Stark (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stark (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stark (OH)
122,979
Total Investors in Stark (OH)
19,158
Investor Owned SFR in Stark (OH)
18,762(15.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
16,692
SFR Owned
13,440
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,466
SFR Owned
5,750
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 18,762 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Stark County's SFR market, securing 38.5% Q4 discounts amidst continued accumulation.
Investors own 18,762 SFR properties, representing 15.3% of the Stark County market, with individuals holding 71.6% of investor-owned homes. Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 86.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, far outweighing the 0.3% held by institutional investors. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 304 properties, comprising 21.9% of all SFR sales, and notably acquired these homes at a 38.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords remain net buyers, reflecting continued investment in the county.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 18,762 SFR properties in Stark County, with individuals holding 71.6% of these homes.
Of all landlord-owned properties, 18,083 are rented, 6,387 are financed, and 12,375 were cash purchases. Rented properties comprise 96.4% of the total landlord portfolio, indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Stark County landlords secured a 38.5% discount in Q4 2025, paying $159,272 compared to homeowners' $258,844.
The landlord price discount has widened significantly, increasing from 19.7% ($49,782) in Q2 2025 to 38.5% ($99,572) in Q4 2025. This indicates landlords are finding increasingly better deals relative to traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 21.9% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Stark County, acquiring 304 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove 76.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025, significantly outpacing institutional investors who bought just 1.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 86.3% of investor-owned SFR properties in Stark County, dwarfing institutional holdings.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio, highlighting their limited presence in Stark County. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) remain the cornerstone of the market, owning 62.9% of all investor-held SFR properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
In Stark County, companies become the majority SFR owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, shifting from individual dominance in smaller tiers.
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, comprising 88.4% of single-property holdings. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) are primarily companies, owning 64 properties within this top tier.
Geographic Distribution
OH-Stark-44646 leads Stark County with 2,178 investor-owned properties, a key concentration hub.
While OH-Stark-44646 has the most properties, OH-Stark-44630 shows 100.0% investor ownership, indicating highly saturated, albeit smaller, investment pockets.
Historical Transactions
Stark County landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.51x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, continuing a clear trend of accumulation.
Overall landlord purchases saw a 11.9% decline from 2,144 properties in 2024 to 1,889 properties in 2025, while institutional transaction volumes remained relatively stable. Institutions recorded a 1.63x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (13 buys vs 8 sells), indicating cautious net buying.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 19.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Stark County, participating in 394 deals.
Institutional investors acquired properties at a significantly lower average price of $38,200, an 80.9% discount compared to the $200,357 paid by single-property landlords. Smaller landlords are also more likely to buy from other landlords, with two-property owners sourcing 42.3% of their buys from within the investor pool.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 18,762 SFR properties in Stark County, with individuals holding 71.6% of these homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stark County collectively own 18,762 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a significant 15.3% of the county's total SFR market of 122,979 properties. This highlights the substantial presence of investors within the local housing landscape.

Individual landlords (mom-and-pop) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned market, holding 13,440 properties (71.6% of the total investor portfolio), compared to companies which own 5,750 properties (30.6%). This split emphasizes that a large majority of rental housing is managed by smaller, individual investors rather than large corporations.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties are rented, with 18,083 properties indicating a strong focus on income generation, comprising 96.4% of the total landlord portfolio. This near-total rental utilization confirms landlords' primary role as providers of rental housing in the county.

Cash transactions significantly outpace financed properties within the landlord portfolio, with 12,375 properties acquired through cash compared to 6,387 that are financed. This indicates a preference for direct ownership and potentially less reliance on traditional lending for property acquisitions.

While individual landlords own 71.6% of properties, they account for 16,692 entities, far outnumbering the 2,466 company landlords. This disparity suggests that individual landlords typically manage smaller portfolios, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' structure of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Stark County landlords secured a 38.5% discount in Q4 2025, paying $159,272 compared to homeowners' $258,844.
Detailed Findings

Stark County landlords consistently acquire properties at a substantial discount compared to traditional homeowners, exemplified by a 38.5% price gap in Q4 2025. Landlords paid an average of $159,272 per property, which is $99,572 less than the $258,844 average paid by homeowners in the same quarter.

The price advantage for landlords has significantly widened throughout 2025. The discount grew from 19.7% ($49,782 difference) in Q2, where landlords paid $203,133 versus homeowners' $252,915, to 38.5% ($99,572 difference) in Q4, signaling an increasing ability for investors to secure properties below market rates.

Comparing annual acquisition trends, the average landlord acquisition price of $159,272 in Q4 2025 represents a 2.9% increase from the $154,810 average observed during the 2020-2023 period. This suggests a modest appreciation in acquisition costs over recent years, though the Q4 price is notably lower than Q2 and Q3 2025 figures.

The quarter-over-quarter analysis reveals a fluctuating but generally substantial discount for landlords: 25.2% in Q1, 19.7% in Q2, 31.7% in Q3, and 38.5% in Q4. This consistent undercutting of homeowner prices suggests strategic purchasing or access to different market segments by landlords.

The significant $99,572 (38.5%) price difference in Q4 2025 underscores landlords' tactical advantage in the market, allowing them to expand their portfolios at a lower entry cost per property compared to traditional owner-occupants. This competitive pricing positions investors for potentially higher rental yields or capital appreciation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 21.9% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Stark County, acquiring 304 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stark County were highly active in Q4 2025, securing 304 SFR properties, which represents a substantial 21.9% of the total 1,388 SFR purchases made in the county during that quarter. This indicates a significant portion of the market is being absorbed by investors rather than traditional homeowners.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 237 properties, or 76.9% of all landlord-owned purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired only 3 properties, representing a mere 1.0% of landlord activity, underscoring the market's reliance on smaller investors.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, contributing 159 properties, which is 51.6% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025. This activity was driven by 225 distinct entities, suggesting a robust influx of new, small-scale investors entering the rental market.

Despite being the most active, Tier 01 entities acquired an average of 0.71 properties per entity (159 properties / 225 entities) in Q4, signaling a cautious approach to market entry. Conversely, larger tiers, such as Tier 21-50, saw 10 entities acquire 32 properties, averaging 3.2 properties per entity, indicating more aggressive purchasing among established mid-size investors.

Overall, purchasing activity in Q4 2025 was heavily concentrated in the smaller investor tiers, with Tiers 01-04 comprising the vast majority of landlord purchases. This reaffirms the localized and individual-driven nature of real estate investment in Stark County during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 86.3% of investor-owned SFR properties in Stark County, dwarfing institutional holdings.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Stark County's investor-owned SFR market is heavily skewed towards smaller landlords, with single-property owners (Tier 01) holding a dominant 12,145 properties, accounting for 62.9% of the total investor portfolio. This establishes first-time landlords as the primary demographic in the local rental housing sector.

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control a commanding 86.3% of all investor-owned SFR properties. This significant concentration of ownership among small-scale investors contrasts sharply with the minimal 0.3% share held by institutional investors (Tier 09), who own just 64 properties.

The investor market demonstrates a clear inverse relationship between portfolio size and property count, with smaller tiers holding the vast majority of properties. Tier 01 alone accounts for nearly two-thirds of all investor-owned homes, followed by Tier 03-05 at 10.8% and Tier 06-10 at 6.4%, illustrating a highly fragmented ownership structure.

While Tier 01 has the most properties, the number of entities in each tier provides insight into portfolio structure; for example, Tier 01 has 12,145 properties, implying an average of 1 property per entity (as per definition). Larger tiers like Tier 101-1000 hold 340 properties, suggesting a higher average number of properties per entity within those segments.

This distribution reveals that the 'Wall Street investor' narrative is largely unfounded in Stark County, with the bulk of rental housing provided by local individuals. The market's stability and responsiveness are therefore more closely tied to the financial health and investment decisions of these numerous smaller landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
In Stark County, companies become the majority SFR owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, shifting from individual dominance in smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller echelons of the landlord market in Stark County, holding 88.4% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios and 64.4% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios. This firmly establishes that the entry-level and small-scale rental market is driven by individual owners.

A significant crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where company ownership becomes the majority, controlling 61.4% of properties compared to 38.6% held by individuals. This marks the transition from predominantly individual to predominantly corporate investment as portfolio sizes increase.

Beyond the Tier 04 crossover, company dominance strengthens considerably in larger portfolio sizes. In the 11-20 property tier (Tier 05), companies own 77.4% of properties, further increasing to 88.1% in the 21-50 property tier (Tier 06) and 88.5% in the 51-100 property tier (Tier 07).

Even in the highest tier, Institutional investors (1000+ properties), the ownership is almost exclusively corporate, with these entities holding all 64 properties. This pattern confirms that very large-scale rental operations are primarily executed by companies rather than exceptionally wealthy individuals.

This distinct segmentation by portfolio size reveals that while individual landlords form the foundation of the market with numerous small holdings, the scaling and professionalization of investment activity increasingly fall under company structures in Stark County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OH-Stark-44646 leads Stark County with 2,178 investor-owned properties, a key concentration hub.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Stark County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes, with OH-Stark-44646 leading by count with 2,178 properties. This is closely followed by OH-Stark-44601 with 1,917 properties and OH-Stark-44705 with 1,645 properties, highlighting these areas as major hubs for investor activity.

While the top areas by count represent significant volume, other sub-geographies exhibit extreme investor saturation. OH-Stark-44630 stands out with 100.0% investor ownership, followed by OH-Stark-44680 at 50.0% and OH-Stark-44670 at 39.5%. These percentages indicate highly concentrated, albeit potentially smaller, investment pockets.

A notable distinction exists between regions with the highest counts of investor-owned properties and those with the highest percentage of investor ownership. For instance, OH-Stark-44646 leads with 2,178 properties at a 13.9% investor rate, whereas OH-Stark-44705 has 1,645 properties but a much higher 27.3% investor rate, suggesting a greater market penetration in the latter despite lower absolute numbers.

The top five sub-geographies by count—OH-Stark-44646, OH-Stark-44601, OH-Stark-44705, OH-Stark-44708, and OH-Stark-44706—collectively account for a significant portion of investor-owned properties, signaling concentrated investment strategies in specific, often urban or suburban, pockets of Stark County.

The disparity between high-count areas (lower percentage) and high-percentage areas (potentially lower count) reveals diverse investment strategies. Some areas attract large volumes of investors who still represent a minority of the market, while others are almost entirely controlled by investors, indicating varying levels of market maturity and saturation across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Stark County landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.51x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, continuing a clear trend of accumulation.
Detailed Findings

Stark County landlords were significant net buyers in Q4 2025, acquiring 394 properties while selling only 157, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 2.51x and a net gain of 237 properties. This demonstrates a strong and continued appetite for portfolio expansion within the local market.

The trend of landlords being net buyers is consistent across 2025, with quarterly net gains of 237 in Q4, 352 in Q3, and 384 in Q2. For the entire year 2025, landlords acquired 1,889 properties versus 573 sells, resulting in a substantial net accumulation of 1,316 properties, reinforcing their role as long-term holders.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) also maintained a net buyer position in Q4 2025, albeit with lower volumes, buying 3 properties and selling 1. Annually, institutions acquired 13 properties and sold 8 in 2025, resulting in a net gain of 5 properties, indicating a more measured but still acquisitive stance.

Comparing annual activity, overall landlord purchases decreased by 11.9% from 2,144 buys in 2024 to 1,889 buys in 2025, while sales remained relatively stable (521 in 2024 vs 573 in 2025). This suggests a slight slowdown in acquisition velocity for the broader landlord market compared to the previous year.

Despite the slight overall slowdown in landlord purchases, both general and institutional landlords continue to be net accumulators in Stark County. Institutional activity shows greater volatility, with a net seller position in 2024 (9 buys vs 9 sells) indicating a more tactical approach to market conditions compared to the consistent growth of the broader landlord base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 19.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Stark County, participating in 394 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stark County contributed significantly to the Q4 2025 market activity, accounting for 394 out of 1,989 total SFR transactions, representing a 19.8% share. This highlights their substantial presence in both buying and selling activities within the quarter.

Transaction volumes were heavily concentrated in the smaller tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) completing 226 transactions, followed by small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 49 transactions. This emphasizes that smaller investors drive the bulk of transaction liquidity in the market.

A striking difference in acquisition pricing exists across tiers: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $200,357, whereas institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired properties at a mere $38,200. This represents an 80.9% discount for institutions compared to mom-and-pop single-property buyers, signaling drastically different purchasing strategies.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied by tier, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) having the highest reliance on purchasing from other landlords, with 42.3% of their 26 transactions originating from fellow investors. In contrast, institutional and large landlords (Tiers 08-09) bought 0.0% of their properties from other landlords, suggesting they source deals from different segments.

Overall, 18.8% (74 out of 394) of landlord transactions in Q4 2025 involved purchases from other landlords, indicating a notable level of internal market churn. This inter-investor activity is predominantly driven by smaller to mid-size landlords, facilitating portfolio adjustments within the non-institutional segments.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Stark County's SFR market, securing 38.5% Q4 discounts amidst continued accumulation.
Holdings
Landlords own 18,762 SFR properties in Stark County, representing 15.3% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 13,440 properties (71.6%) and companies owning 5,750 properties (30.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $159,272 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial $99,572 discount (38.5%) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $258,844.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 304 properties, accounting for 21.9% of all SFR sales, with 225 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 86.3% of investor-owned SFR housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.3% share in Stark County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 71.6% of total investor-owned properties, but company ownership becomes the majority in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Transactions
Landlords in Stark County are strong net buyers with a 2.51x buy/sell ratio (394 buys vs 157 sells) in Q4 2025, and institutional investors also maintained a net buyer position with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio (3 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

Stark County's Single-Family Residential (SFR) market is significantly influenced by investors, who collectively own 18,762 properties, representing 15.3% of the county's total SFR inventory. The vast majority of this investor-owned housing is held by individual landlords, accounting for 13,440 properties or 71.6% of the portfolio, decisively overshadowing the 5,750 properties (30.6%) owned by companies. This structure underscores the enduring dominance of mom-and-pop investors, who control an impressive 86.3% of all investor-owned properties, in stark contrast to the negligible 0.3% held by institutional investors.

In Q4 2025, landlord activity remained robust in Stark County, with investors acquiring 304 properties, comprising 21.9% of all SFR purchases. These landlords consistently demonstrated a keen pricing advantage, securing homes at an average of $159,272—a substantial 38.5% discount compared to the $258,844 paid by traditional homeowners. This quarter, landlords were also clear net buyers, transacting 394 buys against 157 sells, leading to a 2.51x buy/sell ratio. Notably, institutional investors also exhibited net buying activity with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio (3 buys vs 1 sell), albeit with much lower volumes compared to the broader landlord market.

The data from Stark County reveals a residential housing market heavily shaped by individual, small-scale investors who are actively growing their portfolios and securing significant price advantages. This "mom-and-pop" foundation suggests that the rental market's dynamics are driven by local and individual economic factors rather than large corporate strategies. The consistent net buying by both overall and institutional landlords indicates sustained confidence in the Stark County market, suggesting continued growth in rental stock provided by these investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStark (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison