Eddy (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Eddy (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Eddy (ND)
629
Total Investors in Eddy (ND)
88
Investor Owned SFR in Eddy (ND)
70(11.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
85
SFR Owned
68
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3
SFR Owned
3
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 70 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Eddy County's SFR Market is Defined by Local Mom-and-Pop Investors Who Dominate 100% of Holdings
In Eddy County, investors own 70 Single-Family properties, representing 11.1% of the market. This portfolio is almost entirely controlled by individuals (97.1%) and exclusively by mom-and-pop landlords (100%), with no institutional presence. Despite a quiet Q4, landlords were net buyers in 2025, securing deep discounts of up to 88.4% compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 70 SFR properties, with individual landlords owning a dominant 97.1%.
Landlord portfolios are overwhelmingly purchased with cash, with 64 properties owned outright versus only 6 financed. Of the 70 investor-owned properties, 69 are confirmed rented or non-owner-occupied, highlighting a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured massive discounts, paying up to 88.4% less than homeowners in 2025.
The price gap was significant throughout 2025, with landlords enjoying a $459,750 discount in Q2 (88.4% less) and a $74,917 discount in Q3 (39.6% less). No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q4 2025, halting any price comparison for the period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented 100% of the SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025.
The entirety of this activity came from the smallest investor segment, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) making 100% of the purchases. A single new landlord entered the market, acquiring their first investment property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors completely dominate Eddy County, controlling 100% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 94.4% of all investor-held properties (67 homes). Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 97% of single-property portfolios; no pricing comparison is available.
Companies only appear in portfolios of 1 and 6-10 properties, representing a tiny fraction of the market. The crossover point where companies become the majority is non-existent, as individuals dominate every tier where both exist.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Eddy County is highly concentrated, with zip code 58356 holding 47 properties.
While 58356 has the highest count of investor properties, zip code 58374 has the highest penetration rate at 21.0%. This shows a distinction between volume and market share concentration within the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Eddy County were active net buyers in 2025, adding 13 net properties before Q4.
Activity was strongest in Q3 2025, with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This follows a solid Q2 where landlords bought 5 properties and sold only 1. Institutional investors had no transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
The entire Q4 2025 transaction market in Eddy County consisted of a single landlord purchase.
This lone transaction was by a mom-and-pop investor entering the market for the first time. There was no inter-landlord trading, as the property was not purchased from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 70 SFR properties, with individual landlords owning a dominant 97.1%.
Detailed Findings

In Eddy County, investors hold a portfolio of 70 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 11.1% of the total 629 SFRs in the market.

Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who control 68 properties (97.1%), compared to just 3 properties (4.3%) owned by companies. This signifies a market driven by local individuals rather than corporate entities.

The investor landscape consists of 88 distinct landlords, of which 85 are individuals and only 3 are companies, resulting in a 28-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for Eddy County investors. A commanding 64 properties are held as cash assets, while only 6 are financed, indicating a low reliance on leverage and a financially stable investor base.

The rental focus of these portfolios is clear, with 69 of the 70 properties identified as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary strategy is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured massive discounts, paying up to 88.4% less than homeowners in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Eddy County demonstrated an ability to acquire properties at exceptionally deep discounts compared to traditional homeowners in 2025. This pricing advantage peaked in Q2 2025, when landlords paid an average of $60,250, a staggering 88.4% less than the homeowner average of $520,000.

The trend of significant savings continued into Q3 2025, with landlords purchasing at an average price of $114,250, which was 39.6% below the traditional homeowner price of $189,167—a per-property discount of $74,917.

There were no landlord acquisitions recorded in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison for the quarter impossible but also indicating a pause in investor purchasing activity at year-end.

Looking at broader timeframes, the average landlord acquisition price for all of 2025 was $82,222, a notable decrease from the 2024 average of $189,250, suggesting a shift toward acquiring lower-priced assets.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $59,556 was even lower, indicating that while recent prices are up from that period, they remain well below the 2024 peak for investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords represented 100% of the SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity defined the entire SFR market in Eddy County during Q4 2025. Landlords were responsible for 100% of the 1 total SFR purchase in the quarter.

The market's Q4 activity was driven exclusively by new, small-scale investors. The single purchase was made by a 'mom-and-pop' landlord now in the single-property tier (Tier 01).

This purchase represents the entry of one new landlord into the Eddy County market, highlighting organic, small-scale growth rather than acquisitions by established players.

Mid-size (11-1,000 properties) and institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive in Q4, with zero purchases recorded, reinforcing the market's reliance on grassroots investment.

The data shows a hyper-concentrated purchasing environment where the smallest investor tier accounted for 100% of landlord acquisitions, underscoring the absence of large-scale investor competition.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors completely dominate Eddy County, controlling 100% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Eddy County is exclusively controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the 70 investor-held SFR properties.

The market structure is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with the single-property tier alone comprising 67 properties, or 94.4% of the entire investor portfolio.

Larger investors are entirely absent from Eddy County. Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both have a 0.0% market share.

The remaining small portion of the portfolio is held by landlords with 2 to 10 properties, including one two-property owner (1.4%), one small landlord with 3-5 properties (1.4%), and two properties held by an owner in the 6-10 property tier (2.8%).

This complete concentration within the mom-and-pop segment indicates a market characterized by local, small-scale investment strategies, free from the influence of large institutional capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own 97% of single-property portfolios; no pricing comparison is available.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of Eddy County's rental market, owning 97.0% of all properties in the dominant single-property tier (65 of 67 properties).

Company ownership is extremely limited and scattered. A company owns one property in the 6-10 tier (a 50% share of that small tier) and two properties in the single-property tier (a 3.0% share).

There is no 'crossover point' in Eddy County where companies become the majority owners. Individuals maintain overwhelming control across the entire portfolio landscape.

Portfolios in the two-property and 3-5 property tiers are 100% owned by individuals, further cementing their dominance in the small-scale landlord space.

The sparse data for company-owned properties and recent transactions prevents any meaningful price comparison between individual and company buyers, though the market's overall structure suggests individual buying patterns dictate pricing.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Eddy County is highly concentrated, with zip code 58356 holding 47 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Eddy County is not evenly distributed, showing significant geographic concentration. The zip code 58356 is the clear hub for investment, containing 47 of the 70 total investor-owned properties in the county.

While 58356 leads by volume, the zip code 58374 has the highest investor ownership rate. In this area, 21.0% of all SFRs are investor-owned, indicating the highest market penetration.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 58464, with an ownership rate of 13.3%, and 58380, with a 13.0% rate, demonstrating pockets of concentrated landlord activity.

The data reveals a pattern where the area with the most investor properties (58356, 9.6% rate) is not the same as the one with the highest density of investors (58374, 21.0% rate), highlighting different investment dynamics across the county.

Following the top regions, the investor count drops off significantly, with other zip codes like 58464 and 58380 holding just 2 and 3 investor properties, respectively.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Eddy County were active net buyers in 2025, adding 13 net properties before Q4.
Detailed Findings

Despite a quiet Q4, landlords in Eddy County were decidedly net buyers throughout 2025, significantly expanding their portfolios. Across the full year, they purchased 15 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties.

The third quarter of 2025 was the most active period for accumulation, where landlords executed 7 purchases against only 1 sale, showcasing a strong appetite for acquisition.

This accumulation trend was also present in Q2 2025, with a net gain of 4 properties (5 buys vs. 1 sell), indicating sustained buying momentum through the middle of the year.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) recorded zero transactions—buys or sells—throughout all of 2025, underscoring their complete absence from this market's transactional activity.

The consistent net buying behavior from the local landlord base signals confidence in the Eddy County rental market and a clear strategy of portfolio growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The entire Q4 2025 transaction market in Eddy County consisted of a single landlord purchase.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for 100% of the SFR transaction volume in Eddy County during Q4 2025. The entire market activity consisted of just 1 transaction, which was a landlord purchase.

This purchase was made by a new entrant, categorized in the single-property (Tier 01) landlord segment, signifying grassroots market entry rather than expansion by existing owners.

There was no recorded inter-landlord activity in Q4; the single transaction was not a sale from one landlord to another, as 0% of properties were 'Bought From Landlords'.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) and mid-size landlords were completely absent from the transactional market, recording zero purchases or sales in the quarter.

The Q4 data paints a picture of a very quiet market where the only activity was the creation of a new, small-scale landlord, perfectly aligning with the county's overall ownership structure.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Eddy County's real estate market is 100% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, with no institutional footprint.
Holdings
In Eddy County, ND, landlords own 70 SFR properties, representing 11.1% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 68 of these properties (97.1%), with companies owning the remaining 3 (4.3%).
Pricing
Landlords secured substantial discounts in 2025, paying 39.6% less than homeowners in Q3 ($114,250 vs $189,167) and an astounding 88.4% less in Q2 ($60,250 vs $520,000).
Activity
Landlords comprised 100% of Q4 market activity, with a single purchase made by a new, first-time landlord entering the market. All purchasing activity was from the mom-and-pop tier.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exert complete control, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs in the county. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding 97.1% of all investor properties. A crossover point where companies become the majority is nonexistent in Eddy County's market.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio for the year (15 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were entirely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Eddy County, North Dakota, is a definitive example of a hyper-local, small-scale market. Investors own a total of 70 single-family properties, making up 11.1% of the county's SFR housing stock. This market is completely shaped by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100% of the investor-owned inventory. Ownership is almost entirely in the hands of individuals (97.1%), leaving a negligible footprint for companies and a zero presence for large-scale institutional investors.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions. In 2025, landlords consistently paid far less than traditional homeowners, securing discounts as high as 88.4% in Q2. While Q4 saw only a single landlord purchase—which accounted for 100% of market activity—landlords were strong net buyers throughout the year, adding a net 13 properties to their portfolios. This indicates a clear strategy of accumulation, funded primarily by cash, as 64 of the 70 properties are owned outright.

The key takeaway from Eddy County is the total absence of corporate or institutional influence. The market's dynamics are driven by 85 individual landlords making targeted purchases, often at steep discounts, and operating with low leverage. This creates a stable, grassroots rental market where new entrants are more likely to be first-time local investors than national corporations, a structure that stands in stark contrast to narratives of institutional takeover seen elsewhere.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:31 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyEddy (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail