Davis (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Davis (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Davis (UT)
90,125
Total Investors in Davis (UT)
14,446
Investor Owned SFR in Davis (UT)
11,887(13.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
12,716
SFR Owned
8,728
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,730
SFR Owned
3,466
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,887 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Davis County Landlords Expand Portfolios, Pay Premium in Q4, While Institutions Divest
Landlords in Davis County, UT, own 11,887 SFR properties, representing 13.2% of the market, with individuals holding 73.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 168 properties, comprising 15.3% of all SFR purchases, but paid an 11.1% premium over traditional homeowners. Mom-and-pop landlords dominate holdings at 87.8% and are net buyers, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Davis County Landlords Own 11,887 SFR Properties, 73.4% Held by Individuals
Most landlord properties, 97.5% (11,590), are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. A significant 51.9% of investor-owned properties (6,169) are financed, while 48.1% (5,718) were acquired with cash.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Davis County Landlords Paid 11.1% Premium in Q4, Averaging $638,430 Per Property
The Q4 premium marks a significant shift, as landlords secured discounts in previous quarters, including a 1.7% discount in Q3 and a 6.9% discount in Q1 2025. This fluctuation suggests changing market dynamics or altered acquisition strategies for investor purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 15.3% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Davis County, UT
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, making 95.8% of all landlord purchases, totaling 161 properties. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 117 properties through 167 distinct entities, while institutional investors made no Q4 purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 87.8% of Davis County's Investor-Owned SFR
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 74.6% of all investor-owned SFR, totaling 9,018 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) represent a smaller fraction, owning 3.6% (431 properties) of the market. Specific tier pricing data is unavailable to compare acquisition prices by tier.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Dominate Portfolios of 6+ Properties, While Individuals Own 87.0% of Single-Property SFR
The crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs between the '3-5 properties' and '6-10 properties' tiers. In portfolios of 6-10 properties, companies own 87.7%, significantly outweighing individuals at 12.3%.
Geographic Distribution
UT-Davis-84015 Leads Davis County with 2,375 Investor-Owned Properties
UT-Davis-84041 records the highest investor ownership rate at 16.2%, indicating a higher concentration of rental properties relative to total housing stock. The top 5 regions by count collectively hold a significant portion of the county's investor-owned SFR, demonstrating geographic concentration.
Historical Transactions
Davis County Landlords are Net Buyers with 2.97x Buy/Sell Ratio, Institutions are Net Sellers
In Q4 2025, landlords bought 226 properties and sold 76, reflecting strong acquisition activity. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a contrasting trend, being net sellers with 1 buy and 2 sells in Q4, and a 0.5x buy/sell ratio year-to-date 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 12.9% of Q4 Transactions in Davis County, UT
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were responsible for 95.1% of all landlord transactions in Q4, totaling 215 transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) bought from other landlords 16.0% of the time, while larger tiers showed varied reliance on inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Davis County Landlords Own 11,887 SFR Properties, 73.4% Held by Individuals
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Davis County, UT, collectively own 11,887 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 13.2% of the total SFR market in the county. This substantial portfolio underscores the significant role investors play in the local housing landscape, representing over one in eight SFR homes.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord sector, holding 8,728 properties, which constitutes 73.4% of all investor-owned SFR. Companies, by contrast, own 3,466 properties, making up the remaining 29.2% of the investor portfolio, highlighting that 'mom-and-pop' entities are the primary force.

The ownership structure by entity count further emphasizes the prevalence of individual landlords, with 12,716 individual landlords compared to just 1,730 company landlords. This 7.3:1 ratio of individual to company landlords indicates a highly fragmented market, with many small-scale investors.

A striking 97.5% of landlord-owned properties (11,590 out of 11,887) are designated as rented, confirming a near-exclusive focus on generating rental income rather than owner-occupancy. This high proportion highlights the rental market's reliance on these investor-held properties.

Financing methods for investor properties are almost evenly split, with 6,169 properties (51.9%) being financed and 5,718 properties (48.1%) acquired with cash. This balance suggests a mix of leveraging strategies and direct capital investment within the landlord community in Davis County, UT.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Davis County Landlords Paid 11.1% Premium in Q4, Averaging $638,430 Per Property
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Davis County, UT, paid an average acquisition price of $638,430, which remarkably stands as an 11.1% premium over the $574,730 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a significant $63,700 additional cost per property for investors in the latest quarter.

This Q4 premium contrasts sharply with earlier quarters in 2025, where landlords consistently acquired properties at a discount. In Q3, landlords paid $570,720, a 1.7% discount ($10,088 less) compared to homeowners at $580,808. In Q2, they secured a 3.9% discount ($23,782 less) at $587,516 versus homeowner prices of $611,298.

The largest discount for landlords occurred in Q1 2025, where they paid $530,915, a substantial 6.9% ($39,054 less) than the $569,969 paid by traditional homeowners. The rapid swing from a consistent discount to a significant premium in Q4 indicates a notable shift in market competition or investor willingness to pay more.

While data on landlord acquisition volume for specific historical timeframes (2025-Q1 to 2024-Q4) shows 0 properties, the available price comparisons highlight a clear reversal in pricing trends. Landlords in Q4 2025 are no longer securing the price advantages observed earlier in the year.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 15.3% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Davis County, UT
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Davis County, UT, acquired 168 SFR properties, representing 15.3% of all SFR purchases in the county. This indicates a consistent, albeit smaller, share of market activity compared to other buyers who purchased 929 properties during the same period.

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), were overwhelmingly the most active buyers, responsible for 161 purchases, equating to 95.8% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4. This demonstrates their continued dominance in property accumulation in the county.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) accounted for the largest segment of Q4 purchases, with 117 properties acquired by 167 distinct entities. This signifies a strong influx of new or expanding small-scale investors, forming the backbone of landlord acquisition activity.

Mid-size landlords also showed activity, with Tiers 02 (two-property) acquiring 13 properties by 14 entities and Tiers 03-05 (3-10 properties) purchasing 31 properties by 18 entities. These segments collectively contribute to the mom-and-pop majority in Q4 buying.

Notably, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Davis County, UT, during Q4 2025. This complete absence of institutional buying activity further emphasizes the market's reliance on smaller, individual landlords for property acquisition.

The average properties per entity varies across tiers, with single-property entities (Tier 01) making 117 purchases by 167 entities, indicating that some existing single-property landlords are also adding to their portfolios, not just new entrants. However, the majority of active entities are still in the lowest tier, suggesting a highly decentralized acquisition market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 87.8% of Davis County's Investor-Owned SFR
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), collectively control an overwhelming 87.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Davis County, UT. This translates to 10,611 properties, reinforcing their status as the dominant force in the county's rental housing market.

Within the mom-and-pop segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are particularly prominent, owning 9,018 properties which account for 74.6% of the total investor-owned SFR. This highlights the foundational role of first-time or single-investment landlords in the overall market structure.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a relatively small share of 3.6%, representing 431 properties. This suggests that while present, large-scale corporate entities do not exert the same market influence in Davis County as smaller investors.

The distribution of properties across all tiers reveals a steep drop-off after Tier 01, with Tier 02 holding 4.3% (515 properties), Tier 03-05 holding 6.6% (801 properties), and Tier 06-10 holding 2.3% (277 properties). This rapid decline underscores the prevalence of very small portfolios.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 11-1000) collectively own 8.7% of the investor-held properties, with 189 properties in Tier 11-20, 238 in Tier 21-50, 272 in Tier 51-100, and 352 in Tier 101-1000. These segments demonstrate the diverse range of investors beyond the smallest and largest categories.

While the data provides property counts and percentages for tier distribution, specific average acquisition prices by tier are not available for direct comparison. Therefore, insights into whether larger investors pay more or less than smaller landlords cannot be drawn from the provided pricing data by tier.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Dominate Portfolios of 6+ Properties, While Individuals Own 87.0% of Single-Property SFR
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest segment of the market in Davis County, UT, owning 87.0% of single-property (Tier 01) SFR holdings, totaling 8,048 properties. Companies hold a much smaller share at 13.0% (1,206 properties) in this foundational tier.

The shift towards company dominance becomes evident as portfolio size increases, with a clear crossover point between the '3-5 properties' and '6-10 properties' tiers. In the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a majority at 57.1% (466 properties), compared to companies at 42.9% (350 properties).

