Cheatham (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cheatham (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cheatham (TN)
13,135
Total Investors in Cheatham (TN)
2,814
Investor Owned SFR in Cheatham (TN)
2,250(17.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,611
SFR Owned
1,989
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
203
SFR Owned
279
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,250 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Cheatham County with 95% Ownership and Strong Acquisition Activity
Landlords in Cheatham County own 2,250 SFR properties, representing 17.1% of the market, with individual investors holding a dominant 88.4%. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.3% of investor-owned SFR, while institutional investors hold just 1.6%. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 22.8% of all SFR purchases, paying 2.9% less than traditional homeowners, signaling robust individual investor activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own a dominant 88.4% of Cheatham County's 2,250 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A significant 98.7% of landlord-owned properties are non-owner-occupied (rented), demonstrating a strong rental market focus. Moreover, 72.8% of these properties were acquired with cash, indicating a preference for unfinanced assets among investors.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $467,125 in Q4 2025, securing a 2.9% discount versus traditional homeowner prices of $481,206.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly, from 16.9% ($78,234) in Q3 2025 to 2.9% ($14,081) in Q4 2025, indicating varying market conditions and deal-sourcing opportunities. Average landlord acquisition prices have appreciated by 57.97% from the 2020-2023 pandemic era average of $295,710 to $467,125 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 22.8% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Cheatham County, acquiring 31 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove the majority of this activity, accounting for 30 of the 32 detailed landlord purchases (93.8% of these properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made a minimal contribution, purchasing only 1 property (3.1%) this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 95.3% of Cheatham County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 1.6% of the total investor-owned portfolio (36 properties), reinforcing the market's small-investor foundation. This demonstrates a highly fragmented market dominated by individual and small-scale landlords rather than large corporations.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in Tier 04 (6-10 properties), dominating with 75.0% ownership.
Individual investors hold a commanding 93.3% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios. For tiers beyond Tier 04, companies maintain significant presence, owning 70.0% in Tier 11-20 and 40.0% in Tier 21-50, indicating their strategy in building larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
ZIP code 37015 leads in Cheatham County with 1,094 investor-owned SFR properties and a 21.1% ownership rate.
ZIP code 37036 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 33.3%, indicating a high concentration despite a potentially smaller overall market. The top four regions by count—37015, 37082, 37146, and 37143—collectively represent a significant portion of the county's investor activity.
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Cheatham County are net buyers with a 4.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (39 buys vs 9 sells).
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a neutral stance in Q4 2025 with a 1x buy/sell ratio (1 buy vs 1 sell), a shift from their net buyer position in 2025. Overall landlord transaction volume has slightly decreased year-over-year, with 191 buys in 2025 compared to 228 buys in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 18.1% of all 215 transactions in Cheatham County during Q4 2025.
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) and single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired properties at very similar average prices, $320,000 and $322,542 respectively, with institutional buyers paying 0.8% less. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal, with only 2 properties out of 39 landlord transactions bought from other landlords, suggesting a market where most purchases are from non-investor sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own a dominant 88.4% of Cheatham County's 2,250 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Cheatham County, TN, collectively own 2,250 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for a substantial 17.1% of the total SFR market. This establishes a significant investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, holding 1,989 properties, which represents 88.4% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, company-owned SFR properties total 279, comprising only 12.4% of the market, challenging the narrative of corporate investment dominance.

The investor portfolio is highly rental-focused, with 2,220 properties classified as rented, equating to 98.7% of all landlord-owned SFR. This signals that virtually all investor activity in the county is geared towards generating rental income, not speculative holding.

Cash acquisitions are the prevailing method for investors, with 1,637 properties (72.8%) purchased outright. Only 613 properties (27.2%) are financed, indicating a strong preference for debt-free ownership and potentially higher resilience against market fluctuations.

The sheer number of individual landlords, totaling 2,611 entities, significantly outnumbers company landlords at 203, establishing a ratio of nearly 13 individual landlords for every company. This highlights the foundational role of small-scale, individual operators in Cheatham County's rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $467,125 in Q4 2025, securing a 2.9% discount versus traditional homeowner prices of $481,206.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Cheatham County demonstrated a strategic advantage by acquiring properties at an average price of $467,125, which is 2.9% less than the average $481,206 paid by traditional homeowners. This translated to an average savings of $14,081 per property, highlighting effective deal-sourcing or negotiation by investors.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable quarter-over-quarter volatility. While landlords enjoyed a substantial 16.9% discount ($78,234) in Q3 2025 compared to homeowners, this narrowed significantly to 2.9% in Q4 2025, suggesting a more competitive buying environment or changing property profiles.

Analyzing historical trends, landlord acquisition prices have experienced substantial appreciation. The average price in Q4 2025 at $467,125 is 57.97% higher than the average of $295,710 seen during the 2020-2023 period, indicating a robust increase in property values post-pandemic.

The consistency of landlords paying less than homeowners across all observed quarters (Q1-Q4 2025) underscores a recurring pattern in the market. Landlords consistently paid less by $22,195 (5.1%) in Q1, $69,527 (16.3%) in Q2, $78,234 (16.9%) in Q3, and $14,081 (2.9%) in Q4.

Although `section6-1.csv` reported 0 landlord properties acquired in Q4, `section7-1.csv` confirmed 31 landlord purchases. This discrepancy suggests an error in the acquisition count for the pricing section, but the pricing data itself reflects existing market comparisons.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 22.8% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Cheatham County, acquiring 31 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active in Cheatham County, responsible for 31 of the 136 total SFR purchases, securing a significant 22.8% market share. This demonstrates a continued strong appetite for investment properties.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 30 out of the 32 detailed landlord properties. This represents 93.8% of all landlord purchases detailed by tier, emphasizing their critical role in market activity.

The Tier 01 (single-property) segment saw 20 entities purchasing 16 properties, making it the most active tier in Q4 and indicating a steady influx of new or expanding small-scale investors into the market. This highlights the entrepreneurial spirit prevalent among local landlords.

In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made a negligible impact on Q4 purchases, acquiring only 1 property, which comprised 3.1% of detailed landlord purchases. This suggests a minimal presence or a strategic pause from large-scale entities in the local market.

The distribution of Q4 activity reveals that smaller-scale landlords are the primary drivers of growth and transaction volume in Cheatham County, with Tier 01 and Tier 04 contributing significantly to the purchase count at 16 and 6 properties, respectively.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 95.3% of Cheatham County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The Cheatham County real estate market is profoundly shaped by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) owning 2,206 properties, representing an astounding 95.3% of all detailed investor-owned SFR properties. This solidifies their position as the backbone of the local rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, controlling 1,896 properties, which is 81.9% of the total investor-owned SFR detailed in the tiers. This highlights the accessibility and appeal of single-property investment for local individuals.

Despite common perceptions, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a minimal footprint, owning just 36 properties or 1.6% of the investor-owned market. This small share indicates that large corporate entities do not significantly influence Cheatham County's SFR rental landscape.

The concentration of properties in lower tiers, with Tier 01-04 making up the vast majority, points to a decentralized and community-oriented rental market. This structure suggests a diverse array of local landlords rather than consolidated corporate ownership.

While specific pricing data by tier for all-time ownership is not provided in this section, the dominant ownership by mom-and-pop landlords suggests that the pricing dynamics for a vast majority of the market are influenced by individual buyer behavior and access to financing, rather than institutional-scale capital deployment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in Tier 04 (6-10 properties), dominating with 75.0% ownership.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level of the market, controlling 93.3% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios with 1,779 properties, compared to companies at 6.7% (127 properties). This establishes the foundation of Cheatham County's rental market as individually driven.

A clear crossover point occurs at Tier 04 (6-10 properties), where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Companies hold 36 properties (75.0%) in this tier, while individuals own only 12 properties (25.0%), signaling where corporate strategies begin to gain a foothold in portfolio scaling.

Beyond the crossover, companies maintain a significant presence in mid-size tiers. In Tier 11-20, companies own 70.0% of properties, and in Tier 21-50, they hold 40.0%, indicating their focus on accumulating larger, more professionally managed portfolios.

Despite the emergence of companies in larger tiers, individual investors still retain substantial presence in smaller portfolios. They account for 85.2% of properties in Tier 02 and 77.2% in Tier 03, demonstrating their continued importance across the smaller-to-medium landlord spectrum.

The data reveals a clear strategy where individuals initiate investment at the single-property level, while companies strategically target larger portfolio sizes, indicating distinct approaches to market participation and growth in Cheatham County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
ZIP code 37015 leads in Cheatham County with 1,094 investor-owned SFR properties and a 21.1% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Cheatham County, the ZIP code 37015 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting 1,094 investor-owned SFR properties. This represents a significant 21.1% of its total SFR market, making it the most concentrated area by volume.

While 37015 leads in property count, ZIP code 37036 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 33.3%. This suggests that while it may have a smaller total number of SFR properties, a substantial proportion of those are investor-owned, indicating a strong landlord-dominated submarket.

The top four ZIP codes by investor property count—37015 (1,094 properties), 37082 (293 properties), 37146 (288 properties), and 37143 (180 properties)—reveal a clear geographic concentration of investor activity within Cheatham County, pointing to specific areas favored by landlords.

Interestingly, some ZIP codes feature prominently in both top lists, such as 37015 (21.1% ownership, 1,094 properties) and 37143 (14.7% ownership, 180 properties). This indicates these areas are not only attractive to investors but also have a high penetration of investor-owned properties relative to their market size.

The varying rates and counts across these sub-geographies highlight a diverse market where some areas attract a high volume of investor properties, while others demonstrate a high *proportion* of investor ownership, reflecting different localized investment strategies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords in Cheatham County are net buyers with a 4.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (39 buys vs 9 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Cheatham County consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025, culminating in Q4 with a strong 4.33x buy-to-sell ratio, with 39 properties bought against 9 sold. This indicates continued market expansion and investor confidence.

Examining the full year 2025, landlords remained robust net buyers, acquiring 191 properties while selling only 43, resulting in a 4.44x buy-to-sell ratio. This sustained activity underscores a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among local investors.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a more cautious approach. In Q4 2025, they were neutral, buying 1 property and selling 1. This contrasts with their net buyer position for the entire year 2025 (7 buys vs 4 sells), suggesting a potential shift in strategy or market re-evaluation towards the end of the year.

Comparing year-over-year activity, total landlord purchases decreased slightly from 228 in 2024 to 191 in 2025. Despite this, landlords remained net buyers in both years, indicating a consistent, albeit slightly moderated, growth trajectory.

The strong buy-to-sell ratio for all landlords suggests healthy market liquidity and continued demand for rental properties in Cheatham County. This pattern indicates that properties are primarily flowing into investor portfolios rather than being divested.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 18.1% of all 215 transactions in Cheatham County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in Cheatham County's Q4 2025 transaction market, participating in 39 out of 215 total transactions, which represents an 18.1% share. This indicates their sustained influence on market activity and property transfers.

The average purchase prices reveal interesting tier-specific strategies. While single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $322,542, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired properties at a comparable $320,000. This 0.8% price difference suggests that large and small investors are competing for similar valuation ranges in Q4.

Smaller tiers demonstrated varied pricing, with Tier 03 (3-5 properties) paying the highest average at $350,000, and larger landlords (Tier 101-1000) securing properties at the lowest price of $200,000. This wide price spread of $150,000 across tiers highlights diverse acquisition strategies and property types targeted by different investor sizes.

Inter-landlord trading was notably low in Q4. Only 2 of the 39 landlord transactions involved buying from another landlord (1 from Tier 01, 1 from Tier 02). This indicates that the vast majority of investor acquisitions are coming from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers, rather than a churning of properties within the investor class.

The Tier 02 segment showed the highest percentage of purchases from other landlords at 14.3% (1 out of 7 transactions), slightly above Tier 01's 5.0%. This suggests that while minimal, smaller, experienced landlords might be more inclined to trade properties amongst themselves for portfolio adjustments.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Cheatham County's SFR market is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords with minimal institutional presence
Holdings
Landlords in Cheatham County own 2,250 SFR properties, representing 17.1% of the total market, with individual investors holding 1,989 properties (88.4%) and companies owning 279 properties (12.4%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $467,125 in Q4 2025, securing a 2.9% discount ($14,081) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $481,206.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 31 properties, capturing 22.8% of all SFR sales, with 20 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) actively entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.3% of investor-owned SFR housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 1.6% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (93.3% of Tier 01), but companies achieve majority ownership in portfolios of 6-10 properties (Tier 04), controlling 75.0%.
Transactions
All landlords were net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 4.33x buy/sell ratio (39 buys vs 9 sells), while institutional investors maintained a neutral position (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The Cheatham County, Tennessee, SFR market is predominantly shaped by individual and small-scale investors, challenging common perceptions of institutional dominance. Landlords collectively own 2,250 SFR properties, representing 17.1% of the entire market. A significant 88.4% of these properties are held by individual investors (1,989 properties), compared to a smaller 12.4% owned by companies (279 properties). This is further reinforced by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 95.3% of all detailed investor-owned SFR, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 1.6%.

In terms of activity and pricing, landlords continue to demonstrate strategic buying power, securing 22.8% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025. They acquired properties at an average of $467,125, a 2.9% discount compared to the $481,206 paid by traditional homeowners in the same quarter. Landlords have consistently been net buyers throughout 2025, with a 4.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4, indicating sustained portfolio expansion. Notably, 20 new single-property landlords entered the market in Q4, highlighting a continuous influx of small-scale investment. However, institutional investors showed a neutral transaction position in Q4, with 1 buy and 1 sell.

This data paints a clear picture of Cheatham County's SFR market as highly decentralized, with local, individual investors forming its core. The minimal institutional presence, combined with strong mom-and-pop acquisition and ownership, suggests a resilient and community-focused rental market. Geographic hotspots like ZIP code 37015 (21.1% investor-owned) further emphasize localized investment trends, indicating distinct market dynamics where small-scale landlords continue to be the primary drivers of growth and market stability across Cheatham County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:27 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCheatham (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth