UT, controlling a commanding 98.6% of all properties. This concentration reveals a highly decentralized ownership structure, heavily reliant on small-scale investors.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 82.5% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 2,809 units. This signifies that first-time and very small landlords are the prevalent owners in the county's rental housing stock.

Mid-size landlords, those owning 2 to 10 properties (Tiers 02-04), collectively manage 16.2% of investor-owned SFR, reinforcing the mom-and-pop dominance. Specifically, two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold 8.9% (302 properties), while 3-5 property landlords (Tier 03) own 6.3% (213 properties), and 6-10 property landlords (Tier 04) hold 1.0% (33 properties).

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership in Sevier County, with their share standing at 0.0%. This indicates a local market completely untouched by large-scale corporate landlord activity.

Even the larger 'small-medium' tiers (11-50 properties) represent a minuscule portion of the market, with Tier 11-20 holding 1.1% (37 properties) and Tier 21-50 holding 0.3% (9 properties), further emphasizing the prevalence of micro-investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all tiers in Sevier County, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all listed portfolio tiers in Sevier County, UT, indicating their pervasive influence throughout the landlord spectrum. There is no observed 'crossover point' where companies become the dominant owner type in any tier.

The concentration of company ownership steadily increases with portfolio size, peaking in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier where companies own 48.6% of properties, nearly matching individual ownership at 51.4%. This represents the closest an entity type comes to majority control.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) is overwhelmingly individual-dominated, with 2,602 properties (83.4%) held by individuals compared to 517 properties (16.6%) by companies. This pattern is consistent in the two-property tier as well, with 74.5% individual ownership.

Even in mid-sized portfolios, such as the 3-5 property tier, individuals still control 68.6% of properties, while in the 6-10 property tier, they hold 54.5%, demonstrating their consistent lead over company ownership.

The data highlights that Sevier County's investor market, even at higher property counts, remains fundamentally driven by individual investors, with companies playing a significant but not majority role, even in larger portfolio categories.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Sevier County zip codes 84620 and 84652 exhibit highest investor penetration, exceeding 84% ownership rates.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties are highly concentrated within specific zip codes of Sevier County, UT, with UT-Sevier-84701 leading by volume with 893 properties, followed by UT-Sevier-84754 with 549 properties. These two zip codes collectively account for a significant portion of the county's investor holdings.

While some zip codes attract high counts of investor properties, others demonstrate exceptionally high investor ownership rates. UT-Sevier-84657 shows the highest rate at 85.7% investor-owned, closely followed by UT-Sevier-84620 (85.3%) and UT-Sevier-84652 (84.2%).

A notable correlation exists for specific zip codes that appear in both top lists: UT-Sevier-84620 (256 properties at 85.3% rate) and UT-Sevier-84652 (262 properties at 84.2% rate) are hotspots, combining both high volume and high investor penetration.

The diversity between count-leading and rate-leading zip codes reveals different investment strategies; some areas like 84701 are large markets attracting many investors, while others like 84657 indicate an exceptionally high proportion of properties already held by investors within smaller sub-markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Sevier County, with Q4 2025 exhibiting an 11.25x buy-to-sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sevier County, UT, are strong net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they bought 45 properties while selling only 4, resulting in a remarkable 11.25x buy-to-sell ratio.

This robust buying trend is not isolated to Q4; landlords were also net buyers in Q3 (40 buys vs 5 sells, 8x ratio) and Q2 (37 buys vs 6 sells, 6.17x ratio), signifying sustained portfolio growth throughout 2025.

Annually, landlords have also demonstrated a strong accumulation strategy, with 151 buys against 19 sells in 2025 (7.95x ratio) and 181 buys against 28 sells in 2024 (6.46x ratio), revealing a consistent long-term growth pattern.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) stand in stark contrast to the overall landlord market. They show a balanced transaction position, with 1 buy and 1 sell in Q2 2025, and a similar neutral stance for Year 2025 and Year 2024, indicating no net accumulation or divestment.

The acceleration of the buy-to-sell ratio to 11.25x in Q4 2025 suggests a heightened period of landlord acquisition, outpacing previous quarters and solidifying their position as aggressive market participants.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 34.1% of all Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers driving virtually all activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 45 transactions in Q4 2025, representing a significant 34.1% of the total 132 SFR transactions in Sevier County, UT. This highlights their active role in shaping the quarter's real estate market.

The overwhelming majority of landlord transactions were driven by mom-and-pop investors, with Tiers 01-04 completing 44 transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounted for 36 transactions, making them the most active segment by far.

A notable price difference emerged among smaller tiers: two-property landlords (Tier 02) paid an average of $464,436, which is $63,817 more than the $400,619 average paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4.

Inter-landlord trading activity was minimal in Q4. For Tier 01, only 1 out of 36 transactions (2.8%) was a landlord-to-landlord sale. For Tier 02, 1 out of 8 transactions (12.5%) involved another landlord, suggesting properties are predominantly acquired from non-investor sellers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from Q4 transaction activity, with 0 recorded transactions. This reinforces the finding that the Sevier County market is primarily influenced by small and mid-sized investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominance Drives Sevier County's Net-Buyer Market, Institutions Absent
Holdings
Landlords own 3,237 SFR properties in Sevier County, UT, representing 40.8% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 2,949 properties (91.1%), while companies account for 716 properties (22.1%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 5.2% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $22,646 per property ($416,871 vs $439,517). However, landlord pricing has been highly volatile, swinging from a 37.4% premium in Q2 to a 24.4% discount in Q3.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 28 properties, comprising 34.1% of all SFR sales, primarily driven by 34 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) commanded 96.4% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor housing in Sevier County, UT, while institutional investors (1000+) hold 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all tiers, with companies coming closest to parity in the 11-20 property tier (48.6% company ownership). The market is characterized by a 6.65:1 ratio of individual to company landlords.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 11.25x (45 buys vs 4 sells), indicating active portfolio expansion. Institutional investors, however, maintain a neutral position with balanced buy and sell activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Sevier County, UT, is significantly shaped by a robust landlord presence, with investors collectively owning 3,237 SFR properties, representing 40.8% of the county's total SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a remarkable 98.6% of all investor-held SFR. Individual investors, comprising 91.1% of property ownership and 6.65 times more entities than companies, are the foundational pillars of this market, reflecting a highly decentralized and localized investment environment.

Landlord behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrates an aggressive acquisition posture, with investors securing 34.1% of all SFR purchases. This activity is fueled almost entirely by mom-and-pop players, who account for 96.4% of landlord acquisitions, and notably, 34 new single-property landlords entered the market. Landlords operate as strong net buyers, with an 11.25x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, actively expanding their portfolios. While landlords generally secured a 5.2% discount against homeowner prices in Q4, pricing has been exceptionally volatile throughout 2025, swinging from significant premiums to deep discounts quarter-over-quarter.

The pronounced dominance of mom-and-pop landlords and the complete absence of institutional investors in Sevier County, UT, distinguish this market from more institutionally penetrated regions. This dynamic fosters a highly localized and accessible investment landscape where individual and small-scale entities are the primary drivers of market activity and growth. The sustained net-buyer status of landlords signals continued confidence in the local rental market, potentially leading to further expansion of rental housing stock within the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySevier (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price