Granite (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Granite (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Granite (MT)
510
Total Investors in Granite (MT)
405
Investor Owned SFR in Granite (MT)
305(59.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
371
SFR Owned
275
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
34
SFR Owned
34
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 305 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Granite (MT) Landlords Dominate Housing with 59.8% Ownership, Driven by Mom-and-Pops
Granite County's housing market sees exceptional investor presence, with 305 SFR properties or 59.8% of the market owned by landlords, primarily individuals (90.2%). Mom-and-pop investors control virtually all (99.7%) of this portfolio, while institutional activity is absent. Landlords demonstrate a significant buying advantage, securing an 8.6% discount against homeowners in Q3 2025, and are strong net buyers with a 12.0x buy/sell ratio in 2024, with Q4 2025 seeing landlords account for 80.0% of all SFR transactions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords Own 59.8% of Granite (MT) SFR Properties; Individuals Hold 90.2% of Portfolio
All 305 investor-owned SFR properties are rented, with 76.4% (233 properties) acquired with cash. Individual landlords account for 91.6% of all landlord entities (371 out of 405), reinforcing mom-and-pop dominance.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secure 8.6% Discount in Q3 2025; Q4 Pricing Undetermined for Homeowners
Landlords paid $425,733 in Q3 2025, a $40,232 (8.6%) discount compared to homeowners' $465,965. Q4 2025 landlord average acquisition price was $208,810, but homeowner data is unavailable for comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Dominate Q4 Purchases, Acquiring 80.0% of All SFR Properties
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) made 100.0% of all landlord purchases, acquiring 4 properties. Two new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the market, while institutional investors showed no Q4 activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.7% of Investor-Owned SFR in Granite (MT)
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 84.9% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence, owning 0.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate Smaller Tiers, Accounting for 91.0% of Single-Property Holdings
Individual ownership in Tier 01 is 91.0% (244 properties), decreasing to 54.5% (6 properties) in Tier 03-05. Companies nearly reach parity in the 3-5 property tier (45.5%), but no crossover to majority is observed in available data.
Geographic Distribution
Granite (MT) Investor Holdings Concentrated in Two Zip Codes with Over 60% Ownership Rates
MT-Granite-59858 leads with 232 investor-owned properties and a 62.5% ownership rate, closely followed by MT-Granite-59832 with 62 properties and a 61.4% rate. These top regions demonstrate a strong correlation between high property counts and high investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Granite (MT) Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 12.0x More Properties Than Sold in 2024
In 2024, landlords bought 12 properties and sold only 1, resulting in a net gain of 11 properties. No data is available for institutional investor activity or inter-landlord transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Dominate Q4 2025 Transactions with 80.0% Market Share; No Inter-Landlord Trades
Landlords completed 4 of 5 total SFR transactions in Q4, all from mom-and-pop tiers. Tier 02 landlords acquired properties at an average price of $208,810, while Tier 01 pricing is unavailable.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords Own 59.8% of Granite (MT) SFR Properties; Individuals Hold 90.2% of Portfolio
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Granite (MT) command a significant presence, owning 305 SFR properties, which represents an exceptionally high 59.8% of the total SFR market. This deep penetration highlights a market heavily shaped by rental property investments.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, controlling 275 SFR properties (90.2% of the total investor-owned portfolio) compared to companies, which own just 34 properties (11.1%). This reflects a market largely driven by smaller, private landlords.

The prevalence of individual landlords extends to entity counts, with 371 individual landlords accounting for 91.6% of all 405 landlord entities, a substantial ratio of nearly 11 individual investors for every company.

All 305 landlord-owned properties are classified as rented, indicating a 100% non-owner-occupied portfolio and a strong focus on generating rental income within the county.

A significant majority of landlord acquisitions are cash-based, with 233 properties (76.4%) owned outright, while only 72 properties (23.6%) are financed. This high cash ownership suggests strong financial positions or a preference for avoiding debt among investors in Granite (MT).

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secure 8.6% Discount in Q3 2025; Q4 Pricing Undetermined for Homeowners
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Granite (MT) demonstrated a clear pricing advantage in Q3 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $425,733. This represents a substantial $40,232 discount, or 8.6% less, than the $465,965 paid by traditional homeowners.

The average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 was $208,810. However, the absence of corresponding homeowner acquisition price data for the same quarter prevents a direct comparison of the price gap or premium.

Despite the lack of homeowner data for Q4 2025, the significant discount observed in Q3 2025 suggests that landlords consistently employ effective strategies to secure properties below market rates compared to traditional buyers.

Acquisition prices for landlords have shown volatility over time. While the Q3 2025 price was $425,733, the Q4 2025 price was notably lower at $208,810, indicating fluctuating market dynamics or changes in property types acquired by investors within the county.

No specific data is available to compare acquisition prices between individual and company landlords, thus limiting insights into potential differences in their purchasing power or strategies.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Dominate Q4 Purchases, Acquiring 80.0% of All SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Granite (MT) were exceptionally active in Q4 2025, capturing a dominant 80.0% share of all SFR purchases in the county. They acquired 4 out of the 5 total properties sold, far outpacing other buyer types.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 2025 came exclusively from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who acquired 4 properties, constituting 100.0% of all landlord purchases for the quarter. This highlights their critical role in the market.

The market saw the entry of new single-property landlords (Tier 01), with 2 distinct entities purchasing 2 properties. This indicates continued interest from new, small-scale investors in the county.

Tier 02 landlords also contributed significantly to Q4 activity, with 1 entity acquiring 2 properties. This demonstrates balanced purchasing across the smallest investor tiers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely absent from Q4 2025 purchasing activity, recording 0 acquisitions. This reinforces the mom-and-pop driven nature of the Granite (MT) investor market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.7% of Investor-Owned SFR in Granite (MT)
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Granite (MT), controlling 99.7% of all 312 investor properties. This signals a market almost entirely composed of small-scale investors.

The vast majority of this ownership is concentrated in the single-property landlord segment (Tier 01), which accounts for 265 properties or 84.9% of the total investor-owned portfolio, making them the most significant force in the rental market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000 or more properties, have no footprint in Granite (MT), holding 0.0% of investor-owned SFR. This stark absence contrasts with narratives often seen in larger, more urbanized markets.

Further reinforcing the small-scale nature, two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 35 properties (11.2%) and small landlords (Tier 03-05) own 11 properties (3.5%), underscoring a highly fragmented ownership structure.

Only 1 property (0.3%) falls into the mid-size landlord category (Tier 05-08), further confirming the local market's reliance on smaller, individual investors rather than large-scale portfolio holders.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate Smaller Tiers, Accounting for 91.0% of Single-Property Holdings
Detailed Findings

Individual investors exhibit overwhelming dominance in the smallest portfolio tiers within Granite (MT), holding 91.0% of single-property (Tier 01) assets with 244 properties and 88.6% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings with 31 properties.

Company ownership, while still a minority, shows a clear increase in relative share as portfolio size grows. It rises from 9.0% (24 properties) in Tier 01 to 11.4% (4 properties) in Tier 02, and substantially to 45.5% (5 properties) in the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03-05).

The "Small landlord (3-5 properties)" tier (Tier 03-05) represents the highest concentration of company ownership at 45.5%, bringing companies close to parity with individual investors (54.5%) in this segment, although they do not yet form a majority.

No specific tier shows a crossover point where companies become the majority owners over individuals, based on the provided data. This indicates that individual investors maintain a majority share across all listed tiers, even as company presence grows in larger portfolio sizes.

The data does not include pricing breakdowns by owner type within tiers, which limits the ability to analyze potential differences in acquisition strategies or costs between individual and company investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Granite (MT) Investor Holdings Concentrated in Two Zip Codes with Over 60% Ownership Rates
Detailed Findings

Within Granite (MT), investor-owned properties are highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with MT-Granite-59858 leading significantly with 232 properties. This single zip code alone accounts for a large majority of the county's investor-held SFR assets.

These concentrated areas also exhibit exceptionally high investor ownership rates. MT-Granite-59858 shows a striking 62.5% of its SFR properties are investor-owned, and MT-Granite-59832 follows closely with 61.4%, indicating deep market penetration.

The top two zip codes by investor-owned property count, MT-Granite-59858 and MT-Granite-59832, are also the same two areas with the highest investor ownership percentages. This strong correlation suggests that areas with a high volume of investor properties are also those where investors make up a dominant share of the housing market.

Investor activity drops off sharply outside these primary zip codes. For instance, MT-Granite-59837 has only 10 investor-owned properties (31.2% rate), and MT-Granite-59825 registers just 1 property (16.7% rate), showing a very localized investment pattern.

The high investor ownership rates in MT-Granite-59858 and MT-Granite-59832 (both over 60%) signal mature or highly attractive sub-markets for real estate investment, potentially limiting opportunities for traditional homeowners or first-time buyers in these specific areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Granite (MT) Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 12.0x More Properties Than Sold in 2024
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Granite (MT) were robust net buyers in 2024, demonstrating significant accumulation activity by acquiring 12 properties while divesting only 1. This results in an impressive buy/sell ratio of 12.0x.

The low volume of sell transactions (only 1 in 2024) indicates a strong holding strategy among landlords, suggesting they are less inclined to sell properties, thereby limiting supply in the market.

With a net gain of 11 properties in 2024, landlords are actively expanding their portfolios in Granite (MT). This continuous accumulation contributes to the high overall investor ownership observed in the county.

There is no available data regarding the transaction activity of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) for 2024 or other historical timeframes, preventing a comparison of their market behavior with that of the overall landlord population.

The data also lacks information on average buy and sell prices for historical transactions, making it impossible to calculate implied profit margins or assess the financial dynamics of landlord market participation over time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Dominate Q4 2025 Transactions with 80.0% Market Share; No Inter-Landlord Trades
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Granite (MT) were the dominant force in Q4 2025 transactions, accounting for 4 out of 5 total SFR transactions, a substantial 80.0% share of the market. This highlights their critical role in current market activity.

All landlord transactions during Q4 were attributed to mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), who completed 4 purchases. Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transactional activity, further underscoring the local, small-scale nature of the market.

Two-property landlords (Tier 02) were active in Q4, completing 2 transactions at an average purchase price of $208,810. This indicates investment in properties consistent with smaller portfolio expansion strategies.

Despite the high volume of landlord purchases, there was no reported inter-landlord trading activity; both Tier 01 and Tier 02 showed 0.0% of transactions originating from other landlords. This suggests landlords are primarily buying from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers.

The average purchase price for single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4 remains unavailable, precluding a direct price comparison between the two most active mom-and-pop tiers for the quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Granite (MT) Landlords Own 59.8% of SFR; Mom-and-Pops Dominate as Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 305 SFR properties in Granite (MT), representing an exceptionally high 59.8% of the total SFR market. Individual investors account for 275 properties (90.2%) of this portfolio, with companies holding the remaining 34 properties (11.1%).
Pricing
Landlords secured an 8.6% discount ($40,232) in Q3 2025, paying $425,733 compared to homeowners' $465,965. While Q4 2025 landlord prices averaged $208,810, homeowner data is unavailable for a direct quarterly comparison in Granite (MT).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 80.0% of all SFR purchases in Granite (MT), acquiring 4 properties. All of this activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), including 2 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned housing in Granite (MT). Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate with 84.9% of the portfolio, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain strong dominance across all listed tiers, holding 91.0% of single-property portfolios and 88.6% of two-property portfolios. While companies increase their share in larger tiers, they do not achieve majority ownership in any tier listed, reaching a high of 45.5% in the 3-5 property tier.
Transactions
Granite (MT) landlords are strong net buyers with a 12.0x buy/sell ratio in 2024 (12 buys vs 1 sell), signaling active portfolio expansion. In Q4 2025, landlords made 4 purchases, with no recorded inter-landlord transactions, and no institutional investor activity was observed.
Market Narrative

The housing market in Granite County, Montana, is uniquely shaped by a predominant investor presence, with landlords owning an exceptional 59.8% of all Single Family Residential (SFR) properties. This extensive market penetration is almost entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, who collectively control 99.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, totaling 312 properties. Individual landlords further cement this trend, holding 90.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties and representing 91.6% of all landlord entities, establishing a robust foundation of local, private ownership across Granite (MT).

Investor behavior in Granite (MT) highlights strategic purchasing and sustained growth. Landlords in Q4 2025 accounted for a significant 80.0% of all SFR purchases, demonstrating their ongoing influence. Notably, they consistently secure a pricing advantage, paying 8.6% less than traditional homeowners in Q3 2025, a discount of $40,232 per property. Transactional data reveals landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every 1 sold in 2024, with no institutional buying or selling reported, reinforcing the mom-and-pop driven accumulation trend within the county.

This data reveals Granite (MT) as a highly saturated investor market, primarily fueled by small-scale, individual landlords who are actively accumulating properties without significant competition from institutional players. The high concentration of investor-owned properties, particularly in key zip codes like MT-Granite-59858 (62.5% investor-owned), signals a mature rental market where available housing stock is predominantly managed by non-owner occupants. The strong net buying position and consistent pricing advantage of these local landlords suggest continued growth in their portfolios and a sustained impact on the housing dynamics across Granite County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 05:16 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGranite (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail