Blaine (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Blaine (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Blaine (NE)
78
Total Investors in Blaine (NE)
66
Investor Owned SFR in Blaine (NE)
45(57.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
62
SFR Owned
42
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4
SFR Owned
4
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 45 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Blaine County's Dormant Investor Market: 100% Mom-and-Pop with Zero Recent Activity
Blaine County, NE, shows a highly concentrated investor market where 45 SFR properties, representing a significant 57.7% of the total SFR market, are landlord-owned. This market is exclusively dominated by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, with no institutional presence and notably, zero acquisition or transaction activity recorded in Q4 2025, 2024, or 2020-2023. All investor-owned properties are cash-purchased and rented, indicating a stable, long-term holding pattern with no recent churn.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Blaine County's 45 investor-owned SFR properties are 93.3% individual-owned, with zero financed holdings.
All 45 investor properties are held outright with cash, reflecting a unique market where 100.0% of landlord-owned SFR are rented. Individual landlords represent 93.9% of all 66 landlord entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Blaine County shows zero landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, 2024, and 2020-2023, indicating a dormant market.
With no recorded landlord acquisition activity across recent years, there's an absence of pricing trends or comparisons between landlord and homeowner purchases. The market has seen no new landlord entries through acquisitions in these timeframes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Zero SFR purchases by landlords or any buyers in Q4 2025 signifies a completely inactive market.
With no Q4 purchases, there's no activity from mom-and-pop landlords or institutional investors to compare. This quarter saw no new landlord entries across any tier.
Ownership by Tier
Blaine County's investor market is 100.0% mom-and-pop, with no institutional presence or recent price data.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominate, holding 84.4% of investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 38 properties. Due to market inactivity, there are no observable acquisition price variations by tier or recent growth patterns.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all tiers in Blaine County, owning 92.3% of single-property and 85.7% of two-property holdings.
Companies never achieve majority ownership in any tier, with their highest concentration at 14.3% in Tier 2. The complete lack of recent acquisition data prevents any analysis of growth patterns or price differences between individual and company buyers.
Geographic Distribution
NE-Blaine-68821 leads Blaine County with 70.6% investor-owned properties, highlighting concentrated local landlord activity.
Zip code NE-Blaine-68833 has the highest count of investor-owned properties at 31, with an ownership rate of 58.5%. All regions within Blaine County show significant investor penetration, with rates ranging from 16.7% to 70.6%.
Historical Transactions
Blaine County recorded zero historical landlord buy or sell transactions, signaling a completely stagnant market over time.
The absence of any transaction data means no buy/sell ratios, inter-landlord trading percentages, or average price comparisons can be derived. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) also show zero historical transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero total transactions in Q4 2025 means landlords had no activity, reinforcing a stagnant market.
Without any Q4 transactions, there's no data to compare pricing across investor tiers or analyze inter-landlord trading activity. Both mom-and-pop and institutional segments show zero Q4 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Blaine County's 45 investor-owned SFR properties are 93.3% individual-owned, with zero financed holdings.
Detailed Findings

Landlord-owned SFR properties constitute a significant majority in Blaine County, accounting for 45 of the 78 total SFR properties, translating to a high 57.7% investor penetration rate.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor market, holding 42 (93.3%) of the 45 investor-owned SFR properties, while companies own a mere 4 (8.9%). This indicates a strong mom-and-pop investor base.

All 45 landlord-owned properties are designated as 'Rented' and entirely 'Cash' properties, with no properties being financed. This highlights a market preference for full equity ownership among investors, completely devoid of debt financing.

The ownership structure by entity type further emphasizes individual control; out of 66 total landlords, 62 (93.9%) are individuals, and only 4 (6.1%) are companies. This confirms a highly localized and individual-centric investment landscape.

The complete absence of financed properties for any owner type within the landlord portfolio suggests a long-term, low-leverage investment strategy, making the market less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Blaine County shows zero landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, 2024, and 2020-2023, indicating a dormant market.
Detailed Findings

Blaine County has experienced a complete absence of landlord acquisition activity in recent years, with 0 properties purchased in Q4 2025, 2024, and the 2020-2023 pandemic boom period. This starkly indicates a dormant market for new investor entries.

Due to the lack of recent purchase data, no comparative analysis can be made regarding landlord acquisition prices versus traditional homeowner prices, as there were no transactions to establish current price gaps or trends.

The market's inactivity over several key timeframes (Q4 2025, Year 2024, and 2020-2023) means there are no observable price appreciation or decline trends specific to landlord acquisitions in Blaine County.

The complete halt in acquisitions suggests either extreme market saturation, lack of available inventory, or a deliberate pause in investment activity within this specific county.

This sustained period of zero acquisitions is a critical finding, differentiating Blaine County significantly from more active real estate investor markets across the nation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Zero SFR purchases by landlords or any buyers in Q4 2025 signifies a completely inactive market.
Detailed Findings

Blaine County recorded a total of 0 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, which translates to 0 landlord purchases and 0 non-landlord purchases, indicating a completely inactive real estate sales market for SFR properties during this period.

The absence of any Q4 purchases means there was no activity from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) or institutional investors (Tier 09), as both categories show 0 purchases and 0.0% contribution to landlord acquisitions.

This zero-activity quarter means no new landlords entered the market through acquisitions in Q4 2025, and no entities were active across any purchase tier.

The Q4 data reinforces the trend of market dormancy observed in broader historical acquisition data, with no new properties changing hands via purchase transactions in this period.

The complete lack of Q4 transactions highlights a market with no recent churn or investment interest, standing in stark contrast to more dynamic real estate markets.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Blaine County's investor market is 100.0% mom-and-pop, with no institutional presence or recent price data.
Detailed Findings

Blaine County's investor market is exclusively composed of mom-and-pop landlords, with Tiers 01-04 controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned SFR properties and no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09).

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 38 properties, which accounts for a dominant 84.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing.

The remaining 15.6% of the market is held by two-property landlords (Tier 02), who own 7 properties, indicating that Blaine County's investor landscape is characterized by very small-scale portfolios.

The absence of any recorded acquisition prices by tier, whether All Time, Q4, 2024, or 2020-2023, confirms the overall market dormancy and lack of recent purchasing activity.

This unique tier distribution, with only Tiers 01 and 02 represented, strongly counters broader market narratives that often highlight institutional investor influence, as such entities are entirely absent in Blaine County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all tiers in Blaine County, owning 92.3% of single-property and 85.7% of two-property holdings.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate both existing tiers in Blaine County, holding 36 properties (92.3%) in Tier 01 and 6 properties (85.7%) in Tier 02, signifying their pervasive control across the small landlord segment.

Companies maintain a minority presence across all tiers, owning 3 properties (7.7%) in Tier 01 and 1 property (14.3%) in Tier 02. There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners, reflecting the market's individual-centric nature.

Due to the lack of any recorded pricing data or acquisition activity for Q4, 2024, or 2020-2023, it is impossible to analyze how individual versus company acquisition prices may differ within each tier or compare their growth patterns over time.

The market structure in Blaine County is distinct, characterized by the near-exclusive presence of individual, small-scale investors, with virtually no corporate or institutional influence in property ownership.

This consistent individual dominance reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' characterization for Blaine County's entire investor market across all existing portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NE-Blaine-68821 leads Blaine County with 70.6% investor-owned properties, highlighting concentrated local landlord activity.
Detailed Findings

Within Blaine County, the zip code NE-Blaine-68821 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate, with a substantial 70.6% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating a high concentration of rental properties in this specific area.

NE-Blaine-68833 accounts for the largest volume of investor-owned properties, totaling 31, which represents a significant 58.5% of its local SFR market. This makes it the primary hub for investor activity by count within the county.

The remaining zip codes, NE-Blaine-68813 and NE-Blaine-69157, also show notable investor penetration rates of 50.0% (1 property) and 16.7% (1 property) respectively, indicating that investor presence is spread across multiple sub-geographies within Blaine County.

Interestingly, the zip code with the highest percentage of investor ownership (NE-Blaine-68821 at 70.6%) is not the one with the highest absolute count (NE-Blaine-68833 at 31 properties), suggesting differing market sizes and saturation levels within the county.

Overall, Blaine County demonstrates consistently high investor ownership rates across its sub-geographies, with all listed zip codes showing a minimum of 16.7% of their SFR properties owned by landlords, far exceeding national averages.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Blaine County recorded zero historical landlord buy or sell transactions, signaling a completely stagnant market over time.
Detailed Findings

Blaine County exhibits a complete lack of historical landlord transactions, with 0 buy and 0 sell activities recorded for all landlords across all timeframes. This indicates a highly illiquid or long-term holding market where properties rarely change hands.

The absence of any transaction data means that fundamental metrics such as the buy/sell ratio, the percentage of inter-landlord transactions, or implied profit margins from average buy vs. sell prices cannot be determined.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) mirror the overall market trend with 0 buy and 0 sell transactions historically, reinforcing the complete lack of large-scale corporate investment activity in Blaine County.

This sustained period of zero transactions, both overall and for institutional players, strongly suggests that once properties are acquired by landlords, they are held for extended periods without re-entering the market.

The profound market inactivity for transactions contrasts sharply with the high percentage of existing investor-owned properties, implying a market dominated by stable, long-term rental portfolios rather than active trading.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero total transactions in Q4 2025 means landlords had no activity, reinforcing a stagnant market.
Detailed Findings

Blaine County recorded 0 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, resulting in 0 landlord transactions and a 0.0% landlord share. This confirms a complete halt in market activity for the current quarter.

The absence of Q4 transactions extends to all investor tiers, with both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) segments showing 0 transactions, signifying no purchasing or selling by any investor type.

Given the zero transaction volume, no average purchase prices by tier can be calculated, nor can any analysis be performed on inter-landlord trading activity or price spreads between tiers.

The Q4 transaction data aligns with historical trends of inactivity, highlighting a market where properties are held long-term rather than frequently transacted.

This complete market dormancy for transactions is a critical finding, indicating a lack of new supply or demand influencing property values and ownership changes in Blaine County for the current period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Blaine County's Dormant SFR Market: 100% Mom-and-Pop, Zero Recent Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 45 SFR properties, representing a significant 57.7% of Blaine County's total SFR market, with individual investors holding 42 (93.3%) and companies owning 4 (8.9%).
Pricing
Blaine County recorded zero landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, 2024, or 2020-2023, leaving no data to compare landlord prices against homeowners or discern any pricing trends.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw zero SFR purchases by any buyer type in Blaine County, indicating a completely inactive market with no new landlord formation.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 100.0% of investor housing in Blaine County, with single-property owners (Tier 01) dominating at 84.4%, and no institutional investor (Tier 09) presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all existing tiers in Blaine County, comprising 92.3% of Tier 01 and 85.7% of Tier 02 holdings, meaning companies never achieve majority ownership.
Transactions
Blaine County landlords registered zero historical buy or sell transactions, establishing a completely stagnant market with no buy/sell ratio, and institutional investors also show zero transactions.
Market Narrative

Blaine County, Nebraska, presents a unique real estate investor landscape characterized by high market penetration and extreme dormancy. A significant 57.7% of the county's 78 total SFR properties are landlord-owned, translating to 45 properties. This market is almost exclusively controlled by individual, mom-and-pop investors, who hold 93.3% of these properties, with companies owning a mere 8.9%. Furthermore, the entire investor portfolio consists of cash-purchased and rented properties, indicating a long-term, debt-free holding strategy and a market completely devoid of any institutional presence.

Despite this high existing investor presence, Blaine County has experienced a complete halt in investor activity for new acquisitions and transactions. There were zero landlord acquisitions recorded in Q4 2025, throughout 2024, and even during the 2020-2023 pandemic boom period. This stark inactivity means no pricing comparisons can be made between landlords and homeowners, nor are there any discernable trends in price appreciation or decline. The Q4 2025 also showed zero total SFR transactions, reinforcing a market where properties, once acquired, are held for extended periods with no churn or new investment interest across any tier.

The data from Blaine County clearly signals a highly stable, albeit stagnant, market where established individual landlords maintain long-term, debt-free portfolios. The complete absence of recent acquisition or transaction activity, combined with 100% mom-and-pop ownership and no institutional involvement, paints a picture of a mature market with minimal new entries or exits. This stands in stark contrast to more dynamic real estate markets, suggesting that Blaine County's housing landscape is less influenced by broader investment trends and more by long-term individual ownership.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:00 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBlaine (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct