McLean (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McLean (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McLean (ND)
2,999
Total Investors in McLean (ND)
2,364
Investor Owned SFR in McLean (ND)
1,631(54.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,276
SFR Owned
1,560
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
88
SFR Owned
96
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,631 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Individual Investors Dominate McLean County, Owning 54.4% of Market in Cash-Heavy Acquisitions
Investors own 1,631 SFR properties in McLean County, a staggering 54.4% of the total market, with 95.6% held by individuals. In Q4, landlords purchased 62.8% of all homes sold, paying 20.1% less than homeowners. The market is defined by aggressive accumulation, with investors acting as strong net buyers with a 21.5x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 54.4% of the McLean County market, with individuals holding 95.6% of the 1,631 properties.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 1,261 properties (77.3%) owned outright without financing. Nearly the entire investor portfolio (1,623 properties, 99.5%) is actively designated as rental housing.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 20.1% discount in Q4, paying $51,906 less than homeowners on average.
This pricing advantage is highly volatile; landlords paid a 30.4% premium over homeowners in Q3 after securing deep discounts of 53.1% and 63.9% in Q2 and Q1, respectively. The data does not differentiate pricing between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors dominated the Q4 market, purchasing 27 of 43 homes sold for a 62.8% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of this activity. New, single-property landlords were the most active, acquiring 23 properties (85.2% of the landlord total).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.2% of investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, holding just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the investor market. The market is defined by its smallest participants, with single-property landlords alone controlling 86.9% of the rental stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in all portfolio sizes; companies never gain majority control.
The highest concentration of company ownership is in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold just 27.6% of properties (16 homes). In every other segment, individual ownership exceeds 90% or stands at 100%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with five zip codes accounting for 78.3% of all rental properties.
The 58565 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 68.4%. The zip code with the most investor-owned homes is 58540, with 488 properties, representing a 55.8% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 21.5-to-1 ratio over sales in 2025.
The pace of acquisition accelerated significantly from 2024, when the buy-to-sell ratio was 10.5-to-1. Institutional investors were completely inactive, reporting zero buy or sell transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove the Q4 market, participating in 41 of 68 total transactions for a 60.3% share.
Zero percent of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions expanded the rental pool. Two-property landlords paid a premium, averaging $299,900, significantly more than the $193,912 paid by new single-property investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 54.4% of the McLean County market, with individuals holding 95.6% of the 1,631 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in McLean County represents an exceptionally high market penetration, with 1,631 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, or 54.4% of the total 2,999 SFRs, held by landlords.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 1,560 properties, accounting for 95.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 96 properties (5.9%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 2,276 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 88 company landlords, highlighting a granular, non-centralized ownership structure.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition for landlords in this region. Of all investor-owned properties, 1,261 were purchased with cash, representing 77.3% of the portfolio, while only 370 properties are financed.

The investor-owned housing stock is almost entirely utilized for rental purposes. A total of 1,623 properties are classified as rented, which constitutes 99.5% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 20.1% discount in Q4, paying $51,906 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average price of $206,025. This was 20.1% less than the $257,931 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a substantial average discount of $51,906 per property.

The landlord discount has been extremely volatile throughout the year, suggesting a market with low transaction volume where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages. After securing massive discounts of 63.9% in Q1 and 53.1% in Q2, landlords surprisingly paid a 30.4% premium in Q3, averaging $67,710 more than homeowners in that period.

The average acquisition price for landlords has fluctuated significantly, from a low of $87,500 in Q1 to a high of $290,760 in Q3, before settling at $206,025 in Q4.

Comparing recent prices to the pandemic era (2020-2023), the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($223,426) is moderately higher than the $208,423 average from the prior period, indicating modest price appreciation over the long term.

This price volatility highlights an opportunistic purchasing strategy among landlords, who appear to capitalize on deep discounts when available but are also willing to pay a premium for specific assets, as seen in Q3.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors dominated the Q4 market, purchasing 27 of 43 homes sold for a 62.8% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary buyers in McLean County's Q4 2025 housing market, acquiring 27 of the 43 total SFR properties sold. This represents a commanding 62.8% share of all quarterly purchases.

The entirety of this Q4 investor activity was driven by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Investors in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) made up 100% of landlord purchases, with zero activity recorded from mid-size or institutional investors.

New entrants and first-time investors were the most significant force in the market. The single-property (Tier 01) segment alone purchased 23 properties, accounting for 85.2% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

A total of 35 distinct landlord entities participated in these single-property acquisitions, suggesting a high degree of co-ownership and a broad base of new market participants rather than a few active buyers.

In contrast to the high activity at the small end of the market, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent, purchasing zero properties and reinforcing the grassroots nature of real estate investment in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.2% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in McLean County is completely dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,457 properties. This single tier accounts for an overwhelming 86.9% of the entire investor-owned housing supply.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership drops off dramatically. Landlords with two properties (Tier 02) own 8.2% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) hold just 3.5%.

The presence of large-scale investors is virtually non-existent. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own only 2 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized market structure, challenging any narrative of corporate landlord dominance and instead highlighting the importance of small, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in all portfolio sizes; companies never gain majority control.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords maintain majority ownership across every single investor tier in McLean County, with no crossover point where companies become dominant.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 1,418 homes (95.7%), establishing a pattern of personal ownership that persists as portfolios grow.

Company ownership peaks in the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, yet even here, they own only 16 properties, representing a minority share of 27.6%. Individuals own the other 42 properties (72.4%) in this segment.

For larger portfolio tiers represented in the data, such as 6-10 properties and 11-20 properties, individual ownership is even more pronounced, at 91.7% and 100.0% respectively.

This data clearly illustrates that the path to scaling a rental portfolio in McLean County is almost exclusively pursued by individual investors, not corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with five zip codes accounting for 78.3% of all rental properties.
Detailed Findings

A significant geographic concentration of investor activity exists within McLean County, with just five zip codes containing 1,277 of the 1,631 investor-owned properties, or 78.3% of the total.

The top region by sheer volume is the 58540 zip code, where landlords own 488 properties. This represents a high investor ownership rate of 55.8% for that area.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found in the 58565 zip code, where landlords own 68.4% of all SFR properties, indicating an intense focus of investment in that specific community.

Other key areas of concentration include 58577 (268 properties, 42.6% rate), 58575 (198 properties, 59.6% rate), and 58576 (191 properties, 59.5% rate), all showing investor ownership rates well above the national average.

The data shows a clear pattern where investors target specific communities, leading to hyper-local markets with extremely high concentrations of rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 21.5-to-1 ratio over sales in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in McLean County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In 2025, landlords purchased 86 properties while selling only 4, creating an exceptionally high buy-to-sell ratio of 21.5x.

This trend of net buying has accelerated. In 2024, the activity was also positive but less intense, with 42 buys and 4 sells for a ratio of 10.5x. The near doubling of the net acquisition ratio indicates growing investor confidence and activity.

Transactional data shows consistent net buying on a quarterly basis as well. In Q3 2025, investors bought 29 properties and sold only 1, demonstrating sustained demand throughout the year.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were entirely absent from the transaction market, with zero recorded purchases or sales. This confirms their passive role and the market's reliance on smaller investors for liquidity and growth.

The strong and accelerating net-buyer position signals that the high investor market share in the county is not static but actively growing through consistent acquisitions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove the Q4 market, participating in 41 of 68 total transactions for a 60.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a primary driver of the McLean County real estate market in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in 41 of the 68 total transactions, a share of 60.3%.

The market is expanding, not just churning. None of the landlord purchases in Q4 were from other landlords (0.0%), meaning investors acquired properties exclusively from homeowners or new construction, thereby increasing the overall rental supply.

A distinct pricing difference emerged between investor tiers. Landlords in the two-property tier paid the most, with an average purchase price of $299,900 across 6 transactions.

In contrast, new and single-property investors, who were the most active with 35 transactions, paid a much lower average price of $193,912. This creates a large price gap of $105,988 between the two most active tiers.

Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, further cementing the finding that all market-making activity from the investor side is concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Individual Landlords Drive Extreme Market Penetration, Owning 54.4% of McLean County's Housing
Holdings
Investors own 1,631 Single-Family Residential properties in McLean County, representing an unusually high 54.4% of the total market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 1,560 of these properties (95.6%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 20.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $51,906 per property ($206,025 vs $257,931).
Activity
Landlords acquired 62.8% of all homes sold in Q4 (27 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop investors. The market saw 35 new landlord entities enter via single-property purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control virtually the entire investor market at 99.2%, while institutional investors (1000+) have a near-zero share of 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across all portfolio sizes. Companies do not achieve majority control at any tier, peaking at just 27.6% ownership in the small 3-5 property segment.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressively accumulating properties, posting a 21.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (86 buys vs 4 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, reporting zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in McLean County, North Dakota, is characterized by an extraordinarily high concentration of investor ownership, driven almost exclusively by small, individual landlords. Investors own 1,631 single-family properties, a staggering 54.4% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is not controlled by corporations; individuals own 95.6% of these properties. The ownership base is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.2% of the investor market, while institutional firms have a virtually nonexistent presence at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior is defined by aggressive and accelerating accumulation. In 2025, landlords were strong net buyers with a 21.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, a significant increase from the prior year. This activity peaked in Q4, where investors purchased 62.8% of all homes sold, entirely sourced from the homeowner market, which expands the local rental pool. While landlords typically secure price discounts—paying 20.1% below homeowners in Q4—pricing can be volatile, suggesting an opportunistic approach in a market with limited transaction volume.

The key takeaway for the McLean County housing market is its transformation into a majority-renter landscape shaped by local, individual capital, not institutional investment. The high rate of cash purchases (77.3%) and the focus on acquiring properties from homeowners signal a fundamental shift in housing tenure. This trend of converting owner-occupied housing to rentals is actively growing, driven by a broad base of new and existing small landlords who continue to deepen their already significant footprint across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:36 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMcLean (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct