Mountrail (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Mountrail (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Mountrail (ND)
1,690
Total Investors in Mountrail (ND)
1,122
Investor Owned SFR in Mountrail (ND)
956(56.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,066
SFR Owned
856
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
56
SFR Owned
121
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 956 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Mountrail County, Controlling 56.6% of SFR Market with Zero Institutional Presence
Investors own 956 SFR properties in Mountrail County, representing a significant 56.6% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 94.3% of that portfolio. In Q4, landlords comprised 100% of market purchases. Landlords remain strong net buyers and historically secure significant price discounts compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 956 SFRs, 56.6% of the market, with individuals holding 89.5%.
The majority of holdings are owned outright, with 779 properties held in cash versus 177 financed. Landlords in the county are highly focused on rentals, with 950 of 956 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 29.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
This translates to an average savings of $72,555 per property in Q3 ($174,214 vs $246,769). The discount was even more pronounced in Q2, when landlords paid 58.0% less than traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords completely dominated the market, making 100% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
All quarterly purchase activity came from a single mom-and-pop investor, who entered the market by buying their first property. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.3% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, alone accounting for 76.8% of all investor-owned housing. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties) in Mountrail County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own the market, holding over 93% of properties in every small tier.
In the largest landlord segment, single-property owners, individuals hold 94.5% of the properties (734) versus just 5.5% for companies (43). Companies do not achieve majority ownership in any tier within Mountrail County.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with rates exceeding 60% in top zip codes.
The 58763 zip code has the highest investor penetration at 65.3%, followed closely by 58770 at 63.7%. By volume, the 58784 zip code is the largest hub, containing 486 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Throughout 2025, landlords purchased 26 SFR properties while selling only 2. This accumulation trend continues from 2024, when landlords were also net buyers with 40 purchases versus 6 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
A single landlord transaction accounted for 100% of the SFR market activity in Q4 2025.
The sole transaction was made by a mom-and-pop (single-property) investor at a purchase price of $150,000. This property was acquired from the traditional market, not from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 956 SFRs, 56.6% of the market, with individuals holding 89.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a majority stake in Mountrail County's single-family housing market, owning 956 of the 1,690 available SFR properties, a penetration rate of 56.6%.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small, individual investors rather than large corporations. Individual landlords own 856 properties, accounting for 89.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 121 properties (12.7%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,066 of the 1,122 landlords (95.0%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 779 properties owned free and clear, more than four times the 177 properties that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base with low leverage.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 950 properties (99.4%) being non-owner-occupied, signaling a clear business focus for property owners in the region.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 29.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter with comparable data (Q3 2025), landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average of $174,214, which is 29.4% less than the $246,769 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage represents a substantial $72,555 discount per property, highlighting a key financial benefit for investors in the Mountrail County market.

The trend of deep discounts for landlords was even more dramatic earlier in the year. In Q2 2025, investors paid an average of $133,890, a staggering $184,824 (58.0%) below the homeowner average of $318,714.

While Q4 2025 acquisition volume was too low for a direct homeowner comparison, the historical data shows a consistent and significant price gap benefiting investors.

Overall property values have appreciated since the 2020-2023 period, where the average landlord acquisition price was $188,551, compared to a higher average of $231,339 in 2024, before settling to $142,427 for the full year 2025 amid lower volume.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords completely dominated the market, making 100% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the entirety of the Mountrail County SFR market in Q4 2025, with landlords responsible for 100% of the 1 total purchase recorded during the period.

The quarter's activity was driven exclusively by the smallest investor segment. A new 'mom-and-pop' landlord entered the market, acquiring their first rental property and accounting for 100% of all investor purchases.

This highlights a market characterized by grassroots growth, where new, small-scale investors are the primary source of activity, rather than expansion from existing players.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, holding 0.0% of the Q4 market share. This absence underscores the highly localized and small-scale nature of the county's investor landscape.

The data shows that while overall transaction volume was extremely low, the only participant was a new landlord, signaling continued interest in the local rental market even in a quiet quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.3% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Mountrail County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a massive 94.3% of all investor-held SFRs.

The most granular tier, single-property landlords, forms the bedrock of the market. This group owns 763 properties, which constitutes 76.8% of the entire investor portfolio, demonstrating that the market is built on first-time and small-scale investment.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. Landlords with 2 properties hold 9.1%, and those with 3-5 properties hold 7.1%, showing a steep drop-off as portfolio sizes increase.

The concept of a 'Wall Street' landlord is non-existent in this county. There are no institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) with any holdings, resulting in a 0.0% market share for this category.

Even mid-size investors are sparse, with the 51-100 property tier holding just 5.1% of properties, further cementing the market's reliance on small, local landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly own the market, holding over 93% of properties in every small tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the driving force across all small-to-midsize portfolio tiers in Mountrail County, far outweighing corporate ownership.

In the foundational single-property tier, individual landlords own 734 of the properties (94.5%), while companies own a mere 43 (5.5%). This pattern of individual dominance is consistent across other small tiers.

For two-property portfolios, individuals own 84 properties (93.3%) compared to 6 for companies (6.7%). Similarly, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals hold 67 properties (94.4%) versus just 4 for companies (5.6%).

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The data clearly shows that as landlords expand their portfolios in this county, the ownership structure remains firmly in the hands of individuals.

This structure indicates that the rental market is powered by personal investment rather than corporate strategy, shaping the landlord-tenant dynamics and investment patterns within the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with rates exceeding 60% in top zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Mountrail County is not evenly distributed, showing intense concentration in specific zip codes where landlords own a majority of the housing stock.

The highest rate of investor ownership is found in the 58763 zip code, where 65.3% of SFR properties are investor-owned. This is closely followed by 58770, with a 63.7% investor ownership rate.

While some areas have high penetration rates, the largest volume of investor properties is located in the 58784 zip code, which contains 486 investor-owned SFRs, representing 58.4% of that area's market.

The top four zip codes by investor penetration all have rates above 58%, indicating that certain communities within the county are predominantly rental markets shaped by investor activity.

This geographic clustering reveals specific sub-markets of high opportunity or demand that have historically attracted significant real estate investment compared to other parts of the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Mountrail County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In 2025, landlords were strong net buyers, with 26 acquisitions against only 2 dispositions.

This translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 13-to-1 for the year, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market and a focus on portfolio growth.

The net buying trend is not new. In 2024, landlords also expanded their holdings, purchasing 40 properties while selling only 6, a ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

Looking at the most recent quarter with multiple transactions, Q3 2025, the pattern held firm with 7 buys and only 1 sale. There is no indication of a landlord sell-off in the market.

Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity, meaning all buying and selling is being driven by the smaller, predominantly individual landlords who dominate the county's ownership.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
A single landlord transaction accounted for 100% of the SFR market activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was exceptionally quiet in Mountrail County, with landlords involved in 100% of the single SFR transaction that occurred.

Activity was confined to the smallest investor tier, with a single-property landlord making the purchase. This indicates that market participation, though minimal, is happening at the entry-level of real estate investment.

The purchase price for this transaction was $150,000, setting the benchmark for the quarter's investor acquisitions.

Notably, this new landlord acquired the property from a non-investor, as the percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0.0%. This suggests portfolio growth is coming from the traditional housing market rather than inter-investor trading.

With zero transactions from mid-size or institutional tiers, the data shows that the market's liquidity, however limited, is entirely dependent on the activity of mom-and-pop landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, Individual Landlords Dominate Mountrail County's Market with 56.6% Ownership and Zero Institutional Presence
Holdings
Investors own 956 single-family residential properties in Mountrail County, representing a 56.6% majority share of the local market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 856 properties (89.5%), versus 121 (12.7%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In the most recent comparable quarter (Q3 2025), landlords paid 29.4% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $72,555 per property ($174,214 vs. $246,769).
Activity
Landlords accounted for 100% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with one new single-property landlord entering the market. All activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 94.3% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding over 93% of properties in every small tier. Companies fail to gain a majority share at any level in this market.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, acting as net buyers in 2025 with a 13-to-1 buy/sell ratio (26 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Mountrail County, ND is fundamentally shaped by a dominant class of small, individual real estate investors. These landlords own 956 SFR properties, a majority stake representing 56.6% of the county's total SFR stock. This ownership is not corporate; individuals own nearly 90% of the investor portfolio. The market structure is definitively 'mom-and-pop,' with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a staggering 94.3% of all investor-owned homes, while large-scale institutional investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior in Mountrail County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords represented 100% of the purchase activity, with a new single-property investor entering the market. Historically, investors have secured deep discounts, paying 29.4% less than traditional homeowners in Q3 2025. Furthermore, landlords are clear net buyers, acquiring 13 properties for every one they sold in 2025, signaling strong confidence and a long-term strategy of accumulation.

The key takeaway for the Mountrail County housing market is its stability and reliance on a deeply entrenched base of local, individual landlords who operate with high levels of cash ownership. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of small investors create a unique market dynamic, likely resulting in different landlord-tenant relationships and investment priorities than in institutionally-heavy markets. Future market trends will be dictated not by corporate boardrooms, but by the collective decisions of these hundreds of small-scale, local owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:37 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMountrail (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail