Haywood (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Haywood (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Haywood (NC)
27,456
Total Investors in Haywood (NC)
13,488
Investor Owned SFR in Haywood (NC)
10,023(36.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,921
SFR Owned
8,766
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,567
SFR Owned
1,614
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,023 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Haywood County, Paying Premiums to Expand Portfolios
Small-scale investors control 97.6% of the 10,023 landlord-owned SFRs in Haywood County, a 36.5% market share. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 39.4% of all homes sold and paying an unusual 6.4% premium over homeowners. Institutional investors remain absent from this highly localized market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 10,023 SFR properties in Haywood County, with individuals holding 87.5%.
The vast majority of investor properties are held with cash (76.4%) versus financing (23.6%). Nearly all (98.4%) are designated as rentals, indicating a strong focus on investment rather than secondary homes.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Haywood County landlords paid a 6.4% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
Landlords have paid a premium over homeowners for three consecutive quarters, peaking at 10.1% ($46,148) in Q3 before settling at 6.4% ($24,864) in Q4. This reverses the 5.0% discount observed in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 39.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 119 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all investor activity, accounting for 95.8% of purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in Haywood County this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
The market is defined by small investors, with single-property landlords alone owning 75.1% (7,869 properties) of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors have a near-zero footprint, holding just 2 properties and making no new acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 54.9% of homes.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 87.2% of single-property holdings and 82.8% of two-property holdings. The balance of power shifts definitively to companies only in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 28786 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 3,005 properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 28751 zip code, where landlords own 55.4% of all SFRs. The top 5 zip codes by count all have investor ownership rates exceeding 29%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4.
This strong net buyer stance has been consistent, with landlords also being net buyers in Q3 2025 (214 buys vs 29 sells) and throughout 2024 (649 buys vs 74 sells). Purchase volume in Q4 (172) decreased from Q3 (214) but remains robust.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 35.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 172 deals.
New single-property landlords paid one of the highest average prices at $442,550 per home. Larger investors demonstrated more inter-landlord trading, with 50.0% of their purchases coming from other landlords versus only 8.0% for the single-property tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 10,023 SFR properties in Haywood County, with individuals holding 87.5%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a significant 36.5% of the Single-Family Residential market in Haywood County, owning 10,023 out of 27,456 total SFR properties.

Individual investors are the dominant force, owning 8,766 properties, which constitutes 87.5% of the investor-owned market, compared to 1,614 properties (16.1%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 11,921 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 1,567 company landlords, indicating a fragmented market of small operators.

Investor portfolios are overwhelmingly geared towards rental income, with 9,865 properties (98.4% of the portfolio) classified as rented.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 7,656 properties (76.4%) owned outright, compared to only 2,367 (23.6%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Haywood County landlords paid a 6.4% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to typical market behavior, landlords in Haywood County paid more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $413,821 compared to the homeowner average of $388,957.

This represents a significant 6.4% premium, or $24,864 more per property, paid by investors during the quarter, suggesting intense competition for desirable assets.

This premium pricing strategy has been a consistent trend for the past three quarters. Landlords also paid premiums of 10.1% in Q3 ($502,198 vs $456,050) and 6.8% in Q2 ($479,978 vs $449,227).

The recent trend marks a sharp reversal from early 2025, when landlords secured a 5.0% discount in Q1, paying $395,864 while homeowners paid $416,658.

This sustained premium suggests investors are aggressively competing for limited inventory in Haywood County and are willing to pay more to secure properties that meet their investment criteria.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 39.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 119 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was robust in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 119 of the 302 SFR properties sold, capturing a 39.4% share of the market.

The market's new entrants and small-scale investors were the primary drivers of this activity. Single-property landlords alone acquired 92 properties, representing 77.3% of all investor purchases.

"Mom-and-pop" landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were overwhelmingly dominant, collectively responsible for 114 purchases, or 95.8% of the investor total.

This highlights a hyper-localized and fragmented investor landscape, with 137 new landlord entities entering the market by purchasing their first property.

Large-scale investors were entirely absent from the Q4 market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases, reinforcing the narrative that Haywood County is a market dominated by smaller, local players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Haywood County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 97.6% of all investor-held SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 7,869 properties, which accounts for 75.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

The concentration at the small end of the market is extreme. The top three tiers (1, 2, and 3-5 properties) together control 95.4% of all investor-owned housing.

In stark contrast, institutional capital (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) has a virtually non-existent presence, holding only 2 properties for a 0.0% market share.

The complete lack of Q4 purchasing activity from institutional players indicates this is not a target market for large-scale capital, leaving the field open to individual and small-scale investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 54.9% of homes.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, a clear pattern emerges as portfolio sizes increase: company ownership becomes more prevalent.

The critical crossover point occurs in the "small-medium" 11-20 property tier, where companies own a majority stake of 54.9% (107 properties) compared to individuals' 45.1% (88 properties).

Below this threshold, individuals are the clear majority. They own 87.2% of single-property portfolios and 82.8% of two-property portfolios.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain a strong two-thirds majority, holding 67.5% of the properties.

Interestingly, the 21-50 property tier reverts back to individual dominance (84.6%), suggesting the transition to corporate structures is not linear and may be influenced by specific local investor strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 28786 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 3,005 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Haywood County is highly concentrated, with the 28786 zip code alone accounting for 3,005 investor-owned properties.

While 28786 leads in raw volume, the 28751 zip code exhibits the highest market saturation, with investors owning a majority 55.4% of all single-family homes.

There is a clear distinction between volume and penetration rate. The area with the most properties (28786) has a 34.3% investor rate, while the area with the highest rate (28751) is second in total volume with 1,967 properties.

High investor presence is a common theme across top zip codes. NC-Haywood-28745 and NC-Haywood-28743 both show investors owning over half the SFR stock, at 50.8% and 50.0% respectively.

The top five zip codes by property count (28786, 28751, 28716, 28785, 28721) collectively represent the vast majority of the county's investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Haywood County demonstrated a strong appetite for acquisition in Q4 2025, acting as decisive net buyers by purchasing 172 properties while selling only 26.

This equates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.6 to 1, signaling a period of significant portfolio expansion and confidence in the local market.

This aggressive accumulation is not a new trend. The net buyer position was even stronger in Q3 2025, with a ratio of 7.4 to 1 (214 buys to 29 sells).

Looking at the full year, the pattern holds. In 2025, landlords acquired 642 properties and sold just 91, and in 2024 they bought 649 while selling only 74.

The consistent, high-volume net buying across the last two years indicates a sustained, strategic expansion of rental portfolios throughout Haywood County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 35.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 172 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a central role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 172 of the 489 total SFR transactions, which represents a 35.2% market share.

New and small investors dominated this activity, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 137 transactions, or 79.7% of all landlord deals.

A distinct pricing strategy emerges by tier. New landlords (Tier 01) paid a premium average price of $442,550, while the few transactions by larger tiers (e.g., Tier 3-5 at $171,272) were at much lower price points, suggesting they target different types of assets.

The source of properties also varies by investor size. The most experienced buyers in the market (Large 101-1000 tier) acquired 50.0% of their properties from other landlords, indicating a strategy of buying established rental assets.

In contrast, new entrants (Tier 01) were far more likely to buy from the open market, with only 8.0% of their purchases coming from existing landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Haywood County with 97.6% Ownership, Aggressively Buying at a Premium
Holdings
In Haywood County, landlords own 10,023 SFR properties, representing a significant 36.5% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (8,766 properties, 87.5%) compared to companies (1,614 properties, 16.1%).
Pricing
Landlords paid a 6.4% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4, an average of $24,864 more per property ($413,821 vs $388,957), continuing a trend of paying more for acquisitions.
Activity
Landlords purchased 39.4% of all Q4 home sales (119 properties), with activity driven by small investors as 137 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible share of 0.0% with just 2 properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control (54.9%) in the 11-20 property tier, marking the transition to more formalized ownership structures.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.6x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (172 buys vs 26 sells), a consistent trend of portfolio growth. Institutional investors had zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Haywood County, NC is characterized by a deep and concentrated presence of local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 10,023 properties, capturing a substantial 36.5% of the total SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 97.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, institutional investors are virtually non-existent, owning only 0.0% of the portfolio. Ownership is primarily individual-based, with 87.5% of properties held by individuals versus 16.1% by companies.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was defined by aggressive acquisition. Landlords purchased 39.4% of all homes sold and were decisive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 properties for every one they sold. Unusually, they paid a 6.4% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for desirable assets. This activity was fueled by new entrants, with 137 new single-property landlords joining the market. This dynamic shows a thriving, expanding base of small investors confident in the local market's future.

The key takeaway for Haywood County is that its rental market is fundamentally local and fragmented, defying the national narrative of corporate consolidation. The market's health and future direction are tied to the financial capacity and strategic decisions of thousands of individual investors, not a handful of large institutions. This structure suggests a resilient rental supply but also points to a highly competitive acquisition environment where local knowledge and the willingness to pay a premium are critical for growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:53 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHaywood (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison