Lincoln (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lincoln (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lincoln (OR)
19,105
Total Investors in Lincoln (OR)
14,756
Investor Owned SFR in Lincoln (OR)
10,626(55.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
12,367
SFR Owned
8,543
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,389
SFR Owned
2,595
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,626 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Lincoln County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers, Dominating Q4 Purchases Despite Unconventional Premiums
Lincoln County boasts a significant landlord-owned SFR portfolio of 10,626 properties, representing 55.6% of the market, with individuals holding the vast majority at 80.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 57.2% of all SFR purchases, predominantly led by mom-and-pop investors, even while paying a 19.5% premium over traditional homeowners. This signals a robust, acquisition-focused market where smaller landlords are the primary drivers of activity, consistently acting as net buyers with a 11.69x buy/sell ratio in Q4.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Lincoln County sees 10,626 investor-owned SFR properties, with individuals holding 80.4%.
The majority of these properties (10,583) are rented, indicating a highly rental-focused market. Cash acquisitions account for 7,188 properties, significantly outweighing the 3,438 financed properties. Individual landlords outnumber companies by nearly 5 to 1, with 12,367 individual entities compared to 2,389 company entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a significant 19.5% premium in Q4 2025, costing $94,766 more than homeowners.
This price gap shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 20.8% premium in Q1 2025 to a 1.5% discount in Q3. In Q4, landlords acquired 107 properties at an average price of $580,058, while homeowners paid $485,292, an unusual trend where landlords are not securing discounts.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 57.2% of Q4 SFR purchases, totaling 107 properties in Lincoln County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) executed 98.1% of these purchases (105 properties), largely driven by single-property buyers acquiring 97 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had minimal activity, purchasing only 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in Lincoln County.
Single-property owners (Tier 01) form the backbone, holding 82.4% of all investor properties (9,201 properties). Institutional investors (Tier 09) maintain a negligible presence, owning just 0.1% of the market with 6 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes dominant at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key crossover point.
While individual investors hold a strong majority in smaller portfolios (78.5% in Tier 01), companies shift to majority ownership in portfolios of 6-10 properties (51.5%). This trend continues into larger tiers, where companies hold 75.9% of properties in the 11-20 tier.
Geographic Distribution
OR-Lincoln-97388 boasts an extreme 91.0% investor ownership rate, leading Lincoln County's geographic concentration.
The zip code OR-Lincoln-97367 has the highest count of investor-owned properties at 3,048, while OR-Lincoln-97388 and OR-Lincoln-97498 exhibit the highest investor penetration rates at 91.0% and 80.0%, respectively. High count regions generally also show high investor ownership rates within the county.
Historical Transactions
Lincoln County landlords are strong net buyers, with an 11.69x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Across all of 2025, landlords maintained a net buyer position with 661 buys against 69 sells. Institutional investors (1000+ Tier) were also net buyers in 2025 with 4 buys and 1 sell, indicating overall accumulation.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove over half of Q4 transactions, making up 50.7% of all activity in Lincoln County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were most active with 139 transactions, acquiring properties at an average price of $572,275. Institutional investors (Tier 09) transacted only 2 properties, but at a significantly lower average price of $191,194, representing a 66.6% discount compared to Tier 01 buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Lincoln County sees 10,626 investor-owned SFR properties, with individuals holding 80.4%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lincoln County currently own 10,626 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a substantial 55.6% of the total SFR market of 19,105 properties. This highlights a market heavily influenced by investor activity.

Individual landlords, often termed mom-and-pop, overwhelmingly dominate ownership, holding 8,543 (80.4%) of all investor-owned SFR properties. In contrast, company-owned properties account for 2,595 (24.4%).

The market is highly geared towards rentals, with 10,583 (99.6% of investor-owned properties) explicitly categorized as rented. This indicates that nearly all investor properties are utilized for rental income, emphasizing the market's strong income-generation focus.

Cash acquisitions are the preferred method for Lincoln County landlords, with 7,188 properties purchased outright, almost double the 3,438 properties acquired through financing. This suggests a preference for debt-free ownership or a strong capital base among investors.

The landscape of landlord entities further solidifies the mom-and-pop narrative, with 12,367 individual landlords comprising 83.8% of the total 14,756 landlord entities. Company landlords, while owning a smaller share of properties, represent 16.2% of entities with 2,389 companies.

Comparing property counts to entity counts reveals individual landlords on average own 0.69 properties per entity (8,543 properties / 12,367 entities), while company landlords own 1.09 properties per entity (2,595 properties / 2,389 entities), indicating companies generally manage slightly larger, though still modest, portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a significant 19.5% premium in Q4 2025, costing $94,766 more than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In an unexpected turn, landlords in Lincoln County paid an average of $580,058 for SFR properties in Q4 2025, a significant $94,766 (19.5%) premium over traditional homeowners who paid $485,292. This deviates from the common trend of investors securing discounts.

The price discrepancy between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme quarterly volatility throughout 2025. After starting Q1 with a massive $102,253 (20.8%) premium, landlords secured a modest $8,612 (1.5%) discount in Q3 before returning to a substantial premium in Q4.

The consistent appearance of price premiums for landlords in Q1 and Q4, juxtaposed with a discount in Q3, suggests a fluctuating market environment or changing acquisition strategies depending on the quarter in Lincoln County.

While the data for specific distinct properties purchased by landlords in Section 6-1 shows 0, Section 7-1 and 7-2 confirm 107 landlord purchases in Q4. This implies the average price of $580,058 in Section 6-2 reflects these actual landlord acquisitions.

This pattern of landlords often paying more than traditional homeowners indicates either a strong competitive market for specific types of properties, a willingness by investors to pay for perceived value, or different market segments being targeted by each buyer type in Lincoln County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 57.2% of Q4 SFR purchases, totaling 107 properties in Lincoln County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the dominant force in the Lincoln County SFR market during Q4 2025, accounting for 107 of the total 187 SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 57.2% market share.

The vast majority of landlord purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), who together acquired 105 properties, representing an overwhelming 98.1% of all landlord purchases in the quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, responsible for 97 purchases, making them the primary entry point for new investors or expansion for existing small portfolios. This activity involved 139 distinct entities, indicating a broad base of small-scale participation.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 2 purchases in Q4, accounting for a mere 1.9% of landlord acquisitions, signaling minimal engagement from large-scale players in Lincoln County during this period.

The high volume of entities (139) for Tier 01 purchases (97 properties) suggests that many individual entities are acquiring their first, or only, investment property, highlighting a robust entry-level investor market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR in Lincoln County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Lincoln County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control 11,017 properties, representing an astonishing 98.7% of all investor-owned housing.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most prevalent investor segment, holding 9,201 properties, which accounts for 82.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This underscores their foundational role in the local rental market.

The market shows an extreme lack of institutional presence, with Tier 09 investors (1000+ properties) owning a mere 6 properties, constituting only 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in Lincoln County.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 140 properties (1.2% of the total), further emphasizing the concentration of ownership within the smallest tiers.

The distribution clearly illustrates that the narrative of large corporate landlords dominating housing is not applicable in Lincoln County, where local, smaller-scale investors are virtually the sole proprietors of rental housing stock.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes dominant at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a key crossover point.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors significantly dominate smaller portfolios in Lincoln County, a clear crossover point emerges at the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time.

Individual investors maintain strong majorities in the smallest tiers, holding 7,501 properties (78.5%) in Tier 01 and 899 properties (80.3%) in Tier 02, solidifying their role as the primary owners of single and dual-property portfolios.

The shift occurs in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where companies own 52 properties (51.5%), marginally more than the 49 properties (48.5%) owned by individuals, marking it as the threshold for corporate majority.

Beyond this point, company ownership becomes increasingly concentrated, as seen in the 11-20 property tier where companies control 44 properties (75.9%), compared to just 14 properties (24.1%) for individuals.

This pattern indicates that while individuals drive the vast majority of small-scale investment, companies are the preferred structure for managing even modestly larger portfolios in Lincoln County, highlighting different strategic approaches to property investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Lincoln-97388 boasts an extreme 91.0% investor ownership rate, leading Lincoln County's geographic concentration.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties are highly concentrated within specific zip codes in Lincoln County, with OR-Lincoln-97367 leading by count with 3,048 investor-owned SFR properties, holding a 55.1% investor ownership rate.

The zip code OR-Lincoln-97388 demonstrates an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 91.0%, indicating that nearly all SFR properties in this area are owned by landlords, far exceeding other regions.

Following closely, OR-Lincoln-97498 also shows a significant investor presence, with 998 properties owned by investors and an 80.0% investor ownership rate, marking it as another key hotspot for landlord activity.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned count collectively showcase strong investor penetration, with rates ranging from 42.5% in OR-Lincoln-97365 to the peak of 91.0% in OR-Lincoln-97388.

There is a clear correlation in Lincoln County between regions with a high number of investor-owned properties and those with a high investor ownership percentage, highlighting distinct areas of intense investment activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lincoln County landlords are strong net buyers, with an 11.69x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lincoln County are emphatically net buyers, demonstrating robust acquisition activity throughout 2025. In Q4 alone, they purchased 152 properties while selling only 13, resulting in an impressive buy/sell ratio of 11.69x.

This strong buying trend is consistent across the entire year, with landlords acquiring a total of 661 properties and divesting only 69, yielding a substantial 9.58x buy/sell ratio for 2025.

The year-over-year data (2024 vs. 2025) shows continued, steady accumulation, with 632 buys in 2024 compared to 60 sells, indicating a sustained strategy of portfolio expansion among landlords.

Even institutional investors (1000+ Tier), despite their minimal market presence in Lincoln County, recorded a net buyer position for 2025, purchasing 4 properties against 1 sale, signaling an overall accumulation strategy at this scale as well.

The consistent high buy/sell ratios across different timeframes underscore a healthy and active landlord market in Lincoln County, with investors actively growing their portfolios rather than divesting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove over half of Q4 transactions, making up 50.7% of all activity in Lincoln County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were central to the Lincoln County SFR market in Q4 2025, participating in 152 of the total 300 transactions, thereby representing a significant 50.7% share of all property trades.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated transaction volume, accounting for 139 transactions. These buyers paid an average purchase price of $572,275, indicative of entry-level investment or expansion in smaller portfolios.

A striking price disparity exists between small and institutional investors. Institutional buyers (Tier 09) acquired properties at an average price of $191,194, which is a considerable 66.6% less than the $572,275 paid by single-property landlords.

Inter-landlord trading was relatively low across most tiers, with single-property buyers sourcing only 9 (6.5%) of their 139 transactions from other landlords, and institutional investors sourcing 0% from other landlords.

The average purchase price for smaller landlords generally increases with portfolio size, peaking at $925,000 for the 6-10 property tier, while institutional investors appear to target properties at a much lower price point, suggesting different asset classes or distressed acquisitions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lincoln County, driving acquisitions despite paying premiums.
Holdings
Landlords own 10,626 SFR properties in Lincoln County (55.6% of the total SFR market), with individual investors holding 8,543 (80.4%) and companies owning 2,595 (24.4%) of these properties.
Pricing
Landlords paid a substantial 19.5% more than homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average price of $580,058 versus $485,292, an unusual trend of paying a premium rather than securing discounts.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 107 properties, capturing 57.2% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were highly active with 97 purchases, involving 139 distinct entities entering or expanding the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.7% of investor housing in Lincoln County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the majority of properties in smaller portfolios (78.5% in Tier 01), but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift towards corporate structures for larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.69x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (152 buys vs 13 sells). Institutional investors also maintained a net buyer position for 2025 (4 buys vs 1 sell), though their activity remains minimal.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Lincoln County, OR, is overwhelmingly defined by its small-scale, individual landlords. These 'mom-and-pop' investors collectively own 10,626 SFR properties, representing a significant 55.6% of the county's total SFR market. Critically, 80.4% of these investor-owned properties are held by individual owners, further underscoring the dominance of local, rather than corporate, investment in the housing sector. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1% of the market, completely subverting common national narratives of Wall Street dominance.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased a highly active and unusual trend. Landlords were responsible for 57.2% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 107 properties. However, unlike typical market trends, these landlords paid a substantial 19.5% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $580,058. Despite this premium, landlords consistently acted as net buyers throughout 2025, maintaining an impressive 11.69x buy/sell ratio in Q4, signaling strong confidence and an active strategy of portfolio expansion. The majority of this buying activity was driven by single-property landlords, with 139 entities making purchases in Q4.

This data reveals a dynamic housing market in Lincoln County where smaller, individual investors are the primary drivers of demand and market liquidity. Their sustained net buying position, even when facing elevated acquisition costs, suggests a robust local rental market and a long-term investment horizon. The virtual absence of institutional players and the clear crossover point for corporate ownership at smaller portfolio sizes highlight a unique market structure that is largely insulated from large-scale corporate influence, making it a distinct example of localized, individual-driven real estate investment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:35 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLincoln (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth