McDonald (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McDonald (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McDonald (MO)
6,088
Total Investors in McDonald (MO)
2,720
Investor Owned SFR in McDonald (MO)
2,206(36.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,421
SFR Owned
1,859
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
299
SFR Owned
386
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,206 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate McDonald County's SFR Market Amidst Widening Homeowner Price Gap
Investors in McDonald County, MO, own 2,206 SFR properties, with individual investors comprising 84.3% of holdings and mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 98.7% of the total investor portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 48.5% of all SFR purchases at a significant 25.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling strategic acquisition. While overall landlords are net buyers with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio, institutional investors remained largely inactive or neutral in transactions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,206 SFR properties in McDonald County, with individuals holding 84.3% of the portfolio.
An overwhelming 99.0% (2,184 properties) of landlord-owned SFR is dedicated to rentals. A substantial 74.4% (1,641 properties) of these holdings were acquired with cash. Individual landlords constitute 89.0% of all landlord entities in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $255,440 in Q4 2025, securing a notable 25.1% discount compared to homeowners.
The landlord-homeowner price gap significantly widened throughout 2025, increasing from an 8.1% discount in Q1 to 25.1% in Q4. Landlord acquisition prices averaged $254,387 in 2025, marking a 23.7% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $205,698.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 48.5% of Q4 SFR purchases; mom-and-pop tiers dominated 94.3% of properties detailed by tier.
Out of 32 landlord purchases in Q4, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were highly active with 41 entities acquiring 28 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4, indicating their complete inactivity in the county during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR, while institutions hold just 0.0%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) comprise the backbone of investor ownership, holding 1,772 properties, or 77.5% of the total investor-owned SFR. The combined share of all mid-size and large landlords (Tiers 05-08) is a mere 1.3%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become majority owners from Tier 6-10 upwards.
Companies concentrate their holdings in larger tiers, representing 80.0% of properties in Tier 21-50 and 75.0% in Tier 101-1000. Conversely, individual investors overwhelmingly own 88.0% of single-property portfolios and 78.6% of two-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
MO-McDonald-64831 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 588 properties, while MO-McDonald-64868 has an 80.0% ownership rate.
MO-McDonald-64863 and MO-McDonald-64854 exhibit concentrated investor activity, appearing in both the top 5 by property count and top 5 by ownership percentage. MO-McDonald-64868 displays an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 80.0%, signaling a highly specialized or targeted market.
Historical Transactions
Overall landlords remain strong net buyers in McDonald County with 48 Q4 purchases vs 8 sells; institutional activity is limited.
Landlords consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025, accumulating 150 properties (179 buys vs 29 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed negligible net activity in 2025 with 4 buys and 4 sells, and were net sellers in 2024 (2 buys vs 4 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 46.2% of Q4 transactions, overwhelmingly driven by mom-and-pop tiers.
Single-property (Tier 01) landlords dominated Q4 transaction activity with 41 transactions, paying an average price of $253,546. The Large (101-1000) tier showed the highest inter-landlord trading percentage, with 50.0% of its 2 transactions bought from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,206 SFR properties in McDonald County, with individuals holding 84.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In McDonald County, MO, investor-owned SFR properties total 2,206, representing a significant 36.2% of the entire SFR market (6,088 properties). This indicates a robust investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the SFR market, holding 1,859 properties (84.3% of all investor-owned SFR), compared to companies which own 386 properties (17.5%). This highlights that the vast majority of rental housing is managed by smaller-scale, individual landlords rather than large corporations.

The prevalence of individual ownership extends to the entity level, with 2,421 individual landlords making up 89.0% of the total 2,720 landlord entities. This signifies a highly fragmented market driven by a large number of smaller players.

A striking 99.0% (2,184) of all investor-owned SFR properties are rented, underscoring the strong focus on generating rental income within the landlord community. This confirms that investor acquisitions are overwhelmingly for non-owner-occupied purposes.

Cash acquisitions are highly favored by landlords in McDonald County, with 1,641 properties (74.4% of all investor-owned SFR) purchased outright. This contrasts sharply with only 565 properties (25.6%) being financed, suggesting a preference for debt-free or low-leverage investments.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $255,440 in Q4 2025, securing a notable 25.1% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, acquiring SFR properties at an average of $255,440, which is $85,485 less than the $340,925 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial 25.1% discount, highlighting landlords' ability to find and secure more favorable deals.

The price gap favoring landlords has notably widened over the course of 2025. Starting with an 8.1% discount ($19,321) in Q1, the advantage grew to 17.7% ($58,332) in Q2, 18.2% ($59,231) in Q3, and peaked at 25.1% ($85,485) in Q4. This consistent trend suggests an evolving market dynamic where landlords are increasingly able to negotiate lower prices relative to other buyers.

Comparing annual averages, landlord acquisition prices remained relatively stable year-over-year, averaging $249,303 in 2024 and $254,387 in 2025. This modest 2.0% increase signals a consistent investment strategy amidst fluctuating market conditions.

Landlord acquisition prices show a substantial appreciation from the pandemic era, with the 2025 average of $254,387 marking a 23.7% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $205,698. This indicates that investors have seen significant property value growth in recent years within McDonald County.

While acquisition counts for specific timeframes are recorded as 0 in this dataset, the reported average prices consistently illustrate landlords' strategic approach to purchasing. The sustained discount relative to homeowners across quarters suggests a disciplined buying strategy focused on maximizing value, regardless of transaction volume in the specified timeframe.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 48.5% of Q4 SFR purchases; mom-and-pop tiers dominated 94.3% of properties detailed by tier.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly influenced the Q4 2025 SFR market, accounting for 32 purchases, which represents 48.5% of all 66 SFR properties sold. This highlights their substantial role in current market activity within McDonald County.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 purchases, collectively acquiring 33 properties, which constituted 94.3% of all properties detailed by tier for landlord Q4 activity. This signifies that small-scale investors remain the primary drivers of acquisition activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 41 entities acquiring 28 properties, representing 80.0% of properties detailed by tier. This suggests a vibrant entry point for new individual investors into the market or expansion by existing single-property owners.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no SFR purchases in McDonald County during Q4 2025. Their complete absence indicates a lack of engagement from large-scale entities in this market during the period.

The concentration of Q4 purchases among smaller tiers (Tiers 01-04) reinforces the fragmented and locally driven nature of the investor market. Even the 'Large' tier (101-1000 properties) only accounted for 2 properties (5.7%) in Q4, further emphasizing the dominance of smaller landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR, while institutions hold just 0.0%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the investor-owned SFR market in McDonald County, holding 98.7% of all 2,206 investor-owned properties. This indicates a market almost exclusively dominated by small, independent investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, owning 1,772 properties, which is 77.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. Their substantial share underscores the market's reliance on first-time or single-property investors.

The presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is virtually non-existent, owning just 1 property, which translates to 0.0% of the total investor-owned SFR. This debunks any notion of large corporate dominance in this specific county.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively account for only 24 properties, representing a minimal 1.1% of the total investor-owned SFR. This further emphasizes the fragmented nature of the market, with very few properties held in portfolios larger than 10 properties but less than 1000.

The distribution of ownership highlights a highly decentralized market structure where individual initiative and local investment strategies define the landscape, rather than centralized corporate holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become majority owners from Tier 6-10 upwards.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the driving force behind smaller real estate portfolios in McDonald County, owning 1,585 properties (88.0%) in the Single-property (Tier 01) category and 187 properties (78.6%) in the Two-property (Tier 02) category. This confirms their foundational role in the local SFR market.

The ownership dynamic shifts dramatically at the Mid-size landlord level; companies become the majority owners starting from the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where they hold 67.1% (49 properties) compared to individuals' 32.9% (24 properties).

Company investors show increasing dominance in larger portfolio tiers: they own 66.7% (12 properties) in Tier 11-20, 80.0% (4 properties) in Tier 21-50, and 75.0% (3 properties) in Tier 101-1000. This pattern reveals companies are focused on scaling operations once a certain portfolio size is reached.

The crossover point for ownership occurs between Tier 03-05 and Tier 06-10, where individual ownership drops from 73.0% (Tier 03-05) to 32.9% (Tier 06-10), while company ownership correspondingly rises from 27.0% to 67.1%. This transition marks where individual-led growth gives way to more corporatized investment strategies.

Given the data, individual and company acquisition prices by tier are not available, preventing a direct comparison of their pricing strategies within specific portfolio sizes. However, the ownership distribution clearly indicates different scaling strategies based on investor type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MO-McDonald-64831 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 588 properties, while MO-McDonald-64868 has an 80.0% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

In McDonald County, MO, the zip code 64831 leads in investor-owned SFR property count, with 588 properties, representing a 35.6% investor ownership rate. Following closely are 64854 with 445 properties (42.3% rate) and 64856 with 355 properties (33.0% rate), indicating key areas of investor concentration.

When analyzing by investor ownership percentage, MO-McDonald-64868 stands out with an exceptionally high 80.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. Other highly penetrated areas include 64847 (49.5%) and 64863 (46.4%), showcasing zip codes where investors hold a dominant share of the housing stock.

A notable overlap exists between regions leading in property count and those with high ownership rates. For instance, MO-McDonald-64863 ranks 5th by count (173 properties) and 3rd by percentage (46.4%), while 64854 ranks 2nd by count (445 properties) and 5th by percentage (42.3%). This suggests concentrated investment in specific, high-penetration locales.

The high investor ownership rates in certain zip codes, particularly 64868 at 80.0%, indicate distinct market characteristics or investment opportunities that attract a disproportionate amount of landlord activity. These areas may be primary rental markets or feature specific property types favored by investors.

Given the available data, insights into how acquisition prices vary across these specific geographic regions, or the total SFR inventory and landlord entities per region, are not provided. However, the data clearly identifies the hotspots for investor property holdings and market penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Overall landlords remain strong net buyers in McDonald County with 48 Q4 purchases vs 8 sells; institutional activity is limited.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in McDonald County are decisively net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 48 properties while selling only 8, resulting in a net gain of 40 properties and a strong 6.0x buy/sell ratio, indicating robust accumulation.

This net buying trend has been consistent throughout 2025, with landlords completing 179 buy transactions against 29 sell transactions, accumulating a net 150 properties over the year. The previous year, 2024, also saw significant accumulation with 207 buys versus 30 sells, netting 177 properties.

In contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibit much more limited and balanced transaction activity. In 2025, they were neutral, with 4 buys and 4 sells, resulting in a net change of 0 properties.

Looking at 2024, institutional investors were net sellers, with 2 buys and 4 sells, resulting in a net divestment of 2 properties. This trend highlights a stark difference in market strategy, with institutions either exiting or maintaining a minimal presence while smaller landlords actively expand their portfolios.

The data does not provide details on the percentage of buy or sell transactions involving other landlords (inter-landlord trades) or average buy vs sell prices, precluding insights into implied profit margins or internal market liquidity within this section.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 46.2% of Q4 transactions, overwhelmingly driven by mom-and-pop tiers.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, participating in 48 transactions, which represents 46.2% of all 104 SFR transactions in McDonald County. This demonstrates their significant influence on the market's liquidity and property turnover.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 46 of these transactions, solidifying their role as the primary drivers of market activity. Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from Q4 transactions, reinforcing their minimal presence in this local market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active tier, conducting 41 transactions at an average purchase price of $253,546. This tier also had a low percentage of transactions bought from other landlords, at just 4.9% (2 out of 41 transactions), indicating they primarily acquire properties from non-landlord sellers.

Transaction prices varied significantly across tiers: Tier 01 saw average prices of $253,546, while the Two-property (Tier 02) transactions were considerably higher at $743,470. In contrast, smaller multi-property landlord tiers (Tier 03-05 and 06-10) transacted at much lower average prices of $115,045 and $75,000 respectively, suggesting varied property types or distressed acquisitions.

The Large (101-1000) tier, despite only having 2 transactions, showed a high percentage of inter-landlord activity, with 1 of its 2 transactions (50.0%) being purchased from another landlord. This suggests that larger landlords may be more involved in portfolio adjustments or specialized trading within the investor community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

McDonald County: Mom-and-Pops Dominate 98.7% of Holdings, Drive Q4 Activity, Secure 25% Homeowner Price Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 2,206 SFR properties, representing 36.2% of McDonald County's market. Individual investors hold 1,859 properties (84.3%), significantly outweighing company-owned properties (386, or 17.5%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $255,440 in Q4, securing a substantial $85,485 discount (25.1%) compared to homeowners who paid $340,925. This discount notably widened from 8.1% in Q1 to 25.1% in Q4 2025.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 32 properties, representing 48.5% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were highly active, with 41 entities acquiring 28 properties, while institutional investors made no Q4 purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.7% of investor-owned housing in McDonald County, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone holding 77.5%. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 88.0% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger, showing their scaling strategy.
Transactions
Overall landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (48 buys vs 8 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a neutral transaction position in 2025, with 4 buys and 4 sells.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in McDonald County, MO, is overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale, individual investors. Landlords collectively own 2,206 SFR properties, accounting for a significant 36.2% of the county’s total SFR market. Within this segment, individual investors dominate, holding 1,859 properties (84.3%), while companies own a much smaller 386 properties (17.5%). This mom-and-pop ecosystem is further underscored by the fact that landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 98.7% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a negligible 0.0%.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a highly strategic approach to acquisitions, securing 48.5% of all SFR purchases in the county. They consistently acquired properties at a considerable discount, paying an average of $255,440 in Q4 – a substantial 25.1% less than traditional homeowners. This pricing advantage has widened throughout 2025, signaling landlords' ability to identify and capitalize on favorable market opportunities. While overall landlords are net buyers, having accumulated 150 net properties in 2025, institutional investors remained largely inactive or neutral in their transaction patterns.

The McDonald County SFR market is a clear example of decentralized, local investment driving housing trends. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with their consistent buying activity and ability to secure discounts, indicates a robust and active small-investor base. The virtual absence of institutional players suggests this market operates on different dynamics than larger, more urbanized areas, favoring individual initiative and local market knowledge in a highly rental-focused environment where 99.0% of landlord properties are rented.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMcDonald (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail