Meigs (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Meigs (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Meigs (OH)
5,554
Total Investors in Meigs (OH)
1,667
Investor Owned SFR in Meigs (OH)
1,417(25.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,578
SFR Owned
1,286
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
89
SFR Owned
134
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,417 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Meigs County with 96.5% ownership and lead Q4 acquisitions.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control 90.8% of Meigs County's 1,417 investor-owned SFR properties, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 96.5%. Landlords secured a substantial 51.9% discount in Q4 2025, buying properties for $87,833 while homeowners paid $182,658. Landlords are consistently net buyers with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors show no recent transaction activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords own 90.8% of Meigs County's 1,417 investor-owned SFR properties.
A dominant 98.7% of landlord-owned properties are rented, reflecting a strong rental focus. Among these, 1,105 properties were acquired with cash, while 312 are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 51.9% discount in Q4, paying $87,833 versus homeowner's $182,658.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly, showing a $94,825 gap in Q4 2025 compared to a $2,079 premium in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have seen a 9.6% decline from the 2020-2023 average of $97,165 to $87,833 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 22.2% of Q4 SFR purchases in Meigs County, acquiring 10 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated with 90.0% of all landlord purchases, totaling 9 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4, signaling a non-existent presence in recent acquisition activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control a dominant 96.5% of investor-owned SFR properties in Meigs County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 82.5% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.2% of investor-owned properties, signaling limited large-scale corporate ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership in Meigs County once portfolios exceed 5 properties (Tier 06-10).
Below 6 properties, individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 95.1% of single-property portfolios and 93.5% of two-property portfolios. Data on acquisition price differences between individual and company buyers by tier is unavailable.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 45769 leads Meigs County with 406 investor-owned properties, a 25.2% ownership rate.
Zip code 45783 shows the highest investor penetration at 59.5%, demonstrating concentrated landlord activity despite potentially lower property counts. Zip code 45779 appears as both a high-count (129 properties) and high-percentage (45.4%) area, indicating significant investor focus.
Historical Transactions
Meigs County landlords are consistently strong net buyers, with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords accumulated 16 properties while selling only 2 in Q4, and bought 68 properties against 10 sells in 2025. This shows a sustained period of portfolio expansion, further solidifying their market presence. Data on institutional investor transactions or average buy/sell prices is unavailable.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 23.5% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with 16 total.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) drove 93.8% of landlord transactions, totaling 15 purchases. Tier 02 investors paid the highest average price at $138,000, while Tier 01 paid $36,834. Institutional investors made no transactions in Q4.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords own 90.8% of Meigs County's 1,417 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Meigs County collectively own 1,417 SFR properties, constituting a significant 25.5% of the total 5,554 SFR properties in the market. This indicates a substantial presence of rental housing in the county.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned portfolio, holding 1,286 properties, which accounts for 90.8% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties represent a smaller share at 134 properties (9.5%).

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 1,398 out of 1,417, are non-owner-occupied and rented, signifying an extremely high rental-focused portfolio at 98.7%. This demonstrates landlords' primary objective is generating rental income rather than personal occupancy.

In terms of acquisition method for the investor-owned portfolio, 1,105 properties (78.0%) were cash purchases, highlighting a strong preference for unencumbered assets or significant capital deployment. The remaining 312 properties (22.0%) are financed, indicating a mix of investment strategies.

The distribution of landlord entities further reinforces individual dominance, with 1,578 individual landlords compared to just 89 company landlords. This represents 94.7% of all landlord entities being individuals, suggesting a robust 'mom-and-pop' market structure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 51.9% discount in Q4, paying $87,833 versus homeowner's $182,658.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Meigs County demonstrated a remarkable pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $87,833. This represents a substantial $94,825 discount, or 51.9% less than traditional homeowners who paid $182,658 for SFR properties.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable volatility throughout 2025. After securing a significant 47.3% discount in Q1 ($73,543 difference), landlords actually paid a 1.6% premium in Q2 ($2,079 difference), before reverting to a large discount in Q3 (41.7%) and Q4.

While landlord acquisition volumes for 2025 are listed as 0 in some data, the overall average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 was $113,757. Comparing Q4 2025 average acquisition price ($87,833) to the 2020-2023 average ($97,165) reveals a 9.6% decline in landlord acquisition costs.

The inconsistent pricing strategy or market conditions suggest that while landlords often find significant discounts, there are periods where their acquisition costs can align with or even exceed those of traditional homeowners, as seen in Q2 2025.

The dramatic Q4 discount of $94,825 highlights a strong capability among landlords to identify and acquire properties at significantly lower price points compared to the broader market in recent periods, possibly indicating distressed sales or off-market deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 22.2% of Q4 SFR purchases in Meigs County, acquiring 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Meigs County accounted for a significant portion of Q4 2025 SFR purchase activity, acquiring 10 properties out of a total of 45, representing a 22.2% market share. This indicates a consistent investor appetite for residential properties.

The landlord purchase activity was overwhelmingly driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 90.0% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 9 properties. This underscores the fragmented and local nature of the investor market in the county.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, purchasing 5 properties, which accounts for 50.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This tier also saw 8 new entities making purchases, indicating a steady influx of new individual investors into the market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4 2025. This highlights a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying activity in Meigs County for the quarter.

The distribution of Q4 purchases shows Tier 02 contributing 4 properties (40.0% of landlord purchases) by 3 entities, and one medium-large landlord (Tier 51-100) acquiring 1 property (10.0%). This further emphasizes the dominance of smaller portfolio sizes in current market activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control a dominant 96.5% of investor-owned SFR properties in Meigs County.
Detailed Findings

The landscape of investor-owned SFR properties in Meigs County is heavily tilted towards smaller portfolios, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) controlling an overwhelming 96.5% of the market. This equates to nearly all investor-owned housing being held by local, smaller-scale entities.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant segment, owning 1,187 properties, representing an extraordinary 82.5% of all investor-owned SFR. This highlights the crucial role of first-time or single-property investors in shaping the county's rental market.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, hold a minimal share of just 3 properties, accounting for a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned portfolio. This stark contrast challenges common narratives about widespread corporate landlord dominance in this specific geographic area.

The distribution beyond Tier 01 still shows concentration among smaller entities; for instance, Tier 02 holds 92 properties (6.4%) and Tiers 03-05 hold 99 properties (6.9%). Even within the mid-size categories, properties are few, with Tier 11-20 holding 15 properties (1.0%) and Tier 21-50 holding 26 properties (1.8%).

Data regarding acquisition prices by tier for all-time, Q4, or other timeframes was not available. Therefore, insights into price variations or trends across different investor sizes cannot be provided from the current dataset.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership in Meigs County once portfolios exceed 5 properties (Tier 06-10).
Detailed Findings

A clear shift in ownership type occurs as portfolio size increases in Meigs County. While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier.

Specifically, in the Tier 06-10 category, companies own 6 properties (54.5%) compared to individuals who own 5 properties (45.5%). This marks a critical crossover point where corporate entities begin to outnumber individual owners in property holdings.

For smaller tiers, individual ownership is overwhelmingly dominant. In the single-property (Tier 01) segment, individuals hold 1,132 properties (95.1%), while companies own only 58 (4.9%). Similarly, for two-property (Tier 02) owners, individuals control 86 properties (93.5%) against companies' 6 properties (6.5%).

Even in the slightly larger small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, individuals maintain a strong majority with 71 properties (71.7%) compared to companies with 28 properties (28.3%), indicating their prevalence across most smaller portfolio sizes.

Information regarding the specific property counts for institutional investors (Tier 09) broken down by individual vs company ownership was not provided in this section. Additionally, data on how acquisition prices differ between individual and company buyers within each tier is unavailable, preventing insights into varied pricing strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 45769 leads Meigs County with 406 investor-owned properties, a 25.2% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Meigs County shows distinct geographic concentrations at the zip code level. The 45769 zip code leads the county with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 406, which accounts for 25.2% of its SFR market.

Following closely in investor property counts are zip codes 45760 with 226 properties (22.9% ownership rate) and 45771 with 216 properties (26.0% ownership rate). These areas represent the primary hubs for landlord property holdings within the county.

While some zip codes lead in sheer property counts, others exhibit higher investor ownership rates. Zip code 45783 stands out with an impressive 59.5% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating a very high density of rental housing.

Other zip codes with high investor penetration rates include 45720 at 54.5% and 45779 at 45.4%. This highlights specific sub-markets where investors hold a dominant share of the housing stock, catering to a potentially larger rental demand.

Notably, zip code 45779 features prominently in both top lists, ranking 4th by property count (129 properties) and 3rd by ownership percentage (45.4%). This signals a highly active and sought-after area for investors, balancing both volume and market penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Meigs County landlords are consistently strong net buyers, with an 8.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Meigs County consistently demonstrate a strong net buyer position, actively expanding their portfolios across recent timeframes. In Q4 2025, they purchased 16 SFR properties while selling only 2, resulting in a robust 8.0x buy-to-sell ratio.

This trend of accumulation is sustained throughout the entire Year 2025, with landlords buying 68 properties and selling 10, achieving a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.8x. This signals a strategic focus on growth and long-term investment in the county's housing market.

Looking back, Year 2024 also exhibited significant landlord buying activity, with 77 purchases against 8 sales, yielding an even higher buy-to-sell ratio of 9.63x. This historical pattern confirms that landlords have been in a consistent acquisition phase over the past two years.

The consistent high buy-to-sell ratios indicate strong confidence among landlords in the Meigs County market, as they are actively absorbing properties rather than divesting. This sustained accumulation suggests a healthy demand for rental properties or attractive investment opportunities.

Despite the overall landlord activity, specific transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ properties) was not provided, precluding an analysis of their net position or how their behavior compares to the broader landlord market. Additionally, information regarding the percentage of landlord-to-landlord transactions or average buy/sell prices was unavailable from the provided dataset.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 23.5% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with 16 total.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Meigs County played a substantial role in the Q4 2025 transaction market, participating in 16 of the total 68 SFR transactions, representing a 23.5% share. This indicates their ongoing influence on market liquidity and property turnover.

Mirroring ownership and purchase trends, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the primary drivers of this activity, undertaking 15 of the 16 landlord transactions. This reinforces their position as the most active investor segment in the county.

A notable pattern emerges in average purchase prices by tier for Q4 2025. Tier 02 landlords paid the highest average price at $138,000, significantly more than Tier 01 landlords who acquired properties at an average of $36,834. A medium-large landlord (Tier 51-100) acquired their single property at $60,000.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied significantly by tier. While single-property and two-property landlords (Tiers 01 and 02) bought 0.0% of their Q4 properties from other landlords, the sole medium-large landlord (Tier 51-100) acquired their property entirely from another landlord (100.0%).

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions in Q4 2025, confirming their absence from both buying and selling activity in Meigs County for the quarter. This further emphasizes the market's reliance on smaller, local investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Meigs County, owning 96.5% and leading Q4 acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords in Meigs County own 1,417 SFR properties, representing 25.5% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold a commanding 90.8% (1,286 properties) of this portfolio, with companies owning 9.5% (134 properties).
Pricing
Landlords secured a substantial 51.9% discount in Q4 2025, paying $87,833 compared to homeowners' $182,658, a $94,825 difference. Average landlord acquisition prices from 2020-2023 ($97,165) to Q4 2025 ($87,833) show a 9.6% decline.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 10 SFR properties, accounting for 22.2% of all sales. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) drove 90.0% of these acquisitions, with 8 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.5% of investor-owned housing in Meigs County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% of the market, showcasing a highly fragmented ownership structure.
Ownership Type
Individual investors constitute the vast majority of landlords by entity count (94.7%), but companies take majority control of property holdings in portfolios with 6-10 properties. Individual investors own 95.1% of single-property portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.8x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (68 buys vs 10 sells), including an 8.0x ratio in Q4 (16 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors registered no transactions in Q4 2025, indicating their absence from recent activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Meigs County, OH, is overwhelmingly dominated by individual and small-scale investors. Landlords collectively own 1,417 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 25.5% of the county's total SFR market. Within this investor-owned portfolio, individual investors hold a commanding 90.8% (1,286 properties), while companies account for a mere 9.5% (134 properties). Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control an extraordinary 96.5% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone representing 82.5% of this segment, defying narratives of corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signals continued expansion and strategic acquisitions. Landlords captured 22.2% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 10 properties. A notable trend reveals landlords securing substantial discounts, paying $87,833 in Q4—a significant $94,825 (51.9%) less than traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords have been consistent net buyers throughout 2025, with a buy/sell ratio of 6.8x, demonstrating a sustained commitment to portfolio growth. The 8 new single-property landlords entering the market in Q4 highlight a healthy influx of new, small-scale investors.

Meigs County's housing market is largely driven by local, individual investors who are actively expanding their presence and securing properties at competitive prices. The minimal involvement of institutional investors underscores a market primarily shaped by smaller, agile players. This robust mom-and-pop activity, coupled with significant acquisition discounts and a high rental-focused portfolio, indicates a stable and attractive environment for smaller-scale real estate investment within Meigs County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:10 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMeigs (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions