Pierce (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pierce (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pierce (NE)
2,325
Total Investors in Pierce (NE)
521
Investor Owned SFR in Pierce (NE)
443(19.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
468
SFR Owned
371
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
53
SFR Owned
85
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 443 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Pierce County, Actively Acquiring Properties at Significant Discounts
Landlords in Pierce County, NE, own 443 SFR properties, representing 19.1% of the market, with individual investors holding 83.7% of this portfolio. Small-scale mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.3% of all investor-owned housing. In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average of $74,510, a substantial 71.9% less than traditional homeowners, making 10 purchases and remaining net buyers with a 13.0x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 83.7% of Pierce County's 443 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Of these investor holdings, 97.3% are rented, underscoring a strong rental market focus, with 86 properties financed and 357 purchased with cash. Individual landlords represent a substantial 89.8% of all landlord entities in the county, totaling 468 individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Acquired Q4 Properties for 71.9% Less Than Homeowners in Pierce County, NE.
The average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 was $74,510, a $190,768 discount compared to homeowners' average of $265,278. This significant discount has fluctuated, with landlords paying a 25.2% premium in Q1 2025, but returning to substantial discounts in Q2 (-53.4%) and Q3 (-56.1%). Landlord acquisition activity for 2024 and 2025 has been extremely limited, with 0 reported purchases in 2025-Q4, 2025-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q1 and 2024-Q4, making recent average price data for landlords less representative of active market engagement.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 32.3% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Pierce County, NE.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 activity, making 80.0% of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases. Single-property landlords initiated 60.0% of these purchases, with 8 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 96.3% of Investor-Owned SFR in Pierce County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 67.3% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 311 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a mere 0.2% with only 1 property, indicating their minimal footprint in this county. Price data by tier for all-time, Q4, and 2024 was not provided in the summary.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the Small-Medium (11-20) Tier in Pierce County.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 91.2% of single-property (Tier 01) and 76.5% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. The transition occurs sharply, as companies control 75.0% of properties in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
NE-Pierce-68769 Leads With 157 Investor-Owned Properties in Pierce County.
The zip code NE-Pierce-68738 shows a striking 100.0% investor ownership rate despite not being a leader by count. This contrasts with NE-Pierce-68769, which has a high count of 157 properties and a 24.7% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
All Landlords Are Net Buyers with a 13.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025, While Institutions Remain Neutral.
Landlords in Pierce County, NE, completed 13 buys against 1 sell in Q4 2025, maintaining a strong net buyer position throughout 2025 (6.33x ratio) and 2024 (21.0x ratio). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced position with 1 buy and 1 sell in both 2025 and 2024, indicating neither accumulation nor divestment.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Were Involved in 26.5% of All Q4 Transactions in Pierce County, NE.
Landlords participated in 13 out of 49 total transactions in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) accounting for 11 of these. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $76,568, while institutional investors had no Q4 transactions. Only one transaction (100% for Tier 2) was identified as bought from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 83.7% of Pierce County's 443 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pierce County, NE, collectively own 443 SFR properties, constituting a significant 19.1% of the total SFR market in the county.

Individual landlords predominantly shape the market, owning 371 properties (83.7% of investor-owned SFR), while company-owned properties account for 85 (19.2%), indicating a strong presence of private investors.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 431 out of 443 (97.3%), are actively rented, confirming the rental-focused strategy of landlords in Pierce County, NE.

Cash acquisitions remain a popular strategy, with 357 properties purchased outright, contrasting with 86 properties that are financed, highlighting a preference for unleveraged holdings or efficient cash deployment.

Individual investors far outnumber companies as active landlords, with 468 individual landlord entities compared to just 53 company entities, showing that the market is overwhelmingly driven by smaller, private players.

The low number of financed properties (86) relative to cash purchases (357) suggests a market where capital liquidity is strong among investors, or where financing options are less utilized.

The high percentage of individual landlords (89.8% of 521 total landlords) signifies that mom-and-pop operations form the backbone of the rental market in Pierce County, NE, rather than institutional entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Acquired Q4 Properties for 71.9% Less Than Homeowners in Pierce County, NE.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Pierce County, NE, secured properties at an average price of $74,510, a remarkable $190,768 discount (71.9% less) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $265,278.

This significant price advantage for landlords represents a continuation of substantial discounts seen in recent quarters, including Q3 2025 (-$97,349 or 56.1%) and Q2 2025 (-$144,520 or 53.4%), signaling a consistent trend of favorable acquisitions.

However, the trend was not uniform throughout the year, as landlords faced a 25.2% premium in Q1 2025, paying an average of $357,492 against homeowners' $285,500, indicating market volatility early in the year.

The average acquisition price for landlords in Pierce County for Year 2025 stood at $197,840, reflecting a blend of quarterly fluctuations, while Year 2024 recorded a higher average of $337,430, suggesting a softening of landlord-specific acquisition prices over time.

A critical observation is the absence of reported landlord property acquisitions in Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025, Q1 2025, and Q4 2024 (each reporting 0 properties purchased), which challenges the direct interpretation of average acquisition prices during these periods for active market engagement.

Despite the lack of recent purchase volume from Landlords, the price comparisons with Homeowners from `section6-2.csv` consistently show landlords achieving lower acquisition costs in most recent quarters, suggesting that when properties are acquired, they are secured at a considerable discount.

Over a broader historical period, landlord acquisitions between 2020-2023 averaged $115,100, revealing significant price appreciation compared to the $197,840 average for Year 2025, even with limited activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 32.3% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Pierce County, NE.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pierce County, NE, completed 10 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing a significant 32.3% share of the total 31 SFR purchases in the market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the primary drivers of Q4 purchasing activity, acquiring 8 properties, which represents 80.0% of all landlord purchases in the quarter.

New entrants to the market were prominent, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing 6 properties and representing 8 distinct entities, signaling continued individual investment into the rental market.

In stark contrast to the activity of smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4 2025, indicating a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying during this period.

The remaining 20.0% of landlord purchases in Q4 came from small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20), who acquired 2 properties, further emphasizing the dominance of smaller portfolio holders in current market acquisitions.

With 8 distinct entities making 6 single-property purchases, the average properties per entity for Tier 01 in Q4 was 0.75, showing that some individual entities might be engaging in minimal portfolio expansion or initial investments.

The concentration of Q4 purchases heavily favors the lowest tiers, demonstrating that the market's current buying momentum is almost entirely fueled by individual and small-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 96.3% of Investor-Owned SFR in Pierce County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties, exert significant control over the investor-owned SFR market in Pierce County, NE, holding an overwhelming 96.3% of all such properties.

The vast majority of this market is dominated by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who collectively own 311 properties, accounting for 67.3% of the total investor-owned SFR in the county.

Small and mid-size landlords (Tier 02-04), with 2 to 10 properties, also contribute significantly, controlling an additional 29.1% of the market across 134 properties.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible presence in Pierce County, owning just 1 property, which represents a minimal 0.2% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio.

The distribution reveals a highly fragmented market with power concentrated in the hands of numerous small investors rather than large corporations.

While acquisition prices by tier were not available in this specific dataset, the sheer volume of properties held by smaller tiers suggests these investors are key drivers of market stability and activity in Pierce County, NE.

The total 462 properties across all tiers in this distribution section indicates a comprehensive view of the landlord-owned portfolio, further solidifying the dominance of mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the Small-Medium (11-20) Tier in Pierce County.
Detailed Findings

In Pierce County, NE, individual investors are the predominant owners in smaller portfolios, commanding 91.2% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings with 290 properties, compared to companies which hold 8.8%.

The trend of individual dominance continues through the two-property (Tier 02) and small landlord (Tier 03-05) tiers, where individuals own 76.5% (26 properties) and 70.6% (48 properties) respectively.

A significant shift in ownership structure emerges at the small landlord (Tier 06-10) level, where individual ownership reduces to 55.6% (20 properties), with companies increasing their share to 44.4% (16 properties).

The crossover point occurs distinctly at the small-medium (Tier 11-20) portfolio size, where companies become the clear majority, holding 75.0% of properties (12 properties) compared to individuals' 25.0% (4 properties), highlighting increased corporate presence in larger portfolios.

This pattern indicates that while initial investments are largely individual-driven, scaling up to larger portfolios typically involves a transition towards company ownership structures in Pierce County, NE.

The data does not provide specific acquisition price differences by owner type within each tier, but the clear ownership shift suggests varying investment strategies and capital structures among individual and company investors.

Institutional (1000+ property) data is not broken down by owner type in this section, but based on Section 8, they represent a minimal 0.2% of the overall market, indicating that even at the highest tiers, their impact is limited in Pierce County, NE.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NE-Pierce-68769 Leads With 157 Investor-Owned Properties in Pierce County.
Detailed Findings

In Pierce County, NE, the zip code NE-Pierce-68769 stands out with the highest concentration of investor-owned properties, totaling 157 properties and representing a 24.7% investor ownership rate.

Following closely in terms of property count, NE-Pierce-68767 records 116 investor-owned properties, with an ownership rate of 12.0%, indicating another significant area for investor activity in the county.

A unique insight is revealed in NE-Pierce-68738, which has an astounding 100.0% investor ownership rate, making it a fully investor-dominated micro-market within Pierce County, NE, despite potentially having a smaller total property count.

Other notable zip codes by ownership percentage include NE-Pierce-68747 at 35.9% and NE-Pierce-68765 at 25.4%, highlighting areas with particularly high landlord penetration even if total property counts are lower.

The data reveals a clear distinction between regions with high volumes of investor properties and those with high investor ownership rates, indicating diverse market dynamics across different zip codes within Pierce County, NE.

For instance, NE-Pierce-68781, with 1 investor-owned property, shows a 25.0% ownership rate, demonstrating that even a single property can significantly impact the rate in very small markets.

Acquisition prices across these sub-geographies are not provided in this dataset, but the varying concentrations suggest that market conditions and investor appeal differ considerably within Pierce County, NE.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All Landlords Are Net Buyers with a 13.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025, While Institutions Remain Neutral.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pierce County, NE, demonstrated a strong net buyer position in Q4 2025, executing 13 buy transactions against only 1 sell transaction, resulting in an impressive 13.0x buy/sell ratio.

This robust buying trend is consistent throughout Year 2025, with 57 total buys versus 9 sells, yielding a 6.33x buy/sell ratio, and was even more pronounced in Year 2024 with a 21.0x ratio (63 buys vs 3 sells), showing sustained landlord confidence and expansion.

In stark contrast to overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced transaction profile, with 1 buy and 1 sell in both Year 2025 and Year 2024, indicating a neutral stance with no net accumulation or divestment in Pierce County, NE.

The average buy and sell prices for all landlords were not provided in this summary, preventing a direct analysis of implied profit margins or pricing strategies over time.

The significant disparity between the high buy-to-sell ratio of all landlords and the neutral position of institutional investors suggests that market growth in Pierce County, NE, is predominantly driven by smaller, independent investors.

The consistent net buying behavior of landlords year-over-year indicates a resilient investment climate in the county, with investors actively expanding their portfolios rather than divesting.

There is no specific data on the percentage of buy or sell transactions originating from or going to other landlords (inter-landlord), limiting insights into market liquidity and trading patterns within the investor community.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Were Involved in 26.5% of All Q4 Transactions in Pierce County, NE.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pierce County, NE, played a significant role in Q4 2025, accounting for 13 of the total 49 SFR transactions, representing a 26.5% market share of all transactions.

Transaction volumes were concentrated among smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) responsible for 11 of the 13 landlord transactions, further underscoring their market activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded the highest number of transactions with 9, and also had the highest average purchase price among active tiers at $76,568, indicating strong individual entry into the market.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had no transactions recorded in Q4 2025, reinforcing their minimal and neutral presence in the county's transaction landscape.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only 1 transaction (for a two-property landlord, Tier 02) explicitly identified as bought from another landlord, suggesting that most landlord acquisitions come from non-landlord sellers.

The average purchase price varied across tiers, with small landlord (Tier 03-05) transactions averaging $70,000 and small-medium (Tier 11-20) averaging $87,500, showing different price points for different investor sizes.

The significant transaction activity from mom-and-pop tiers in Q4 reflects their ongoing engagement in portfolio adjustments or initial investments, contrasting sharply with the inactive institutional segment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominant, Actively Buying in Pierce County's Investor Market
Holdings
Landlords own 443 SFR properties in Pierce County, NE, representing 19.1% of the total SFR market; individual investors hold 371 properties (83.7%), while companies own 85 properties (19.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $74,510 in Q4 2025, securing properties at a substantial 71.9% discount ($190,768 less) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $265,278.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords make 10 purchases, representing 32.3% of all SFR sales, with 8 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market, driving the majority of activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.3% of investor housing in Pierce County, NE, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 83.7% of landlord-owned SFR properties, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties (75.0% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords in Pierce County, NE, are strong net buyers with a 13.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (13 buys vs 1 sell), while institutional investors maintained a neutral position, with 1 buy and 1 sell in Year 2025.
Market Narrative

Pierce County, NE, exhibits a highly fragmented real estate investor market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords dominating the landscape. Out of 443 investor-owned SFR properties, individuals hold a significant 83.7% (371 properties), while companies account for 19.2% (85 properties). This segment represents 19.1% of the total SFR market in Pierce County, NE, with an overwhelming 96.3% of investor-owned housing controlled by landlords with 1-10 properties, clearly signaling that smaller-scale investors are the primary force.

Landlord behavior in Q4 2025 shows active purchasing, with 10 acquisitions representing 32.3% of all SFR sales, driven largely by new single-property landlords, with 8 entities entering the market. A notable trend is the significant pricing advantage landlords secured in Q4, acquiring properties for an average of $74,510 – a 71.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $265,278. Landlords overall remained strong net buyers in Q4 with a 13.0x buy/sell ratio (13 buys vs 1 sell), contrasting with institutional investors who maintained a neutral transaction stance.

These patterns underscore a market where local, individual investors are actively expanding their portfolios, capitalizing on favorable pricing dynamics. The minimal presence and neutral activity of institutional investors suggest that Pierce County, NE, remains a market primarily shaped by small-scale, private investment. This robust activity from mom-and-pop landlords indicates a resilient rental market, driven by local capital and individual entrepreneurial efforts, despite fluctuating acquisition price trends throughout the year.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:41 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPierce (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price