For portfolios of 6-10 properties (Small Landlord Tier 06-10), companies become the clear majority, owning 87.7% (243 properties), while individual ownership sharply drops to 12.3% (34 properties). This trend continues into larger tiers, where company ownership becomes almost exclusive.

In mid-to-large portfolios (Tiers 11-20 and 21-50), companies control virtually all properties, with 97.9% in both tiers (185 properties in Tier 11-20, 233 properties in Tier 21-50). Individual ownership in these tiers is minimal, at just 2.1% for both.

For the largest landlord tiers (101-1000+ properties), company ownership is almost absolute, holding 99.7% of properties in Tier 101-1000 (351 properties). This pattern illustrates that while individual investors form the broad base, corporate structures are primarily used for managing larger, multi-property portfolios in Davis County, UT.

The data does not provide specific growth patterns by owner type (all-time vs Q4) for a direct comparison of how individual and company holdings have evolved within tiers over recent periods.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
UT-Davis-84015 Leads Davis County with 2,375 Investor-Owned Properties
Detailed Findings

In Davis County, UT, the zip code UT-Davis-84015 stands out with the highest count of investor-owned properties, totaling 2,375 SFRs. This concentration represents a substantial portion of the county's investor activity, with an ownership rate of 13.2% within that specific zip code.

Following closely, UT-Davis-84041 ranks second by property count with 2,035 investor-owned SFRs. This zip code also boasts the highest investor ownership rate in the county, at 16.2%, indicating that over one-sixth of its SFR housing stock is investor-controlled.

The top 5 sub-geographies by investor-owned count – UT-Davis-84015, UT-Davis-84041, UT-Davis-84010, UT-Davis-84040, and UT-Davis-84075 – collectively account for 7,986 investor properties. This represents approximately 67.2% of all investor-owned SFR in Davis County, demonstrating strong geographic concentration within a few key areas.

When examining investor ownership rates, UT-Davis-84041 not only has a high count but also leads the county with 16.2%. Other areas with high penetration include UT-Davis-84054 (14.5%), UT-Davis-84087 (14.2%), UT-Davis-84025 (14.1%), and UT-Davis-84014 (13.8%), indicating specific sub-markets with a higher proportion of rental housing.

There is a notable correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages in Davis County, UT, as regions like UT-Davis-84041 appear in the top rankings for both metrics. This suggests that areas with a larger volume of investor properties also tend to have a higher penetration of investor ownership relative to their total housing stock.

Acquisition prices across these regions are not provided in this section, precluding insights into whether investors pay more or less in high-concentration areas. However, the varying ownership rates hint at differing market dynamics and investor appeal across these distinct sub-geographies within Davis County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Davis County Landlords are Net Buyers with 2.97x Buy/Sell Ratio, Institutions are Net Sellers
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Davis County, UT, continued their role as net buyers in Q4 2025, executing 226 buy transactions against 76 sell transactions, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 2.97x. This consistent trend across 2025 (Year 2025 ratio of 2.78x with 849 buys and 305 sells) indicates a strong market for investor acquisition.

In sharp contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in Q4 2025, with 1 buy and 2 sells, yielding a 0.5x buy/sell ratio. This divestment trend is consistent throughout Year 2025, where institutions recorded 6 buys and 12 sells, solidifying their net seller position with the same 0.5x ratio.

The difference in transactional behavior between all landlords and institutional investors highlights a bifurcated market strategy: smaller landlords are actively accumulating properties, while larger institutional players appear to be divesting or consolidating their portfolios in Davis County, UT.

Comparing quarterly activity, the overall landlord buy transactions remained relatively stable in 2025, with 226 in Q4, 212 in Q3, and 248 in Q2. Sell transactions also show consistency, ranging from 76 to 88 per quarter, indicating a steady pace of market turnover driven by non-institutional investors.

While specific average buy and sell prices for all landlords are not explicitly provided in this section for a historical margin analysis, the consistent net buying suggests a favorable market for acquisitions from the perspective of the majority of landlords. Inter-landlord transaction percentages are also not available here.

The year-over-year comparison further solidifies the overall landlord net buyer trend, with 907 buys and 299 sells in Year 2024 (a 3.03x ratio), slightly higher than 2025's buy/sell activity, suggesting a stable, albeit slightly decreasing, acquisition pace over the past two years.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 12.9% of Q4 Transactions in Davis County, UT
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Davis County, UT, were involved in 226 transactions, representing 12.9% of the total 1,752 SFR transactions that occurred during the quarter. This indicates a measurable, but not dominant, presence of investors in the overall transaction volume.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were overwhelmingly active, participating in 215 transactions, which accounts for 95.1% of all landlord transactions in Q4. This reaffirms their critical role as the primary driver of market liquidity within the investor segment.

The average purchase price varied significantly by tier in Q4. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded the highest average purchase price at $622,717 across 169 transactions. In contrast, small landlords (Tier 06-10) purchased properties at an average price of $456,316, representing a substantial $166,401 difference from Tier 01.

Inter-landlord trading activity shows varied patterns: single-property landlords (Tier 01) sourced 27 (16.0%) of their 169 transactions from other landlords. Small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20) sourced 20.0% (1 of 5 transactions) from other landlords, and Tier 21-50 sourced 50.0% (1 of 2 transactions).

Notably, some tiers, such as Tier 03-05 and Tier 101-1000, reported 0% of their transactions being bought from other landlords, suggesting they primarily acquire properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers. This highlights diverse acquisition channels across different investor sizes.

With only one transaction for institutional investors (Tier 09) and a 'nan' average purchase price, a direct comparison of institutional vs. mom-and-pop pricing strategies cannot be conclusively made from this data. However, the higher average prices for smaller tiers (e.g., Tier 01) might reflect individual investors competing more directly with homeowners.

The distribution of Q4 transactions largely mirrors the overall ownership distribution by tier, reinforcing that the smaller landlord tiers, especially Tier 01, are not only the largest owners but also the most active participants in market transactions in Davis County, UT.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Davis County Market, Institutions Divest Amidst Rising Prices
Holdings
Landlords own 11,887 SFR properties in Davis County, UT, representing 13.2% of the market, with individual investors holding 8,728 properties (73.4%) and companies owning 3,466 properties (29.2%).
Pricing
Landlords in Davis County paid an average of $638,430 in Q4 2025, an 11.1% premium compared to traditional homeowners at $574,730, marking a significant reversal from prior quarters' discounts.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 168 properties, comprising 15.3% of all SFR sales, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) driving 95.8% of these acquisitions; 167 entities from Tier 01 made new purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 87.8% of investor-owned housing in Davis County, UT, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 3.6% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (owning 87.0% of single-property SFR), but companies become the majority owners for portfolios with 6 or more properties in Davis County, UT.
Transactions
Landlords overall are net buyers with a 2.97x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (226 buys vs 76 sells), but institutional investors (1000+ tier) are net sellers with a 0.5x ratio (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Davis County, UT, is significantly shaped by a dominant contingent of small-scale investors. Landlords collectively own 11,887 SFR properties, constituting 13.2% of the total market, primarily driven by individual investors who hold 73.4% of these properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 87.8% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone accounting for nearly three-quarters of this segment, challenging narratives of institutional market capture.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated robust activity, acquiring 168 properties and representing 15.3% of all SFR purchases in Davis County. However, this period marked a significant shift in pricing dynamics, with landlords paying an average of $638,430 per property – an 11.1% premium over traditional homeowners. While overall landlords are net buyers with a healthy 2.97x buy/sell ratio in Q4, institutional investors are notably in a net seller position, indicating a strategic divergence in market participation. Acquisition patterns show single-property landlords remain the most active buyers, responsible for a large proportion of Q4 purchases.

This data reveals a dynamic market in Davis County, UT, where individual and small-scale investors are the primary drivers of landlord activity and portfolio growth, despite facing increasing purchase premiums. The retreat of institutional investors as net sellers, juxtaposed with strong mom-and-pop buying, signals a more localized and fragmented investor market. The high proportion of rented properties among investor holdings underscores their critical role in supplying rental housing, with sustained demand reflected in the continued acquisition efforts of smaller landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:50 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDavis (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership