Davie (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Davie (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Davie (NC)
11,181
Total Investors in Davie (NC)
2,652
Investor Owned SFR in Davie (NC)
2,230(19.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,381
SFR Owned
1,927
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
271
SFR Owned
350
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,230 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 95.1% of Davie County's Investor Market Amid Institutional Absence
Investors own 19.9% of the SFR market in Davie County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 95.1% of the portfolio versus a mere 1.9% for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords purchased 29.2% of all homes sold, securing them at an 18.0% discount compared to homeowners, and acted as aggressive net buyers with a 4.4-to-1 buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,230 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 86.4% share.
The majority of investor properties are owned outright, with cash purchases (1,879) outnumbering financed ones (351) by more than 5-to-1. Nearly all investor-owned properties are rentals, with 2,160 of 2,230 (96.9%) identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 18.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $66,850 per property.
The landlord discount has been widening, increasing from 12.3% in Q2 and 14.8% in Q3 to 18.0% in Q4 2025. This contrasts sharply with Q1, where landlords unusually paid a 45.1% premium.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 29.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 31 of 106 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the exclusive source of investor activity, accounting for 100% of all 31 landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in Davie County this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 95.1% of all investor-owned housing in Davie County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minor 1.9% share of the market. With zero purchases in Q4, their presence is currently static, not growing, while small landlords continue to drive all market activity.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across all small-to-mid-size tiers, from 91.3% in single-property portfolios to 73.5% in 6-10 property portfolios.
Based on available data, there is no tier where companies become the majority owner in Davie County, highlighting the pervasive dominance of individual landlords. Institutional investors own 45 properties in total.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 27028 zip code alone holding 1,536 properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 27014 zip code, where an astonishing 80.1% of SFRs are investor-owned. This contrasts with the 27028 zip code, which has a much larger raw count but a lower 20.0% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This strong net buying trend is consistent, with a buy/sell ratio of 4.3x for all of 2025 and an even higher 5.5x for 2024. Transaction volume remains robust and stable, with 164 purchases in 2025 compared to 153 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 24.4% of all SFR transactions in Q4, accounting for 40 of 164 total sales.
All 40 transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, as institutions made zero purchases. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $320,641 and sourced 11.4% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,230 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 86.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Davie County, owning 2,230 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 19.9% of the total 11,181 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by 2,381 individual investors who own 1,927 properties (86.4% of the portfolio), dwarfing the 350 properties (15.7%) held by 271 company entities.

A strong preference for all-cash holdings is evident, with investors owning 1,879 properties outright compared to only 351 that carry financing. This 5.3-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties indicates a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental housing, as 2,160 of the 2,230 properties (96.9%) are classified as non-owner-occupied or rented, highlighting a clear focus on generating rental income.

The data points to a market dominated by private capital and individual operators, challenging the narrative of corporate landlord consolidation in this specific geography.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 18.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $66,850 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $305,049, which is $66,850 (18.0%) less than the $371,899 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap in favor of investors has widened steadily throughout the year, growing from a 12.3% discount in Q2 and a 14.8% discount in Q3, signaling a strengthening negotiating position for landlords in the market.

The consistent quarterly discounts stand in stark contrast to an anomalous Q1 2025, where landlords paid a significant premium of 45.1% ($471,680 vs. $325,157), likely due to a small number of high-value, targeted acquisitions.

Long-term price appreciation remains strong, with the average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 ($305,049) showing substantial growth from the 2024 average of $228,028 and the 2020-2023 average of $208,808.

The ability to consistently secure properties well below the prices paid by traditional homeowners suggests investors are effectively identifying undervalued assets or leveraging superior deal-sourcing strategies.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 29.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 31 of 106 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, capturing 29.2% of all SFR sales by purchasing 31 of the 106 properties that were sold.

The entirety of this quarter's investor activity was driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who accounted for a full 100% of the 31 acquisitions.

The market saw a significant influx of new investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) making up the vast majority of activity by purchasing 26 of the 31 properties (83.9%).

In a clear sign of local market dynamics, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive in Davie County during Q4, acquiring zero properties and ceding all activity to smaller players.

The data indicates a healthy, ground-level market expansion, with 35 new entities entering the single-property landlord tier, highlighting the area's appeal to first-time investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 95.1% of all investor-owned housing in Davie County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Davie County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the backbone of the rental market, alone accounting for 1,572 properties, which represents 67.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

The footprint of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is minimal, with their 45 properties making up just 1.9% of the investor market, challenging any narrative of large-scale corporate dominance.

Davie County's investor market is highly fragmented and heavily skewed towards the smallest players. All tiers with 11 or more properties combined account for less than 5% of the total investor portfolio.

The complete lack of purchasing activity from the institutional tier in Q4 indicates their local portfolio is not in an expansion phase, leaving market growth entirely in the hands of smaller, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across all small-to-mid-size tiers, from 91.3% in single-property portfolios to 73.5% in 6-10 property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors constitute the clear majority of owners across every reported portfolio tier. Their share begins at 91.3% for single-property landlords and remains a commanding 73.5% even in the 6-10 property tier.

Unlike many other markets, Davie County shows no evidence of a 'crossover point' where corporate entities overtake individuals in ownership share, even as portfolio sizes increase.

While never achieving a majority, the share of company ownership does grow with scale, increasing from 8.7% in the single-property tier to 26.5% in the 6-10 property tier, indicating a move toward more formal structures for larger local operations.

The data firmly establishes that the 'mom-and-pop' segment is overwhelmingly composed of private individuals. For portfolios of 1-5 properties, individuals own 1,934 properties compared to only 244 for companies.

The ownership structure strongly suggests that real estate investment in Davie County is primarily an activity for private individuals rather than a target for large-scale corporate consolidation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 27028 zip code alone holding 1,536 properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Davie County are located in the 27028 zip code, which contains 1,536 properties and represents nearly 69% of the entire investor portfolio.

The 27014 zip code stands out for its extreme investor penetration rate of 80.1%, indicating a hyper-local market almost entirely composed of rental or investment properties rather than owner-occupied homes.

A clear divergence exists between volume and saturation. The zip code with the highest property count (27028) has a 20.0% investor ownership rate, while the zip code with the highest rate (27014) has a much smaller count of 185 properties.

Two smaller zip codes, 28625 and 27014, reveal remarkably high investor saturation with rates of 58.3% and 80.1% respectively, suggesting specific neighborhoods or developments are targeted investor hotspots.

While ownership is heavily concentrated by raw count in one primary area, the data shows that high-density pockets of investment exist across the county, reflecting diverse geographic strategies among investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Davie County are clearly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 40 properties while selling only 9, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4.4-to-1.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term trend, not a quarterly anomaly. The buy/sell ratio for the full year 2025 was a strong 4.3x (164 buys vs. 38 sells), following an even more aggressive 5.5x ratio in 2024 (153 buys vs. 28 sells).

The pace of acquisitions has remained remarkably steady year-over-year. Investors purchased 164 properties in 2025, a slight increase from the 153 properties purchased in 2024, indicating persistent confidence in the local market.

The low number of sales relative to purchases suggests that investors are employing a long-term buy-and-hold strategy rather than speculative flipping, with annual sales representing a very small fraction of the total 2,230-property portfolio.

The absence of any reported institutional transactions means the market's liquidity and net growth are being driven entirely by smaller, independent landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 24.4% of all SFR transactions in Q4, accounting for 40 of 164 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a role in nearly a quarter of all market activity in Q4, with their 40 transactions making up 24.4% of the 164 total SFR sales in Davie County.

Small investors were the sole drivers of transactional activity, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 100% of investor purchases while institutional investors remained on the sidelines.

New entrants (Tier 01) paid the highest average price among active investor tiers at $320,641, significantly more than the average prices paid by landlords in the 2-property ($182,500) and 3-5 property ($230,833) tiers.

Inter-landlord trading appears limited. Only the single-property tier sourced acquisitions from existing landlords, with 11.4% of their purchases coming from this channel.

The single-property tier not only dominated transaction volume with 35 of 40 investor deals but also showed a willingness to pay a premium, suggesting they are competing directly with traditional homeowners for available inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 95.1% of Davie County's Investor Market as Institutions Remain Absent
Holdings
Investors own 2,230 single-family residential properties, a 19.9% share of the market in Davie County. Individual investors command the portfolio with 1,927 homes (86.4%), far outpacing the 350 properties (15.7%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at a significant 18.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $305,049 versus $371,899, a savings of $66,850 per home.
Activity
Investor purchasing accounted for 29.2% of all Q4 sales (31 properties), with activity driven entirely by small landlords. The market welcomed 35 new single-property landlord entities this quarter.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 95.1% of the portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.9% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, holding over 73% of properties even in the 6-10 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressively expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers with a 4.4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (40 buys vs. 9 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, neither buying nor selling.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Davie County, NC is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 2,230 properties, representing 19.9% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 95.1% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint of just 1.9%. The market is further characterized by individual ownership, with private individuals holding 86.4% of the assets compared to 15.7% for companies.

Investor behavior is marked by strategic, discounted acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, purchasing 29.2% of all homes sold while securing an 18.0% price advantage over traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by an influx of new market participants, as 35 new single-property landlord entities emerged this quarter. The long-term trend shows landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.4 properties for every one they sold in Q4, signaling strong confidence and a clear buy-and-hold strategy.

The key takeaway is that the investor landscape in Davie County is the opposite of a consolidated, corporate-run market. It is a highly fragmented ecosystem built and expanded by local individuals and small-scale operators. This structure suggests a stable rental market less susceptible to the large, sudden strategy shifts of institutional capital. Growth is organic and from the ground up, driven by new entrants who are successfully competing for inventory and building the local supply of rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:43 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDavie (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct