Weakley (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Weakley (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Weakley (TN)
9,380
Total Investors in Weakley (TN)
3,032
Investor Owned SFR in Weakley (TN)
2,623(28.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,828
SFR Owned
2,378
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
204
SFR Owned
276
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,623 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Weakley County Market, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts
Weakley County's real estate investor market is dominated by individual, mom-and-pop landlords who control 96.7% of the 2,623 investor-owned SFR properties. In Q4 2025, landlords secured an average acquisition price of $167,084, a significant 14.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while acting as strong net buyers with 62 purchases against 10 sales.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords dominate Weakley County's SFR portfolio, owning 90.7% of 2,623 properties.
A vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 98.4% (2,580 properties), are rented, highlighting a strong rental market focus. Cash purchases significantly outnumber financed properties, with 2,108 cash-held properties compared to 515 financed properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secure deep discounts in Q4, paying 14.1% less than traditional homeowners.
The price gap swung from landlords paying a 1.0% premium in Q3 to a substantial 14.1% discount in Q4. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated by 52.5% since the 2020-2023 period, climbing from an average of $109,521 to $167,084 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 40.2% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Weakley County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove Q4 activity, accounting for 89.4% (42 properties) of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords alone acquired 31 properties, with 44 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 96.7% of Weakley County's investor-owned SFR.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% of investor-owned SFR with only 3 properties. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, owning 71.6% of all investor-held SFR properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners over individuals in portfolios of 101-1000 properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller tiers, holding 93.2% of single-property portfolios and 90.4% of two-property portfolios. Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain 64.1% ownership, demonstrating a gradual shift rather than a sharp crossover.
Geographic Distribution
Four zip codes concentrate 84.0% of investor-owned properties in Weakley County.
TN-Weakley-38237 leads by count with 1,124 investor-owned properties, while TN-Weakley-38261 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 50.0%. These top regions highlight specific areas of high investor focus within the county.
Historical Transactions
All landlords are strong net buyers in Q4 with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio; institutions are also net buyers.
Overall landlord buy transactions surged 43.0% in 2025 (273 buys) compared to 2024 (191 buys). Institutional investors also maintained a net buyer position in Q4 (2 buys vs 1 sell) and for the full year 2025 (3 buys vs 1 sell).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 34.8% of all Q4 transactions in Weakley County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) purchased at an average price of $176,367, which is 13.3% less than single-property landlords who paid $203,491. Smaller landlords (Tier 6-10) showed the highest reliance on inter-landlord transactions, with 100.0% of their single transaction bought from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate Weakley County's SFR portfolio, owning 90.7% of 2,623 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the cornerstone of the investor-owned SFR market in Weakley County, controlling an overwhelming 90.7% of properties (2,378 properties) compared to companies at 10.5% (276 properties). This distribution challenges the perception of corporate dominance, showing the local market is primarily fueled by smaller, individual investors.

Despite the high number of individual landlords (2,828 entities), their total SFR property count (2,378) suggests that many individual landlords own properties outside the SFR category in Weakley County, or their portfolio includes properties in other geographies, averaging 0.84 SFR properties per individual landlord entity in this county.

The portfolio exhibits a strong rental focus, with 2,580 properties (98.4%) explicitly classified as rented out of 2,623 total investor-owned SFR. This indicates a highly active rental market where investors prioritize income-generating assets.

A significant preference for cash purchases is evident among landlords, with 2,108 properties (80.4%) held outright in cash versus 515 properties (19.6%) that are financed. This robust cash position suggests financial resilience and a preference for avoiding debt-related risks in the market.

Although individual landlords collectively hold more properties, company landlords exhibit a slightly larger average portfolio size at 1.35 properties per entity (276 properties owned by 204 companies), compared to individuals at 0.84 properties per entity, suggesting greater efficiency or a different investment strategy per entity for companies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secure deep discounts in Q4, paying 14.1% less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Weakley County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $167,084 – a notable $27,450 (14.1%) less than traditional homeowners who paid $194,534. This substantial discount highlights landlords' ability to find undervalued assets or negotiate more favorable terms in the current market.

The landlord-homeowner price gap has shown considerable volatility quarter-over-quarter in 2025. After paying a slight premium of $2,134 (1.0%) in Q3 and a 1.1% discount in Q2, landlords dramatically shifted to a 14.1% discount in Q4, underscoring dynamic market conditions and potentially opportunistic buying strategies.

Landlord acquisition prices have experienced significant appreciation, increasing by 52.5% from the 2020-2023 period average of $109,521 to $167,084 in Q4 2025. This trend signals a robust recovery and growth in property values post-pandemic, offering potential capital gains for long-term investors.

The average acquisition price for landlords peaked in Q2 2025 at $216,814, followed by a decline to $167,084 by Q4. This quarterly fluctuation suggests either changing market sentiment, shifts in the types of properties acquired, or a strategic cooling off in acquisition prices by investors, despite the overall year-on-year increase.

Despite overall price increases, the consistency of landlords securing discounts, particularly the substantial 10.8% in Q1 and 14.1% in Q4, suggests a persistent structural advantage in their buying process compared to the broader market, even as market prices fluctuate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 40.2% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Weakley County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in the Weakley County SFR market during Q4 2025, securing 43 properties which represents a significant 40.2% share of all 107 SFR purchases. This indicates a robust and active investor segment absorbing a substantial portion of available housing stock.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the primary drivers of Q4 purchasing activity, acquiring 42 properties, which accounts for 89.4% of all landlord purchases in the quarter. This highlights the continued grassroots nature of investor activity, with smaller portfolios dominating market entry.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) accounted for the largest segment of activity, purchasing 31 properties (66.0% of landlord purchases) and bringing 44 new entities into the market. This influx of new, small-scale investors underscores the accessibility and appeal of single-property investment in Weakley County.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made a minimal impact in Q4, acquiring only 1 property, representing just 2.1% of landlord purchases. This suggests a very limited large-scale corporate presence in the county's investor landscape.

While individual single-property entities were most active by number of landlords (44 entities acquiring 31 properties), the average properties per entity for Tier 01 was 0.70, indicating that some entities classified as landlords in the tier data may not have acquired an SFR property in Weakley County this quarter, or the classification accounts for portfolios beyond this specific geography/property type.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 96.7% of Weakley County's investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively dominate the Weakley County investor market by controlling an impressive 96.7% of all investor-owned SFR properties. This figure underscores the enduring influence of smaller investors in the local housing ecosystem.

The market's concentration in smaller portfolios is further emphasized by Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone owning 1,980 properties, representing a substantial 71.6% of all investor-owned SFR. This highlights the vital role of individual, entry-level investors in providing rental housing.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minuscule share of the market, owning only 3 properties which translates to a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR. This significantly contrasts with narratives often suggesting widespread corporate acquisition of single-family homes, at least in Weakley County.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) also maintain a limited presence, collectively owning only 87 properties (3.2%) across their various tiers. This reinforces the pattern of a highly fragmented market largely controlled by the smallest landlords.

The distribution clearly shows a 'fat tail' in ownership, where the vast majority of properties are held by a large number of small owners, rather than a few large institutional players, making the market highly dependent on individual investment decisions and behavior.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners over individuals in portfolios of 101-1000 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Weakley County, the ownership landscape shifts dramatically towards corporate entities in larger portfolios, with companies becoming the majority owners in the Large landlord tier (101-1000 properties), controlling 80.0% of properties compared to individuals at 20.0%. This marks a significant crossover point in the market structure.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, forming the backbone of the mom-and-pop segment. They hold 93.2% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios (1,863 properties) and 90.4% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios (245 properties), showcasing their foundational role.

Even within the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, individual investors maintain a strong majority at 64.1% (59 properties), though company ownership rises to 35.9% (33 properties) at this level, indicating a growing corporate presence as portfolio sizes increase.

The shift from individual to company dominance is not linear; for example, the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier sees individual ownership rebound to 86.6% (58 properties), despite companies holding a higher percentage in the smaller 6-10 tier. This suggests nuanced strategies or historical acquisition patterns for different size segments.

Overall, the data underscores a highly fragmented market at the lower tiers, almost exclusively driven by individual investors, with corporate entities only gaining significant traction and majority control in the largest portfolio segments, particularly beyond 100 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Four zip codes concentrate 84.0% of investor-owned properties in Weakley County.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Weakley County are highly concentrated within a few zip codes, with the top four areas—TN-Weakley-38237, 38225, 38230, and 38229—collectively accounting for 2,204 properties, representing a substantial 84.0% of all investor-owned SFR in the county. This signals significant geographic hotbeds for investment activity.

TN-Weakley-38237 stands out as the primary hub for investor holdings by volume, with 1,124 investor-owned SFR properties. Its investor ownership rate of 27.5% suggests a well-established investor presence within a large housing stock.

While not a leader in raw property count, TN-Weakley-38261 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 50.0%, indicating that half of its SFR properties are investor-owned. This high concentration suggests a highly attractive or specialized market for landlords in this specific zip code.

The top five zip codes by ownership percentage, excluding incomplete data for 38238, show varying levels of investor penetration: 38261 (50.0%), 38224 (37.5%), 38226 (32.5%), and 38255 (30.2%). These areas represent markets where a significant portion of the housing stock is dedicated to rentals.

There's a notable distinction between regions with high property counts and those with high ownership rates. While 38237 leads in total properties, its ownership rate (27.5%) is lower than that of 38261 (50.0%). This implies that larger markets may accommodate more investor properties, while smaller, specific markets may have a higher proportion of investor-owned housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords are strong net buyers in Q4 with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio; institutions are also net buyers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Weakley County are currently in an aggressive acquisition phase, acting as strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with 62 buy transactions against only 10 sell transactions, resulting in an impressive 6.2x buy-to-sell ratio. This signals a robust expansion of landlord portfolios in the current quarter.

The overall landlord market has sustained a net buyer position throughout 2025, with 273 buy transactions compared to 70 sell transactions (a 3.9x ratio), significantly outpacing 2024's activity of 191 buys and 56 sells (a 3.41x ratio). This consistent buying trend indicates long-term confidence in the Weakley County market.

Buy transaction volumes for all landlords increased substantially year-over-year, climbing by 43.0% from 191 buys in 2024 to 273 buys in 2025. This significant rise demonstrates accelerated landlord activity and market expansion.

Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) also maintained a net buyer position in Q4 2025 (2 buys vs 1 sell) and for the full year 2025 (3 buys vs 1 sell), though at a much smaller scale than the broader landlord market. Their activity reflects a more cautious, yet still acquisitive, stance.

The buy-to-sell ratio for all landlords shows a notable increase from 3.57x in Q2 to 6.2x in Q4, suggesting that buying activity intensified relative to selling towards the end of 2025, potentially in response to favorable market conditions or pricing.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 34.8% of all Q4 transactions in Weakley County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a dominant force in the Weakley County transaction market during Q4 2025, participating in 62 of the total 178 transactions, representing a significant 34.8% share of all quarterly activity. This highlights their integral role in market liquidity and property turnover.

Pricing strategies varied considerably by investor tier; institutional investors (Tier 1000+) paid an average of $176,367, notably 13.3% less than single-property landlords (Tier 01) who paid the highest average price of $203,491. This suggests that larger investors may leverage economies of scale or specialized deal-sourcing to achieve better pricing.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively accounted for 56 of the 62 landlord transactions, underscoring their overwhelming activity and influence on the quarter's market dynamics. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were involved in only 2 transactions.

Inter-landlord trading activity was most pronounced in the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where 100.0% of its single transaction was acquired from another landlord. The Large (101-1000 properties) tier also showed significant inter-landlord engagement, with 50.0% of its 2 transactions being landlord-to-landlord deals.

The average purchase prices across tiers highlight a trend where smaller investors tend to pay more per property. After Tier 01 at $203,491, the lowest average prices were seen in the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier at $27,500 and the Two-property (2) tier at $34,167, indicating a wide range of property types or conditions being transacted across the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Weakley County SFR Market Driven by Mom-and-Pop Landlords; Deep Q4 Discounts, Net Buying Surges
Holdings
Landlords own 2,623 SFR properties in Weakley County, representing 28.0% of the total SFR market. Individual investors dominate this portfolio, holding 2,378 properties (90.7%) compared to companies owning 276 properties (10.5%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $167,084, a substantial 14.1% less than traditional homeowners who purchased at $194,534. This significant $27,450 discount per property signals a strong buying advantage for investors in the recent quarter.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, acquiring 43 properties, which constituted 40.2% of all SFR purchases in Weakley County. New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 44 new entities entering the market and acquiring 31 properties.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.7% of investor-owned housing in Weakley County, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a minimal 0.1% share (3 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 93.2% of single-property assets, with companies becoming majority owners primarily in portfolios of 101-1000 properties (80.0% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords overall are strong net buyers with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (62 buys vs 10 sells). Institutional investors also maintained a net buyer position in Q4, acquiring 2 properties while selling 1.
Market Narrative

The Weakley County single-family residential (SFR) market is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop investors, who collectively own 2,378 properties, representing 90.7% of the 2,623 landlord-owned SFR properties in the county. This investor-owned segment constitutes a significant 28.0% of the total SFR market in Weakley County. The dominance of smaller landlords, particularly those owning 1-10 properties, controlling an impressive 96.7% of the investor portfolio, strongly counters the narrative of widespread institutional control, which holds a mere 0.1% of properties.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased aggressive acquisition strategies coupled with significant pricing advantages. Landlords secured properties at an average of $167,084, achieving a substantial 14.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This quarter saw landlords as robust net buyers, with 62 buy transactions against only 10 sell transactions, marking a 6.2x buy-to-sell ratio. This strong buying momentum is further highlighted by a 43.0% increase in buy transactions year-over-year from 2024 to 2025, signaling growing confidence and expansion within the landlord segment.

Geographically, investor activity in Weakley County is concentrated in specific zip codes, with the top four areas accounting for 84.0% of all investor-owned properties, while one zip code boasts a 50.0% investor ownership rate. The consistent net buyer position of landlords, coupled with deep discounts, suggests a strategic, growth-oriented market. This environment fosters continued expansion of the mom-and-pop rental housing supply, making the local housing market highly dependent on the investment decisions of individual landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 01:07 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWeakley (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership