Highland (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Highland (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Highland (OH)
11,012
Total Investors in Highland (OH)
2,459
Investor Owned SFR in Highland (OH)
1,978(18.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,257
SFR Owned
1,668
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
202
SFR Owned
341
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,978 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Highland County with 94.1% ownership, driving Q4 acquisitions.
Landlords own 1,978 SFR properties (18.0% of Highland County's market), with individuals holding 84.3% versus companies at 17.2%. Landlords captured 28.2% of Q4 sales at a 31.0% discount, primarily mom-and-pop buyers, while institutional investors held a minimal 0.6% share and were net sellers in Q3.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,978 SFR properties in Highland County, with individuals holding 84.3% of the portfolio.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 1,921 (97.1%), are rented, with 1,312 (66.3%) acquired via cash. Individual landlords outnumber companies by over 11-to-1 in entity count.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a substantial 31.0% discount in Q4, paying $151,474 versus homeowner average of $219,506.
Landlords consistently pay $68,032 to $80,934 less than homeowners, though the percentage discount narrowed from 36.1% in Q1 to 31.0% in Q4 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 18.0% from $128,387 (2020-2023) to $151,474 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 28.2% of Q4 SFR purchases in Highland County, acquiring 29 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) drove 93.1% of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors made no Q4 acquisitions. A significant 21 new single-property landlords entered the market in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned SFR in Highland County.
The single-property tier alone holds 75.9% (1,553 properties) of the market, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) control a mere 0.6% (12 properties). Data limitations prevent analysis of pricing differences by tier.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Tier 04 (6-10 properties), controlling 51.6% of properties in that tier.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 91.4% of Tier 01 properties, though their majority surprisingly reverses in Tier 05. There is no available data to compare acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within tiers.
Geographic Distribution
OH-Highland-45133 leads with 972 investor-owned properties, comprising 17.0% of its SFR market.
OH-Highland-45132 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 40.8%, demonstrating deep penetration in specific zip codes. Two zip codes, 45123 and 45171, feature in both the top 5 by count and by percentage.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Highland County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 4.0x (32 buys vs 8 sells).
All landlords consistently bought significantly more properties than they sold throughout 2024 and 2025. Institutional investors, while net buyers annually (2.0x ratio), briefly became net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 32 (20.9%) of all Q4 SFR transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers driving activity.
Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $189,557 in Q4, a striking $152,307 more than Tier 06-10 landlords ($37,250). Approximately 19-20% of Tier 01 and Tier 03-05 transactions were inter-landlord trades.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,978 SFR properties in Highland County, with individuals holding 84.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Highland County, OH, collectively own 1,978 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 18.0% of the total 11,012 SFR properties in the market. This significant market penetration highlights the investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned portfolio, holding 1,668 properties, which accounts for 84.3% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned properties comprise a smaller share, with 341 units making up 17.2%.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties are geared towards rental income, with 1,921 properties (97.1% of the portfolio) identified as rented. This indicates a strong focus on generating consistent rental cash flow within the investor segment.

Investor acquisition strategies reveal a preference for cash purchases; 1,312 (66.3%) of landlord-owned properties were acquired with cash, while 666 properties (33.7%) were financed. This suggests that a substantial portion of the landlord market in Highland County operates with significant liquid capital or a desire to avoid debt.

The landlord ecosystem is predominantly driven by individual investors, with 2,257 individual landlords compared to just 202 company landlords. This 11.17-to-1 ratio underscores the prevalent "mom-and-pop" structure of the investor market in Highland County, OH.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a substantial 31.0% discount in Q4, paying $151,474 versus homeowner average of $219,506.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Highland County, OH, demonstrated superior acquisition capabilities, paying an average of $151,474 for SFR properties. This represents a significant $68,032 discount, or 31.0% less, compared to traditional homeowners who paid $219,506 on average.

The pricing advantage for landlords has been consistently strong throughout 2025. While the percentage discount saw a slight narrowing from 36.1% in Q1 ($76,785 difference) to 31.0% in Q4 ($68,032 difference), landlords continue to acquire properties at substantially lower prices than traditional buyers.

Looking at historical trends, landlord acquisition prices have appreciated from a 2020-2023 average of $128,387 to $151,474 in Q4 2025. This 18.0% increase signals a growing value in investor-held assets in the region over the past few years.

The consistent, double-digit percentage discount across all quarters of 2025, ranging from 31.0% to 36.1%, highlights a persistent structural advantage for real estate investors. This suggests efficient sourcing, bulk buying power, or a focus on properties not typically targeted by traditional homeowners.

Despite a general upward trend in landlord acquisition prices from the pandemic era to 2025, the average price in Q4 2025 ($151,474) saw a slight decrease from the Q2 peak of $160,067. This subtle quarterly fluctuation indicates potential market cooling or shifting acquisition strategies among investors in the latter half of the year.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 28.2% of Q4 SFR purchases in Highland County, acquiring 29 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a substantial force in the Highland County, OH housing market during Q4 2025, accounting for 29 (28.2%) of the total 103 SFR purchases. This indicates a consistent investor presence, capturing nearly one-third of available properties in the quarter.

The Q4 purchasing activity was overwhelmingly dominated by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) acquiring 27 properties, representing an impressive 93.1% of all landlord purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no recorded purchases during this period, signaling a disengagement from the local market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) emerged as the most active segment, securing 19 properties, which alone constituted 65.5% of all landlord acquisitions. This high concentration highlights the continued entry and expansion of small-scale individual investors.

A notable 21 new single-property landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, underscoring the ongoing appeal of SFR investment for individual buyers in Highland County, OH. This influx suggests robust grassroots interest in real estate ownership for rental income.

Beyond the single-property tier, activity remained distributed among other smaller landlord segments, with Tier 03-05 (5 properties) and Tier 06-10 (2 properties) also contributing. The observed property-per-entity ratio of 1:1 for most tiers (excluding Tier 01) indicates that active entities often acquired one property during the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned SFR in Highland County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04 (1-10 properties), collectively control a dominant 94.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Highland County, OH. This underscores the grassroots nature of the local rental market, with small-scale investors holding the vast majority of rental housing.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment forms the backbone of the investor market, owning 1,553 properties, which represents an expansive 75.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This concentration highlights the prevalence of first-time or single-property investors in the region.

In stark contrast to the small landlord dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a minimal footprint in Highland County, controlling only 12 properties, which translates to a mere 0.6% of the investor-owned market. This challenges common perceptions about corporate dominance in local housing markets.

The distribution reveals a "fat tail" pattern, with ownership heavily concentrated in the smallest tiers. After Tier 01, the share drops significantly, with Tier 02 (6.6%) and Tier 03-05 (8.5%) contributing, before tapering off to minimal shares in larger tiers.

While the data provides a clear picture of ownership distribution, specific acquisition price variations by tier for current or historical periods are not available. This limits an in-depth analysis of how different-sized investors price their acquisitions in the market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Tier 04 (6-10 properties), controlling 51.6% of properties in that tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, accounting for 91.4% of single-property (Tier 01) landlord holdings, company ownership steadily increases through the initial tiers, signaling a shift in market structure as portfolio size grows.

A distinct crossover point occurs within Tier 04 (6-10 properties), where company investors become the majority owners, holding 32 properties (51.6%) compared to individuals' 30 properties (48.4%). This signifies that mid-sized portfolios are more likely to be managed under a corporate structure in Highland County, OH.

However, this trend of increasing company dominance with portfolio size is not linear. In Tier 05 (11-20 properties), individual investors surprisingly regain a substantial majority, owning 17 properties (81.0%) versus companies' 4 properties (19.0%). This unusual reversal suggests unique localized market dynamics or specific investment strategies that favor individuals in this particular mid-tier segment.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found in the single-property tier (Tier 01) at 91.4%, reinforcing the mom-and-pop foundation of the market. Conversely, Tier 04 (6-10 properties) exhibits the highest proportion of company concentration at 51.6%.

Despite the clear distinctions in ownership distribution across tiers, the available data does not provide insights into how acquisition prices differ between individual and company buyers within these specific tiers. This gap limits an in-depth analysis of their respective purchasing power or strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OH-Highland-45133 leads with 972 investor-owned properties, comprising 17.0% of its SFR market.
Detailed Findings

Within Highland County, OH, investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with OH-Highland-45133 leading significantly with 972 investor-owned SFR properties. This single zip code alone accounts for nearly half of all investor holdings in the county, making it a critical hub for rental housing.

While OH-Highland-45133 holds the highest count, OH-Highland-45132 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate, with a striking 40.8% of its SFR properties owned by landlords. This indicates a high saturation of investor activity in smaller, potentially niche, sub-markets within the county.

Further demonstrating concentration, the top five zip codes by investor property count—45133, 45123, 45142, 45135, and 45171—collectively account for 1,856 properties. This substantial concentration highlights where investor capital is primarily deployed across Highland County, OH.

A comparison of the top lists reveals that some zip codes, such as OH-Highland-45123 (494 properties, 23.2% rate) and OH-Highland-45171 (65 properties, 17.7% rate), are prominent in both investor property count and ownership percentage. This signifies areas where investors have both a large presence and a high market penetration.

Conversely, zip codes like OH-Highland-45155 (34.2%) and OH-Highland-45172 (31.4%) have very high investor ownership rates but do not appear in the top 5 by sheer property count. This implies that while these areas might have fewer total SFR properties, a much larger proportion of them are landlord-owned, indicating focused and deep market penetration by investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Highland County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 4.0x (32 buys vs 8 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Highland County, OH, are unequivocally net buyers, demonstrating sustained confidence in the market. In Q4 2025, they acquired 32 properties while selling only 8, resulting in a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 4.0x. This pattern of aggressive acquisition activity is consistent across all quarters of 2025.

Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a net buyer position, with 152 purchases against 41 sales, achieving a cumulative buy-to-sell ratio of 3.71x. This follows a similar trend in 2024, where 142 properties were bought versus 51 sold, yielding a 2.78x ratio, indicating a consistent growth strategy over the past two years.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) present a nuanced picture. While they were net buyers for both Year 2024 (2 buys vs 1 sell) and Year 2025 (4 buys vs 2 sells), a notable shift occurred in Q3 2025 where they briefly became net sellers, acquiring 1 property while divesting 2. This short-term selling behavior suggests tactical adjustments or portfolio rebalancing.

The consistent high buy-to-sell ratios for all landlords signal a healthy demand for SFR properties among investors in Highland County. The steady influx of new acquisitions suggests an expanding rental market and continued confidence in property value appreciation or rental yield potential.

The absence of data on inter-landlord transactions and average buy/sell prices for historical periods limits a deeper analysis into specific market dynamics like internal trading and implied profit margins over time. This information would further refine understanding of market liquidity and profitability for investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 32 (20.9%) of all Q4 SFR transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers driving activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in a notable 32 transactions in Q4 2025, comprising 20.9% of the total 153 SFR transactions in Highland County, OH. This indicates that while landlords are active, the majority of market turnover still involves non-investor parties.

Transaction volumes were predominantly driven by mom-and-pop landlords, with Tier 01 (single-property) leading with 21 transactions, representing 65.6% of all landlord-involved trades. Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transaction activity in Q4, reaffirming their minimal presence in this local market's current quarter.

A striking pattern emerges in average purchase prices by tier: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average of $189,557. This is a significant premium compared to larger mom-and-pop tiers, with Tier 06-10 landlords paying the lowest average of $37,250, creating a massive $152,307 price spread across investor segments.

Inter-landlord trading activity was most pronounced within the smaller tiers; 19.0% of Tier 01 transactions (4 properties) and 20.0% of Tier 03-05 transactions (1 property) involved purchases from other landlords. This indicates a segment of properties changing hands within the existing investor community.

The disparity in average purchase prices suggests differing acquisition strategies, where smaller, likely individual, investors may be purchasing higher-value, perhaps move-in ready, properties, while larger mom-and-pop landlords focus on distressed or lower-priced inventory for value-add opportunities.

The transaction activity in Q4 closely mirrors the overall ownership distribution, with Tier 01 remaining the most active both in terms of existing portfolio size and current market engagement. This consistency suggests a stable and active base of single-property landlords in Highland County, OH.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Highland County with 94.1% ownership, driving Q4 acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,978 SFR properties (18.0% of Highland County's market), with individual investors holding 1,668 (84.3%) and companies owning 341 (17.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 31.0% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $68,032 per property ($151,474 vs $219,506).
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 29 properties (28.2% of all sales), with 21 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors drove 93.1% of landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.1% of investor housing in Highland County, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.6%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (91.4% of Tier 01 holdings), but companies take majority control in Tier 04 (6-10 properties) at 51.6%.
Transactions
Landlords are robust net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (32 buys vs 8 sells), though institutional investors were net sellers in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The SFR market in Highland County, OH, is characterized by a strong and localized investor presence, with landlords owning 1,978 properties, representing 18.0% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,668 properties (84.3%), significantly outweighing company ownership at 341 properties (17.2%). The market's structure is predominantly "mom-and-pop," with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling an impressive 94.1% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors with over 1000 properties maintain a minimal 0.6% share, challenging common narratives of corporate landlord dominance.

Investor behavior in Highland County, OH, signals continued confidence and strategic acquisitions. Landlords were net buyers in Q4 2025, executing 32 purchases against 8 sales, resulting in a robust 4.0x buy-to-sell ratio. They consistently secured a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of $151,474 in Q4—a 31.0% discount ($68,032) compared to traditional homeowners. Q4 acquisition activity was spearheaded by mom-and-pop landlords, who accounted for 93.1% of all landlord purchases, with 21 new single-property landlords entering the market. Interestingly, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $189,557, suggesting a focus on higher-value inventory, while larger mom-and-pop tiers secured lower-priced properties.

These findings collectively paint a picture of a vibrant, localized investor market in Highland County, OH, driven by individual and small-scale entities. The strong net buying position and consistent pricing advantage indicate a healthy investment environment, particularly for mom-and-pop landlords. The significant market penetration in certain zip codes, such as OH-Highland-45132 with 40.8% investor ownership, suggests a deeply entrenched investor ecosystem. While institutional players have a limited role, the sustained activity of smaller investors underscores their critical contribution to the rental housing supply and overall market dynamics in Highland County, OH.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:58 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHighland (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4