Merrick (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Merrick (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Merrick (NE)
2,673
Total Investors in Merrick (NE)
701
Investor Owned SFR in Merrick (NE)
539(20.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
627
SFR Owned
437
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
74
SFR Owned
110
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 539 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Merrick County Amidst Minimal Institutional Activity
Landlords in Merrick County own 539 SFR properties, making up 20.2% of the local market, with mom-and-pop investors controlling an overwhelming 98.7% of the investor-owned housing. In Q4 2025, landlords made just 1 purchase, notably paying a 226.0% premium over homeowners, while institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Merrick County landlords collectively own 539 SFR properties, with individuals holding an 81.1% majority.
A significant 531 of these landlord-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income within Merrick County. While 84 properties are financed, 455 are held outright in cash, highlighting a preference for unencumbered assets among landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Merrick County landlords paid a 226.0% premium in Q4, acquiring properties for $735,000 versus homeowners at $225,458.
The landlord-homeowner price gap shows high volatility; after paying a 226.0% premium in Q4, landlords secured a 50.2% discount in Q3. This inconsistency, alongside periods of zero purchases, suggests highly localized and opportunistic buying patterns.
Current Quarter Purchases
Merrick County landlords accounted for just 2.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, with only 1 property acquired.
All landlord purchases in Q4 (100.0%) were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), with no institutional activity observed. This single purchase was attributed to 2 entities entering the single-property tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR housing in Merrick County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the vast majority, owning 76.4% of investor properties. The absence of institutional investors (Tier 09) highlights a market overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale portfolios.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in Merrick County at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 85.3% of holdings.
Individual investors dominate the single-property tier (89.5%), showing a clear preference for smaller portfolios. The shift to company majority ownership beyond 5 properties reveals a critical crossover point in investment strategy by entity type.
Geographic Distribution
NE-Merrick-68826 leads Merrick County with 269 investor-owned properties, while 68854 shows the highest ownership rate at 50.0%.
Three zip codes, NE-Merrick-68663, 68827, and 68628, appear in both the top 5 by count and top 5 by percentage, indicating significant and concentrated investor presence. NE-Merrick-68854 has the highest investor penetration (50.0%), suggesting a highly attractive market for investors relative to its total SFR inventory.
Historical Transactions
Merrick County landlords were net buyers in 2025 with a 3.5x buy/sell ratio; institutional investor transactions were absent.
In Q4 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status with 2 purchases against 1 sale. The year 2024 also saw landlords as net buyers, with 8 purchases compared to 4 sales, indicating a consistent trend of portfolio expansion over recent years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised a mere 3.3% of Q4 transactions in Merrick County, with just 2 total transactions.
All landlord transactions in Q4 were made by single-property (Tier 01) investors, who paid an average of $735,000, and none of these purchases were sourced from other landlords. Institutional investors showed no transaction activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Merrick County landlords collectively own 539 SFR properties, with individuals holding an 81.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

Merrick County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio stands at 539 properties, representing 20.2% of the county's total SFR market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 437 (81.1%) of all investor-held SFR properties, significantly outnumbering company-owned properties at 110 (20.4%). This suggests a market primarily driven by local, individual investors rather than large corporations.

The prevalence of individual landlords is further emphasized by entity counts, with 627 individual landlords compared to just 74 company landlords, establishing an 8.5:1 ratio of individual to company entities in the county.

A strong rental-focused strategy is evident as 531 of the 539 investor-owned properties are classified as rented, indicating that 98.5% of landlord holdings are actively generating rental income.

Landlords show a strong preference for cash acquisitions or unencumbered assets, with 455 properties held outright in cash compared to only 84 properties that are financed.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Merrick County landlords paid a 226.0% premium in Q4, acquiring properties for $735,000 versus homeowners at $225,458.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Merrick County landlords acquired properties at an average price of $735,000, representing a significant $509,542 premium or 226.0% more than traditional homeowners who paid $225,458.

This pricing dynamic shows extreme quarterly volatility; in contrast to Q4, landlords secured a substantial 50.2% discount in Q3 2025, paying $70,000 compared to homeowners' $140,462.

The price gap demonstrates inconsistency, with Q2 2025 showing a modest 5.5% landlord premium ($250,000 vs $236,891) and Q1 2025 showing an 85.0% premium ($335,000 vs $181,083).

Across 2025, the average acquisition price for landlords was $387,143, reflecting the sporadic yet impactful transactions. While specific purchase counts were very low for each quarter, the overall average for 2025 is higher than the $350,286 average for 2024.

Comparing broader timeframes, landlord acquisition prices have surged from an average of $124,040 during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom to $387,143 in 2025, an appreciation of 212.1%, albeit with very low transaction volumes.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Merrick County landlords accounted for just 2.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, with only 1 property acquired.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord activity was minimal in Merrick County, with only 1 SFR property purchased by landlords, constituting a small 2.9% share of the total 35 SFR purchases in the quarter.

The entire landlord purchasing activity for Q4 2025 was concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment (Tier 01-04), which made 100.0% of the landlord acquisitions.

Specifically, the single-property (Tier 01) category drove all landlord purchases, acquiring 1 property; this activity was associated with 2 distinct entities, indicating new or emerging landlords.

There was no recorded purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Merrick County during Q4 2025, reinforcing the dominance of smaller-scale investors.

The average properties per entity for Q4 acquisitions in Tier 01 was 0.5, given 1 property was purchased by 2 entities, which could suggest co-ownership or very small-scale individual entries into the market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.7% of investor-owned SFR housing in Merrick County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Merrick County's investor-owned housing market, controlling 98.7% of all such properties.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the market, holding 423 properties, which accounts for 76.4% of all investor-owned SFR.

Following Tier 01, the two-property (Tier 02) and small landlord (3-5 properties) tiers contribute significantly, holding 46 properties (8.3%) and 44 properties (7.9%) respectively, further solidifying small landlord influence.

In stark contrast to the small landlord dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no market share in Merrick County, with 0.0% of all investor-owned properties, defying common narratives of corporate land grabs.

Larger portfolio tiers (11-20 and 21-50 properties) represent a negligible portion of the market, with 1 property (0.2%) and 6 properties (1.1%) respectively, highlighting that investor concentration remains firmly with smaller entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in Merrick County at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 85.3% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level single-property (Tier 01) segment in Merrick County, holding 385 (89.5%) of properties, while companies own only 45 properties (10.5%).

This individual dominance persists through the two-property (Tier 02) tier, where individuals own 35 properties (76.1%) compared to companies with 11 properties (23.9%).

A clear crossover point occurs within the small landlord tiers; in the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a majority at 26 properties (59.1%) versus companies at 18 properties (40.9%).

However, by the 6-10 property tier, company ownership becomes the decisive majority, controlling 29 properties (85.3%), while individual holdings drop significantly to just 5 properties (14.7%).

This pattern indicates that while individuals are the primary drivers of small-scale investment, larger portfolios (6+ properties) in Merrick County are predominantly managed and owned by companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NE-Merrick-68826 leads Merrick County with 269 investor-owned properties, while 68854 shows the highest ownership rate at 50.0%.
Detailed Findings

NE-Merrick-68826 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity in Merrick County, harboring 269 investor-owned properties, which represents 18.2% of its total SFR housing stock.

While 68826 has the highest count, NE-Merrick-68854 demonstrates the highest concentration of investor ownership, with a remarkable 50.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, despite likely having a smaller overall SFR inventory.

Zip codes like NE-Merrick-68663 (60 properties, 29.9% rate), NE-Merrick-68827 (52 properties, 27.5% rate), and NE-Merrick-68628 (72 properties, 26.9% rate) show strong performance in both total investor properties and investor ownership rates, signifying dense investor markets.

The geographic distribution reveals distinct patterns: certain zip codes attract a high volume of investors (e.g., 68826), while others exhibit a high penetration rate within their smaller markets (e.g., 68854).

Comparing the top regions, NE-Merrick-68864 has 60 investor-owned properties with a 23.9% ownership rate, showcasing consistent investor presence across multiple areas of Merrick County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Merrick County landlords were net buyers in 2025 with a 3.5x buy/sell ratio; institutional investor transactions were absent.
Detailed Findings

Merrick County landlords collectively maintained a strong net buyer position in 2025, with 7 buy transactions versus only 2 sell transactions, yielding a significant 3.5x buy-to-sell ratio.

This trend continued into Q4 2025, where landlords recorded 2 buys against 1 sell, further expanding their portfolios.

Over the past two years, landlords have consistently been net buyers; in 2024, they completed 8 buy transactions and 4 sell transactions, reflecting an active accumulation strategy.

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, there was no recorded transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) throughout any of the analyzed timeframes, suggesting a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying or selling in Merrick County.

The quarterly transaction data shows some fluctuation, with Q3 2025 being neutral (1 buy, 1 sell), but the yearly totals confirm landlords are generally accumulating properties in this market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised a mere 3.3% of Q4 transactions in Merrick County, with just 2 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord activity represented a minimal portion of the overall market in Merrick County, participating in only 2 of the 60 total SFR transactions, a share of just 3.3%.

The entire landlord transaction volume for Q4 was driven by the single-property (Tier 01) segment, which accounted for both recorded landlord transactions.

Single-property landlords acquired these properties at a substantial average price of $735,000, indicating that new or small-scale investors are active even at higher price points in this quarter.

Notably, none of the Q4 landlord transactions involved buying from other landlords, with 0.0% of properties sourced this way, suggesting that current landlord acquisitions are primarily from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions in Q4 2025, emphasizing that transaction activity in Merrick County is exclusively concentrated among small-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Steadily Accumulate Holdings Amidst Merrick County's Volatile Market
Holdings
Landlords in Merrick County own 539 SFR properties, making up 20.2% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors hold the dominant share with 437 properties (81.1%), compared to 110 properties (20.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid a significant $509,542 premium (226.0%) over homeowners, with average prices of $735,000 vs $225,458, yet the price gap has been highly volatile, with landlords securing a 50.2% discount in Q3.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords make only 1 purchase, comprising 2.9% of all SFR sales, with 2 new single-property landlord entities entering the market and driving all landlord acquisition activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of investor-owned housing in Merrick County, demonstrating that mom-and-pop investors are the market's primary drivers, while institutional investors (1000+ tier) hold no market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (89.5% of single-property holdings), but companies take majority control in Merrick County portfolios exceeding 5 properties, specifically holding 85.3% of properties in the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Overall, Merrick County landlords were net buyers in 2025 with a 3.5x buy/sell ratio (7 buys vs 2 sells), indicating continued portfolio expansion; institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

Merrick County's real estate investor landscape is unequivocally dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These individual investors collectively own 539 SFR properties, representing 20.2% of the total SFR market within the county. This significant market penetration is largely attributed to individual owners, who account for 81.1% of all investor-held properties, with an impressive 98.7% of the total investor-owned portfolio concentrated in landlords owning 1 to 10 properties. Institutional investors, contrary to broader national trends, hold no discernible market share in Merrick County, reinforcing its character as a local, community-driven investment environment.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by exceptionally low transaction volume, with landlords accounting for just 1 purchase, or 2.9% of total SFR sales. Despite this minimal activity, the Q4 purchase price for landlords was notably higher than for homeowners, showing a 226.0% premium, an outlier possibly due to a unique property or low transaction count. Historical data, however, reveals highly volatile pricing, with landlords securing significant discounts in previous quarters, indicating opportunistic buying. The market saw 2 new single-property landlord entities enter in Q4, driving all observed landlord acquisition activity, while institutional investors remained entirely dormant, registering no transactions throughout the year.

The overall market in Merrick County signals a steady accumulation by small landlords, who consistently maintained a net buyer position in 2025. This sustained, albeit low-volume, buying activity by local investors, combined with the complete absence of institutional participation and volatile pricing, defines a unique and resilient investment dynamic. Geographic analysis further highlights this localized activity, with zip codes like NE-Merrick-68854 showing particularly high investor penetration rates, underscoring the granular and community-focused nature of real estate investment across Merrick County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:37 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMerrick (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price