Coos (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Coos (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Coos (OR)
17,594
Total Investors in Coos (OR)
7,036
Investor Owned SFR in Coos (OR)
5,371(30.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,292
SFR Owned
4,931
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
744
SFR Owned
940
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,371 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Coos County SFR Amid Volatile Prices and Institutional Retreat
Landlords own 5,371 SFR properties (30.5% of Coos County's market), with individuals holding an overwhelming 91.8%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 38.9% of SFR sales, but surprisingly paid a 9.4% premium over homeowners, while institutional investors showed signs of net selling in Q3.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Coos County landlords own 5,371 SFR properties, with individual investors holding 91.8% of the portfolio.
A striking 98.3% (5,280 properties) are rented, and 70.9% (3,810 properties) were acquired via cash, demonstrating a strong rental focus and significant cash buying.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Coos County landlords paid a 9.4% premium for SFR in Q4 2025, averaging $408,483 against homeowner's $373,471.
The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced extreme volatility in 2025, fluctuating from a 13.3% premium in Q1 to an 8.5% discount in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices for 2025 averaged $391,368, representing a 12.6% increase over 2024's $347,405.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 38.9% of Coos County's Q4 2025 SFR purchases, acquiring 75 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated purchases, securing 96.2% of all landlord acquisitions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired a mere 1 property (1.3%).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.9% of investor-owned SFR in Coos County.
Single-property owners alone account for 75.7% (4,256 properties) of the market, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.1% (6 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes the majority at the small-medium (21-50) property tier in Coos County.
Individual investors dominate the single-property tier with 88.1% (3,997 properties), while by the 21-50 tier, companies own 80.0% (8 properties). The lack of pricing data by owner type prevents specific price comparison for different investor sizes.
Geographic Distribution
OR-Coos-97420 leads in investor-owned property count with 2,019 units, while 97407 boasts a 100.0% ownership rate.
Zip code 97411 is a dual-leader, ranking second in property count (1,108 properties) and fifth in ownership rate (45.4%), signifying a high concentration of investor presence. Three of the top five by percentage are not among the top five by count, revealing diverse market saturation levels.
Historical Transactions
Coos County landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (104 buys vs 13 sells).
All landlords showed consistent net buying activity throughout 2024 and 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells), but remained net buyers for the full Year 2025 (5 buys vs 3 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 34.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Coos County, participating in 104 out of 302 deals.
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) acquired their single property at $294,175, a 27.8% discount compared to the $407,559 paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01). Only 4.7% of Tier 01 transactions were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Coos County landlords own 5,371 SFR properties, with individual investors holding 91.8% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly influence Coos County's housing market, owning 5,371 SFR properties, which constitutes 30.5% of the total SFR properties available in the county.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market in Coos County, holding 4,931 properties, representing 91.8% of all investor-owned units, in stark contrast to companies owning 940 properties (17.5%).

The vast majority of landlord-owned SFR properties, 5,280 out of 5,371 (98.3%), are actively rented, underscoring the strong rental market focus and operational nature of investor portfolios in this county.

Cash acquisitions are a prominent strategy among Coos County landlords, with 3,810 properties (70.9%) being cash-owned, indicating a preference for debt-free assets or strategic capital deployment.

The landlord ecosystem in Coos County is heavily skewed towards individual owners, with 6,292 individual landlords compared to just 744 company landlords, translating to approximately 8.5 individual landlords for every company entity.

While individuals comprise 89.4% of all landlord entities, their property ownership share is even higher at 91.8%, suggesting that individual investors collectively hold larger proportions of the market relative to their entity count compared to companies.

A significant portion of properties (1,561 or 29.1%) are financed, indicating that while cash purchases are strong, a healthy segment of the landlord market also leverages debt to expand or manage their portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Coos County landlords paid a 9.4% premium for SFR in Q4 2025, averaging $408,483 against homeowner's $373,471.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising turn for Q4 2025, landlords in Coos County paid an average acquisition price of $408,483, which is $35,012 or 9.4% more than traditional homeowners, who paid $373,471.

The landlord-homeowner price dynamic was highly inconsistent throughout 2025, swinging from a significant 13.3% premium for landlords in Q1 ($420,487 vs $371,025) to an 8.5% discount in Q2 ($355,057 vs $387,983), before another premium in Q4.

Despite the lack of specific acquisition counts from `section6-1.csv` for these periods, the reported average prices indicate a clear price appreciation trend, with Q4 2025 prices ($408,483) being 24.4% higher than the average of $328,375 from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era.

Comparing annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stood at $391,368, a notable 12.6% increase from Year 2024's average of $347,405, reflecting a general upward movement in property values.

The significant quarter-over-quarter fluctuations in the landlord-homeowner price gap highlight a highly dynamic and potentially unpredictable market, where landlord pricing strategies must adapt rapidly to changing conditions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 38.9% of Coos County's Q4 2025 SFR purchases, acquiring 75 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Coos County were highly active, accounting for a substantial 38.9% of all SFR purchases by acquiring 75 out of 193 properties, indicating significant investor interest in the local market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, with 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly led the purchasing activity, making 75 acquisitions, which represents 96.2% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

The entry of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) was robust, with 85 entities buying 62 properties, underscoring that small-scale investors are a primary driver of Q4 acquisition volume, representing 79.5% of all landlord-purchased properties.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had a negligible presence, acquiring only 1 property, which comprised a mere 1.3% of total landlord purchases in Q4.

The data suggests that the average properties per buying entity for Tier 01 was approximately 0.73 (62 properties by 85 entities), implying a high number of first-time or one-off purchasers entering the market.

The concentration of Q4 activity in the lower tiers, particularly Tier 01, highlights a grassroots-driven market where smaller investors are actively expanding or initiating their portfolios in Coos County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.9% of investor-owned SFR in Coos County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Coos County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control 97.9% of the 5,622 investor-owned properties, reinforcing a decentralized market structure.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the fundamental core of the market, owning 4,256 properties, which alone constitutes 75.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio in Coos County.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-absent footprint in Coos County, owning a mere 6 properties, accounting for just 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR, directly contradicting narratives of corporate market takeover.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively hold a small share of 1.9% (112 properties), indicating a steep drop-off in investor participation or growth once portfolios exceed 10 properties.

The distribution clearly illustrates that the vast majority of rental housing in Coos County is provided by small, local investors, with 97.9% of properties held by entities owning 10 or fewer properties.

Due to the absence of specific pricing data by tier in this section, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary across different investor sizes based on these holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes the majority at the small-medium (21-50) property tier in Coos County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios in Coos County, holding 88.1% (3,997 properties) of the single-property (Tier 01) market and maintaining majority control up to the 11-20 property tier (53.0% individual vs. 47.0% company).

A distinct crossover in ownership occurs at the small-medium (21-50 property) tier, where company ownership shifts to the majority, controlling 80.0% (8 properties) compared to individuals at 20.0% (2 properties).

This pattern of increasing company dominance with portfolio size continues into the larger tiers, with companies owning 77.8% of properties in the 51-100 tier (7 properties) and 80.0% in the 101-1000 tier (4 properties).

The data clearly illustrates that while individual landlords form the backbone of the Coos County SFR market, companies are the primary, albeit smaller, players in larger-scale portfolio management.

Despite companies taking over larger tiers, the total number of properties within these company-dominated tiers (e.g., 10 properties in 21-50 tier, 9 in 51-100 tier, 5 in 101-1000 tier) remains quite small, indicating that even larger portfolios are not widespread in Coos County.

The provided data does not include pricing information broken down by owner type and tier, precluding an analysis of whether companies or individuals pay different prices within the same portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Coos-97420 leads in investor-owned property count with 2,019 units, while 97407 boasts a 100.0% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Coos County, zip code OR-Coos-97420 is the epicenter of investor activity by volume, holding the highest number of investor-owned properties at 2,019 units, representing 28.5% of its SFR market.

Zip code OR-Coos-97407 presents a unique market dynamic with a remarkable 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it is a completely investor-driven SFR area, likely a specialized or small geographic segment.

OR-Coos-97411 stands out as a highly concentrated investor market, ranking second in total investor-owned properties with 1,108 units and also making the top five with an impressive 45.4% ownership rate.

A notable distinction exists between areas with high investor counts and those with high ownership rates; for example, three zip codes in the top five by percentage (97407, 97466, 97449) are not among the top five by sheer property volume, indicating varying market saturation levels across Coos County.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned property count (97420, 97411, 97459, 97423, 97458) reveal clear geographic hotbeds for landlord activity, together holding a significant portion of the county's investor-owned SFR.

The absence of acquisition price data for these specific sub-geographies prevents an analysis of how landlord purchase costs vary across the most active and saturated areas within Coos County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Coos County landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (104 buys vs 13 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Coos County demonstrated consistent and strong net buying activity over the past two years, with their buy-to-sell ratio increasing from 5.59x in 2024 (380 buys vs 68 sells) to a more aggressive 7.74x in 2025 (410 buys vs 53 sells).

In Q4 2025 alone, landlords showed significant accumulation, acquiring 104 properties while selling only 13, resulting in a robust net gain of 91 properties and an impressive 8.0x buy-to-sell ratio, signaling continued confidence in the market.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited a more nuanced transaction pattern, acting as net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells), indicating a strategic divestment of properties during that period.

Despite the Q3 selling, institutional investors maintained a net buyer position for the full Year 2025, acquiring 5 properties against 3 sales, suggesting overall growth, albeit at a very limited scale, for larger entities.

The overall market trend for landlords in Coos County is clearly one of portfolio expansion, with total purchases significantly outpacing sales across all analyzed timeframes, reflecting a bullish outlook among investors.

Due to the lack of explicit data on average buy prices, average sell prices, or the percentage of landlord-to-landlord transactions in this section, insights into profit margins or internal market liquidity cannot be derived here.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 34.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Coos County, participating in 104 out of 302 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in Coos County's Q4 2025 SFR market, contributing to 104 transactions, representing 34.4% of the total 302 transactions that occurred.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 85 transactions, though only a small fraction (4.7%, or 4 transactions) were acquired from other landlords, indicating a preference for properties from traditional sellers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) demonstrated a strategic pricing advantage, acquiring their single Q4 property for $294,175, which is $113,384 or 27.8% less than the average $407,559 paid by single-property landlords.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal across most tiers, with two-property, small landlord (3-5), small-medium (11-20 and 21-50), and institutional tiers reporting zero transactions bought from other landlords in Q4 2025.

The average purchase price varied considerably by tier in Q4, with two-property landlords paying the highest average of $576,141, contrasting sharply with small-medium (21-50 properties) paying the lowest at $95,287, reflecting diverse investment strategies and property market segments.

The significant price disparity between institutional and mom-and-pop landlords suggests that larger entities may have access to preferential deals or specialized acquisition channels, allowing them to secure properties at a notable discount.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively accounted for 101 transactions in Q4, solidifying their dominant position in transaction volume within the Coos County market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Coos County SFR Amid Volatile Prices and Institutional Retreat
Holdings
Landlords own 5,371 SFR properties in Coos County, representing 30.5% of the total market, with individual investors holding 4,931 (91.8%) and companies 940 (17.5%) of these properties.
Pricing
Landlords paid a 9.4% premium in Q4 2025, averaging $408,483 compared to homeowners at $373,471, despite experiencing discounts in previous quarters, highlighting volatile pricing dynamics.
Activity
Coos County landlords made 38.9% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases (75 properties), primarily driven by 85 new single-property landlords entering the market, while institutional activity was minimal.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.9% of investor housing in Coos County, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) owning a marginal 0.1% of the total portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios up to 20 properties, but companies become the majority owners at the small-medium (21-50 property) tier, signaling a shift in ownership structure for larger holdings.
Transactions
Coos County landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (104 buys vs 13 sells), although institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The Coos County housing market is significantly influenced by investors, who collectively own 5,371 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 30.5% of the total SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual landlords, who account for 91.8% (4,931 properties) of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, owning just 6 properties or 0.1% of the market, firmly establishing the mom-and-pop landlord as the dominant force in Coos County.

Landlord behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrated strong buying intent, capturing 38.9% of all SFR purchases with 75 properties acquired, largely fueled by 85 new single-property landlords entering the market. This quarter saw landlords surprisingly paying a 9.4% premium over traditional homeowners, with average acquisition prices of $408,483 versus $373,471, a notable reversal from prior quarter discounts. Overall, landlords in Coos County were aggressive net buyers, evidenced by an 8.0x buy/sell ratio (104 buys vs. 13 sells) in Q4, signaling continued portfolio expansion and confidence in the local rental market.

The data from Coos County reveals a highly localized and decentralized investor market, where small-scale landlords are the primary participants, owning over 97% of investor-held SFR. The notable premium paid by landlords in Q4, coupled with their consistent net buying status, suggests strong competition for limited inventory, possibly driven by the robust influx of new individual investors. This dynamic market, characterized by significant individual ownership and volatile pricing, implies a vibrant rental demand within Coos County and a housing market structure less influenced by large corporate entities than often perceived.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:23 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCoos (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth