Valley (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Valley (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Valley (NE)
1,116
Total Investors in Valley (NE)
368
Investor Owned SFR in Valley (NE)
313(28.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
323
SFR Owned
266
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
45
SFR Owned
52
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 313 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pops dominate NE-Valley SFR market, owning 99.7% amid zero Q4 activity.
Landlords own 313 SFR properties, comprising 28.0% of the NE-Valley's market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.7% of investor-owned homes. Q4 2025 recorded zero landlord purchases, yet benchmark data indicates a 48.9% landlord price discount over homeowners. While 2024 saw landlords as net buyers, Q4 2025 shows complete market inactivity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 313 SFR properties, with individuals holding 85.0% and companies 16.6%.
Nearly all landlord properties (310 of 313) are rented, entirely acquired with cash. Individual landlords comprise 87.8% of entities, significantly outnumbering company landlords by a 7:1 ratio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords made zero acquisitions in 2024 and 2025 in NE-Valley county.
Despite no recent purchases, hypothetical landlord acquisition prices in Q2 2025 ($110,500) showed a 48.9% discount ($105,670) compared to homeowner prices ($216,170). This potential discount was consistent with Q1 2025's 46.8% gap.
Current Quarter Purchases
NE-Valley county recorded zero landlord and total SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
The market experienced complete inactivity for Q4 2025, with no properties acquired by landlords, mom-and-pop, or institutional investors. This confirms a halt in new acquisition activity for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFR in NE-Valley county.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominate with 80.3% of holdings, while institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence. The market is exclusively composed of smaller investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all tiers, holding 72.7% to 100% of properties in each category.
There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners, even in the largest represented tier (3-5 properties). Companies show a maximum presence of 27.3% in the 3-5 property tier, while being entirely absent in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 68862 leads in investor-owned properties with 181, while 68859 has the highest rate at 52.4%.
Zip codes 68859 and 68815 show high investor penetration rates at 52.4% and 48.1% respectively, indicating significant landlord presence in over half of their SFR housing. Zip code 68837 has minimal investor activity with only 4 properties and an 18.2% rate.
Historical Transactions
NE-Valley landlords were significant net buyers in 2024, acquiring 15 properties while selling only 2.
This resulted in a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5x for all landlords, indicating a period of accumulation. No data is available for institutional transactions or for Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Q4 2025 saw zero SFR transactions in NE-Valley county, with no landlord activity.
Both total SFR transactions and landlord-specific transactions were completely absent. This indicates a frozen market for new purchases during the current quarter across all investor tiers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 313 SFR properties, with individuals holding 85.0% and companies 16.6%.
Detailed Findings

The NE-Valley county market features 313 investor-owned SFR properties, representing 28.0% of the total 1,116 SFR properties in the area. This indicates a significant presence of investors in the local housing stock.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the ownership landscape, holding 266 properties (85.0%) compared to companies which own 52 properties (16.6%). This split emphasizes that the market is largely shaped by smaller, individual investors rather than corporate entities (note: percentages for individual and company ownership as provided reflect distinct property counts, not mutually exclusive categories, hence sum exceeds 100%).

The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 310 out of 313, are rented, affirming the strong focus on rental income within landlord portfolios. This suggests a stable, income-generating segment of the housing market.

A striking finding is that all 313 investor-owned properties were acquired through cash transactions, with 0 properties being financed. This points to a highly liquid and financially robust investor base in the NE-Valley county, less reliant on traditional lending for acquisitions.

In terms of entities, individual landlords comprise 323 of the total 368 landlords (87.8%), significantly outnumbering the 45 company landlords (12.2%). This 7.2:1 ratio of individual to company landlords further solidifies the market's mom-and-pop character.

The complete absence of financed properties for landlords, coupled with 310 properties being rented and all 313 acquired with cash, highlights a market where investors operate with substantial capital, reducing exposure to interest rate fluctuations and demonstrating a strong preference for unencumbered assets for rental purposes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords made zero acquisitions in 2024 and 2025 in NE-Valley county.
Detailed Findings

A notable trend in the NE-Valley county is the complete absence of landlord acquisition activity, with 0 properties purchased in both Year 2024 and Year 2025, including Q1 and Q2 2025. This signals a highly illiquid market or a period of divestment/holding for investors, contradicting broader narratives of active investor buying.

Although actual landlord acquisitions were absent in Q1 and Q2 2025, benchmark data suggests a significant pricing advantage for landlords in this market. In Q2 2025, landlords could potentially acquire properties for $110,500, a substantial 48.9% discount ($105,670) compared to the $216,170 average price paid by traditional homeowners.

This substantial price gap observed in Q2 2025 for hypothetical landlord acquisitions mirrors a similar trend in Q1 2025, where the landlord price of $120,000 was 46.8% ($105,625) lower than the homeowner price of $225,625. The consistent discount, even in the absence of purchases, suggests a structural pricing dynamic in the market.

The lack of any landlord acquisitions from 2020 through 2025 highlights a prolonged period of inactivity from a buying perspective. Average acquisition prices cited for these periods ($87,567 in 2024 and $88,920 in 2020-2023) would only be relevant if actual transactions had occurred.

The sustained inactivity in landlord acquisitions, contrasted with substantial price discounts compared to homeowners, indicates that even attractive pricing has not stimulated buying from investors in the NE-Valley county in recent years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
NE-Valley county recorded zero landlord and total SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The NE-Valley county market saw a complete cessation of SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025, with 0 total SFR purchases recorded. This includes zero purchases by landlords, highlighting a significant pause in market transactions.

Landlords accounted for 0.0% of the Q4 SFR market share due to their complete absence from buying. This indicates a period of extreme illiquidity for new investor entries or portfolio expansion in the current quarter.

Breaking down landlord activity further, both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded 0 purchases in Q4 2025. This pattern suggests that no investor segment was active in acquiring properties during this period.

The total absence of Q4 purchase data across all tiers underscores a market environment that is not currently attracting new investment. This could be due to various factors, including lack of inventory, unattractive pricing for sellers, or a wait-and-see approach from potential buyers.

The lack of any new landlords (Tier 01) entering the market in Q4 2025, as evidenced by 0 purchases in this tier, signifies that new individual investors are also not finding opportunities or choosing not to invest in the county at this time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.7% of all investor-owned SFR in NE-Valley county.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in NE-Valley county, controlling 99.7% of all 313 investor properties. This highlights a market structure heavily reliant on small-scale investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, holding 257 properties, which accounts for 80.3% of the total investor-owned SFR. This concentration indicates a strong presence of first-time or casual landlords.

Further reinforcing the small-investor focus, two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 34 properties (10.6%), while small landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) hold 19 properties (5.9%), and those with 6-10 properties (Tier 04) own 9 properties (2.8%).

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in the NE-Valley county, with 0.0% ownership. This stark absence positions the county as a counter-narrative to markets often perceived as being overrun by large corporations.

An interesting outlier is the single entity in the medium-large landlord category (Tier 05-08, specifically 51-100 properties) which owns 1 property, representing 0.3% of the total. This solitary presence does not alter the overall mom-and-pop dominance.

The distribution clearly illustrates that the NE-Valley county is a market of individual entrepreneurship in real estate, with nearly all SFR rental properties managed by small-portfolio owners, largely immune to the influence of large-scale corporate landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all tiers, holding 72.7% to 100% of properties in each category.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all observed investor tiers in NE-Valley county, consistently owning between 72.7% and 100% of properties within each tier. This underscores the highly individual-driven nature of the local market.

Specifically, in the single-property (Tier 01) category, individual investors own 220 properties (84.9%) compared to 39 properties (15.1%) held by companies. This pattern is consistent in the two-property (Tier 02) segment, where individuals hold 28 properties (82.4%) and companies 6 properties (17.6%).

Even in the relatively larger small landlord tier of 3-5 properties (Tier 03), individual investors still command the majority, holding 16 properties (72.7%) while companies own 6 properties (27.3%). This is the highest proportion of company ownership observed across any tier.

Notably, there is no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in any tier. This defies trends seen in more active markets where corporate entities often become dominant in larger portfolio sizes, further cementing the mom-and-pop character of NE-Valley county.

In the small landlord tier of 6-10 properties (Tier 04), individual investors own all 9 properties (100.0%), with no company presence at all. This highlights a clear preference or opportunity for individuals to scale their portfolios slightly without corporate competition in this specific size range.

The data clearly illustrates that, regardless of portfolio size within the small-to-mid range, the NE-Valley county market remains firmly in the hands of individual landlords, with companies playing a consistently minor role in property ownership across all tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 68862 leads in investor-owned properties with 181, while 68859 has the highest rate at 52.4%.
Detailed Findings

Within the NE-Valley county, investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes. The 68862 zip code leads by volume with 181 investor-owned properties, making it the primary hub for landlord activity by sheer count.

While 68862 has the highest count, zip code 68859 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at a remarkable 52.4%. This signifies that more than half of the SFR housing in 68859 is owned by landlords, revealing a dense concentration of rental properties.

Similarly, zip code 68815 also exhibits a very high investor penetration, with 48.1% of its SFR properties being investor-owned (63 properties). Together with 68859, these two zip codes are the most heavily landlord-penetrated areas within the county.

The rankings for count and percentage show a distinct pattern: 68862 leads in total properties but 68859 and 68815 lead in ownership rate. This indicates that 68862 is a larger market with more SFR properties overall, while 68859 and 68815 have a higher proportion of their existing stock dedicated to rentals.

In contrast to the highly concentrated areas, zip code 68837 shows significantly less investor activity, with only 4 investor-owned properties and a lower ownership rate of 18.2%. This suggests varying market attractiveness or availability for investors across different sub-geographies.

The top three zip codes by count (68862, 68859, 68815) collectively account for 309 of the 313 investor-owned properties in the entire county, representing 98.7% of landlord holdings. This extreme geographic concentration points to very specific micro-markets driving the county's investor landscape.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
NE-Valley landlords were significant net buyers in 2024, acquiring 15 properties while selling only 2.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in NE-Valley county were unequivocally net buyers in Year 2024, purchasing 15 properties while divesting only 2. This strong activity signifies a period of portfolio expansion and confidence in the local market by investors.

The buy/sell ratio for all landlords in 2024 stands at an impressive 7.5x (15 buys / 2 sells), highlighting a strong inclination towards acquiring assets rather than liquidating them. This positions landlords as key accumulators in the market during that year.

While landlord buy and sell prices are not provided for 2024 in this dataset, the substantial net buying activity suggests that market conditions, likely including pricing, were favorable enough to encourage significant acquisitions from existing landlords.

Notably, there is no historical transaction data available for institutional investors (Tier 1000+) for any timeframe. This further supports the finding that the NE-Valley county market is not significantly influenced by large corporate players.

The absence of transaction data for Q4 2025 and earlier quarters beyond 2024 limits the ability to track recent trends. However, the 2024 activity demonstrates that when transactions occur, landlords have shown strong buying intent.

The 2024 transaction data reveals a clear picture of active asset accumulation by landlords, contrasting with the complete absence of activity observed in 2025. This suggests a sharp shift in market dynamics between the two years.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Q4 2025 saw zero SFR transactions in NE-Valley county, with no landlord activity.
Detailed Findings

The NE-Valley county market experienced a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with 0 total SFR transactions recorded. This includes a full cessation of activity from landlords, who accounted for 0.0% of the market transactions.

The absence of any landlord transactions means that both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 purchases. This suggests a universal halt in new acquisition or disposition strategies across all investor sizes for the quarter.

With zero transactions, the average purchase prices for Tier 01 and Tier 09 investors are reported as $0, which accurately reflects the lack of any actual purchasing activity by these groups in Q4 2025.

This widespread inactivity contrasts sharply with the net buying observed in 2024, signaling a significant shift in market liquidity and investor behavior within the county over the past year.

The data clearly points to an extreme market environment in Q4 2025 where neither existing landlords nor potential new entrants engaged in any SFR property transactions in NE-Valley county.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pops dominate NE-Valley SFR market, owning 99.7% amid zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 313 SFR properties, representing 28.0% of the NE-Valley's total SFR market, with individual investors holding 266 properties (85.0%) and companies 52 properties (16.6%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisitions were entirely absent in Q4 2025, though benchmark pricing in Q2 2025 showed landlords potentially paying $110,500, a 48.9% discount ($105,670) compared to homeowner prices of $216,170.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw zero total SFR purchases, resulting in 0.0% landlord purchase share and no new landlords entering the market in NE-Valley county. This reflects a complete halt in acquisition activity across all tiers.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of investor housing in NE-Valley county, while institutional investors (1000+) maintain a 0.0% presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio tiers in NE-Valley county, consistently owning 72.7% to 100% of properties, with no crossover point where companies become majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords were significant net buyers in 2024 with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio (15 buys vs 2 sells), but NE-Valley county recorded no transactions in Q4 2025. Institutional investor transaction data is unavailable.
Market Narrative

The NE-Valley county SFR market is characterized by profound mom-and-pop landlord dominance and extreme illiquidity in recent periods. Landlords collectively own 313 SFR properties, accounting for 28.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. Individual investors hold an overwhelming 85.0% (266 properties) of this portfolio, with companies owning a comparatively small 16.6% (52 properties). This market structure is further emphasized by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control 99.7% of all investor-owned properties, while institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible 0.0% presence in NE-Valley county.

Investor behavior in the NE-Valley county has seen a significant shift, marked by a complete absence of acquisition and transaction activity in Q4 2025. This contrasts with 2024, when landlords were net buyers with a robust 7.5x buy/sell ratio (15 buys vs 2 sells). While no actual landlord purchases occurred in Q4 2025, benchmark data from Q2 2025 suggests landlords could hypothetically acquire properties at a substantial 48.9% discount ($110,500 vs homeowner average of $216,170). The current quarter's zero transactions across all tiers, including new landlord entries, signals a frozen market for new investment in NE-Valley county.

The NE-Valley county presents a unique market driven almost entirely by small, cash-rich individual investors, with all 313 investor-owned properties acquired with cash and 310 of them rented. This highlights a highly resilient, income-focused segment of the housing market that is not reliant on financing. The extreme geographic concentration of investor properties within specific zip codes, like 68859 with a 52.4% ownership rate, further underlines a localized and distinct market dynamic. The complete halt in Q4 2025 activity, following a period of strong net buying in 2024, suggests a dynamic environment in NE-Valley county where investor engagement can quickly pivot, currently signaling a period of holding or caution.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:53 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyValley (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price