Burke (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Burke (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Burke (ND)
328
Total Investors in Burke (ND)
119
Investor Owned SFR in Burke (ND)
88(26.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
117
SFR Owned
86
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2
SFR Owned
2
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 88 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor-owned housing comprises 26.8% of Burke County's market, exclusively held by individual, mom-and-pop landlords as purchasing activity halts.
Investors own 88 single-family residential properties in Burke County, representing 26.8% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors (97.7%) and entirely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (100%), with zero institutional presence. Recent market activity has frozen, with landlords making zero purchases in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 88 SFRs (26.8% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 97.7% share.
Landlord portfolios are heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 69 properties owned outright versus 19 that are financed. Of the 119 total landlords in the county, 117 are individuals, underscoring the local, small-scale nature of the rental market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Sparse 2025 data shows landlords can achieve extreme discounts, paying 90.1% less than homeowners in Q3.
In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $20,000 while homeowners paid $201,875, a staggering $181,875 difference. However, with zero landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, this pricing data reflects highly opportunistic, low-volume buys rather than a consistent market trend.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing in Burke County halted completely, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
The market saw zero SFR purchases by landlords in the last quarter of 2025, with mom-and-pop and institutional tiers both recording no activity. This represents a 0.0% share of the total market's 0 quarterly sales.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords exercise complete control, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 97.7% of all investor-owned housing, with 86 properties. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (Tier 09), defining this as an exclusively small-investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own nearly all investor properties, with company ownership at a minimal 2.3% in the single-property tier.
Companies have no presence in portfolios larger than one property. In the single-property tier, individuals own 84 properties while companies own just 2. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 58721 zip code, holding 28 properties at a 38.4% ownership rate.
The zip code 58721 is the clear hub for investors, containing nearly a third of all investor-owned properties in the county. Other notable areas include 58773 (25 properties, 27.8% rate) and 58772 (7 properties, 30.4% rate), showing high penetration in specific communities.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data indicates an illiquid market with infrequent landlord-to-landlord sales.
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded for landlords or institutional investors in the available data. This points to a buy-and-hold strategy among local investors and an absence of a trading market for rental properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented 0.0% of all transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market with no recorded sales.
With zero total transactions in the Burke County SFR market for the quarter, all investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to institutional, recorded no activity. There was no inter-landlord trading and no new acquisitions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 88 SFRs (26.8% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 97.7% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 26.8% of the single-family residential market in Burke County, with a total portfolio of 88 properties.

The investor landscape is almost entirely composed of individuals, who own 86 of the 88 properties (97.7%), while companies own just 2 properties (2.3%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 117 of the 119 landlords (98.3%) are individuals, indicating a market of local residents rather than corporate entities.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with landlords holding 69 properties outright, more than triple the 19 properties that are financed. This suggests a low-leverage, financially stable investor base.

Virtually the entire investor-owned portfolio is dedicated to rentals, with 87 of the 88 properties classified as rented, confirming a strong focus on providing housing supply to the local market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Sparse 2025 data shows landlords can achieve extreme discounts, paying 90.1% less than homeowners in Q3.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Burke County displays high variability due to extremely low transaction volumes, making trend analysis challenging. However, available data points to a strategy of opportunistic, deep-discount purchasing.

The most recent data from Q3 2025 shows a dramatic price gap, with landlords acquiring property for an average of $20,000 compared to the traditional homeowner price of $201,875. This represents a massive 90.1% discount, or $181,875 per property.

This significant discount likely reflects non-standard transactions, such as distressed sales or properties requiring substantial renovation, rather than typical market conditions, especially given the lack of consistent activity.

The absence of any landlord purchases in Q4 2025 and sparse data in other periods prevents a reliable analysis of price appreciation or a consistent landlord-versus-homeowner price gap.

Overall, pricing data suggests that investors in this market are not consistently active but instead wait for exceptional opportunities to purchase assets far below the typical homeowner market value.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing in Burke County halted completely, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Burke County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero single-family properties.

This lack of activity means investors captured 0.0% of the total market share for purchases in the quarter, reflecting a frozen market for rental property acquisitions.

The purchasing halt was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who constitute the entirety of the investor base, made no acquisitions.

Correspondingly, there was no activity from institutional investors (Tier 09), as they have no presence in the county.

This pause in purchasing suggests a wait-and-see approach from local investors, potentially driven by local economic factors, interest rates, or a simple lack of available properties meeting their investment criteria.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords exercise complete control, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Burke County is defined by the absolute dominance of small-scale landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 100% of the 88 investor-owned SFRs.

The market is granular to an extreme, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) owning 86 properties, which constitutes 97.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords are virtually non-existent. Only one landlord owns two properties (1.1% share) and one owns between 3-5 properties (1.1% share).

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in Burke County, holding 0.0% of the market. This defies the national narrative of large-scale corporate ownership and highlights the hyper-local nature of this rental market.

The ownership structure indicates a market composed of residents likely investing in their first or second rental property, rather than professional or large-scale real estate operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals own nearly all investor properties, with company ownership at a minimal 2.3% in the single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the sole drivers of the Burke County rental market, owning 86 of the 88 investor properties (97.7%).

Company ownership is negligible, limited to just 2 properties (2.3%), both of which are in single-property portfolios (Tier 01). This suggests these may be small, family-run LLCs rather than larger corporations.

In every tier with more than one property, ownership is 100% individual. This includes the single two-property portfolio and the single small-landlord portfolio in the county.

Consequently, there is no 'crossover point' where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership is dominant across the board, from the smallest to the largest portfolios in the county.

This ownership structure highlights a market completely devoid of corporate investment, relying instead on local residents to provide rental housing.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 58721 zip code, holding 28 properties at a 38.4% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Burke County is not evenly distributed, showing significant concentration in a few key zip codes.

The 58721 zip code is the primary center of investor activity, with 28 investor-owned properties. This area also has the highest investor penetration rate at 38.4%, meaning nearly two in five SFRs are investor-owned.

Following closely in count is the 58773 zip code, with 25 properties and a high ownership rate of 27.8%.

Some smaller communities exhibit very high investor penetration. For instance, the 58772 zip code has a 30.4% ownership rate, with 7 investor-owned properties.

This geographic clustering suggests investors are targeting specific towns or neighborhoods within the county, likely based on localized demand for rental housing or perceived value.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data indicates an illiquid market with infrequent landlord-to-landlord sales.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data for Burke County is empty, which is a significant finding in itself. It indicates an extremely illiquid market where rental properties rarely trade hands.

The absence of buy and sell transactions for landlords suggests that the prevailing investor strategy is long-term buy-and-hold, rather than flipping or portfolio repositioning.

There is no evidence of any landlord-to-landlord transactions, meaning a secondary market for occupied rental properties does not appear to exist in this county.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) have no recorded transaction history, which aligns with their complete lack of ownership in the area.

The overall picture is that of a static, stable rental market where properties are acquired and held for rental income over extended periods, with very little turnover.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented 0.0% of all transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market with no recorded sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 0.0% of all single-family residential transactions in Burke County, as there were no transactions recorded for any buyer type.

The complete lack of market activity means transaction volumes were zero across all investor tiers, from the dominant single-property landlords to larger portfolio holders.

There was no inter-landlord trading activity, with 0% of transactions being sourced from other landlords, reinforcing the illiquid nature of the local rental market.

Average purchase prices by tier are not applicable for the quarter, as no properties were bought or sold by investors.

This data confirms that the halt in investor purchasing seen in Section 7 was part of a broader market freeze in Q4, with neither investors nor other buyer types transacting property.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individuals exclusively control Burke County's investor market, owning 26.8% of SFRs as all purchasing activity halts.
Holdings
Landlords own 88 SFR properties, representing a significant 26.8% of Burke County's market, with individual investors holding a near-total 86 properties (97.7%) and companies owning just 2 (2.3%).
Pricing
Transaction data is too sparse for reliable trend analysis, but a Q3 2025 outlier shows a landlord paying $20,000 versus a homeowner average of $201,875, suggesting a focus on deeply opportunistic buys.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity ceased in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, representing 0.0% of all sales, and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have 100% control of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, holding 97.7% of properties. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist, as they only own 2.3% of single-property portfolios and 0% of others.
Transactions
With no recorded transactions, landlords in Burke County are neither net buyers nor net sellers. The lack of activity for all landlords, including the non-existent institutional tier, points to a buy-and-hold market with minimal turnover.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Burke County, North Dakota, represents a significant portion of the local housing stock, with 88 investor-owned properties comprising 26.8% of all single-family residences. This market is fundamentally local and small-scale. Individual investors own 97.7% of these properties, and the entire portfolio is controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties). Single-property landlords are the backbone, owning 97.7% of all investor-held homes, while institutional investors have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior is characterized by a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy, evidenced by a heavy reliance on cash purchases (69 cash vs. 19 financed) and a complete lack of recent transaction activity. In Q4 2025, landlords made zero property acquisitions, indicating a market that is either in equilibrium or facing headwinds that have paused all investment. The sparse pricing data suggests that when investors do act, they pursue deeply discounted, opportunistic buys far below typical homeowner prices.

The key takeaway for Burke County is a stable, mature rental market dominated by local individuals, not corporations. The high penetration rate combined with a halt in recent activity suggests a market where rental supply and demand are currently balanced. This is not a growth market for new investment but rather a static environment where existing local landlords provide housing with very little property turnover, operating completely outside the trends of institutional investment seen in larger metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBurke (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price