Hood River (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hood River (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hood River (OR)
5,700
Total Investors in Hood River (OR)
2,881
Investor Owned SFR in Hood River (OR)
2,029(35.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,592
SFR Owned
1,774
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
289
SFR Owned
311
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,029 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Hood River Market with Strong Buying, Facing Q4 Price Premiums
Landlords collectively own 2,029 SFR properties, accounting for 35.6% of Hood River's market, with mom-and-pop investors controlling an overwhelming 99.7%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 52.5% of all SFR purchases, notably paying a 4.0% premium over traditional homeowners, a significant shift from prior quarters’ discounts, while remaining strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,029 SFR properties in Hood River, with individuals holding 87.4% vs companies at 15.3%.
A substantial 98.9% (2,006 properties) of landlord holdings are rented, confirming a strong rental focus. Notably, all investor properties are either financed (778 properties) or cash (1,251 properties), accounting for 100% of the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 4.0% premium ($29,723) over homeowners in Q4 2025, reaching an average acquisition price of $776,877.
The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced sharp reversals, moving from a 14.8% discount in Q3 to a 4.0% premium in Q4. Landlord average acquisition prices have consistently appreciated, rising from $606,389 (2020-2023) to $739,958 in Year 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased a dominant 52.5% of all SFR properties in Q4 2025, acquiring 21 out of 40 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4, acquiring 21 properties, while institutional investors made no purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove this activity, purchasing 20 properties, signaling robust new investor formation.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.7% of investor-owned SFR properties in Hood River.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, holding 1,765 properties (83.7%). Institutional investors (Tier 09) maintain 0.0% ownership, with the largest active tier (101-1000 properties) only owning 0.1% (2 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Hood River, with no company crossover point observed.
Individual owners represent 86.7% of properties in Tier 01 and 83.0% in Tier 02, solidifying their control in smaller portfolios. Companies hold their highest concentration at 22.8% in the 3-5 property tier, still far from a majority.
Geographic Distribution
Investor-owned SFR properties are highly concentrated in three Hood River County zip codes, led by 97031 with 1,518 properties.
The 97014 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 71.2%, followed by 97041 at 37.1%. These top three regions by count are also the top three by percentage, revealing focused investor activity within specific local sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
Hood River landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, purchasing 34 properties and selling 3.
Landlords have consistently been net buyers, with a 10.14x buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (142 buys vs 14 sells). The Q4 ratio, while strong, represents a decrease from Year 2024's exceptionally high 39.67x ratio (119 buys vs 3 sells), indicating a slight increase in selling activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 50.0% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions, driving half of the market's activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) represented 100% of all landlord transactions, with single-property (Tier 01) landlords paying the highest average price at $781,369. Tier 01 landlords sourced 9.4% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,029 SFR properties in Hood River, with individuals holding 87.4% vs companies at 15.3%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hood River County control a significant portion of the housing market, owning 2,029 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, which represents 35.6% of the total SFR inventory.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 1,774 SFR properties (87.4% of investor-owned), while company-owned SFR properties account for 311 (15.3%). This highlights the prevalence of individual, often local, investors in the market.

The ownership split by entity count further emphasizes this individual dominance, with 2,592 individual landlords making up 89.9% of all 2,881 landlords, compared to just 289 company landlords (10.0%). This reflects a heavily fragmented market structure.

A striking 98.9% of landlord-owned properties (2,006 out of 2,029) are rented, underscoring a clear focus on rental income generation within the investor segment of Hood River.

The financing structure of investor portfolios reveals a balanced approach: 778 properties are financed, and 1,251 are purchased with cash. These two categories sum precisely to the total investor-owned properties (2,029), indicating all holdings are either mortgaged or fully paid off.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 4.0% premium ($29,723) over homeowners in Q4 2025, reaching an average acquisition price of $776,877.
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift in the Q4 2025 market, landlords paid an average of $776,877 for SFR properties, which represents a $29,723 or 4.0% premium compared to traditional homeowners who paid $747,154.

This Q4 premium marks a significant reversal from the previous two quarters: in Q3, landlords secured a substantial 14.8% discount ($126,882), and in Q2, they enjoyed an even larger 16.1% discount ($136,960) against homeowner prices.

The trend in acquisition pricing has been highly volatile; Q1 2025 also saw landlords paying a considerable $122,625 (19.3%) premium over homeowners, indicating inconsistent pricing strategies or dynamic market conditions for investor purchases.

Across longer timeframes, landlord acquisition prices show a consistent upward trend, appreciating from an average of $606,389 during the 2020-2023 period to $665,449 in Year 2024, and further to $739,958 in Year 2025, reflecting broader market value increases.

The average acquisition price for landlords from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) at $606,389 has appreciated significantly to $776,877 in Q4 2025, marking an increase of $170,488 or 28.1% over this period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased a dominant 52.5% of all SFR properties in Q4 2025, acquiring 21 out of 40 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly outpaced other buyers in Q4 2025, capturing 52.5% of all SFR purchases in Hood River County by acquiring 21 out of a total of 40 properties.

This quarter's buying activity was exclusively driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 100.0% of all landlord purchases, totaling 21 properties. No institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases were recorded in Q4.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord activity came from single-property owners (Tier 01), who acquired 20 properties, representing 95.2% of all landlord purchases, indicating a strong influx of new or entry-level investors.

This concentration in Tier 01 highlights that the market for investor acquisitions in Hood River County is currently fueled by individual landlords expanding small portfolios or entering the market.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were linked to 20 properties in Q4, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) acquired 1 property, further illustrating the small-scale nature of recent investor growth.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.7% of investor-owned SFR properties in Hood River.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Hood River County is decisively dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control an overwhelming 99.7% of all investor-held properties, totaling 2,102 properties across these tiers.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market structure, owning 1,765 properties, which constitutes a significant 83.7% of the total investor-owned SFR properties.

The presence of large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is non-existent, as they hold 0.0% of investor-owned SFR properties. The largest observed investor tier (101-1000 properties) owns only 2 properties, representing a mere 0.1%.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure where local, small-scale investors are the primary actors, challenging narratives of corporate dominance in this specific geography.

The remaining ownership is distributed among slightly larger mom-and-pop categories: two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold 187 properties (8.9%), and small landlords (Tiers 03-05) own 136 properties (6.4%).

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Hood River, with no company crossover point observed.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all landlord portfolio tiers in Hood River County, with no tier showing company ownership exceeding individual ownership. This demonstrates the strong local, non-corporate nature of investor activity.

In the single-property tier (Tier 01), individual investors own 1,569 properties (86.7%), greatly surpassing company ownership of 241 properties (13.3%), highlighting that new market entrants or small-scale investors are predominantly individuals.

Even in slightly larger portfolios, such as the two-property tier (Tier 02), individuals still dominate, owning 156 properties (83.0%) compared to companies with 32 properties (17.0%).

The highest percentage of company ownership is found in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), where companies hold 31 properties, representing 22.8% of that tier. However, individuals still own the majority with 105 properties (77.2%).

In the 6-10 property tier, individual investors account for 100.0% of ownership, holding all 14 properties, while companies have no presence, further emphasizing the limited role of corporate entities in larger small-to-mid-size portfolios within this market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor-owned SFR properties are highly concentrated in three Hood River County zip codes, led by 97031 with 1,518 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Hood River County are heavily concentrated within a few specific zip codes, indicating targeted investment strategies in this localized market.

The 97031 zip code leads by property count, with 1,518 investor-owned properties, making it the most significant hub for real estate investors in the county.

The 97014 zip code exhibits the highest investor ownership rate, with a striking 71.2% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, signifying an exceptionally high penetration of rental properties in that area.

Following closely, the 97041 zip code also shows a substantial investor presence, with 192 properties reflecting a 37.1% investor ownership rate.

The strong correlation between the top regions by count and by percentage (97031, 97014, and 97041 appearing in both top 3 lists) highlights that investors are both numerous and represent a high market share in the same specific Hood River County sub-geographies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Hood River landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, purchasing 34 properties and selling 3.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hood River County are actively expanding their portfolios, demonstrating a clear position as net buyers across all observed timeframes, including a robust 11.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (34 purchases vs 3 sales).

This strong buying trend is consistent throughout the year, with landlords collectively making 142 purchases against 14 sales in Year 2025, resulting in a healthy 10.14x buy/sell ratio.

Looking back, Year 2024 saw even more aggressive accumulation, with landlords buying 119 properties and selling only 3, yielding an exceptionally high buy/sell ratio of 39.67x, signifying minimal divestment during that period.

While Year 2025 shows continued net buying, the reduction in the buy/sell ratio from 39.67x in 2024 to 10.14x in 2025 suggests a slight increase in properties coming onto the market from investor owners compared to the previous year.

Individual quarterly data for 2025 also reveals consistent net buying: Q3 had 44 buys vs 3 sells (14.67x ratio), and Q2 had 44 buys vs 7 sells (6.29x ratio), reinforcing the long-term acquisition strategy of landlords in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 50.0% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions, driving half of the market's activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a central role in the Q4 2025 housing market in Hood River County, participating in 34 transactions, which represents exactly 50.0% of the total 68 SFR transactions for the quarter.

Transaction activity was entirely concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04), which accounted for all 34 landlord transactions, further underscoring the dominance of smaller investors in this local market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 32 transactions. These investors paid an average purchase price of $781,369, which was higher than the $705,000 paid by two-property landlords (Tier 02).

The data reveals that Tier 01 landlords are paying a premium of $76,369 more per property compared to Tier 02 landlords, suggesting that entry-level investors or those acquiring single properties are facing higher per-unit costs in Q4.

Inter-landlord trading was observed primarily in Tier 01, where 3 of their 32 transactions (9.4%) involved buying from another landlord, indicating a modest level of intra-investor market liquidity for smaller portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominance Drives Hood River Market Amidst Q4 Price Premiums and Strong Landlord Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 2,029 SFR properties, representing 35.6% of Hood River County's total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,774 properties (87.4%) and companies owning 311 properties (15.3%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, Hood River landlords paid an average of $776,877, a 4.0% premium over traditional homeowners at $747,154, marking a significant reversal from the 14.8% discount observed in Q3.
Activity
Landlords captured 52.5% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Hood River County, acquiring 21 properties, with all activity originating from mom-and-pop investors, including 20 single-property purchases signaling robust new landlord formation.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned SFR housing in Hood River, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all landlord tiers in Hood River County, representing 86.7% of properties in Tier 01, and no tier shows companies achieving majority ownership over individuals.
Transactions
Landlords in Hood River County are strong net buyers with an 11.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (34 buys vs 3 sells), while no institutional investor transactions were recorded.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Hood River County, Oregon, is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords. These smaller investors collectively own 2,029 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting a significant 35.6% of the total SFR market. Individual owners account for a dominant 87.4% of these investor-held properties, with 1,774 holdings, underscoring the local, fragmented nature of the market, which contrasts sharply with narratives of institutional corporate takeovers.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 revealed dynamic shifts, particularly in pricing. Landlords secured 52.5% of all SFR purchases, but faced an average 4.0% premium, paying $776,877 compared to homeowners' $747,154. This marks a notable reversal from the substantial discounts observed in previous quarters. Despite paying more, landlords remained active net buyers, evidenced by an 11.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4, indicating continued confidence and expansion efforts. All purchasing activity was concentrated within mom-and-pop tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) being particularly active and even showing a higher average purchase price than two-property landlords.

The Hood River market is characterized by profound mom-and-pop dominance, with these investors controlling 99.7% of all investor-owned housing. The complete absence of institutional investors suggests a local market highly responsive to individual investment strategies and demand. This implies a potentially resilient rental market supported by local capital, but also highlights a pricing environment where smaller landlords might be competing more aggressively or targeting specific property types that command higher prices, as observed in the Q4 premium and tier-level pricing differences.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:30 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHood River (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail