Grenada (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

In Grenada, MS, landlords collectively own 2,178 SFR properties, representing a substantial 29.7% of the market's total 7,342 SFR properties, highlighting the significant presence of investor activity in the area.

Individual landlords form the backbone of this market, controlling a dominant 83.9% of investor-owned properties (1,828 properties), vastly outnumbering company entities which hold 19.2% (418 properties), demonstrating that smaller-scale investors are the primary owners in this geography.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 2,138 properties (98.2% of landlord holdings) currently rented out, underscoring the market's strong orientation towards generating rental income rather than owner-occupancy.

Cash acquisitions are the predominant method for landlords in Grenada, MS, with 2,097 properties (96.3% of the portfolio) purchased outright, indicating a preference for debt-free investments or a market where financing is less common for investors.

Financed properties account for a minimal portion of landlord holdings, with only 81 properties (3.7%) being financed, which further emphasizes the strong cash-based investment strategy prevalent among landlords in this region.

Individual landlords significantly outnumber their company counterparts by a ratio of 7.0:1, with 1,785 individual landlords compared to 255 companies, indicating that the Grenada, MS investor market is largely driven by numerous small-scale, individual operators.

The high percentage of rented properties (98.2%) closely aligns with the equally high percentage of cash-acquired properties (96.3%), suggesting a clear trend where landlords in Grenada, MS primarily purchase properties with cash specifically for rental income generation.

There is no recorded landlord acquisition activity in Grenada, MS for Q4 2025, which means no current data is available to compare landlord acquisition prices against those paid by traditional homeowners.

Similarly, the provided data indicates zero landlord property acquisitions during the significant 2020-2023 period, making it impossible to establish historical landlord pricing trends or assess price appreciation from the pandemic era.

Without any recorded landlord purchases, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the typical price gap between landlords and homeowners in Grenada, MS, nor whether any potential discount has widened or narrowed over time.

The absence of acquisition data for individual or company landlords during Q4 2025 and previous periods prevents any analysis of whether different owner types pay varied prices for properties in this market.

The overall lack of landlord acquisition data across all provided timeframes for Grenada, MS suggests either extremely low market activity by investors or data collection limitations for this specific geography and period.

For Q4 2025, the data indicates zero total SFR purchases in Grenada, MS, meaning landlords made no acquisitions and thus represented 0.0% of the market's purchasing activity.

The complete absence of Q4 landlord purchases means no investor tiers, including mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09), recorded any acquisition activity, each contributing 0.0% to landlord purchases.

Without any recorded Tier 01 purchases, it can be concluded that no new single-property landlords entered the Grenada, MS market during Q4 2025, signaling a dormant quarter for new investor participation.

The lack of Q4 purchase data across all tiers prevents any analysis of which investor tiers were most active or concentrated in buying, as all reported activity stands at zero.

Consequently, it is not possible to determine the number of entities active per tier or the average properties acquired per entity for Q4 2025, due to the complete absence of transactional data.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Grenada, MS, controlling an overwhelming 91.2% of all properties held by investors, emphasizing the grassroots nature of the market.

The largest segment within this market is single-property landlords (Tier 01), who own 1,504 properties, representing a significant 66.6% of all investor-owned SFR, making them the most prevalent type of investor in the region.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Grenada, MS, with 0 properties owned, indicating that larger corporate entities are not active players in this specific geographic market.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold the remaining 8.8% of investor-owned properties, with Small-medium (11-20 properties) at 4.9% (111 properties), Small-medium (21-50 properties) at 1.2% (27 properties), Medium-large (51-100 properties) at 2.6% (58 properties), and Large (101-1000 properties) at 0.1% (3 properties).

The pronounced concentration of ownership in the lower tiers (1-10 properties) reveals a market largely shaped by local and individual investors rather than national or large-scale corporate entities.

Despite the summary providing tier distribution, no data is available on how acquisition prices vary by tier, preventing an analysis of whether larger or smaller investors pay different average prices for properties.

The absence of entity counts for each tier means it is not possible to determine the average portfolio size per landlord, limiting a deeper understanding of investor scale within each tier.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, with 89.0% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 79.6% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios, underscoring their foundational role in the Grenada, MS investor market.

The ownership structure shifts as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where they control 63 properties, representing 56.8% of the properties in that tier, marking a significant crossover point.

Despite the company majority in the 11-20 tier, individual investors surprisingly reclaim dominant ownership in the Medium-large (51-100 properties) tier, holding 54 properties (93.1%), demonstrating a unique concentration of large individual portfolios in this specific market segment.

In the largest tier present, Large (101-1000 properties), companies again hold the majority, owning 2 properties (66.7%) compared to 1 property (33.3%) owned by individuals, suggesting a preference for corporate structures at the highest end of the market scale.

The highest individual concentration is observed in the Medium-large (51-100 properties) tier at 93.1%, while companies show their highest concentration in the Large (101-1000 properties) tier at 66.7%, revealing distinct preferences or strategies for different owner types across portfolio sizes.

The absence of acquisition pricing data by owner type within tiers prevents an analysis of whether individual or company investors employ different buying strategies or achieve varied price points based on their entity type and portfolio size.

Without Q4 specific data on tier and owner type distribution, it is impossible to analyze recent growth patterns and compare how individual versus company ownership has evolved in the latest quarter.

The zip code 38901 in Grenada, MS, serves as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting the highest count of landlord-owned properties at 1,811, which also represents a significant 29.7% investor ownership rate.

Investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in a few key zip codes, with the top five by count (38901, 38940, 38929, 38922, 38925) collectively holding 2,163 properties, representing nearly all (99.3%) of the 2,178 total investor-owned SFR in the entire county.

While 38901 leads in absolute numbers, zip code 38914 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 34.8%, highlighting areas where investors constitute a larger proportion of the overall SFR market, even if the total property count is lower.

There is a strong correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages in Grenada, MS, as four of the top five zip codes by count (38901, 38940, 38929, 38922) also appear among the top five by investor ownership rate, signaling concentrated and deep investor markets.

The consistent appearance of certain zip codes on both the highest count and highest percentage lists indicates that investor activity in Grenada, MS is not just widespread but also deeply embedded in specific local sub-markets.

The data provided for geographic distribution does not include average acquisition prices for these sub-geographies, making it impossible to analyze how pricing strategies or market values differ across these investor hotbeds.

The absence of landlord entity counts by zip code prevents an understanding of the density of individual landlords versus companies within these specific sub-markets, limiting insight into local investor demographics.

The provided data shows no historical buy or sell transactions for all landlords in Grenada, MS, making it impossible to determine if investors have been net buyers or net sellers over time.

Similarly, institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded zero historical transactions, which prevents any analysis of their net position or how their activity might differ from the broader landlord market.

Without any recorded transactions, the percentage of inter-landlord buy or sell transactions cannot be calculated, hindering insights into market liquidity and internal trading dynamics within the investor community.

The absence of buy and sell prices means there is no data to compare average acquisition costs against disposition prices, thus precluding any analysis of implied profit margins for landlords in Grenada, MS.

It is impossible to track how buy/sell ratios or transaction volumes have evolved across different timeframes due to the complete lack of historical transaction data for this region.

The data shows zero total SFR transactions in Grenada, MS for Q4 2025, resulting in landlords having a 0.0% share of all quarterly transactions, indicating a completely dormant market for investor sales and purchases.

With no recorded transactions, it is impossible to analyze how transaction volumes vary across investor tiers or which tiers were most active in buying or selling during Q4 2025.

The average purchase prices for both Tier 01 and Tier 09 landlords are reported as $0, which stems from the complete absence of transactions, preventing any meaningful comparison of pricing strategies across different investor sizes.

Due to zero transactions, there was no inter-landlord trading activity in Q4 2025, making it impossible to assess market liquidity or the extent to which investors bought properties from other landlords in this period.

The lack of any transactional data means no price spread can be calculated between the highest and lowest tiers, as all reported prices are $0 due to inactivity.

Without any transactions, no tier can be identified as having the highest inter-landlord purchase percentage, as no such activity occurred.

The complete absence of Q4 transaction activity by tier means no comparison can be made between recent buying patterns and the existing landlord ownership distribution across tiers, as there are no new transactions to report.