Forrest (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Forrest (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Forrest (MS)
20,584
Total Investors in Forrest (MS)
3,174
Investor Owned SFR in Forrest (MS)
3,666(17.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,477
SFR Owned
2,199
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
697
SFR Owned
1,493
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,666 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Forrest County, Mississippi, Securing Significant Price Discounts
Individual investors in Forrest County, MS, own 2,199 (60.0%) of the 3,666 landlord-owned SFR properties, largely dominating the market structure. Landlords consistently secure substantial discounts against traditional homeowners, notably 39.9% ($115,871) in Q4 2025 alone. In Q4, landlords purchased 65 properties, representing 23.7% of all SFR sales, with mom-and-pop landlords accounting for 69.7% of those acquisitions, while institutional investors remain net buyers, albeit with fluctuating activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 60.0% of Forrest County's 3,666 landlord-owned SFR properties.
The portfolio is predominantly held via cash (3,189 properties) and rented (3,448 properties), indicating a strong focus on generating rental income with less reliance on traditional financing. Individuals comprise the vast majority of landlords by entity count, with 2,477 individuals compared to 697 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secure massive discounts, paying 39.9% less than homeowners in Q4 2025.
Landlords consistently acquired properties at a lower price than traditional homeowners throughout 2025, with discounts ranging from 11.6% in Q3 to a staggering 41.2% in Q1. While no landlord acquisition properties were recorded for 2025 in the specific price trends dataset, the comparative pricing indicates significant market advantages for investor buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 23.7% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, totaling 65 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) spearheaded Q4 activity, accounting for 69.7% (46 properties) of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords alone purchased 27 properties (40.9% of landlord buys), demonstrating strong market entry and expansion from smaller investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a massive 85.4% of investor-owned SFR in Forrest County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate, holding 53.0% (2,008 properties) of the total investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own a minimal 0.2% (9 properties) of the market, challenging perceptions of corporate dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a clear crossover point.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the single-property tier (82.2%), but by the 11-20 property tier, companies own a commanding 87.8% of properties. This shift reveals distinct growth strategies between individual and corporate landlord types.
Geographic Distribution
MS-Forrest-39401 leads Forrest County with 2,386 investor-owned properties.
MS-Forrest-39401 also boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 24.0%, indicating a concentrated hub for real estate investment within the county. Other significant zip codes for investor activity include MS-Forrest-39465 (748 properties, 11.3%) and MS-Forrest-39402 (428 properties, 13.4%).
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Forrest County are net buyers, with 2025 activity showing 301 buys vs 105 sells.
In Q4 2025, overall landlords bought 85 properties while selling 35, resulting in a net gain of 50 properties, affirming their acquisition-oriented strategy. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were also net buyers in Q4 2025 (5 buys vs 3 sells) and for the full year 2025 (13 buys vs 4 sells), a shift from being net sellers in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 21.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Forrest County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded the highest transaction volume (36 buys) at an average price of $203,035. Institutional buyers (Tier 09) secured properties at a significantly lower average price of $132,306, a 34.8% discount compared to single-property buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 60.0% of Forrest County's 3,666 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Forrest County, MS, own a significant portfolio of 3,666 SFR properties, representing 17.8% of the total SFR market of 20,584 properties.

Individual landlords are the backbone of the market, controlling 2,199 properties (60.0%) compared to companies which own 1,493 properties (40.7%). This highlights the enduring presence of 'mom-and-pop' investors over larger corporate entities in the county.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals, with 2,477 individual landlords comprising 78.0% of the total 3,174 landlord entities, further underscoring the fragmented, individual-driven nature of the county's rental market.

A dominant characteristic of the landlord portfolio is its cash-heavy and rental-focused nature, with 3,189 properties (87.0% of investor-owned) purchased with cash and 3,448 properties (94.1%) designated as rented. This suggests a strategy geared towards long-term rental income generation with minimal leverage.

Company-owned portfolios exhibit a higher reliance on financing, though the data for specific property types by owner is not fully granular here, the overall trend shows a market leaning towards cash purchases for investor-owned properties.

The high percentage of rented properties (94.1% of landlord-owned) clearly indicates that the vast majority of these SFR properties serve as non-owner-occupied rental housing, directly contributing to the county's rental stock.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secure massive discounts, paying 39.9% less than homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Forrest County consistently show a significant pricing advantage over traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $174,732, a substantial $115,871 or 39.9% less than homeowners who paid $290,603.

This pattern of landlords securing considerable discounts is not isolated to Q4. In Q1 2025, landlords paid $162,839 – a $114,128 (41.2%) discount compared to homeowners' average of $276,967, highlighting a persistent strategic advantage for investors.

Even in Q3 2025, when the price gap was at its narrowest, landlords still paid 11.6% less ($225,412 vs. $254,868), indicating a consistent ability to find and acquire properties below average market rates for traditional buyers.

Comparing Q4 2025 to Q4 2024, the available data for 'Year 2025' and 'Year 2024' indicates average landlord acquisition prices of $195,902 and $168,540 respectively, suggesting a potential 16.2% increase in average acquisition cost for landlords year-over-year if transactions had been recorded in this specific dataset.

The significant price disparity, particularly the 39.9% discount in Q4 2025, suggests that landlords in Forrest County are adept at identifying undervalued assets or negotiating more favorable terms compared to traditional owner-occupiers.

Acquisition prices in the 2020-2023 'pandemic boom' era averaged $144,442 for landlords (per the dataset where 0 properties were acquired for those periods), implying that the Q4 2025 average of $174,732 represents a 21.0% increase in acquisition costs since that period, reflecting broader market appreciation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 23.7% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, totaling 65 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords actively participated in the Q4 2025 market in Forrest County, securing 65 of the 274 total SFR purchases, which represents a significant 23.7% share of all acquisitions.

The 'mom-and-pop' segment (Tiers 01-04) dominated landlord purchasing activity in Q4, acquiring 46 properties and collectively accounting for 69.7% of all landlord purchases, underscoring their vital role in market dynamics.

New or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, purchasing 27 properties in Q4, representing 40.9% of all landlord buys and indicating a steady flow of new individual investors entering the market.

Despite the focus on smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) also made purchases in Q4, adding 2 properties to their portfolios and accounting for 3.0% of landlord acquisitions.

The average properties per entity in Q4 ranged from 0.75 for single-property landlords (27 properties by 36 entities) to 2.0 for institutional investors (2 properties by 1 entity), indicating varied acquisition strategies and capacities across tiers.

Smaller landlord tiers, including single-property (27 properties), small landlord (3-5 properties, 10 properties), and small landlord (6-10 properties, 6 properties), collectively drove 65.2% of all landlord purchases in Q4, cementing their market influence.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a massive 85.4% of investor-owned SFR in Forrest County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively own an overwhelming 85.4% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Forrest County, totaling 3,234 properties out of 3,786.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment represents the largest individual share, accounting for 2,008 properties or 53.0% of the entire landlord-owned housing stock, highlighting the foundation of individual investors in the market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop majority, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, owning just 9 properties, which translates to a mere 0.2% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08), with portfolios ranging from 11 to 1000 properties, collectively control 14.2% of the investor-owned market, owning 543 properties, demonstrating their niche but growing presence.

The distribution reveals a deeply fractured market structure where small-scale individual investors are the primary drivers and holders of rental properties, rather than large-scale corporate entities.

While acquisition price data by tier for 'All Time', 'Q4', '2024', and '2020-2023' was not provided in the dataset, the ownership distribution clearly indicates a grassroots, localized investment landscape in Forrest County.

The significant concentration of properties within the smallest tiers underscores that the barrier to entry into the landlord market is relatively low in Forrest County, allowing a large number of individual investors to participate.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a clear crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio segments, holding 1,664 properties (82.2%) in the single-property (Tier 01) category and 207 properties (68.5%) in the two-property (Tier 02) segment.

A clear crossover point occurs within the small landlord tiers: while individuals still lead in the 3-5 property tier (52.3% or 313 properties), companies take majority control at the 6-10 property tier, owning 71.5% (233 properties) compared to individuals' 28.5% (93 properties).

Beyond the crossover, company ownership dramatically increases with portfolio size. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own a dominant 194 properties (87.8%) compared to individuals' 27 properties (12.2%), demonstrating a strong corporate presence in mid-size portfolios.

This pattern indicates that individuals typically start small and often remain in the 'mom-and-pop' categories, while companies are more likely to scale their operations into larger portfolios.

The data suggests that the business model for property investment shifts significantly as portfolios grow, with individual capacity often capped at smaller sizes before corporate structures become more efficient for expansion.

Forrest County's market structure reveals a dual investment landscape: a broad base of individual small-scale investors, and a growing presence of companies focused on building more substantial portfolios after a certain entry point.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MS-Forrest-39401 leads Forrest County with 2,386 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Forrest County, MS-Forrest-39401 stands out as the primary hub for real estate investor activity, holding a substantial 2,386 investor-owned properties, significantly more than any other zip code in the county.

This leading zip code, MS-Forrest-39401, also demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate at 24.0% of all SFR properties in that area, confirming its status as a highly concentrated market for landlords.

Following MS-Forrest-39401, MS-Forrest-39465 and MS-Forrest-39402 are the next most significant areas for investor-owned properties, with 748 (11.3% rate) and 428 (13.4% rate) properties respectively, showcasing a localized distribution of investment.

The top two zip codes, MS-Forrest-39401 and MS-Forrest-39465, collectively account for 3,134 investor-owned properties, representing 85.5% of all landlord-owned SFR in Forrest County, highlighting extreme geographic concentration.

Regions with a lower but still notable investor presence include MS-Forrest-39577 (38 properties, 16.5% rate) and MS-Forrest-39425 (36 properties, 14.1% rate), indicating diversified investment targets even outside the main hot spots.

The consistent appearance of the same zip codes in both the 'highest count' and 'highest percentage' lists suggests that the areas with the most investor properties are also the areas where investors hold a larger proportion of the overall SFR housing stock.

This strong geographic concentration likely reflects specific market conditions, such as affordability, rental demand, or property availability, making these particular zip codes more attractive to real estate investors in Forrest County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords in Forrest County are net buyers, with 2025 activity showing 301 buys vs 105 sells.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Forrest County consistently operated as net buyers throughout 2025, accumulating 301 properties against 105 sales, resulting in a net gain of 196 properties, indicating a strong acquisition phase for the year.

In Q4 2025, the trend of net buying continued, with 85 buy transactions versus 35 sell transactions for all landlords, leading to a net increase of 50 properties in their collective portfolios.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) demonstrated a shift in strategy: after being net sellers in 2024 (4 buys vs 6 sells, a net loss of 2 properties), they became net buyers in 2025, acquiring 13 properties against 4 sales for a net gain of 9 properties.

Quarter-over-quarter, all landlords maintained a net buyer position: Q3 saw 70 buys vs 29 sells (net +41), and Q2 recorded 76 buys vs 26 sells (net +50), showing sustained growth in landlord holdings.

The average buy price for all landlords in Q4 2025 was $174,732 (from section 6 data), while the average sell price is not directly provided in this section, making an implied margin calculation for Q4 difficult here.

The consistent net buying activity across all landlord segments in 2025 suggests an optimistic outlook and active expansion within the Forrest County real estate market for investors.

Institutional investors' return to net buyer status in 2025, particularly with 5 buys and 3 sells in Q4, indicates renewed confidence or strategic repositioning in the market after a period of divestment in 2024.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 21.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Forrest County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for 85 out of 393 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, representing a significant 21.6% share of all market activity in Forrest County.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 36 transactions at an average purchase price of $203,035, highlighting strong entry-level investment activity.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) completed 5 transactions, demonstrating their strategic, albeit lower volume, presence in the Q4 market.

There's a notable price disparity across tiers: single-property buyers (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $203,035, while institutional investors (Tier 09) secured properties for a much lower average of $132,306, representing a 34.8% discount.

Inter-landlord trading varied significantly by tier: institutional investors bought 60.0% of their properties from other landlords, suggesting sophisticated portfolio adjustments. In contrast, single-property landlords bought only 13.9% from other investors, indicating a preference for properties from non-landlord sellers.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively accounted for 58 transactions, significantly outpacing the institutional tier's 5 transactions, underscoring their ongoing dominance in transaction volume.

The wide price spread between the highest-paying (Tier 01) and lowest-paying (Tier 09) tiers reveals differing acquisition strategies, with larger, more experienced investors potentially leveraging economies of scale or distressed asset identification.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Forrest County's Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Holdings and Acquisitions with Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords in Forrest County, MS, collectively own 3,666 SFR properties, representing 17.8% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 2,199 properties (60.0%), significantly outpacing company-owned portfolios at 1,493 properties (40.7%).
Pricing
Landlords consistently secure substantial price advantages in Forrest County, paying 39.9% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025 ($174,732 vs $290,603), a significant $115,871 discount per property.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 65 properties, comprising 23.7% of all SFR purchases. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove this activity, accounting for 69.7% of landlord acquisitions, with single-property landlords alone adding 27 properties.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 85.4% of investor-owned housing in Forrest County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a minimal 0.2%, highlighting a fragmented market structure.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (82.2% of single-property holdings), but companies gain majority control in portfolios with 6-10 properties and beyond, reaching 87.8% ownership in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
All landlords in Forrest County are net buyers, with 301 buys versus 105 sells in 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were also net buyers in Q4 2025 (5 buys vs 3 sells), reversing a net seller position from 2024.
Market Narrative

Forrest County, Mississippi's single-family residential (SFR) investment market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, 'mom-and-pop' landlords. These smaller investors collectively control a vast 85.4% of the 3,666 investor-owned SFR properties, which constitute 17.8% of the county's total SFR market. Individual owners specifically hold 2,199 properties (60.0%) compared to companies owning 1,493 properties (40.7%), solidifying the grassroots nature of the county's rental housing supply. The foundation of this market lies with single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone hold 53.0% of all investor-owned housing.

Investor behavior in Forrest County is characterized by strategic acquisitions and significant pricing advantages. In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average of $174,732, a remarkable 39.9% ($115,871) discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $290,603. This consistent ability to acquire properties at lower prices underscores their market acumen. Landlords were active buyers in Q4, completing 65 purchases and making up 23.7% of all SFR sales. This activity was heavily driven by mom-and-pop landlords (69.7% of all landlord buys), while institutional investors, after being net sellers in 2024, returned to a net buyer position in 2025, with 5 buys against 3 sells in Q4.

The market dynamics in Forrest County reveal a clear picture: a robust and expanding small-scale investor base that consistently outcompetes traditional buyers on price. While individual investors lead in smaller portfolios, companies begin to dominate at the 6-10 property tier and beyond, highlighting distinct growth strategies. This fragmented, individual-heavy market structure, coupled with sustained net buying and significant acquisition discounts, suggests a resilient and attractive environment for property investors in Forrest County, MS, particularly for those operating at a smaller scale.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 02:13 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyForrest (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership