Benson (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Benson (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Benson (ND)
555
Total Investors in Benson (ND)
335
Investor Owned SFR in Benson (ND)
229(41.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
322
SFR Owned
220
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
13
SFR Owned
13
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 229 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Benson County a Mom-and-Pop Stronghold: Small Investors Own 100% of Rental Homes and Captured 45.5% of Q4 Sales
Investors own 41.3% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Benson County, ND, a market completely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (100% of holdings). In Q4 2025, these small investors were highly active, purchasing 45.5% of all homes sold while paying an anomalous 515.7% premium over traditional homeowners in a low-volume quarter. Landlords remain strong net buyers, signaling continued portfolio growth in this individual-dominated market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 41.3% of Benson County SFRs, with individual landlords holding 96.1%.
Cash purchases (159 properties) are more than double the number of financed ones (70 properties). The market is comprised of 322 individual landlords compared to only 13 operating as companies. All 229 investor-owned properties are classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 515.7% premium over homeowners in Q4, a significant anomaly.
The Q4 average landlord price was $540,622 versus just $87,800 for homeowners, a staggering difference of $452,822. This deviates sharply from Q3, when landlords paid a more moderate 20.5% premium. This pricing volatility suggests very low transaction volumes or unique, high-value property sales.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 45.5% of all Q4 2025 home sales, driven entirely by small investors.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 5 landlord purchases. Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with 4 new single-property landlords entering the market. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely control Benson County's rental market with 100% ownership.
Single-property landlords are the cornerstone of the market, alone owning 225 properties, which constitutes 97.0% of all investor-owned SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero ownership stake in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, including 94.3% of single-property portfolios.
Companies have a minimal presence, owning only 13 properties in total, all at the single-property level. There is no portfolio size in Benson County where companies are the majority owners, as individuals hold 100% of properties in the two-property and 3-5 property tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip code 58346, with 69 properties at a 56.1% rate.
Certain micro-markets show extreme investor penetration, with zip code 58341 at 100% investor ownership. Zip code 58348 is another significant hub, containing 53 investor-owned homes (42.1% rate).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, buying 20 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
This aggressive buying resulted in a net gain of 19 properties for investor portfolios throughout 2025. All transactional activity is driven by smaller investors, as there were no recorded transactions by institutional firms.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 29.4% of all Q4 property transactions, all sourced from the open market.
All 5 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, who paid an average of $120,667 for single-property acquisitions. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating investors are acquiring stock from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 41.3% of Benson County SFRs, with individual landlords holding 96.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership constitutes a significant portion of the housing stock in Benson County, ND, with 229 of the 555 total Single-Family Residential properties (41.3%) held by landlords.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 220 properties, accounting for 96.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 13 properties (5.7%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 322 individual landlords operating in the county compared to just 13 companies, a ratio of nearly 25 to 1.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 159 properties owned outright versus 70 that are financed. This indicates that a majority of investor capital in the area is deployed without reliance on leverage.

The entire investor-owned portfolio of 229 properties is actively part of the rental market, classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, highlighting the direct impact of investor activity on the local rental supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 515.7% premium over homeowners in Q4, a significant anomaly.
Detailed Findings

In a striking deviation from typical market behavior, landlords in Benson County paid a massive 515.7% premium for homes in Q4 2025 compared to traditional homeowners. The average landlord acquisition price was recorded at $540,622, while homeowners paid an average of just $87,800.

This enormous $452,822 price gap in Q4 represents a significant market anomaly, especially when compared to the prior quarter. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a much smaller premium of 20.5% ($220,000 vs. $182,500), indicating extreme price volatility between quarters.

The pricing data across 2025 shows inconsistent and dramatic swings, with a Q1 premium of 204.4% followed by the Q3 and Q4 figures. This pattern is characteristic of a very low-volume market where a single high-value transaction can heavily skew the quarterly average.

Overall price appreciation for landlord-acquired properties appears substantial, with the average price in 2025 ($310,681) nearly double the 2024 average ($160,593), though this is based on a small number of transactions.

The absence of the typical landlord discount suggests investors in this specific market may be targeting premium properties or competing fiercely for limited inventory, rather than acquiring distressed or lower-cost assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 45.5% of all Q4 2025 home sales, driven entirely by small investors.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 5 of the 11 total SFR properties sold in Benson County. This represents a commanding 45.5% market share for the quarter.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in Tiers 01-04 accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions, highlighting the grassroots nature of the local market.

New entrants were a primary driver of Q4 activity. Four of the five properties were purchased by new single-property landlords, indicating a healthy influx of first-time investors into the Benson County rental market.

The market's smallest investors were the most active, as the single-property (Tier 01) and two-property (Tier 02) landlords were the only ones to make acquisitions.

In stark contrast to national headlines, large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had no presence in the market, making zero purchases during the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely control Benson County's rental market with 100% ownership.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Benson County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 100% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Market concentration is exceptionally high at the smallest end of the spectrum. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 225 properties, representing a staggering 97.0% of all investor holdings.

The scale of investors remains minimal beyond the first tier. Landlords with two properties own just 6 homes (2.6%), and those with 3-5 properties own a single home (0.4%).

There is no presence of mid-size (11-1000 properties) or institutional (1000+ properties) investors in this market. This indicates that the local rental supply is entirely managed by small, local operators rather than large corporations.

This ownership structure suggests that market dynamics, such as rent prices and property availability, are directly influenced by the collective decisions of hundreds of individual investors, not a consolidated entity.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, including 94.3% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain overwhelming control across every investor tier in Benson County. Even in the most populous single-property tier, individuals own 216 of the 229 properties, a 94.3% share.

Corporate ownership is exceptionally scarce, with companies holding a total of only 13 properties (5.7%), all of which are in single-property portfolios. This indicates companies are not scaling their operations in this market.

There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type. Individuals represent 100% of ownership in the two-property tier (6 properties) and the small landlord tier (1 property), leaving no room for corporate control at any scale.

The data clearly shows that portfolio growth in Benson County is an individual pursuit. As landlords expand their holdings from one to multiple properties, they continue to operate as individuals rather than forming corporate entities.

This structure reinforces the hyper-local, non-corporate nature of the Benson County rental market, where personal ownership is the standard at all levels of investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip code 58346, with 69 properties at a 56.1% rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Benson County is not evenly distributed, showing significant concentration in a few key zip codes. The 58346 zip code is the primary hub, with 69 investor-owned SFRs, representing 56.1% of its housing stock.

Some areas are almost entirely rental markets. The 58341 zip code reports a 100% investor ownership rate, signaling a complete conversion of its SFR properties to rental housing.

Following 58346, the 58348 zip code is another investor hotspot, with 53 properties owned by landlords, making up 42.1% of the local market.

High investor penetration is a common theme across several zip codes. 58332 also shows a high concentration with a 47.7% investor ownership rate.

The geographic data reveals that landlord strategy is focused on specific communities within the county, creating pockets of high rental density rather than a uniform spread of investment.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, buying 20 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Benson County demonstrated a clear and aggressive growth strategy in 2025, operating as strong net buyers. They acquired 20 properties while selling only 1 throughout the year.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 20-to-1, one of the strongest indicators of an accumulation phase. For every property an investor sold, 20 more were purchased, resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 19 homes.

Transactional data from Q2 2025 further supports this trend, showing 2 purchases against only 1 sale, maintaining a net-positive acquisition rate even within specific quarters.

The historical transaction data contains no activity for institutional investors (1000+ tier), confirming that the market's growth and liquidity are entirely functions of mom-and-pop landlord behavior.

This sustained net buying signals strong investor confidence in the future of the Benson County real estate market and a collective effort to expand the local rental supply.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 29.4% of all Q4 property transactions, all sourced from the open market.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 5 of the 17 total SFR transactions, a market share of 29.4%.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated among the smallest players. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of these transactions, with no activity from mid-size or institutional tiers.

A crucial finding from the quarter is the source of investor acquisitions. Zero percent of the properties bought by landlords were purchased from other landlords, suggesting that investors are exclusively buying from traditional homeowners or new construction.

This pattern indicates that investors are expanding the overall rental pool in Benson County, rather than simply trading existing rental properties among themselves.

Pricing for new entrants was modest, with single-property (Tier 01) buyers paying an average of $120,667 per property in Q4 transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Benson County a Mom-and-Pop Stronghold: Small Investors Own 100% of Rentals and Captured 45.5% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
In Benson County, ND, landlords own 229 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 41.3% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 220 of these properties (96.1%), compared to just 13 (5.7%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a highly unusual quarter, landlords paid an average price of $540,622 in Q4, a 515.7% premium over the traditional homeowner price of $87,800. This anomaly in a low-volume market contrasts with the typical trend where investors pay a discount.
Activity
Landlords were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 5 properties and capturing 45.5% of all sales. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 4 new single-property landlords joining the market, while institutional investors remained completely inactive.
Market Share
The investor market in Benson County is completely controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 100% of all investor-held housing. Single-property landlords alone dominate, holding a 97.0% share of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding 96.1% of all investor properties and 100% of portfolios with 2 or more properties. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, underscoring the market's non-corporate nature.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in 2025, with a 20-to-1 buy/sell ratio (20 buys vs 1 sell), signaling an aggressive accumulation strategy. All transaction activity is driven by small landlords, as institutional investors recorded zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Benson County, ND, is a definitive stronghold of the small, individual investor. Landlords own a substantial 41.3% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 229 properties. This market is characterized by its grassroots structure; individual investors own 96.1% of these homes, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Large-scale corporate or institutional ownership is entirely absent, making Benson County a pure reflection of a locally-driven rental market.

Investor behavior is marked by aggressive acquisition and a clear growth mandate. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 45.5% of all homes sold, with all activity originating from the smallest mom-and-pop tiers. Throughout 2025, landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 20 homes for every one they sold. Pricing in the low-volume Q4 market was anomalous, with landlords paying a significant premium over homeowners, a departure from typical trends that suggests competition for limited, desirable inventory.

The key takeaway from Benson County is the profound dominance of the small landlord, which shapes the entire rental ecosystem. Unlike institutionally-influenced markets, housing availability and rental conditions here are dictated by the collective actions of over 300 individual operators. The market's trajectory is one of continued expansion from the ground up, as new, first-time landlords enter and existing ones actively expand their portfolios, bringing more properties from the sales market into the local rental supply.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:22 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBenson (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail