McIntosh (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McIntosh (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McIntosh (ND)
1,033
Total Investors in McIntosh (ND)
619
Investor Owned SFR in McIntosh (ND)
462(44.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
572
SFR Owned
425
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
47
SFR Owned
48
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 462 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

McIntosh County's Investor Market: Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Amidst a Q4 Transaction Freeze
Investors own a significant 44.7% of all Single-Family Residential properties in McIntosh County, a market controlled entirely by mom-and-pop landlords (100% of holdings). This local-investor landscape saw a complete halt in purchasing activity in Q4 2025, contrasting sharply with active net buying in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 462 SFR properties in McIntosh County, with individual landlords holding 92.0%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash, with 423 cash properties versus only 39 financed. Nearly all properties in the portfolio (458 out of 462) are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord vs. homeowner pricing showed extreme volatility due to low sales volume in 2025.
In Q3 2025, landlords paid a 125.0% premium over homeowners ($167,844 vs $74,611). This flipped from Q1 2025, where landlords secured a 46.4% discount ($46,667 vs $87,025), indicating a highly inconsistent and thin market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity in McIntosh County came to a complete halt, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Out of 3 total SFR properties purchased in the county during Q4 2025, none were acquired by new or existing landlords. Both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate the market, controlling 100% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 85.4% of all investor-owned housing, with 403 properties. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier have zero presence in McIntosh County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control every single landlord tier in McIntosh County.
In the largest active tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 100% of the properties. Even in the '3-5 properties' tier, individuals own 24 of the 25 properties (96.0%). A corporate crossover point does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes accounting for 86.1% of all holdings.
The zip code 58413 is the epicenter of investment, containing 255 properties (55.2% of the total). Meanwhile, 58581 has the highest investor penetration rate at 62.0%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 30 properties while only selling 4.
This net acquisition of 26 properties in 2024 demonstrates a clear strategy of portfolio growth. Institutional investors had no recorded buy or sell transactions, being completely inactive in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Confirming a market standstill, landlords were involved in 0% of the 3 total transactions in Q4 2025.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from single-property owners to larger landlords. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 462 SFR properties in McIntosh County, with individual landlords holding 92.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 44.7% of the total 1,033 Single-Family Residential properties in McIntosh County, indicating a high level of rental market penetration.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 572 individual landlords, who control 425 properties (92.0% of the investor portfolio), compared to just 47 company landlords owning 48 properties (10.4%).

A strong preference for all-cash holdings is evident, with 423 properties owned outright versus only 39 properties that are financed. This suggests investors in this market are well-capitalized and have low debt exposure.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental income, with 458 of the 462 investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

The ratio of individual to company landlords is approximately 12 to 1 (572 vs 47), highlighting a market composed almost exclusively of small-scale, local operators rather than larger corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord vs. homeowner pricing showed extreme volatility due to low sales volume in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Pricing comparisons between landlords and traditional homeowners in McIntosh County are highly volatile, reflecting a market with very few transactions. This makes it difficult to establish a consistent purchasing advantage for either group.

In Q3 2025, the few landlord acquisitions occurred at a significant premium of $93,233, with an average price of $167,844 compared to the homeowner average of $74,611.

This trend reversed dramatically from earlier in the year. In Q1 2025, landlords acquired properties at a $40,358 discount (46.4% less) than homeowners, paying an average of $46,667 versus the homeowner price of $87,025.

The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $59,987, substantially lower than any quarterly average seen in 2025, highlighting significant price fluctuations in the post-pandemic market.

With zero landlord property purchases recorded in Q4 2025, recent pricing trends could not be established, signaling a complete pause in acquisition activity at year's end.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity in McIntosh County came to a complete halt, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in McIntosh County experienced a total freeze in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 3 SFR properties sold during the period.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who constitute the entirety of the local market, made no new purchases.

Similarly, there was no entry or expansion from mid-size or institutional investors, who remain entirely absent from this market.

The lack of acquisitions means no new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, a significant slowdown from previous periods of activity.

This halt in purchasing suggests a potential market equilibrium, a lack of desirable inventory, or a wait-and-see approach from local investors in response to current market conditions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate the market, controlling 100% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in McIntosh County is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the 462 investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the definitive backbone of the market, with the '1 property' tier alone comprising 403 properties, or 85.4% of the total investor portfolio.

The concentration at the small end of the scale continues with the '2 properties' tier holding 42 properties (8.9%) and the '3-5 properties' tier holding 25 properties (5.3%).

There is a complete absence of large-scale investors; the '1000+ properties' institutional tier has no ownership stake in the county.

This ownership structure highlights a market driven by local, small-scale capital rather than national or institutional investment trends.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly control every single landlord tier in McIntosh County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in McIntosh County, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the market.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 371 of the 403 properties, a commanding 90.0% share.

Companies have a minimal footprint even at the smallest scales, owning just 41 properties in the single-property tier and 6 in the two-property tier.

The trend of individual dominance solidifies in larger portfolios, with individuals owning 96.0% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier and 100% in the 6-10 unit tier.

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no crossover tier where company ownership surpasses individual ownership, highlighting the deeply local and personal nature of real estate investment in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes accounting for 86.1% of all holdings.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in McIntosh County is not evenly distributed, showing heavy concentration in specific postal codes. The zip code 58413 alone is home to 255 investor-owned SFRs, representing over half (55.2%) of the entire investor portfolio.

Together, the top two zip codes, 58413 (255 properties) and 58495 (143 properties), contain 398 properties, which is 86.1% of all investor holdings in the county.

Some areas exhibit extremely high investor saturation. In zip code 58581, investors own 62.0% of the total SFR housing stock, indicating a market heavily skewed towards rentals.

High penetration rates are also seen in 58413 (50.6%) and 58460 (48.5%), where roughly half of all single-family homes are investor-owned.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting specific communities, likely driven by local economic factors, rental demand, or housing affordability.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 30 properties while only selling 4.
Detailed Findings

Historical data from 2024 shows a period of aggressive accumulation by landlords in McIntosh County, a stark contrast to the market freeze in late 2025.

Investors acted as decisive net buyers throughout 2024, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5 to 1, based on 30 acquisitions versus only 4 dispositions.

This activity resulted in a net portfolio expansion of 26 properties for the landlord community, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market during that year.

The complete absence of transactions from institutional investors (1000+ tier) in all historical periods confirms their non-participation in this market.

The sharp drop from 30 buys in 2024 to 0 in Q4 2025 illustrates a dramatic and recent shift in investor sentiment or market opportunity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Confirming a market standstill, landlords were involved in 0% of the 3 total transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete lack of investor transaction activity in McIntosh County. Landlords were not on either side of the 3 SFR transactions that occurred.

This inactivity was consistent across all tiers, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) recording zero transactions for the quarter.

As there were no purchases, there is no data on Q4 acquisition prices by tier, preventing any analysis of recent purchasing strategies.

The absence of buying also meant there was zero inter-landlord trading, where one investor sells a property to another. This indicates a lack of portfolio churn within the existing investor community.

This transactional silence suggests that current owners are holding their assets, and no new investors are deploying capital, leading to a period of market illiquidity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

McIntosh County's SFR market is defined by total mom-and-pop control (100%) and a recent halt in investor activity.
Holdings
In McIntosh County, landlords own 462 SFR properties, representing a significant 44.7% of the market. The ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 425 properties (92.0%), versus companies which own 48 (10.4%).
Pricing
Due to extremely low transaction volume, landlord pricing is volatile, swinging from a 46.4% discount versus homeowners in Q1 2025 to a 125.0% premium in Q3 2025.
Activity
Investor purchase activity stopped entirely in Q4 2025, with landlords making 0 acquisitions out of 3 total market sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise complete control, owning 100% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, owning 90.0% of single-property holdings and 100% of 6-10 property portfolios. A corporate crossover point is non-existent.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with 30 buys versus 4 sells, transaction activity froze in Q4 2025 with zero landlord purchases or sales. Institutional investors remain completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The investor market in McIntosh County, North Dakota, is a microcosm of hyper-local, small-scale ownership, fundamentally different from national trends. Landlords command a substantial 44.7% of the county's 1,033 Single-Family Residential properties, totaling 462 homes. This market is exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who control 100% of the investor-owned housing stock. Individual operators are the primary force, owning 425 properties (92.0%), while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior has shifted dramatically from active accumulation to a complete standstill. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, expanding their portfolios with 30 purchases against only 4 sales. However, this momentum ceased by Q4 2025, when landlords recorded zero transactions, neither buying nor selling. Pricing data reflects a thin, volatile market, with landlord purchase prices swinging wildly from a 46.4% discount to a 125.0% premium compared to homeowners in 2025, making consistent trends impossible to identify.

The key takeaway for McIntosh County is a mature, highly saturated rental market dominated by individual, unleveraged (423 cash vs. 39 financed) investors who are now in a holding pattern. The recent freeze in transactions suggests the market has reached an equilibrium where existing landlords are content to hold, and few opportunities exist for new entrants. The future of this market hinges not on large-scale investment, but on the decisions of hundreds of local owners and the organic turnover of their extensive portfolios.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:36 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMcIntosh (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price