Monroe (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Monroe (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Monroe (OH)
3,966
Total Investors in Monroe (OH)
1,346
Investor Owned SFR in Monroe (OH)
1,136(28.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,256
SFR Owned
1,028
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
90
SFR Owned
116
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,136 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate in Monroe County, Securing 32.4% Price Discount in Q4
Monroe County's SFR market sees strong mom-and-pop landlord activity, with these small investors controlling 97.7% of all 1,136 investor-owned properties. In Q4 2025, landlords, overwhelmingly individuals, acquired 10 properties, securing an average 32.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While landlords remain net buyers overall, institutional activity is virtually nonexistent in this market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 90.5% of Monroe County's 1,136 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Monroe County's investor portfolio is significantly cash-driven, with 1,034 (91.0%) properties acquired with cash and only 102 (9.0%) financed. A vast majority, 1,100 properties (96.8%), are rented, highlighting the market's focus on non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured a Significant 32.4% Price Discount Over Homeowners in Q4 2025
The price gap showed extreme volatility throughout 2025, with landlords experiencing discounts ranging from 32.4% in Q4 to a massive 53.7% in Q1, but even paying a 1.1% premium in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated by 38.1% from the 2020-2023 average of $59,731 to $82,467 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 30.3% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Monroe County, OH
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all 10 landlord purchases in Q4, representing 100.0% of the quarter's investor activity. Notably, 10 new single-property landlords entered the market, underscoring the dominance of small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.7% of Monroe County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, owning 69.9% of all investor-held properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.0% share, confirming their absence from Monroe County's real estate landscape.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company Ownership Reaches Parity with Individuals at 6-10 Property Tiers in Monroe County, OH
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 92.3% of single-property and 90.6% of two-property assets. However, in the 6-10 property tier and the 11-20 property tier, companies achieve an equal 50.0% ownership share with individuals.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 43793 Leads Monroe County with 356 Investor-Owned Properties
While 43793 has the highest count at 356 properties, other zip codes exhibit far higher investor penetration rates, with OH-Monroe-43752 astonishingly showing 100.0% investor ownership. The top five regions by count collectively represent a significant portion of the county's investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Monroe County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, with 6.0x More Buys Than Sells in Q4 2025
Overall, landlords have been consistently net buyers in Monroe County, with Year 2025 seeing 69 buys against 7 sells. Institutional investors (1000+ tier), however, showed a neutral position in Year 2025 with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation or divestment from large entities.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 26.1% of All Q4 2025 SFR Transactions in Monroe County, OH
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove all 12 landlord transactions in Q4, while institutional investors showed no activity. Notably, no inter-landlord trading occurred, with 0.0% of transactions involving a landlord selling to another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 90.5% of Monroe County's 1,136 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Monroe County, OH, exhibits a robust single-family rental (SFR) market with 1,136 investor-owned properties, representing 28.6% of the total 3,966 SFR properties in the area. This demonstrates a significant investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, owning 1,028 properties, which accounts for 90.5% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, company-owned properties make up only 10.2% with 116 units, challenging the narrative of large corporate landlords.

The ownership structure is further solidified by entity counts, revealing 1,256 individual landlords compared to just 90 company landlords. This highlights a market largely driven by smaller-scale, independent investors rather than institutional entities.

A notable pattern in property acquisition is the prevalence of cash purchases, with 1,034 properties (91.0% of investor holdings) acquired without financing. This signals a market with strong liquidity among investors or a preference for avoiding debt.

Conversely, only 102 (9.0%) of investor-owned properties are financed, suggesting a conservative approach to leverage or a market where cash offers are highly competitive. This financing split underscores the significant capital deployed by landlords in Monroe County.

The market's primary focus is rental income, as 1,100 properties (96.8% of the investor portfolio) are rented. This high percentage of non-owner-occupied units confirms that the vast majority of investor activity is geared towards providing rental housing within Monroe County, OH.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured a Significant 32.4% Price Discount Over Homeowners in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Monroe County, OH, demonstrated strong purchasing power, acquiring properties at an average price of $82,467. This represents a substantial $39,590 discount, or 32.4% less, than traditional homeowners who paid an average of $122,057 for SFR properties.

The price discrepancy between landlords and homeowners has shown significant fluctuation throughout 2025. Landlords secured their largest discount in Q1, paying $49,333—a massive 53.7% less than homeowners at $106,479.

Conversely, Q2 2025 saw an unusual reversal where landlords paid a slight premium, acquiring properties at an average of $128,943, which was 1.1% higher than homeowners' average of $127,575, indicating shifting market dynamics or specific property types traded.

Historical trends reveal a substantial price appreciation for landlord acquisitions; the average price jumped from $59,731 during the 2020-2023 period to $82,467 in Q4 2025, marking a 38.1% increase. This trend highlights a significant growth in property values within Monroe County.

The wide swing in landlord discounts and premiums across quarters, from a 53.7% discount in Q1 to a 1.1% premium in Q2, suggests a highly dynamic market with varied opportunities for investors, rather than a consistent price advantage.

Despite the quarterly volatility, the overall trend of landlords often paying less than homeowners underscores their ability to find undervalued properties or leverage negotiation tactics, consistently resulting in cost savings per acquisition in most quarters.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 30.3% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Monroe County, OH
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Monroe County, OH, were significant players in the SFR market, making 10 purchases. This accounts for 30.3% of the total 33 SFR properties transacted during the quarter, indicating a notable investor appetite.

The purchasing activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This highlights a market structure where smaller investors are the exclusive drivers of new inventory growth among landlords.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from Q4 purchasing activity, with 0 reported acquisitions. This reinforces the finding that the Monroe County market is not attracting or sustaining large-scale corporate real estate investment.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 8 properties, which represents 80.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This demonstrates that new entrants and very small investors are the primary force behind recent landlord acquisitions.

A total of 10 new entities entered the market as single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating a steady influx of first-time or small-scale investors into Monroe County's SFR market during Q4 2025.

The remaining landlord purchases came from two-property landlords (Tier 02) and small landlords (Tier 03-05), each acquiring 1 property, contributing 10.0% each to the total landlord purchases. This further emphasizes the granular nature of investor activity in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.7% of Monroe County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Monroe County, OH, controlling 97.7% of all properties. This translates to 1,174 properties owned by smaller investors, underscoring their critical role in the local rental market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for the largest segment, owning 840 properties, which represents 69.9% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio. This highlights the widespread presence of individual, small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), typically defined as owning 1,000+ properties, hold 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR in Monroe County. This stark absence contradicts broader market narratives about institutional dominance and highlights the unique local market structure.

Small landlords in Tiers 02 (two properties) and Tiers 03-05 (3-5 properties) contribute significantly, holding 11.5% (138 properties) and 14.8% (178 properties) respectively. Their combined activity further reinforces the market's reliance on non-institutional players.

Even mid-size landlord tiers remain small, with Tier 06-10 (6-10 properties) holding 1.5% (18 properties) and Tier 11-20 (11-20 properties) owning 2.2% (26 properties). The distribution demonstrates a very fragmented ownership landscape.

The largest active tier is small-medium (11-20 properties), representing just 2.2% of the total investor portfolio. This reinforces that Monroe County's market is characterized by a low concentration of larger-scale investors, with virtually no truly large entities present.

The absence of any significant institutional presence means that local economic and housing trends are primarily influenced by the decisions and financial stability of numerous small-scale landlords, making the market less susceptible to large corporate shifts.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company Ownership Reaches Parity with Individuals at 6-10 Property Tiers in Monroe County, OH
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties by owner type across tiers reveals a clear pattern in Monroe County, OH: individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but company presence grows significantly in mid-size tiers.

Individual owners hold a commanding lead in the single-property (Tier 01) and two-property (Tier 02) segments, owning 92.3% (783 properties) and 90.6% (125 properties) respectively. This underscores the prevalence of independent landlords in the foundational tiers.

The crossover point where company ownership becomes substantial occurs in the mid-size tiers. In both the Small landlord (6-10 properties) and Small-medium (11-20 properties) tiers, company and individual ownership stands at an equal 50.0%.

Specifically, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 9 properties alongside companies owning 9 properties. Similarly, in the 11-20 property tier, both individual and company owners hold 13 properties each, signifying a shift in ownership structure as portfolio size increases.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals still strongly dominate, holding 164 properties (92.1%) compared to companies owning just 14 properties (7.9%). This indicates that individuals largely manage portfolios up to five properties.

This pattern suggests that as investors scale beyond small portfolios, the organizational structure often shifts towards corporate entities, likely for asset protection, tax advantages, or more sophisticated management capabilities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 43793 Leads Monroe County with 356 Investor-Owned Properties
Detailed Findings

Monroe County, OH, exhibits distinct geographic concentrations of investor-owned properties, with zip code OH-Monroe-43793 leading by volume. This area accounts for 356 investor-owned properties, representing 24.2% of its total SFR housing market, making it the most active hub for property investors by count.

Other significant concentrations by property count include OH-Monroe-43946 with 200 properties (34.1% investor rate) and OH-Monroe-43716 with 108 properties (25.9% investor rate). These top regions collectively highlight where investors are choosing to accumulate assets.

Conversely, the highest investor ownership rates are found in different zip codes, indicating areas with potentially fewer total properties but a higher proportion of them owned by investors. OH-Monroe-43752 astonishingly reports 100.0% investor-owned properties, signaling a highly specialized or small market.

Following 43752, zip codes like OH-Monroe-43786 (71.4% investor-owned) and OH-Monroe-43931 (47.9% investor-owned) also demonstrate exceptionally high landlord penetration, suggesting these areas are almost entirely composed of rental units or investment properties.

The disparity between top regions by count and top regions by percentage indicates two different types of investor appeal: areas with high overall inventory attracting numerous investors versus areas with limited inventory where nearly all properties are investor-held.

Zip codes such as OH-Monroe-43793 (24.2% rate) and OH-Monroe-43915 (25.2% rate) represent a balance, combining a sizable number of investor-owned properties with a moderate penetration rate, indicating mature investment sub-markets within Monroe County.

