Stutsman (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stutsman (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stutsman (ND)
6,434
Total Investors in Stutsman (ND)
1,505
Investor Owned SFR in Stutsman (ND)
1,312(20.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,444
SFR Owned
1,247
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
61
SFR Owned
73
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,312 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Stutsman County, Owning 98.8% of Investor Properties Amidst Zero Institutional Growth
Investors own 1,312 SFR properties in Stutsman County, ND, representing 20.4% of the market. The landscape is entirely controlled by small-scale investors, with individuals owning 95.0% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords, who were exclusively mom-and-pop entities, purchased 22.2% of all homes sold and are aggressively accumulating properties as strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,312 SFRs (20.4% of the market), with individual landlords holding a dominant 95.0% share.
The majority of investor properties, 1,087, are owned outright with cash, compared to just 225 that are financed. Of the 1,505 total landlords in the county, 1,444 are individuals. Rented properties make up the vast majority of the portfolio at 1,278 homes.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 46.2% premium over homeowners in Q4, an anomaly in a volatile, low-volume market.
The price relationship between landlords and homeowners is highly erratic, swinging from a 9.9% discount in Q3 to a 46.2% premium in Q4. This volatility, including a 184.1% premium in Q1, highlights a market driven by unique transactions rather than stable trends. There is no available data to compare individual versus company pricing.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.2% of all homes sold in Q4, with 100% of purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
All 14 properties purchased by investors were acquired by small landlords in Tiers 01-04. New, single-property landlords were the most active, buying 10 homes (71.4% of the investor total). No institutional investors (Tier 09) purchased any properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 98.8% of Stutsman County's investor-owned housing.
Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, which is 0.1% of the investor market. The largest segment by far is the single-property landlord tier, which alone accounts for 930 properties, or 68.2% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point to company-majority ownership.
In the 6-10 property tier, individuals still own 95.8% of homes (69 properties). Even in the smallest tier of single-property owners, companies only account for 4.3% of holdings. This data shows corporate ownership has not scaled in Stutsman County.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 58401 holding 875 properties.
While 58401 has the highest count, smaller zip codes show extreme investor penetration rates. For example, 100.0% of SFRs in 58475 are investor-owned, and 54.6% in 58483 are investor-owned, indicating these areas are primarily rental markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This net-buying trend has been consistent, with 75 properties bought versus 10 sold in 2025, and 83 bought versus 4 sold in 2024. In contrast, institutional investors were neutral in 2025, with 1 purchase and 1 sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with zero purchases from other landlords.
All 22 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04). Pricing varied significantly by tier, with two-property landlords paying an average of $774,000, likely due to an outlier, compared to $290,313 for single-property buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,312 SFRs (20.4% of the market), with individual landlords holding a dominant 95.0% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 20.4% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Stutsman County, with a total portfolio of 1,312 properties out of 6,434 total SFRs.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, small-scale landlords rather than corporations. Individuals own 1,247 properties, constituting 95.0% of the investor-owned market, while companies own just 73 properties (5.6%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,444 of the 1,505 total landlords (96.0%) are individuals, underscoring the mom-and-pop nature of the local rental market.

A strong preference for cash ownership is evident, with 1,087 properties (82.8%) held free and clear, compared to only 225 financed properties (17.2%). This suggests a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 1,278 properties classified as rented, confirming the primary business model for local property investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 46.2% premium over homeowners in Q4, an anomaly in a volatile, low-volume market.
Detailed Findings

In a stark deviation from typical market behavior, landlords in Stutsman County paid a significant premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $339,737 compared to $232,455 for traditional homeowners. This represents a $107,282, or 46.2%, premium per property.

The pricing dynamic between landlords and homeowners has been exceptionally volatile throughout the year, suggesting that low transaction volumes lead to large swings based on individual deals. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a 9.9% discount, while in Q1 2025 they paid an extraordinary 184.1% premium.

This inconsistency indicates that an average 'landlord discount' does not apply in this market; rather, prices are dictated by specific opportunities and property types acquired in any given quarter.

Historical data shows significant price appreciation, with the average acquisition price for properties purchased between 2020-2023 at $184,870, climbing to an average of $330,264 for the full year 2025.

The absence of any landlord purchases recorded for several quarters, including all of 2024 in this dataset, further emphasizes the low-velocity nature of investor activity, making quarter-to-quarter trend analysis challenging.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.2% of all homes sold in Q4, with 100% of purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Stutsman County market during Q4 2025, purchasing 14 of the 63 total SFRs sold, which accounts for a 22.2% market share of all transactions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with 100.0% of investor acquisitions falling into this category. This highlights a complete absence of mid-size or institutional-level purchasing in the quarter.

New market entrants were the primary drivers of investor activity, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired 10 of the 14 homes, representing 71.4% of all investor purchases.

A total of 16 new landlord entities entered the market by purchasing their first rental property, signaling healthy grassroots growth in the local investor community.

In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made zero purchases, reinforcing their non-existent role in the local acquisition market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 98.8% of Stutsman County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Stutsman County is defined by the absolute dominance of small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a combined 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 930 properties, which represents 68.2% of the entire investor portfolio on their own.

The four smallest tiers combined—representing owners with 1 to 10 properties—account for 1,348 of the 1,364 properties where tier is identified, demonstrating a market built almost exclusively by local individuals.

Conversely, institutional-scale investment is virtually non-existent. The largest investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own just 2 properties, making up only 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.

This distribution starkly contrasts with national narratives of corporate consolidation, revealing a hyper-localized market where investment remains at the individual and small-family level.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with no crossover point to company-majority ownership.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority control across every single landlord tier in Stutsman County, with no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type.

Even among landlords with 6-10 properties (Tier 04), individuals own 69 of the 72 properties, a commanding 95.8% share, demonstrating that scaling is primarily an individual pursuit in this market.

The dominance of individuals is established from the very beginning, as they own 95.7% of properties in the single-property (Tier 01) category and 95.0% in the two-property (Tier 02) category.

Corporate ownership remains a fringe strategy, with its highest penetration in the 3-5 property tier, where it still only accounts for 10.2% of properties (19 total).

The data clearly illustrates that the path to building a rental portfolio in Stutsman County is almost exclusively undertaken by individual investors, not by structured corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 58401 holding 875 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Stutsman County is geographically concentrated, with the 58401 zip code alone accounting for 875 investor-held properties. This single area represents the core of investor activity by volume.

However, the highest rates of investor saturation occur in smaller, more rural zip codes. ND-Stutsman-58475 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it may be an area with specialized or vacation rental housing.

Several other zip codes also exhibit high investor penetration, including 58483 (54.6%), 58466 (50.0%), and 58467 (46.1%), indicating that in certain parts of the county, more than half of the housing is owned by landlords.

This reveals a key pattern: the areas with the highest raw counts of investor properties are not necessarily the ones with the highest market share. For instance, 58401 holds the most properties but has a modest 16.7% ownership rate.

This distinction between volume and saturation highlights diverse market dynamics within the county, from a broad investor presence in the main hub to intense rental focus in smaller communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stutsman County are in a strong portfolio growth phase, demonstrated by their status as consistent net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 22 properties while selling only 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 7-to-1.

This aggressive accumulation has been a multi-year trend. Throughout all of 2025, landlords acquired 75 homes and sold only 10, while in 2024, the ratio was even more skewed at 83 buys to just 4 sells.

This sustained net-buying activity signals strong confidence among local investors in the future of the Stutsman County rental market.

The institutional tier, while barely active, displays a contrasting, neutral strategy. In 2025, the single institutional transaction was a wash, with one property bought and one sold, indicating no net growth.

The high volume of acquisitions compared to dispositions suggests that local investors are focused on long-term holds rather than short-term flipping, steadily increasing the county's rental housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with zero purchases from other landlords.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a key role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 22 of the 94 total SFR transactions, for a total market share of 23.4%.

A notable finding from the quarter is that 100% of investor acquisitions came from the open market, with 0% of transactions recorded as being purchased from another landlord. This indicates that investors are expanding the rental pool by acquiring properties from homeowners rather than trading assets among themselves.

All transactional activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) being the most active group, conducting 16 of the 22 transactions.

There was a dramatic price disparity between tiers, likely caused by low sample sizes. Two-property landlords (Tier 02) recorded an average purchase price of $774,000, while single-property buyers (Tier 01) paid an average of $290,313.

No transactions were conducted by institutional investors, reaffirming their lack of participation in the county's active real estate market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Stutsman County's investor market is fueled entirely by mom-and-pop landlords who own 98.8% of rental homes and are strong net buyers.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,312 Single-Family Residential properties in Stutsman County, ND, representing 20.4% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,247 properties (95.0%), compared to just 73 (5.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords in Stutsman County paid a 46.2% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025 ($339,737 vs $232,455), a sign of a volatile, low-volume market where specific acquisitions can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 14 properties, accounting for 22.2% of all market sales. Activity was driven entirely by new and small investors, with 16 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 98.8% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a mere 0.1%, or just 2 properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Stutsman County, owning over 95% of properties even in the 6-10 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with a 7.3x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (22 buys vs 3 sells). Institutional investors, with only one buy and one sell for the year, are effectively neutral and not expanding.
Market Narrative

In Stutsman County, ND, the real estate investor market is fundamentally a local, small-scale phenomenon. Investors own a significant 1,312 SFR properties, comprising 20.4% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 98.8% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors, rather than corporations, are the primary drivers, holding 95.0% of the rental portfolio. Institutional capital, often a focus of national discussion, has a near-zero footprint here, with large-scale investors owning just 0.1% of the properties.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition, with landlords purchasing 22.2% of all homes sold. This activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop buyers, including 16 new landlords entering the market. Transaction data reveals landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.3 properties for every one they sold in the quarter, signaling deep confidence in the local market. Pricing is anomalous; unlike in larger markets, landlords paid a 46.2% premium over homeowners in Q4, a volatility likely caused by very low transaction volumes and unique property purchases.

The key takeaway for Stutsman County is that its housing market is insulated from the trend of corporate consolidation seen elsewhere. The market's stability and growth are tied to the financial health and decisions of hundreds of local, individual investors. These investors are expanding the rental supply by purchasing from the traditional homeowner market, primarily with cash, and are focused on long-term holds. This creates a resilient but highly localized rental ecosystem where community-level investment, not institutional strategy, shapes the future of housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:45 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStutsman (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct