Gillespie (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Gillespie (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Gillespie (TX)
6,186
Total Investors in Gillespie (TX)
1,760
Investor Owned SFR in Gillespie (TX)
1,391(22.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,444
SFR Owned
1,070
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
316
SFR Owned
354
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,391 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Gillespie County with 98.7% ownership and strong Q4 buying activity.
Landlords in Gillespie County own 1,391 SFR properties (22.5% of market), with individuals holding 76.9% versus companies at 25.4%. Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of this investor housing, while institutional investors show no market presence. In Q4, landlords were strong net buyers, purchasing 29.0% of sales, despite displaying an unusual 77.0% price premium over homeowners for 0 recorded acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Gillespie County landlords own 1,391 SFR properties, primarily individuals (76.9%) over companies (25.4%).
Nearly all landlord-owned SFR properties (1,368) are rented, indicating a strong rental focus. Cash purchases (940 properties) significantly outnumber financed properties (451), suggesting a preference for unencumbered assets.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q4 2025 showed a striking $421,280 premium (77.0%) over homeowners despite acquiring 0 properties.
The landlord-homeowner price gap fluctuated wildly in 2025, from a 13.4% discount in Q3 to premiums of 7.2% in Q1 and 2.9% in Q2, indicating significant market volatility. Landlord average prices for earlier 2025 quarters were still higher than the 2020-2023 average of $483,981.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 29.0% (27 properties) of Q4 SFR sales, with mom-and-pops dominating 100%.
All 27 landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), with single-property investors (Tier 01) accounting for a significant 85.2% (23 properties) of this activity. A total of 33 entities identified as single-property landlords were active, signalling strong new entrant interest or existing small landlord growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.7% of Gillespie County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 77.9% (1,121 properties) of the investor market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no recorded ownership in Gillespie County, underscoring the market's complete dominance by smaller investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors universally dominate all recorded tiers (73.8% to 78.5%), with no company majority crossover observed.
Individuals hold 78.5% of single-property portfolios, while companies represent 37.5% of Tier 6-10 holdings, their highest share. No institutional companies are present in the provided data.
Geographic Distribution
TX-Gillespie-78624 leads with 1,309 investor-owned properties, demonstrating high regional concentration.
While zip code TX-Gillespie-78624 has the highest count (1,309 properties), TX-Gillespie-78058 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 50.0%, albeit with only 1 property. TX-Gillespie-78631 is notable for both its count (69 properties) and a high ownership rate (27.4%), indicating a dense investor market.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers across all timeframes, with Q4 2025 showing a 13.0x buy/sell ratio.
All landlords consistently operated as net buyers in 2024 and 2025, with buy-to-sell ratios as high as 7.7x in 2024. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) had no recorded transactions in any timeframe, showing complete absence of activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 26.5% (39 transactions) of all Q4 SFR transactions in Gillespie County.
All Q4 landlord transactions (39) were by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), with Tier 01 alone responsible for 33 transactions. Tier 01 landlords had an average purchase price of $835,218, and 6.1% of their transactions were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Gillespie County landlords own 1,391 SFR properties, primarily individuals (76.9%) over companies (25.4%).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Gillespie County hold a substantial portfolio of 1,391 SFR properties, representing 22.5% of the total SFR market of 6,186 properties, showcasing significant investor penetration.

Individual landlords are the dominant force, owning 1,070 properties (76.9%) compared to companies which own 354 properties (25.4%), challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in the local market.

A staggering 1,368 landlord-owned properties are rented, equating to 98.3% of the investor portfolio, highlighting a clear and overwhelming focus on rental income generation within Gillespie County.

The financing structure reveals a preference for cash acquisitions, with 940 properties acquired via cash compared to 451 properties that are financed, signaling financial strength or strategic avoidance of debt among investors.

By entity count, individual landlords far outnumber company landlords at a ratio of 1,444 to 316, or approximately 4.57 individual landlords for every company landlord, reinforcing the mom-and-pop nature of the investor landscape in Gillespie County.

The high percentage of rented properties (1,368) compared to financed (451) and cash (940) indicates that properties can be both rented and financed or cash, demonstrating a robust rental market where investors prioritize occupancy.

While individuals own the vast majority of properties, companies still control a notable portion (25.4%), suggesting that a segment of the market caters to larger, entity-based investment, even if smaller in number.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q4 2025 showed a striking $421,280 premium (77.0%) over homeowners despite acquiring 0 properties.
Detailed Findings

Despite landlords acquiring 0 properties in Q4 2025, the stated average landlord acquisition price of $968,652 was an extraordinary $421,280 (77.0%) premium compared to the traditional homeowner price of $547,372, an unusual market signal given the lack of actual purchases.

The landlord-homeowner price differential has been highly inconsistent throughout 2025; after securing a 13.4% discount ($65,386) in Q3 ($421,304 vs $486,690), landlords paid premiums in Q1 (7.2% / $28,650) and Q2 (2.9% / $14,168), showing extreme volatility in market dynamics.

Landlord acquisition prices, when transactions were occurring, have shown an upward trend in average values for 2025 (averaging $583,510) compared to the 2020-2023 pandemic era average of $483,981, representing a substantial 20.5% increase.

The 0 landlord properties purchased in Q4 2025, coupled with the high implied average price, suggests a possible market pause or a high barrier to entry for new investor acquisitions during this specific quarter in Gillespie County.

Comparing annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 ($583,510) has seen an increase of $76,506 (15.1%) from Year 2024's average of $507,004, indicating a generally appreciating market for properties targeted by investors.

The stark shift from a landlord discount in Q3 to a significant premium in Q4, even with no purchases, highlights that Gillespie County's real estate market experienced considerable price instability or strategic recalibration at the end of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 29.0% (27 properties) of Q4 SFR sales, with mom-and-pops dominating 100%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Gillespie County were active purchasers in Q4 2025, securing 27 SFR properties, which accounts for a substantial 29.0% of the total 93 SFR purchases in the market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) entirely drove Q4 investor activity, responsible for 100.0% of all 27 landlord purchases, with institutional investors (Tier 09) registering no acquisitions.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) exhibited the highest purchase activity, acquiring 23 properties, which represents 85.2% of all landlord purchases in Q4, making them the primary growth engine for the investor segment.

A notable 33 entities classified as single-property landlords were active in Q4, acquiring 23 properties, indicating a robust presence of new or expanding small-scale investors in the market.

The average properties per entity for single-property landlords in Q4 stood at 0.69 properties (23 properties / 33 entities), suggesting that some active entities may not have completed a purchase or these are total entities associated with the tier, not just new buyers.

Smaller landlord tiers (two-property, three-to-five property, and six-to-ten property) also contributed to Q4 activity, each making 1-2 purchases, reinforcing the widespread engagement across the mom-and-pop segment.

The complete absence of purchases by institutional investors (Tier 09) in Q4 highlights a strategic divergence from the highly active mom-and-pop segment, suggesting institutional retrenchment or market unattractiveness for large-scale operations in Gillespie County this quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.7% of Gillespie County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Gillespie County, controlling 98.7% of all properties held by investors, totaling 1,420 properties across these tiers.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone accounts for 1,121 properties, representing a significant 77.9% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio based on tier distribution.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded presence in Gillespie County, holding 0.0% of investor-owned properties, completely defying national trends of institutional influence.

Even the mid-size landlord tiers (Tiers 05-08) represent a minuscule portion, collectively owning only 19 properties (1.3%) (3+7+4+5=19), further solidifying the mom-and-pop character of the market.

The combined share of Tier 01-04 (1,420 properties) starkly contrasts with the small-medium to large tiers (19 properties), indicating that nearly all investor-owned housing stock is held by entities with 10 or fewer properties.

Given the absence of price data by tier in this section, it's not possible to determine if larger or smaller investors pay different prices historically; however, the ownership concentration clearly points to a market shaped by local, smaller-scale investors.

The high concentration in the lowest tiers suggests that the barrier to entry for new landlords is relatively low, or that investors prefer to maintain smaller, manageable portfolios rather than expanding significantly within Gillespie County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors universally dominate all recorded tiers (73.8% to 78.5%), with no company majority crossover observed.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all landlord portfolio tiers in Gillespie County, from 78.5% in the single-property tier (899 properties) to 62.5% in the 6-10 property tier (25 properties), indicating a deeply individual-centric market.

The data reveals no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; instead, companies consistently hold minority positions, ranging from 21.5% in Tier 01 to 37.5% in Tier 04 (6-10 properties), their highest representation.

In the crucial single-property tier, individual owners possess 899 properties, dwarfing company ownership of 246 properties, confirming that initial market entry and small-scale investment is predominantly individual-driven.

Despite their minority status, companies show a gradual increase in their proportional ownership share as portfolio size grows, moving from 21.5% in Tier 01 to 37.5% in Tier 04, suggesting a strategic interest in slightly larger portfolios among corporate entities.

The absence of data for individual vs company ownership in tiers above 10 properties, combined with the lack of Tier 09 ownership, reinforces the local market's complete reliance on smaller, non-institutional investors.

Given the complete lack of pricing data by owner type within tiers in the provided CSV, it is not possible to analyze whether individual or company landlords within the same tier exhibit different acquisition price strategies.

The sustained dominance of individual ownership across all available tiers demonstrates that the traditional mom-and-pop model is the prevailing investment strategy in Gillespie County, with less penetration from corporate investment compared to other markets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TX-Gillespie-78624 leads with 1,309 investor-owned properties, demonstrating high regional concentration.
Detailed Findings

Within Gillespie County, the zip code TX-Gillespie-78624 is the clear epicenter of investor activity, hosting a dominant 1,309 landlord-owned SFR properties, which represents 22.5% of its total SFR market.

While TX-Gillespie-78624 leads by raw count, zip code TX-Gillespie-78058 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 50.0%, indicating that half of its limited SFR properties are investor-owned, despite having only 1 investor-owned property.

Zip code TX-Gillespie-78631 demonstrates a robust investor presence with 69 landlord-owned properties and a high ownership rate of 27.4%, making it the second most significant sub-geography for investor concentration by both volume and penetration.

The top two zip codes by count, TX-Gillespie-78624 (1,309 properties) and TX-Gillespie-78631 (69 properties), collectively account for 1,378 properties, representing an overwhelming majority (99.1%) of all investor-owned SFR properties in Gillespie County, signaling extreme geographic concentration.

The distribution shows a clear disparity between high-volume regions and high-rate regions; for example, TX-Gillespie-78058 has a high rate but very low count, whereas TX-Gillespie-78624 balances both, suggesting diverse market dynamics across the county's zip codes.

The total SFR inventory for zip code TX-Gillespie-78624 is significantly larger to accommodate 1,309 landlord properties at a 22.5% rate, compared to TX-Gillespie-78058 which has only 1 landlord property at a 50.0% rate, showing market density varies greatly.

The absence of acquisition price data by geographic region prevents an analysis of how landlord purchase prices vary across these specific zip codes, but the concentration patterns clearly direct where the majority of investor capital is currently deployed.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers across all timeframes, with Q4 2025 showing a 13.0x buy/sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Gillespie County consistently act as strong net buyers, particularly in Q4 2025 with 39 buys against only 3 sells, resulting in an impressive 13.0x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating aggressive portfolio expansion.

This net buyer trend is sustained throughout recent periods; for the full Year 2025, landlords recorded 140 buys versus 42 sells (3.33x ratio), and in Year 2024, they executed 154 buys against a mere 20 sells (7.7x ratio), demonstrating sustained growth.

The transaction volume has shown quarterly fluctuations, with Q4 2025 experiencing 39 buys, a modest increase from Q3's 29 buys and Q2's 31 buys, but a consistent pattern of positive net acquisitions.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) had no recorded buy or sell transactions in any of the provided timeframes (2025-Q4, 2025-Q3, 2025-Q2, Year 2025, Year 2024), indicating a complete lack of market participation from large-scale entities.

Given the strong net buyer position and the lack of institutional activity, the market growth in Gillespie County's investor segment is entirely driven by smaller, non-institutional landlords.

The buy-to-sell ratios highlight a market where investors are holding onto properties, with a relatively low number of sales compared to acquisitions, suggesting strong long-term confidence or rental demand.

The absence of data on landlord-to-landlord transactions and average buy/sell prices directly from this section prevents a detailed analysis of internal market liquidity or implied profit margins, but the volume trends clearly point to accumulation.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 26.5% (39 transactions) of all Q4 SFR transactions in Gillespie County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant participants in the Q4 2025 market, contributing 39 transactions, which represents 26.5% of the total 147 SFR transactions in Gillespie County.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) solely drove all landlord transaction activity in Q4, accounting for 39 transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions, echoing their complete absence in purchases and ownership.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, completing 33 transactions at an average purchase price of $835,218, making them the primary transacting force among investors.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal in Q4, with only Tier 01 reporting transactions where properties were "Bought From Landlords," totaling 2 out of 33 transactions, or 6.1% of their activity.

Tiers 02, 03-05, and 06-10 collectively engaged in only 6 transactions (4, 1, and 1 respectively), with no recorded purchases from other landlords for these tiers, indicating a preference for non-investor sellers.

The average purchase price for Tier 01 ($835,218) significantly surpasses the average price for Tier 03-05 ($562,590), indicating that smaller, single-property investors might be acquiring higher-value properties or properties in more desirable locations.

The dominance of mom-and-pop transactions in Q4, coupled with their minimal reliance on other landlords as sellers, suggests a healthy inflow of properties from traditional homeowners directly into smaller investor portfolios in Gillespie County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Gillespie County with 98.7% ownership and strong Q4 buying activity.
Holdings
Landlords in Gillespie County, Texas, own 1,391 SFR properties, representing 22.5% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,070 (76.9%) and companies owning 354 (25.4%).
Pricing
Landlords displayed an unusual $421,280 premium (77.0%) over homeowners in Q4 2025, despite acquiring 0 properties, contrasting sharply with a 13.4% discount in Q3 2025.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 27 properties, accounting for 29.0% of all sales, with 33 single-property landlord entities active in the market, driving all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 98.7% of investor-owned housing in Gillespie County, while institutional investors (1000+) have no recorded ownership.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all landlord tiers, from 78.5% in single-property portfolios to 62.5% in Tier 6-10, with no tier showing majority company ownership.
Transactions
All landlords are strong net buyers with a 13.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (39 buys vs 3 sells), while institutional investors show no recorded transaction activity in any timeframe.
Market Narrative

Gillespie County's real estate investor landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 1,391 SFR properties, representing a significant 22.5% of the total SFR market. Individual investors own a dominant 1,070 properties (76.9%), far outpacing company-owned holdings at 354 properties (25.4%). This concentration is further underscored by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) account for an extraordinary 98.7% of all investor-owned housing in Gillespie County, with single-property owners alone holding 77.9% of the portfolio. Crucially, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership or transactional presence, indicating a market completely driven by local, smaller-scale players.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signals a dynamic but unusual period in Gillespie County. Landlords purchased 27 properties, making up 29.0% of all Q4 SFR sales. Notably, all of this acquisition activity came from mom-and-pop landlords, with 33 single-property entities actively engaging in the market. Despite zero direct landlord acquisitions in Q4, the reported average landlord price of $968,652 presented an extraordinary $421,280 (77.0%) premium over traditional homeowners ($547,372), a sharp contrast to the 13.4% discount observed in Q3 2025. This pricing anomaly, coupled with the lack of recorded Q4 purchases, suggests a highly selective or paused market for new landlord investments at year-end.

Overall, landlords in Gillespie County, Texas, remain strong net buyers, exhibiting a robust 13.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025 (39 buys vs 3 sells) and consistent accumulation throughout 2024 and 2025. This sustained net buying, entirely driven by smaller investors, indicates confidence in the long-term value and rental income potential of the market. The high percentage of rented properties (98.3%) within landlord portfolios reinforces this focus on income-generating assets. The distinct absence of institutional activity throughout the analysis period highlights a unique market structure, where local, individual investors are the sole drivers of growth and market dynamics in Gillespie County, Texas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 02:13 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGillespie (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price