The diverse geographic patterns underscore that investors employ varied strategies within Monroe County, targeting both high-volume markets and highly concentrated niche areas, depending on their investment goals and market entry points.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Monroe County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, with 6.0x More Buys Than Sells in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Monroe County, OH, consistently operate as net buyers across all observed timeframes, significantly expanding their portfolios. In Q4 2025 alone, they executed 12 buy transactions against only 2 sell transactions, resulting in a robust 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio.

This trend of accumulation is not limited to the recent quarter; in Year 2025, landlords completed 69 buy transactions compared to just 7 sell transactions, signaling an aggressive growth strategy with a near 10x buy-to-sell ratio. This indicates a highly confident and expanding investor base.

Year 2024 also reflected this strong buying sentiment, with 57 acquisitions versus 5 divestments, further cementing the overall landlord community's position as net accumulators of SFR properties in Monroe County.

In stark contrast to the general landlord population, institutional investors (1000+ properties tier) demonstrated a neutral stance in Year 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell transaction. This indicates that large-scale entities are neither significantly expanding nor contracting their limited presence in Monroe County.

The lack of aggressive buying from institutional investors, coupled with the strong net buying from smaller landlords, indicates a market primarily driven by local and regional individual investors, largely free from the influence of large corporate players.

The sustained net buying activity by landlords points to a favorable investment climate in Monroe County, potentially driven by strong rental demand, attractive property values, or positive long-term outlooks on real estate appreciation within the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 26.1% of All Q4 2025 SFR Transactions in Monroe County, OH
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Monroe County, OH, were a significant force in the transaction market, participating in 12 of the total 46 SFR transactions. This means landlords accounted for 26.1% of all property exchanges during the quarter, indicating their active market presence.

The transaction volume was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for all 12 landlord transactions. This reinforces the pattern of small-scale investors dominating both ownership and activity in Monroe County.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from Q4 transaction activity, recording 0 transactions. This further highlights that the dynamics of Monroe County's real estate market are largely independent of large corporate investment firms.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 10 transactions. These properties were purchased at an average price of $81,429, showing that new entrants or very small landlords are consistent participants in the market.

Remarkably, there was no inter-landlord trading reported in Q4 2025, with 0.0% of transactions involving a landlord buying from another landlord. This suggests that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sources.

The average purchase prices varied significantly among the active tiers, with Tier 01 paying $81,429, Tier 02 paying $160,000, and Tier 03-05 paying a notably low $12,200. This wide range could reflect diverse property conditions, locations, or highly specific distressed sales.

The concentration of all landlord transactions within the mom-and-pop tiers indicates a vibrant, locally driven investor market, less influenced by larger capital flows and more reflective of individual investment strategies and local market conditions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Monroe County: Mom-and-Pop Dominance with Strong Landlord Discounts and Growth
Holdings
Landlords in Monroe County, OH, own 1,136 SFR properties, representing 28.6% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors account for 1,028 properties (90.5%), vastly outnumbering company-owned properties at 116 (10.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $82,467 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial 32.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $122,057. This $39,590 per property advantage highlights landlord's strategic purchasing power.
Activity
Landlords completed 10 purchases in Q4 2025, representing 30.3% of all SFR sales in Monroe County. This activity was led by 10 new single-property landlords entering the market, demonstrating a robust influx of small-scale investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.7% of investor-owned housing in Monroe County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold 92.3% of single-property portfolios, but company ownership achieves parity at 50.0% within the 6-10 and 11-20 property tiers in Monroe County.
Transactions
Landlords in Monroe County are strong net buyers with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (12 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors showed a neutral position in Year 2025 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

Monroe County, OH, stands out as a market overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, individual real estate investors. Of the 1,136 investor-owned single-family residential (SFR) properties, 90.5% are held by individual landlords, with companies owning only 10.2%. This market exhibits a significant penetration rate, with investor-owned properties comprising 28.6% of the total SFR inventory in the county. Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties, collectively control a commanding 97.7% of the investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding virtually no presence (0.0%), underscoring a highly localized and fragmented ownership structure.

Investor behavior in Monroe County reveals a persistent buying trend and a notable ability to secure advantageous pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 10 properties, representing 30.3% of all SFR purchases, at an average price of $82,467—a substantial 32.4% discount compared to the $122,057 paid by traditional homeowners. This quarter’s activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, including 10 new single-property landlords entering the market. While all landlords are net buyers with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 6.0x (12 buys vs 2 sells), institutional activity remained neutral in Year 2025 (1 buy, 1 sell), further highlighting the grassroots nature of investment in the county.

The Monroe County housing market is therefore primarily shaped by the decisions of numerous small investors, rather than large institutional players. This market structure implies a high degree of local influence and responsiveness to community-level dynamics. The consistent discount secured by landlords suggests a strategic approach to acquisitions, while the continuous influx of new mom-and-pop landlords indicates a resilient and attractive environment for small-scale real estate investment within Monroe County, OH. This localized strength offers a distinct counter-narrative to broader trends of corporate consolidation in other markets.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:10 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMonroe (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price