Pemiscot (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pemiscot (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pemiscot (MO)
3,620
Total Investors in Pemiscot (MO)
1,403
Investor Owned SFR in Pemiscot (MO)
1,293(35.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,325
SFR Owned
1,160
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
78
SFR Owned
148
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,293 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Pemiscot County, Controlling 92.6% of Investor-Owned Homes
Investors own 35.7% of all SFR properties in Pemiscot County, MO, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 92.6% of that total. In Q4 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 37.1% of homes sold at a significant 27.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is defined by small, individual operators, as institutional investors hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,293 SFRs (35.7% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 89.7%.
Cash transactions dominate investor holdings, with 1,117 properties owned outright versus just 176 financed. The vast majority of the portfolio, 1,261 properties, are classified as rented, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 27.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $47,414.
The landlord discount has narrowed from the 47.6% seen in Q3 and Q1. This follows a highly unusual Q2 where landlords paid a premium of 86.8%, suggesting volatile market conditions or unique high-value purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 37.1% of all SFRs sold in Q4, acquiring 13 of the 35 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords dominated Q4 activity, making 92.3% of all investor purchases (12 properties). New, single-property landlords were the most active, acquiring 11 of the 13 homes bought by investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 92.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Pemiscot County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the total investor portfolio. Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 904 properties (66.7%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11+ properties.
Individuals own over 94% of properties in the 1-5 property tiers. The ownership model flips starting at the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 60.0% of the homes, a figure that rises to 67.2% in the 21-50 tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 63830 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 645 properties.
While 63830 has the highest volume, smaller zip codes like 63853 and 63840 show 100% investor ownership, indicating niche areas are completely saturated. The top 3 zip codes by count (63830, 63851, 63877) hold a combined 1,124 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
This strong net-buyer position is a consistent trend, with landlords adding 80 net properties in 2025 and 79 net properties in 2024. Acquisition volume has remained steady year-over-year, with 91 buys in 2025 compared to 88 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 35.4% of all market transactions in Q4, totaling 17 transactions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $138,479 per property. The single institutional purchase sourced its property from another landlord (100%), while new mom-and-pop investors sourced only 6.7% of their purchases from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,293 SFRs (35.7% of market), with individuals holding a dominant 89.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 35.7% of all Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties in Pemiscot County, totaling 1,293 homes.

Individual "mom-and-pop" investors are the cornerstone of the local rental market, owning 1,160 properties, which accounts for 89.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

In contrast, company-owned SFRs number just 148, making up the remaining 11.4% of the investor portfolio, highlighting a market dominated by smaller-scale landlords.

The investor landscape is characterized by a high number of individual landlords (1,325) compared to companies (78), indicating a broad base of small investors rather than a concentration of large corporate owners.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 1,117 properties owned outright, nearly 6.4 times the 176 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, with 1,261 of the 1,293 investor-owned properties designated as rented, confirming the primary business model for landlords in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 27.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $47,414.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Pemiscot County demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average of $126,656, a substantial 27.2% discount compared to the $174,070 paid by traditional homeowners.

This translates to an average savings of $47,414 per property for investors, showcasing a distinct market advantage in sourcing and negotiating deals.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been volatile throughout 2025. While Q4 saw a strong discount, it was narrower than the massive 47.6% discounts observed in both Q1 and Q3.

Q2 2025 stands out as a major anomaly, where landlords paid an unprecedented 86.8% premium, with an average price of $293,754 compared to homeowners' $157,269. This could indicate a one-off purchase of a high-value asset or a short-term market distortion.

Despite the Q2 outlier, the consistent and deep discounts in three out of four quarters reinforce the trend that investors are typically able to acquire properties well below the prices paid by the general public.

Historical data shows a significant price appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $112,790 to the Q4 2025 price of $126,656, even with the investor discount applied.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 37.1% of all SFRs sold in Q4, acquiring 13 of the 35 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a major force in the Pemiscot County real estate market in Q4 2025, purchasing 13 of the 35 total SFRs sold, capturing a significant 37.1% market share.

The overwhelming majority of this activity was driven by small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 12 of the 13 purchases, representing 92.3% of all landlord acquisitions.

New entrants to the rental market were particularly active, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone buying 11 properties, which is 84.6% of the quarterly investor total.

This surge in new landlord activity is represented by 14 distinct entities entering the market with their first rental property, signaling strong grassroots interest in real estate investment.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal footprint, acquiring just a single property, which accounted for only 7.7% of investor buying activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 92.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Pemiscot County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pemiscot County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 92.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market is even more pronounced when looking at single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone own 904 properties, representing 66.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here; institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a minimal footprint, holding just 2 properties, which equates to a mere 0.1% market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning 98 properties or 7.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The ownership structure clearly shows a highly fragmented market, with the vast majority of rental housing provided by local, small-portfolio investors rather than large, consolidated entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 11+ properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure: individuals overwhelmingly dominate the smaller end of the market, while companies take control of larger portfolios in Pemiscot County.

For landlords with 1-5 properties, individual ownership is near-total, accounting for 94.3% of single-property portfolios and 95.2% of portfolios with 3-5 homes.

The transition to corporate ownership happens decisively as portfolios grow. The crossover point occurs after the 6-10 property tier, with companies becoming the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, holding 60.0% of properties.

This corporate dominance intensifies in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 45 homes, representing a 67.2% majority stake.

This data suggests a strategic shift where investors managing larger, more complex portfolios (11+ properties) are more likely to professionalize and operate under a corporate structure for liability and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 63830 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 645 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Pemiscot County is highly concentrated, with the 63830 zip code serving as the primary hub, containing 645 investor-owned properties alone.

This single zip code has a high investor penetration rate of 37.7%, well above the county average, and is followed by 63851 (252 properties) and 63877 (227 properties) in terms of sheer volume.

Analysis of ownership rates reveals a different story, with certain smaller zip codes showing complete investor saturation. Both 63853 and 63840 have a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting these areas may consist entirely of rental housing or investment land.

The zip code 63839 also shows an extremely high concentration, with an investor ownership rate of 86.0%.

This highlights a dual market dynamic: large-scale concentration of properties in core areas like 63830, alongside smaller, niche zip codes that are almost exclusively investor-controlled.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pemiscot County are consistently and aggressively expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers throughout recent periods.

In Q4 2025, investors acquired 17 properties while only selling 3, resulting in a net gain of 14 properties and demonstrating a buy-to-sell ratio of over 5-to-1.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. For the full year 2025, landlords added a net of 80 properties to their holdings (91 buys vs. 11 sells), showing an even stronger buy-to-sell ratio of more than 8-to-1.

The pace of acquisition has remained remarkably stable year-over-year, with 91 purchases in 2025 nearly matching the 88 purchases made in 2024.

The consistent, high-volume net buying activity signals strong confidence among investors in the local rental market and a clear strategy of long-term growth and accumulation.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 35.4% of all market transactions in Q4, totaling 17 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a role in over a third of all real estate activity in Q4 2025, with 17 of the 48 total transactions (35.4%) involving a landlord as a buyer or seller.

New, single-property landlords dominated the transaction volume, accounting for 15 of the 17 investor transactions and paying an average price of $138,479.

A notable difference in acquisition strategy emerged: the sole institutional investor purchase was a landlord-to-landlord transaction (100%), suggesting a focus on acquiring existing, potentially stabilized rental assets.

In contrast, new mom-and-pop investors primarily sourced their properties from the open market, with only 1 of their 15 purchases (6.7%) coming from another landlord.

This data highlights two distinct investor behaviors: institutions acquiring proven assets from peers, and new entrants finding opportunities outside the existing investor network, likely from traditional homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 92.6% of Investor Market, Fueling 37.1% of Q4 Purchases
Holdings
Landlords own 1,293 SFR properties, representing a significant 35.7% of the market in Pemiscot County. The ownership is dominated by individual investors holding 1,160 properties (89.7%), compared to just 148 properties (11.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 27.2% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $47,414 per property by paying $126,656 versus the homeowner price of $174,070.
Activity
Investors captured 37.1% of all Q4 sales by purchasing 13 properties, with activity overwhelmingly driven by the smallest investors. In this quarter, 14 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.6% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but a strategic shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 60.0% share.
Transactions
Landlords in Pemiscot County are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 5.67-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio (17 properties bought versus 3 sold).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Pemiscot County, MO is defined by a high concentration of small, individual operators rather than large corporations. Landlords own a substantial 1,293 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 35.7% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 92.6% of all investor-held homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a minimal presence, controlling a mere 0.1% of the portfolio, underscoring the local, fragmented nature of rental ownership.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrated both confidence and strategic acumen. Landlords were highly active, purchasing 37.1% of all homes sold during the quarter. They achieved this with a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of 27.2% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of $47,414 per property. Furthermore, investors are in a phase of aggressive accumulation, evidenced by a strong 5.67-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4. This growth is fueled by new entrants, with 14 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway for the Pemiscot County housing market is its profound reliance on small-scale landlords for its rental supply. The high investor ownership rate indicates that a significant portion of the housing stock is unavailable for traditional homeownership. The consistent ability of investors to acquire properties at a discount while expanding their portfolios suggests a sophisticated and competitive environment that may pose challenges for aspiring homeowners. The market's health and direction are therefore intrinsically tied to the decisions of thousands of individual investors, not the strategies of a few large firms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:25 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPemiscot (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell