Cass (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cass (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cass (ND)
36,083
Total Investors in Cass (ND)
4,002
Investor Owned SFR in Cass (ND)
3,386(9.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,450
SFR Owned
2,543
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
552
SFR Owned
902
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,386 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Drive Cass County's Rental Market, Controlling 92.7% of a Growing Portfolio
Investors own 3,386 SFR properties in Cass County (9.4% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 92.7% of that inventory versus a mere 0.2% for institutional firms. In Q4 2025, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 13.6% of all homes sold while paying an average of 2.3% less than traditional homeowners, signaling continued confidence and growth from small-scale investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 3,386 SFR properties in Cass County, with individual landlords owning 75.1%.
Of these holdings, 2,131 properties are owned outright in cash, compared to 1,255 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,278 properties (96.8%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 2.3% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, a discount of $8,342 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed dramatically from a 36.5% discount in Q3 to just 2.3% in Q4. This suggests increased competition for properties toward the end of the year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 13.6% of all SFR properties sold in Cass County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 93.4% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 92.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Cass County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties hold a minuscule 0.2% share of the investor market, owning just 7 properties in total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Individuals own 86.9% of single-property portfolios. However, in the 6-10 property tier, company ownership jumps to 76.7%, marking a clear shift in business structure as investors scale up.
Geographic Distribution
The highest concentration of investor properties is in Fargo zip codes 58102, 58103, and 58104.
While Fargo zip codes have the highest counts, smaller communities show the highest ownership rates, such as 58027 (66.7%) and 58064 (46.2%), revealing different investor strategies across the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Cass County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4.76 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of aggressive acquisition has been consistent, with landlords remaining net buyers throughout 2025 and 2024. Even the small institutional presence is in growth mode, with a net acquisition of 3 properties in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions represented 12.0% of all market activity in Q4 2025, with 81 total transactions.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $355,448, while larger investors targeted much cheaper properties, such as the $68,000 average for the 21-50 property tier. Inter-landlord trading was very low, with only 2.7% of mom-and-pop purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 3,386 SFR properties in Cass County, with individual landlords owning 75.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 3,386 Single-Family Residential properties in Cass County, accounting for 9.4% of the total 36,083 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the local market, holding 2,543 properties (75.1%), while company-owned portfolios consist of 902 properties (26.6%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at entity counts, with 3,450 individual landlords compared to just 552 company landlords, a ratio of more than 6-to-1.

A significant portion of the investor portfolio is held free and clear, with 2,131 properties owned in cash, far surpassing the 1,255 properties that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized and stable investor base.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, with 3,278 properties (96.8% of all investor-owned SFRs) designated as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the vital role investors play in providing housing supply in Cass County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 2.3% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, a discount of $8,342 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Cass County purchased properties at an average price of $362,037, securing a 2.3% discount compared to the $370,379 average paid by traditional homeowners. This translated to a modest savings of $8,342 per home.

This Q4 price gap represents a significant tightening from previous quarters. For instance, in Q3 2025, landlords enjoyed a massive 36.5% discount, paying $150,339 less than homeowners on average, indicating a far less competitive environment earlier in the year.

The trend of a narrowing discount continued throughout 2025, falling from 22.9% in Q1 to 26.7% in Q2, and then sharply to 2.3% in Q4, signaling that investors had to pay closer to retail prices as the year concluded.

Comparing prices year-over-year shows a slight market cooling for landlords, whose average acquisition price of $300,756 in 2025 was slightly below the 2024 average of $305,327.

Overall price appreciation since the 2020-2023 boom is evident, with the average Q4 2025 landlord purchase price of $362,037 being 29.5% higher than the $279,575 average from the preceding four years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 13.6% of all SFR properties sold in Cass County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a notable force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 60 of the 440 SFRs sold, which represents a 13.6% share of all transactions in Cass County.

The market saw a significant influx of new investors, with 55 new entities purchasing their first rental property. These single-property landlords accounted for 39 properties, representing 63.9% of all Q4 investor buying activity.

Small, local investors drove virtually all purchasing activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) collectively bought 57 homes, making up 93.4% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Mid-size investors (11-50 properties) were far less active, acquiring only 4 properties combined, which is just 6.6% of the investor purchase volume.

Large-scale and institutional investors were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, with zero properties acquired by entities owning more than 50 homes. This reinforces the narrative of a market overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale participants.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 92.7% of investor-owned SFRs in Cass County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cass County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 92.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Landlords with a single rental property (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 2,496 properties. This single tier alone accounts for 71.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, owning 11-1,000 properties) represent a small fraction of the market, collectively holding only 247 properties, or 7.1% of the total investor portfolio.

The presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) is negligible. These large firms own just 7 properties in the county, making up only 0.2% of the investor market and posing no significant competitive threat to smaller landlords.

This highly fragmented ownership structure, with 71.3% of properties held by single-unit owners, indicates a market characterized by local participation rather than large-scale corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Cass County shows a distinct evolution as investors grow their portfolios. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 86.9% of single-property (Tier 01) and 62.8% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings.

A clear crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where companies take majority control, owning 112 properties (76.7%) compared to just 34 (23.3%) for individuals. This suggests a common strategy of incorporating for liability and financial purposes as a portfolio scales.

This trend of company dominance continues into larger tiers. Companies own 78.6% of properties in the 11-20 unit tier and 83.9% in the 21-50 unit tier, solidifying their role as the primary structure for mid-size landlords.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, ownership is nearly split, with individuals holding a slight majority at 56.1% (203 properties) against companies' 43.9% (159 properties).

This data reveals a typical investor lifecycle in Cass County: starting as an individual and transitioning to a corporate entity as holdings and complexity increase beyond a handful of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The highest concentration of investor properties is in Fargo zip codes 58102, 58103, and 58104.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in the core Fargo area. The top three zip codes by count of investor-owned properties are 58102 (849 properties), 58103 (819 properties), and 58104 (777 properties).

However, the highest rates of investor ownership are found in smaller, more rural zip codes, indicating a different investment focus. Zip code 58027 has an investor ownership rate of 66.7%, followed by 58064 at 46.2% and 58006 at 35.7%.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas highlights divergent strategies. Investors in Fargo's primary zip codes are participating in a larger market, while those in areas like 58027 are dominating a smaller one.

In the high-volume zip code of 58102, the investor ownership rate is 12.3%, which is above the county average of 9.4% but far below the rates seen in the top-ranked rural areas.

Conversely, zip code 58104, despite having the fourth-highest count of investor properties (777), has an ownership rate of only 7.0%, which is below the county average, showing that a high number of properties does not always equate to market saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Cass County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4.76 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Cass County are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrating strong confidence in the market. In Q4 2025, they purchased 81 properties while selling only 17, resulting in a net gain of 64 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.76x.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term trend, not a quarterly anomaly. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 307 properties and sold 96, a net increase of 211 properties. This pattern also held in 2024, with a net gain of 154 properties.

Transaction volume in Q4 (81 buys) was robust, though slightly down from Q3's 95 purchases, it remained higher than Q2's 72 purchases, indicating sustained market activity.

Even the market's small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are net buyers, though their activity is minimal. In 2025, they purchased 5 properties and sold only 2, adding a net of 3 properties to their portfolios.

The consistent, high-volume net buying from the landlord community as a whole signals a bullish outlook on the future of Cass County's single-family rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions represented 12.0% of all market activity in Q4 2025, with 81 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were involved in 12.0% of all SFR transactions in Cass County during Q4, with 81 purchases out of a total of 675 market transactions.

A clear pricing strategy emerges across tiers. New investors (Tier 01) were the most active with 55 transactions and paid a high average price of $355,448, suggesting they are buying market-rate homes to enter the rental space.

In contrast, more established, larger landlords targeted significantly lower-priced assets. Investors in the 21-50 property tier paid an average of just $68,000, and those in the 6-10 property tier paid $208,000, indicating a focus on value-add or distressed properties.

Inter-landlord trading is not a significant source of inventory for small investors. Of the 75 properties purchased by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), only 2 came from other landlords, suggesting most acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market.

The highest average purchase price was paid by two-property landlords at $516,390, though this was based on a smaller sample size of 10 transactions. This may indicate a strategy of acquiring higher-value properties after an initial purchase.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, Individual Landlords Overwhelmingly Dominate Cass County's Rental Market with 92.7% of Holdings
Holdings
In Cass County, investors own 3,386 SFR properties, representing 9.4% of the total market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 2,543 of these properties (75.1%) compared to 902 (26.6%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 purchased homes for 2.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $8,342 ($362,037 vs. $370,379), though this gap has narrowed significantly from previous quarters.
Activity
Investors purchased 13.6% of all homes sold in Q4 (60 properties), a period which saw 55 new single-property landlords enter the market. Mom-and-pop investors drove 93.4% of this activity.
Market Share
The market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 92.7% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier, indicating a common strategy of incorporation for scaling investors.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers in Cass County, with a 4.76x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (81 buys vs. 17 sells). Institutional investors, while small, are also in acquisition mode, adding a net of 3 properties in 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Cass County, North Dakota is fundamentally driven by small, local participants, not large corporations. Investors own 3,386 SFR properties, comprising 9.4% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 92.7% share, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties own a mere 0.2%. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals, who account for 75.1% of investor-owned homes and represent over 86% of all landlord entities.

Investor activity in Q4 2025 demonstrated continued confidence and growth, particularly from new entrants. Landlords acquired 13.6% of all homes sold, with 55 new single-property investors joining the market. This group was the most active, accounting for 63.9% of all investor purchases. Overall, landlords remain aggressive net buyers with a 4.76-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4. While they secured a 2.3% discount compared to homeowners, this price advantage has shrunk considerably from earlier in the year, suggesting a more competitive purchasing environment.

The key takeaway for the Cass County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local capital. The market structure, with its high fragmentation and lack of institutional presence, insulates it from the volatility associated with large-scale investor sell-offs. The consistent influx of new, small landlords and the net-buyer stance of the existing investor community signal a healthy, growing demand for rental properties. The primary dynamic is one of gradual accumulation by local individuals who often incorporate as their portfolios expand beyond a half-dozen properties.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCass (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth