Washington (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washington (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washington (MS)
14,755
Total Investors in Washington (MS)
1,486
Investor Owned SFR in Washington (MS)
1,542(10.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,136
SFR Owned
1,019
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
350
SFR Owned
534
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,542 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate MS-Washington's cash-centric market amidst zero Q4 activity.
Landlords own 1,542 SFR properties (10.5% of market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 91.0% against a negligible institutional share. However, pricing data and all Q4 activity are unavailable, preventing recent market trend analysis.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,542 SFR properties in MS-Washington, with individuals holding 66.1% of the portfolio.
A staggering 98.6% of landlord-owned SFR properties in MS-Washington were acquired with cash (1,521 properties). Nearly all (92.1%) of these properties are rented, underscoring a strong rental market focus. Individual landlords outnumber companies by over 3 to 1 (1,136 vs 350 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Pricing data for landlord acquisitions and homeowner comparisons is entirely unavailable for MS-Washington.
Without specific data for MS-Washington, it is not possible to analyze landlord acquisition prices or compare them to traditional homeowner costs. Therefore, trends in price gaps and price appreciation for this county cannot be determined from the provided dataset.
Current Quarter Purchases
No SFR purchase activity was recorded by landlords or other buyers in MS-Washington during Q4 2025.
With zero recorded purchases by landlords or any other buyers in Q4 2025, it's impossible to analyze landlord market share or activity by investor tier. This indicates either a stagnant quarter for transactions or a data reporting anomaly.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 91.0% of investor-owned SFR in MS-Washington.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 1,185 properties, representing 76.4% of the total investor-owned portfolio in MS-Washington. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible share, owning just 1 property, or 0.1% of the market. Pricing data by tier is unavailable, preventing an analysis of acquisition cost differences across investor sizes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (Tier 01, 79.1%), but companies become majority owners starting at the 3-5 property tier in MS-Washington.
Companies gain majority control from Tier 03-05 (57.9%) and significantly lead in Tier 06-10 (84.4%) holdings in MS-Washington. Pricing data by owner type and tier is unavailable, preventing a comparison of acquisition costs or growth trends between individual and company investors.
Geographic Distribution
MS-Washington-38701 leads in investor-owned properties (684), while MS-Washington-38930 boasts a 100.0% investor ownership rate.
The zip codes 38701 and 38703 collectively account for over 70% of all investor-owned properties in MS-Washington, showing high concentration. MS-Washington-38722 is notable for appearing in both top lists, indicating both a significant rate (30.3%) and a moderate count of investor properties (40). No pricing data is available by sub-geography to analyze cost variations.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data for all landlords and institutional investors is entirely unavailable for MS-Washington.
The absence of transaction data precludes analysis of whether landlords are net buyers or sellers, inter-landlord trading percentages, or average buy/sell prices. Consequently, no historical market trends or institutional activity can be determined for MS-Washington.
Current Quarter Transactions
No SFR transaction activity by landlords or other parties was recorded in MS-Washington during Q4 2025.
With zero total transactions and zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, it is impossible to assess landlord market share or analyze transaction volumes by investor tier. Consequently, average purchase prices and inter-landlord trading activity for the quarter remain undeterminable.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,542 SFR properties in MS-Washington, with individuals holding 66.1% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

The landlord-owned SFR portfolio in MS-Washington totals 1,542 properties, representing 10.5% of the county's total SFR market of 14,755 properties, indicating a significant but not overwhelming investor presence.

Individual landlords are the backbone of the investor market in MS-Washington, owning 1,019 properties (66.1% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio), significantly outpacing company ownership of 534 properties (34.6%).

A remarkable 98.6% of all landlord-owned SFR properties in MS-Washington, totaling 1,521 properties, were acquired with cash, suggesting a strong preference for unencumbered assets or a lack of financing options.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 1,420 out of 1,542 (92.1%), are rented, highlighting the primary focus of investors in MS-Washington on income generation from rental activity.

The prevalence of individual investors is further emphasized by entity counts, with 1,136 individual landlords compared to 350 company landlords, a ratio of approximately 3.25 individual landlords for every company.

The very low number of financed properties (21 properties, or 1.4% of landlord holdings) indicates either a robust cash market or limited access to financing for investors in this specific geography, contrasting sharply with the high percentage of cash purchases.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Pricing data for landlord acquisitions and homeowner comparisons is entirely unavailable for MS-Washington.
Detailed Findings

A critical gap in the provided dataset for MS-Washington is the absence of landlord acquisition pricing data, both historically and for the current quarter.

This data omission means it is impossible to determine how landlord acquisition prices compare to those paid by traditional homeowners in MS-Washington, preventing any analysis of potential discounts or premiums.

Consequently, no insights can be drawn regarding the quarter-over-quarter trend of landlord-homeowner price gaps within MS-Washington, nor can price appreciation from past periods to the current quarter be calculated.

The lack of pricing details also precludes an examination of whether individual and company landlords in MS-Washington exhibit different pricing strategies or average acquisition costs.

Therefore, any conclusions regarding acquisition price trends, investor price advantages, or market valuation shifts specific to MS-Washington must be deferred until comprehensive pricing data becomes available.

The absence of this key financial metric significantly limits the depth of analysis possible for investor behavior and market dynamics in the MS-Washington real estate market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
No SFR purchase activity was recorded by landlords or other buyers in MS-Washington during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The provided data indicates a complete absence of SFR purchase activity in MS-Washington during Q4 2025, with both total SFR purchases and landlord Q4 purchases recorded as 0.

This lack of transactional data prevents any meaningful analysis of landlord market share for the quarter, as landlords accounted for 0.0% of the non-existent market activity.

Without any purchases, it is impossible to identify which investor tiers, including mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) landlords, were most active or their respective shares of buying activity in Q4.

The data also shows no new landlords (single-property, Tier 01) entered the market during Q4 2025, reflecting the overall stagnant purchasing environment.

The absence of Q4 purchase data suggests either a halt in transaction volume, a significant reporting lag, or a market entirely devoid of new SFR acquisitions during this period in MS-Washington.

Consequently, no insights can be derived regarding current purchasing trends, investor entry points, or the concentration of buying activity across different landlord tiers for Q4 2025 in MS-Washington.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 91.0% of investor-owned SFR in MS-Washington.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the investor-owned SFR market in MS-Washington, controlling 1,412 properties, which represents a substantial 91.0% of all landlord-owned housing.

The vast majority of this mom-and-pop activity comes from single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone own 1,185 properties, accounting for a significant 76.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio in the county.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence in MS-Washington, owning just 1 property, which is only 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) hold a relatively small portion of the market at 138 properties (8.9%), indicating a highly fragmented market structure heavily skewed towards smaller investors.

The pronounced concentration in Tier 01 challenges common narratives about large corporate dominance, underscoring that individual, small-scale investors are the primary drivers and holders of rental housing in MS-Washington.

Without specific pricing data by tier, it is not possible to analyze whether larger investors pay more or less per property in MS-Washington, nor can the evolution of tier distribution over time be assessed.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (Tier 01, 79.1%), but companies become majority owners starting at the 3-5 property tier in MS-Washington.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios in MS-Washington, holding 944 properties (79.1%) in Tier 01 (single-property ownership), establishing them as the primary entry point into the landlord market.

The transition point where companies become the majority owners occurs at the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03-05), where companies hold 66 properties (57.9%) compared to 48 properties held by individuals (42.1%).

This corporate majority becomes even more pronounced in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 06-10), with companies owning a dominant 65 properties (84.4%) against just 12 properties held by individuals (15.6%).

Even in the two-property tier (Tier 02), individuals still maintain a slight lead, owning 20 properties (55.6%) compared to 16 properties (44.4%) held by companies, signaling a gradual shift in ownership structure as portfolio size increases.

The data highlights that while individuals are crucial for market entry, companies quickly establish a dominant position as investors scale their portfolios in MS-Washington, reflecting different strategies for growth and management.

Without pricing data by owner type and tier, it is not possible to determine if individual or company investors secure different average prices within their respective portfolio sizes in MS-Washington.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MS-Washington-38701 leads in investor-owned properties (684), while MS-Washington-38930 boasts a 100.0% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in MS-Washington are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with MS-Washington-38701 leading with 684 properties, followed closely by MS-Washington-38703 with 409 properties.

These two leading zip codes (38701 and 38703) together account for 1,093 investor-owned SFR properties, representing over 70% of the total 1,542 investor-owned properties in MS-Washington, highlighting a significant geographic focus.

While 38701 and 38703 lead in absolute property counts, the highest investor ownership rates are found in different areas, such as MS-Washington-38930 with 100.0% investor-owned and MS-Washington-38702 with 60.0% investor-owned, indicating smaller markets entirely dominated by investors.

MS-Washington-38722 stands out as a unique sub-geography, ranking fifth in both investor property count (40 properties) and investor ownership rate (30.3%), suggesting a market where investors hold a significant share of a smaller overall SFR inventory.

This dual distribution pattern reveals that investor activity in MS-Washington targets both high-volume areas and niche markets with extremely high penetration rates, indicating diverse investment strategies across the county's zip codes.

The provided data does not include acquisition prices by sub-geography, precluding an analysis of how pricing strategies or market values differ across these investor-dense regions within MS-Washington.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Historical transaction data for all landlords and institutional investors is entirely unavailable for MS-Washington.
Detailed Findings

A significant limitation in the provided dataset for MS-Washington is the complete absence of historical transaction data for all landlords.

This data gap means it is impossible to determine if landlords in MS-Washington have been net buyers or sellers over time, or to calculate any buy/sell ratios.

Furthermore, without transaction details, the percentage of landlord purchases originating from other landlords (inter-landlord transactions) cannot be assessed, which is crucial for understanding market liquidity and investor-to-investor trading.

The lack of average buy and sell prices also prevents any analysis of implied profit margins or pricing strategies employed by landlords in MS-Washington.

Similarly, institutional investor (1000+ tier) transaction patterns are entirely undeterminable, making it impossible to ascertain their net position (accumulating or divesting) or their specific contribution to market dynamics.

Therefore, any conclusions regarding historical market activity, investor sentiment, or the strategic movements of large-scale and small-scale investors in MS-Washington must be deferred.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No SFR transaction activity by landlords or other parties was recorded in MS-Washington during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The data for MS-Washington indicates a complete halt in SFR transaction activity during Q4 2025, with both total quarterly transactions and landlord transactions recorded as 0.

This absence of activity means landlords held a 0.0% share of transactions, as no sales or purchases by any party were documented for the quarter in MS-Washington.

Due to the zero transaction volume, it is not possible to analyze how transaction activity varies across different investor tiers, including mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) landlords.

Similarly, the average purchase prices by tier, and any insights into which tiers pay more or less, cannot be determined for Q4 2025 in MS-Washington.

The lack of transaction data also precludes an assessment of inter-landlord trading activity or the percentage of properties bought from other landlords by any tier during the quarter.

Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn about Q4 transactional behavior, pricing strategies, or market liquidity among landlords in MS-Washington based on the provided data.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate MS-Washington's cash-centric market amidst zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords in MS-Washington own 1,542 SFR properties, comprising 10.5% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors hold 1,019 properties (66.1%) of this portfolio, with companies owning 534 properties (34.6%).
Pricing
Pricing data for landlord acquisitions and homeowner comparisons is entirely unavailable for MS-Washington. This prevents any analysis of landlord discounts, premiums, or price trends during Q4 2025.
Activity
No SFR purchase or transaction activity was recorded in MS-Washington for Q4 2025, resulting in zero landlord purchases and no new landlord entries into the market during this period.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 91.0% of investor-owned housing in MS-Washington, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) owning a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors lead ownership in smaller portfolios up to two properties in MS-Washington, but companies assume majority control starting from the 3-5 property tier.
Transactions
Historical and Q4 transaction data is unavailable for MS-Washington, preventing any determination of whether landlords overall, or institutional investors specifically, are net buyers or sellers.
Market Narrative

Landlords in MS-Washington collectively own 1,542 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 10.5% of the county's total SFR market of 14,755 properties. The market is predominantly shaped by individual investors, who hold 1,019 properties (66.1% of the landlord-owned portfolio), significantly outnumbering company owners. Reflecting a deeply fragmented market, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control a commanding 91.0% of all investor-owned housing, starkly contrasting with the minimal 0.1% share held by institutional investors (Tier 09).

A notable characteristic of the MS-Washington investor market is its strong reliance on cash transactions, with 98.6% of landlord-owned properties acquired without financing, and 92.1% of these properties being rented, underscoring a clear focus on rental income. However, for Q4 2025, the market saw no recorded SFR purchase or transaction activity by any party, including landlords. This complete absence of recent transactional data, coupled with a lack of historical pricing information, severely limits the ability to assess current buying trends, landlord acquisition price advantages, or overall market momentum in MS-Washington.

The data for MS-Washington reveals a landlord market almost entirely composed of small, individual investors heavily focused on cash-purchased rental properties. The glaring absence of Q4 and historical transaction data, along with pricing information, suggests either an unusually dormant period for investor activity or significant data reporting gaps for the county. This unique market structure, coupled with the lack of recent movement, signals a localized market operating with distinct dynamics, potentially isolated from broader national or state-level trends in investor behavior.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 04:58 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWashington (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price