Pickett (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pickett (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pickett (TN)
2,093
Total Investors in Pickett (TN)
1,363
Investor Owned SFR in Pickett (TN)
933(44.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,304
SFR Owned
887
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
59
SFR Owned
56
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 933 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate 99.9% of holdings as strong net buyers in Pickett County.
Individual investors own 95.1% of the 933 landlord-held SFR properties in Pickett County, comprising 44.6% of the market. Landlords demonstrated strong net buying, with a 3.88x buy/sell ratio in 2025, securing a 29.1% discount over homeowners in Q4. This activity is exclusively driven by small-scale investors, as institutional presence is absent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 933 SFR properties in Pickett County, with individuals holding 95.1% of this portfolio.
A significant 76.0% (709 properties) of landlord-owned properties were acquired with cash, indicating a preference for unencumbered assets. All 933 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied and actively rented, confirming a highly focused rental market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $197,680 in Q4, a substantial 29.1% less than traditional homeowners at $278,744.
The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced extreme volatility, swinging from a 62.6% premium in Q1 2025 to a 29.1% discount in Q4, representing a $93,300 shift per property. Landlord acquisition prices have generally declined throughout 2025, from $242,300 in Q1 to $197,680 in Q4, indicating evolving market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 38.9% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Pickett County, totaling 7 properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 5 properties (62.5% of landlord buys), with 6 new entities becoming active. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for all 100% of landlord purchases this quarter, while institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.9% of Pickett County's investor-owned SFR, totaling 950 properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the market's backbone, holding 885 properties or 93.1% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no properties in this market, confirming an absence of large-scale corporate ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, with no tier showing majority company ownership.
Individual landlords comprise 94.4% of single-property owners and maintain an 81.8% majority even within the 3-5 property tier. The highest company concentration occurs in the 3-5 property tier, where they own 4 properties, representing just 18.2% of that segment's holdings.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 38549 dominates investor-owned property counts in Pickett County with 756 properties.
Zip code 38543 exhibits the highest investor penetration at 50.0% of its SFR housing, despite having a smaller total of 30 investor-owned properties. The top five zip codes by count are also the top five by ownership percentage, indicating a strong correlation in concentrated investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Pickett County with a 3.88x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
Overall landlord buying activity peaked in Q2 2025 with a 10.0x buy/sell ratio (20 buys vs 2 sells), before moderating to 2.5x in Q4. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced transaction position in 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords engaged in 30.3% of Q4 transactions in Pickett County, primarily driven by single-property investors.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led Q4 transactions with 6 deals, paying the highest average price of $256,667. Smaller landlords (Tier 03-05) secured properties for significantly less at $70,000, revealing diverse pricing strategies. Only Tier 01 investors participated in inter-landlord transactions, buying 16.7% of their properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 933 SFR properties in Pickett County, with individuals holding 95.1% of this portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Pickett County exhibits a substantial landlord presence, with 933 SFR properties comprising 44.6% of the total market, signaling a robust and active rental sector within the county.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor landscape, owning 887 properties or 95.1% of all investor-owned SFR, dramatically outpacing the 56 properties (6.0%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is further evidenced by entity counts, with 1,304 individual landlords operating in the county compared to only 59 company landlords, underscoring the strong mom-and-pop foundation.

Every one of the 933 landlord-owned SFR properties is currently rented, confirming their primary function as income-generating assets rather than owner-occupied residences and highlighting a fully deployed rental portfolio.

A significant majority of landlord-owned properties, 709 out of 933 (76.0%), were acquired with cash, suggesting a preference for high equity positions or long-term hold strategies among investors in this market.

Only 224 properties (24.0%) are financed, further emphasizing the cash-heavy nature of property acquisitions by landlords in Pickett County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $197,680 in Q4, a substantial 29.1% less than traditional homeowners at $278,744.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pickett County secured a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $197,680, which is an $81,064 discount or 29.1% less than traditional homeowners who paid $278,744.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly inconsistent across 2025; in Q1, landlords paid a substantial $93,300 premium (62.6%) compared to homeowners ($242,300 vs $149,000).

Following the Q1 premium, landlords shifted to acquiring properties at a discount, paying $58,472 (18.8%) less than homeowners in Q2 ($252,328 vs $310,800) and $39,371 (13.0%) less in Q3 ($264,000 vs $303,371).

The trend through 2025 shows landlords progressively gaining negotiation leverage, culminating in their most substantial discount in Q4, suggesting a growing market opportunity or increased efficiency in acquisitions.

Comparing Q4 2025 landlord acquisition prices ($197,680) to the average from the 2020-2023 pandemic period ($227,583) suggests a notable 13.1% decrease, indicating a cooling in acquisition costs post-boom.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 38.9% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Pickett County, totaling 7 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords secured a significant share of the Pickett County housing market in Q4 2025, completing 7 out of 18 total SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 38.9% of all market transactions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of this quarterly activity, acquiring 5 properties, or 62.5% of all landlord purchases, indicating a robust entry rate for new individual investors.

The Q4 purchasing landscape was entirely dominated by smaller investors; mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 7 properties, with no institutional presence.

Six new entities classified as single-property landlords (Tier 01) became active in Q4, signaling a consistent influx of first-time investors entering the rental property market in Pickett County.

Mid-size landlords also contributed to the quarter's activity, with those holding 3-5 properties (Tier 03) purchasing 2 properties, showcasing varied investment scales beyond just single-property owners.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Pickett County during Q4 2025, further emphasizing their minimal involvement in this local market's current acquisition trends.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.9% of Pickett County's investor-owned SFR, totaling 950 properties.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned housing market in Pickett County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, with Tiers 01-04 collectively controlling 99.9% of the 951 investor-owned SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the most significant segment, owning 885 properties, which alone accounts for 93.1% of all landlord-held SFR, underscoring their foundational role in the local rental market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Pickett County's SFR market, holding 0 properties, which contrasts sharply with national investment trends in larger markets.

Landlords with two properties (Tier 02) and those with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) represent smaller but notable segments, holding 33 properties (3.5%) and 22 properties (2.3%) respectively, collectively reinforcing the small-scale nature of local investment.

The minimal presence of larger investors is evident, with only 1 property (0.1%) held by a landlord in the 101-1000 properties tier, highlighting that mid-to-large-scale corporate investment is nearly non-existent.

In Q4 2025, average acquisition prices varied by tier: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid $256,667, while small landlords (Tier 03-05) acquired properties for a significantly lower average of $70,000, illustrating distinct market entry strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, with no tier showing majority company ownership.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently dominate landlord ownership across all represented tiers in Pickett County, reinforcing the local market's reliance on small-scale, personal investment over corporate entities.

In the single-property tier (Tier 01), individual landlords own an overwhelming 842 properties, representing 94.4% of this segment, while companies hold a mere 50 properties (5.6%).

This individual investor dominance persists in the two-property tier (Tier 02), where 32 properties (94.1%) are individually owned compared to only 2 properties (5.9%) held by companies.

Even within the small landlord segment (3-5 properties, Tier 03-05), individual ownership remains substantial at 18 properties (81.8%), with companies holding a comparatively small 4 properties (18.2%). This tier represents the highest concentration of company ownership observed.

Furthermore, the small landlord tier (6-10 properties, Tier 06-10) is exclusively individual-owned, with all 10 properties held by individual investors, showcasing a complete absence of company presence in this portfolio size.

No observed tier reaches a crossover point where companies become the majority owners, indicating that corporate entities do not outnumber individual investors at any portfolio size in this local market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 38549 dominates investor-owned property counts in Pickett County with 756 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Pickett County are highly concentrated within a few key zip codes, with TN-Pickett-38549 leading significantly with 756 investor-owned SFR properties, representing 47.1% of its local market.

While 38549 holds the highest raw count, TN-Pickett-38543 demonstrates the highest investor penetration rate at 50.0% of its SFR housing stock, even though it accounts for a smaller total of 30 investor-owned properties.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned property count closely mirror the top five by investor ownership percentage, highlighting that regions with a large volume of investor properties also tend to have a higher proportion of them.

Zip codes 38573 and 38577 also show substantial investor activity, with 80 (33.3% rate) and 57 (35.4% rate) investor-owned properties respectively, reinforcing the concentrated nature of the investor market in Pickett County.

The smallest top-ranked zip code by count, TN-Pickett-38556, still shows a robust investor ownership rate of 37.0% for its 10 investor-owned properties, indicating a strong landlord presence even in sub-markets with fewer total SFR units.

This consistent appearance of the same zip codes across both count and percentage metrics reveals distinct hotspots where investors have deeply penetrated the local SFR market, affecting a substantial portion of available housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Pickett County with a 3.88x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pickett County have consistently been net buyers, demonstrating a strong accumulation of SFR properties, with an overall buy-to-sell ratio of 3.88x for the entire year 2025 (62 buys vs 16 sells).

This net buying trend has been consistent historically, with landlords acquiring 72 properties against 13 sells in 2024, resulting in an even higher buy/sell ratio of 5.54x for that year.

Quarterly activity in 2025 shows fluctuations in net buying intensity; Q2 recorded the highest buy-to-sell ratio at 10.0x (20 buys vs 2 sells), followed by Q4 at 2.5x (10 buys vs 4 sells) and Q3 at 2.0x (18 buys vs 9 sells).

Despite the strong overall landlord net buying, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced transaction profile in 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation or divestment by this segment.

The sustained high buy-to-sell ratios for all landlords signal a market where investors are actively expanding their portfolios, though at a slightly reduced pace in 2025 compared to 2024.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords engaged in 30.3% of Q4 transactions in Pickett County, primarily driven by single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in a notable 30.3% of all SFR transactions in Pickett County during Q4 2025, accounting for 10 out of 33 total transactions, indicating their continued active presence in the market.

Transaction volumes are concentrated in the smaller investor tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) leading with 6 transactions, followed by small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 3 transactions, and one large landlord (Tier 101-1000) completing a single transaction.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by tier: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average of $256,667, while small landlords (Tier 03-05) secured properties for a substantially lower average of $70,000, illustrating distinct market entry points.

The price spread between the highest and lowest average purchase prices across active tiers in Q4 was $186,667, highlighting a broad range of property values being acquired by different investor segments.

Inter-landlord trading was limited, with only single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing from other landlords, accounting for 1 out of their 6 transactions (16.7%), suggesting most acquisitions come from non-investor sellers.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively executed 9 of the 10 landlord transactions in Q4, reinforcing their market dominance in terms of activity, consistent with their overall ownership share.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no transaction activity in Q4, further confirming their non-involvement in this local market's recent buying and selling.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate 99.9% of holdings as strong net buyers in Pickett County.
Holdings
Landlords own 933 SFR properties in Pickett County, representing 44.6% of the total market. Individual investors hold 887 properties (95.1%), significantly outpacing company-owned portfolios (6.0%).
Pricing
Landlords achieved a substantial 29.1% discount in Q4, acquiring properties at an average of $197,680 compared to homeowners' $278,744. This follows a volatile year that saw landlords pay a 62.6% premium over homeowners in Q1.
Activity
In Q4, landlords made 7 purchases, capturing 38.9% of all SFR sales, with 6 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for all 100% of these purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.9% of investor-owned housing in Pickett County, totaling 950 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all landlord tiers, maintaining at least 81.8% ownership even in the 3-5 property tier, with no observed crossover point where companies become a majority.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 3.88x (62 buys vs 16 sells). However, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced position with 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025.
Market Narrative

Pickett County's housing market is significantly influenced by a robust landlord presence, with 933 SFR properties (44.6% of the total market) owned by investors. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual investors, who control 95.1% (887 properties) of the landlord portfolio, dramatically outpacing the 6.0% held by companies. Further reinforcing this local, small-scale dynamic, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an astounding 99.9% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding no market share in the county.

Investor behavior in Pickett County demonstrates a strategic approach to acquisitions and pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a substantial 29.1% discount, paying $197,680 on average compared to homeowners' $278,744, despite a volatile year that saw a 62.6% landlord premium in Q1. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers, with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 3.88x (62 buys vs 16 sells), actively expanding their portfolios. Q4 purchases saw landlords capture 38.9% of all SFR sales, primarily driven by single-property landlords, with 6 new entities entering the market.

This data reveals Pickett County, Tennessee, as a market where individual, small-scale landlords are the dominant force, actively acquiring properties and maintaining a substantial portion of the housing stock for rental purposes. The absence of institutional investor presence, combined with the prevalent cash acquisition strategies, suggests a stable, locally-driven rental market. The continued influx of new single-property landlords highlights ongoing accessibility and attractiveness of real estate investment for individuals in this Tennessee county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPickett (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions