Slope (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Slope (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Slope (ND)
37
Total Investors in Slope (ND)
16
Investor Owned SFR in Slope (ND)
13(35.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
15
SFR Owned
13
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1
SFR Owned
2
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 13 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Slope County's investor market is small but mighty: 35.1% of homes are investor-owned, all by mom-and-pop landlords in a frozen market.
Investors own 13 single-family homes in Slope County, representing a significant 35.1% of the market. This ownership is entirely concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with 100% of the portfolio held by individuals. However, the market has ground to a halt, with zero landlord purchase or sale transactions recorded in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 13 SFR properties, a 35.1% market share, with individuals holding 100% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor properties are held in cash (10 properties) versus financed (3 properties). All 13 properties are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals. The market consists of 16 landlords, 15 of whom are individuals and only 1 is a company.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisition activity occurred in Q4 2025, preventing a direct price comparison with homeowners.
With zero landlord purchases in the last year, a trend analysis is not possible. Historically, the average landlord acquisition price between 2020-2023 was $121,750.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented 0.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, as no transactions occurred.
The market was entirely inactive, with zero properties purchased by any investor tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Slope County, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 86.7% of the investor portfolio, owning 13 of the 15 investor-held properties. There is no institutional (Tier 09) presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The investor market is 100% controlled by individuals, making individual vs. company price comparisons not applicable.
All 13 single-property landlord holdings are owned by individuals. There is no company ownership in any tier, indicating a complete absence of corporate investment structures.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 58623, 58643, and 58651, with ownership rates exceeding 66%.
The zip code 58623 has the highest investor penetration at 75.0%. Zip code 58643 not only has the most investor-owned properties (5) but also a staggering 71.4% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a market with extremely low liquidity and a buy-and-hold strategy.
The absence of buy or sell transactions for all landlords, including institutional investors, suggests that properties are rarely traded. This prevents analysis of inter-landlord sales or price margins.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor-involved transactions were 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025 due to a complete absence of market activity.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from single-property to institutional. Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades or price variations to analyze for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 13 SFR properties, a 35.1% market share, with individuals holding 100% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial footprint in Slope County, owning 13 single-family properties, which constitutes 35.1% of the total 37 SFRs in the market.

Ownership is completely dominated by individuals, who own 100% (13) of the investor-held SFR properties. While there is one company landlord, they co-own 2 properties with individuals, reflecting a 15.4% overlap but no exclusive company ownership.

The investor base is composed of 16 distinct landlords, with 15 individuals and only 1 company, highlighting an almost exclusively non-corporate rental market.

A strong buy-and-hold strategy is evident, as all 13 investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals (non-owner-occupied).

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with investors holding 10 properties outright, more than triple the 3 properties that are financed.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisition activity occurred in Q4 2025, preventing a direct price comparison with homeowners.
Detailed Findings

The investor acquisition market in Slope County was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by landlords. This lack of activity makes a direct price comparison to traditional homeowners impossible for the quarter.

The purchasing freeze extends to the entirety of 2024 and 2025, as no landlord acquisitions were recorded in either year to date.

Looking at historical data, the average acquisition price for the few properties purchased by investors between 2020 and 2023 was $121,750.

The absence of recent transactions signals a stable, buy-and-hold environment where existing landlords are not expanding their portfolios and new investors are not entering the market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords represented 0.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, as no transactions occurred.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Slope County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero of the zero total SFRs purchased in the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero purchases.

The lack of Tier 01 (single-property) purchases indicates that no new landlords entered the Slope County rental market during the fourth quarter.

The data points to a market in a holding pattern, with no signs of investor expansion or new entries in the recent period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Slope County, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Slope County is exclusively controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 100.0% of the 15 investor properties.

The market is built on the smallest investors, as the single-property tier (Tier 01) alone holds 13 properties, accounting for 86.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold the remaining 2 properties, making up 13.3% of the market, reinforcing the small-investor concentration.

There is zero presence from mid-size (Tiers 05-08) or institutional (Tier 09) investors, defining Slope County as a purely grassroots rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
The investor market is 100% controlled by individuals, making individual vs. company price comparisons not applicable.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the sole owners in the Slope County rental market, holding 100% of the properties in the single-property tier, which is the only active tier.

Company ownership is non-existent within any portfolio tier. The single company entity in the market co-owns properties with an individual, but there are no exclusively company-owned portfolios.

Given the 100% individual ownership across all tiers, a crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market.

The data portrays a market exclusively shaped by personal investment, with no footprint from corporate or institutional capital.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 58623, 58643, and 58651, with ownership rates exceeding 66%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Slope County is not evenly distributed, but rather hyper-concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 58643 is the epicenter of activity, with 5 investor-owned properties.

Certain zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates, far exceeding the county average. In 58623, investors own 75.0% of the SFRs, while in 58643 they own 71.4%, and in 58651 they own 66.7%.

The top region by property count, 58643, is also a leader in ownership percentage (71.4%), indicating that where investors are present, they are a dominant market force.

In contrast, areas like 58647 have a much lower investor ownership rate of 16.7%, highlighting the pocketed nature of rental property investment within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a market with extremely low liquidity and a buy-and-hold strategy.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction log for Slope County is empty, revealing a market characterized by a profound lack of churn. Landlords appear to acquire properties and hold them long-term, with minimal selling activity.

Without transaction data, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers, but the stable portfolio size suggests a state of equilibrium.

The concept of inter-landlord trading is not applicable, as no recorded sales from one landlord to another exist in the dataset.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 1000+) have no transactional history in the county, consistent with their complete absence from the market.

This lack of liquidity suggests that the investor market is illiquid and primarily serves as a source of long-term rental income rather than a vehicle for capital gains through frequent sales.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor-involved transactions were 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025 due to a complete absence of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Slope County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in zero of the zero total transactions.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors alike recording no buy or sell transactions.

As there were no purchases, the average purchase price for every tier was effectively $0, and no price spread between the highest and lowest tiers could be observed.

Inter-landlord trading was also non-existent, with 0% of transactions originating from other landlords, reflecting the overall lack of market liquidity.

The Q4 transaction data reinforces the image of a buy-and-hold market where assets are not actively traded among investors or with the broader market.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Slope County's housing market is defined by a high 35.1% mom-and-pop investor ownership rate and a complete halt in recent sales activity.
Holdings
In Slope County, ND, landlords own 13 SFR properties, a significant 35.1% of the total market. The portfolio is exclusively held by individuals, who account for 100.0% of ownership, with companies having a minor co-ownership stake but no sole holdings.
Pricing
With zero landlord purchases in Q4 2025, a direct price comparison against traditional homeowners is not possible, highlighting a dormant acquisition market.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity was non-existent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of all SFR sales and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control over the rental market with 100.0% ownership. There is zero institutional (1000+) investor presence.
Ownership Type
The market is exclusively composed of individual investors, who dominate 100% of holdings. There is no tier where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
The transactional market is frozen, with no buy or sell activity recorded for any landlord type in Q4 2025, preventing the calculation of a net buyer or seller status.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Slope County, ND, is a unique case of high concentration and low activity. Landlords own a substantial 13 single-family residences, accounting for 35.1% of the county's entire SFR market. This market is exclusively driven by small, individual investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned portfolio, with single-property owners alone making up 86.7% of that. There is no institutional or mid-size investor presence, defining it as a purely grassroots rental environment.

Recent investor behavior has been static, with market activity grinding to a halt. In Q4 2025, landlords made zero purchases, representing 0.0% of market sales and signaling a complete pause in portfolio expansion. This lack of recent acquisitions prevents any pricing comparison against traditional homeowners. The transaction history is similarly bare, indicating that landlords operate on a long-term buy-and-hold strategy rather than engaging in frequent trading, making the market highly illiquid.

The key takeaway for Slope County's housing market is the powerful influence of a small group of local, long-term investors in specific locales. With ownership rates soaring to 75.0% in some zip codes, these mom-and-pop landlords are the primary providers of rental housing. The current inactivity suggests a stable, mature market where existing players are content with their holdings, and the barriers or incentives for new entrants are low. This creates a predictable but rigid rental supply with minimal competitive pressure from new or large-scale investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:45 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySlope (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct