Bottineau (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bottineau (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bottineau (ND)
1,331
Total Investors in Bottineau (ND)
499
Investor Owned SFR in Bottineau (ND)
339(25.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
473
SFR Owned
316
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
26
SFR Owned
27
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 339 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bottineau County with 98.8% Ownership and 61.9% of Q4 Purchases
Investors own 25.5% of the Single-Family Residential market in Bottineau County, with individual investors comprising 93.2% of all landlord-owned properties. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 61.9% of all homes sold, paying a surprising 53.0% premium over traditional homeowners. The market is almost entirely controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 98.8% of the investor-held housing stock, while institutional investors have a near-zero presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 316 properties (93.2%), dominating the 339 landlord-owned homes in Bottineau County.
Cash-financed properties outnumber mortgaged ones nearly 2-to-1, with 221 properties owned outright versus 118 financed. The portfolio is intensely focused on rentals, with 337 of 339 properties (99.4%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 53.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, with an average price of $293,188 vs $191,645.
This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from Q3 and Q2, when landlords secured steep discounts of 42.3% and 34.7%, respectively. The pricing behavior in this market shows extreme quarter-to-quarter volatility. The available data shows no landlord property acquisitions for any listed timeframe, suggesting that buying activity is highly sporadic.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the Q4 market, purchasing 13 of 21 homes for a 61.9% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of landlord acquisitions. The market saw an influx of new investors, with 16 single-property entities acquiring 12 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
The dominance of small investors is profound, with single-property landlords alone owning 92.8% of the housing stock. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, holding just one property, or 0.3% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner at the 3-5 property tier, capturing 61.5% of holdings at that level.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 95.4% of single-property investments and 100% of two-property portfolios. The shift to corporate ownership happens swiftly once a portfolio exceeds two properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 58318 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 273 landlord-owned properties.
Several smaller zip codes exhibit extreme investor saturation, with 58329 and 58782 reporting 100% investor ownership rates. The area with the highest volume (58318) has a 23.2% investor rate, while areas with the highest rates have far fewer properties.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.5 properties for every one they sold.
Landlord acquisition activity was strong with 39 properties purchased versus only 6 sold throughout 2024. This resulted in a net gain of 33 properties to investor portfolios. No transaction data for institutional investors was available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 60.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, with 18 of 30 total deals.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of this transaction volume. A striking 0% of landlord purchases came from other investors, indicating all acquisitions were from the homeowner market. Prices varied wildly by tier, from $21,000 to $372,400.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 316 properties (93.2%), dominating the 339 landlord-owned homes in Bottineau County.
Detailed Findings

Investors own a significant 25.5% of the total Single-Family Residential (SFR) housing stock in Bottineau County, holding 339 out of 1,331 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations, with individuals owning 316 properties (93.2%) compared to just 27 (8.0%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 473 of the 499 total landlords (94.8%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with 221 properties (65.2%) held free of financing, compared to 118 properties (34.8%) that are mortgaged. This suggests a market of financially stable investors with high liquidity.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, as 337 of the 339 properties are non-owner-occupied, signaling a clear business focus rather than casual or secondary home ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 53.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, with an average price of $293,188 vs $191,645.
Detailed Findings

In a significant market reversal, landlords paid a substantial 53.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $293,188 compared to the homeowner average of $191,645.

This $101,543 price premium per property in Q4 stands in stark contrast to the preceding two quarters. In Q3, landlords enjoyed a 42.3% discount ($79,964 less per property), and in Q2 they paid 34.7% less ($99,769 less per property).

The data reveals a highly volatile pricing environment, swinging from deep discounts to high premiums within a single year, suggesting that landlord purchase types or motivations may vary dramatically from quarter to quarter.

While historical price comparisons are available, the underlying data indicates zero properties were purchased by landlords in any of the tracked timeframes (Q1-Q4 2025, 2024, 2020-2023), indicating that transaction volumes are low and activity is inconsistent.

The price for landlords in Q4 2025 ($293,188) represents a significant increase compared to the average price during the 2020-2023 period ($199,887), showing substantial price appreciation in the assets investors are targeting.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the Q4 market, purchasing 13 of 21 homes for a 61.9% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated overwhelming market power in Q4 2025, acquiring 13 of the 21 total SFR properties sold, which amounts to a commanding 61.9% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 100% of the 14 properties purchased.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases and reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of investor activity.

The quarter was defined by new market entrants, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone bought 12 properties, representing 85.7% of all landlord acquisitions.

This wave of new investment came from 16 distinct entities buying in the single-property tier, signaling a significant expansion of the landlord base in Bottineau County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bottineau County is defined by an overwhelming concentration of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 98.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 320 properties, which accounts for 92.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no presence, owning just a single property, or 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords are also exceptionally rare, with only one investor holding between 21 and 50 properties, owning a combined 3 homes (0.9%).

This distribution reveals a market completely driven by small-scale, local capital, challenging any narrative of large corporate control over the area's rental housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner at the 3-5 property tier, capturing 61.5% of holdings at that level.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the rental market, holding 95.4% of all single-property landlord portfolios (308 properties).

The transition from individual to corporate ownership occurs at a very small scale. While individuals own 100% of two-property portfolios, companies become the majority owners (61.5%) in the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties.

This early crossover point suggests that local investors who decide to expand beyond a couple of properties quickly see the strategic advantage of incorporating, likely for liability protection and financial management.

In the 3-5 property tier, companies own 8 properties compared to the 5 owned by individuals, marking the clear point where business formalization becomes the preferred strategy.

Despite this trend, the vast majority of all investor properties (316 of 345) remain under individual ownership due to the sheer volume of single-property landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 58318 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 273 landlord-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated geographically, with the 58318 zip code alone accounting for 273 landlord-owned properties, representing 80.5% of all investor holdings in the county.

While 58318 is the leader in volume, several smaller zip codes demonstrate much higher investor saturation. The 58329 and 58782 zip codes are 100% investor-owned, indicating niche areas that have been fully converted to rental housing.

Other areas with high penetration rates include 58711 (75.0%), 58762 (71.4%), and 58761 (60.0%), showcasing pockets of intense investor focus.

There is a clear distinction between the market's core volume hub (58318 with a 23.2% rate) and these smaller, high-saturation rental enclaves.

The top five regions by property count are 58318 (273 properties), 58793 (17 properties), 58750 (14 properties), 58384 (9 properties), and 58762 (5 properties).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.5 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bottineau County showed a strong appetite for growth in 2024, operating as decisive net buyers throughout the year.

Transaction data from 2024 reveals that landlords purchased 39 SFR properties while selling only 6, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.5 to 1.

This high ratio signifies strong confidence in the local market and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion among investors, adding a net total of 33 properties to their holdings.

Data on institutional-level (1000+ tier) transactions was not available, but given their minimal ownership presence, their activity is likely negligible.

The available data does not specify the percentage of transactions that occurred between landlords, focusing solely on the net buying and selling behavior of the investor class as a whole.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 60.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, with 18 of 30 total deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary movers in the Q4 2025 real estate market, participating in 18 of the 30 total transactions for a dominant 60.0% market share.

All 18 of these landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional-level entities.

Notably, none of the landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords (0% 'Bought From Landlords'), meaning investors acquired 100% of their new properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Average purchase prices showed extreme variance between tiers. Two-property landlords paid the most at $372,400, while single-property landlords averaged $306,973.

In a significant outlier, the single transaction in the 3-5 property tier was for just $21,000, which could represent a land purchase, a distressed asset, or a non-arms-length transaction.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Bottineau County's Market, Owning 98.8% of Rentals and Driving 62% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Landlords own 339 Single-Family Residential properties in Bottineau County, representing a 25.5% market penetration rate, with individual investors holding a commanding 93.2% of that portfolio.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid a surprising 53.0% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average price of $293,188 versus $191,645, a reversal of earlier trends.
Activity
Landlords dominated Q4 sales, purchasing 13 properties for a 61.9% market share, with activity driven by an influx of 16 new single-property landlord entities.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with 98.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors own just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate overall, companies become the majority owners (61.5%) in portfolios as small as 3-5 properties, marking a very early crossover point for incorporation.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 6.5x buy-to-sell ratio, and in Q4 2025 they were involved in 60.0% of all market transactions. No institutional transaction activity was recorded.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Bottineau County, North Dakota, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale enterprise. Investors command a significant 25.5% of the county's single-family housing stock, with a total of 339 properties under their control. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individuals, who own 93.2% of these homes. The market structure is extremely bottom-heavy: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint at just 0.3%.

Investor behavior reflects this grassroots composition. In Q4 2025, landlords drove the market by purchasing 61.9% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop buyers. This included an influx of 16 new single-property investors, signaling ongoing growth from new entrants. Pricing behavior is volatile; after securing deep discounts earlier in the year, Q4 saw landlords pay a surprising 53.0% premium over homeowners. This activity follows a strong 2024, where landlords operated as decisive net buyers, acquiring 6.5 properties for every one they sold.

The key takeaway for Bottineau County is that its rental market is defined not by corporate strategy but by the decisions of hundreds of individual operators. The path to growth involves early incorporation, as companies become the majority owners in portfolios as small as 3-5 properties. With activity heavily concentrated in specific zip codes like 58318 and smaller enclaves reaching 100% investor saturation, the market's future will be dictated by the confidence and financial capacity of these local landlords, who continue to actively expand their holdings by acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBottineau (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices