Red Lake (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Red Lake (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Red Lake (MN)
1,203
Total Investors in Red Lake (MN)
124
Investor Owned SFR in Red Lake (MN)
123(10.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
111
SFR Owned
97
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
13
SFR Owned
27
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 123 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Red Lake County: Mom-and-pop landlords dominate with 88.7% ownership, securing deep Q4 discounts.
Red Lake County's investor market comprises 123 SFR properties, representing 10.2% of the total market, overwhelmingly dominated by individual landlords (78.9% of holdings). In Q4, landlords secured an exceptional 61.9% average discount compared to homeowners, despite minimal purchasing activity of just 1 property, indicating a highly opportunistic and localized market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Red Lake County investors own 123 SFR properties, with individuals holding 78.9% of the portfolio.
A striking 99.2% of these landlord-owned properties are rented, primarily through cash acquisitions (91.1%) rather than financing (8.9%). Individual landlords account for 89.5% of all landlord entities, owning an average of 0.87 properties each, while company landlords own 2.08 properties on average.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an average 61.9% discount in Q4, paying $75,000 compared to homeowners at $196,793.
The landlord-homeowner price gap was highly erratic, showing a 53.8% premium ($69,930) for landlords in Q2 2025 before returning to a deep 72.3% discount ($140,797) in Q3. Landlord acquisition prices have declined by 15.2% from the 2020-2023 average of $88,428 to $75,000 in Q4 2025, signaling a potential market softening for investor buys.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a minimal 8.3% of Red Lake County's total SFR purchases.
All Q4 landlord purchases were exclusively by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), with a single new entity entering the market as a single-property landlord (Tier 01), acquiring 1 property. This indicates that non-landlord buyers dominate transaction activity in the county.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Red Lake County, controlling 88.7% of investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 70.2% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 87 homes. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in the county, holding 0.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Red Lake County, owning 90.9% of single-property portfolios.
Even in the largest reported mom-and-pop tiers, such as 3-5 properties, individual ownership remains strong at 70.0% (7 properties). There is no observed crossover point where companies become the majority owners in any tier, highlighting the enduring individual investor presence.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership in Red Lake County is concentrated, with zip code 56750 leading with 54 investor-owned properties.
While 56750 leads in total investor-owned properties, zip code 56742 exhibits the highest investor penetration rate at 15.0%, with 35 properties. The top two zip codes by count, 56750 and 56742, together hold 89 of the county's 123 investor properties (72.4%).
Historical Transactions
Red Lake County landlords are robust net buyers, with a 7.0x buy/sell ratio in both 2024 and 2025.
Across 2024 and 2025, landlords consistently bought 7 properties while selling only 1 annually, indicating a strong disposition to acquire and hold. There is no historical transaction activity reported for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Red Lake County, underscoring their complete absence from the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for only 1 transaction in Q4, a minimal 5.6% of all county SFR transactions.
The sole landlord transaction was a purchase by a single-property investor (Tier 01) at an average price of $75,000. No institutional investor transactions (Tier 09) occurred in Q4, and no landlord-to-landlord trading was recorded for this period.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Red Lake County investors own 123 SFR properties, with individuals holding 78.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Red Lake County's investor-owned SFR portfolio totals 123 properties, which represents a modest 10.2% of the county's 1,203 total SFR properties, indicating a relatively low market penetration by investors.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 97 properties (78.9% of the investor-owned total), while company investors hold a smaller share of 27 properties (22.0%). This ratio is further reflected in the entity count, where individual landlords represent 89.5% (111 entities) compared to company landlords at 10.5% (13 entities).

A significant 99.2% (122 properties) of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, highlighting a strong focus on generating rental income within the portfolio rather than holding for other purposes.

The financing structure reveals a preference for cash acquisitions, with 112 properties (91.1%) purchased outright, contrasting sharply with only 11 properties (8.9%) that are financed, indicating a robust capital position among Red Lake County landlords.

Despite individual landlords being far more numerous (111 entities), their average portfolio size within Red Lake County is approximately 0.87 properties (97 properties / 111 entities), suggesting some individual landlords may hold very small local portfolios or that their qualifying portfolio extends beyond this specific county. In contrast, company landlords hold a larger average of 2.08 properties (27 properties / 13 entities).

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an average 61.9% discount in Q4, paying $75,000 compared to homeowners at $196,793.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $75,000, representing a substantial 61.9% discount compared to the average homeowner acquisition price of $196,793, translating to a $121,793 savings per property.

The price discrepancy between landlords and homeowners has shown significant volatility throughout 2025. Following a Q1 discount of 6.8% ($8,750), landlords paid a rare premium of 53.8% ($69,930) over homeowners in Q2, averaging $200,000 versus $130,070, suggesting an isolated, high-value landlord transaction.

This Q2 premium sharply contrasted with Q3, where landlords achieved their largest discount of 72.3% ($140,797), paying only $54,000 compared to homeowner purchases averaging $194,797.

Analyzing historical trends, landlord acquisition prices have experienced a decline, falling from an average of $88,428 during the 2020-2023 period to $75,000 in Q4 2025, which represents a 15.2% decrease. This indicates that while landlords are still finding favorable pricing, the market dynamics have shifted.

The substantial and inconsistent swings in the landlord-homeowner price gap quarter-over-quarter point to extremely low transaction volumes, making average prices highly susceptible to the characteristics of individual sales in Red Lake County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a minimal 8.3% of Red Lake County's total SFR purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity in Red Lake County was notably low in Q4 2025, with only 1 SFR purchase out of a total of 12 transactions, representing a mere 8.3% share of the overall market.

The vast majority of Q4 SFR purchases, 11 properties, were made by non-landlord buyers, highlighting that the market is predominantly driven by traditional homeowners or other non-investor entities.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4, with the sole acquisition coming from this segment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Red Lake County during Q4, maintaining a 0.0% share of landlord purchases and reinforcing their complete absence from this local market.

The single landlord purchase in Q4 was made by a Tier 01 (single-property) entity, indicating a new, small-scale investor entered the market, which aligns with the county's mom-and-pop dominated structure.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Red Lake County, controlling 88.7% of investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively own the overwhelming majority of investor-owned SFR properties in Red Lake County, controlling 88.7% of the total portfolio.

Within this segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the primary force, holding 87 properties, which alone constitutes 70.2% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This underscores the fragmented and small-scale nature of investor ownership in the county.

The next largest segments are two-property landlords (Tier 02) with 13 properties (10.5%) and small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 10 properties (8.1%), further solidifying the dominance of smaller portfolios.

Mid-size landlords, specifically the 11-20 properties tier, hold 12 properties (9.7%), indicating a small presence of slightly larger, but still non-institutional, investors. The 21-50 properties tier accounts for a mere 2 properties (1.6%).

There is a complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) in Red Lake County, as they control 0.0% of investor-owned SFR, contrasting sharply with national narratives and emphasizing the local, independent character of the market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Red Lake County, owning 90.9% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owner type across all observed tiers in Red Lake County, particularly in the foundational Single-property (Tier 01) segment, where they own 80 properties, representing a substantial 90.9% share.

This individual dominance extends to slightly larger portfolios; in the Two-property (Tier 02) segment, individuals hold 11 properties (84.6%), and in the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, they maintain 7 properties (70.0%).

Company ownership remains secondary in these smaller tiers, with their highest concentration in the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, where they own 3 properties, accounting for 30.0% of that segment.

Crucially, no crossover point is observed within the provided data where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in any tier, reinforcing the deeply individual-centric structure of investor holdings in Red Lake County.

The data also indicates a complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09), meaning there are no properties owned by either individual or company entities in the 1000+ properties tier, solidifying Red Lake County as a market fundamentally driven by small, private landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership in Red Lake County is concentrated, with zip code 56750 leading with 54 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Red Lake County are geographically concentrated, with zip code MN-Red Lake-56750 leading in absolute count, holding 54 properties and an 8.0% investor ownership rate.

Despite having fewer total properties, zip code MN-Red Lake-56742 demonstrates the highest investor penetration rate at 15.0%, with 35 investor-owned properties, signaling a greater proportion of its housing stock is landlord-owned.

The top three performing zip codes by count (56750, 56742, and 56715) together account for 101 properties, representing a significant 82.1% of all investor-owned SFR in Red Lake County, indicating high regional concentration.

A notable disparity exists between regions leading by count versus by percentage; for instance, MN-Red Lake-56716 appears in the top 5 by percentage (11.1%) but its specific property count is not detailed, highlighting varying market saturation levels across the county.

The presence of 'nan' values for some zip codes (e.g., 56535 and 56684) suggests either an absence of investor activity or insufficient data for these areas, further emphasizing that investor presence is highly localized within Red Lake County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Red Lake County landlords are robust net buyers, with a 7.0x buy/sell ratio in both 2024 and 2025.
Detailed Findings

Red Lake County landlords are firmly in a net buyer position, demonstrated by a significant 7.0x buy/sell ratio in both Year 2025 (7 buys vs. 1 sell) and Year 2024 (7 buys vs. 1 sell), indicating a sustained period of accumulation.

Transaction volumes, however, remain exceptionally low; in Q3 2025, landlords engaged in only 2 buy transactions and 1 sell transaction, resulting in a 2.0x buy/sell ratio for that quarter.

The consistent pattern of limited sales despite ongoing, albeit low, buying activity suggests that landlords in Red Lake County are primarily accumulating properties for long-term holding rather than actively trading assets.

Crucially, there is no recorded historical transaction activity for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Red Lake County, reinforcing the market's reliance on smaller, independent landlords and their lack of interest from large entities.

The high buy-to-sell ratios underscore a market where properties, once acquired by landlords, are retained, contributing to a stable and less liquid investor segment within the county's housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for only 1 transaction in Q4, a minimal 5.6% of all county SFR transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlord participation in Q4 2025 transactions in Red Lake County was extremely limited, with only 1 transaction recorded out of a total of 18 SFR transactions, representing a marginal 5.6% share of market activity.

This single landlord transaction originated from a single-property landlord (Tier 01), who acquired 1 property at an average purchase price of $75,000, aligning with the overall Q4 landlord acquisition price.

Notably, there was no inter-landlord trading activity recorded for this Q4 purchase, as 0.0% of transactions were sourced from other landlords, suggesting that the buyer acquired the property from a non-landlord seller.

Mirroring historical trends and current ownership patterns, institutional investors (Tier 09) remained completely absent from Q4 transactions, registering 0 transactions.

The minimal transaction volume for landlords in Q4 underscores a highly inactive purchasing market, where the very few active participants belong to the smallest investor tiers, further emphasizing the mom-and-pop nature of the Red Lake County real estate market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Red Lake County with 88.7% ownership, securing deep Q4 discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 123 SFR properties in Red Lake County (10.2% of the market), with individual investors holding 97 (78.9%) and companies owning 27 (22.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $75,000 in Q4, a significant 61.9% less than traditional homeowners who paid $196,793, resulting in a $121,793 discount per property.
Activity
Q4 saw very limited landlord activity, with only 1 purchase (8.3% of all sales) made by a new single-property landlord, indicating minimal new entry despite low overall transaction volume.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 88.7% of investor housing in Red Lake County, while institutional investors (1000+) hold 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors strongly dominate all tiers, accounting for 90.9% of single-property landlords, with no observed tier where companies hold a majority of properties.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers with a 7.0x buy/sell ratio across both 2024 and 2025, acquiring 7 properties against 1 sale annually, and institutional investors show no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

Red Lake County's single-family residential (SFR) investor market is distinctly localized and dominated by small-scale private landlords. Out of 1,203 total SFR properties in the county, investors own 123, representing a modest 10.2% market penetration. Individual investors constitute the vast majority, holding 97 properties (78.9% of the investor portfolio) and accounting for 89.5% of all landlord entities. This landscape is further defined by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 88.7% of investor-owned SFR, with single-property owners alone holding 70.2%.

Investor behavior in Red Lake County is characterized by highly opportunistic acquisitions and low transaction volumes. In Q4 2025, landlords secured an exceptional average discount of 61.9%, paying $75,000 per property compared to homeowners' $196,793. However, Q4 saw only one landlord purchase, signaling minimal activity. Historically, landlords have been strong net buyers, exhibiting a 7.0x buy/sell ratio in both 2024 and 2025, indicating a long-term holding strategy rather than active trading. Pricing volatility, including a rare Q2 premium, suggests that average prices are highly susceptible to the characteristics of very few, unique transactions.

The complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties) from both ownership and transaction data is a defining characteristic of Red Lake County's real estate market. This underscores a stable, locally-driven investor environment primarily shaped by individual landlords focused on long-term rental income, as evidenced by 99.2% of investor properties being rented and 91.1% acquired with cash. The market is not subject to the dynamics often associated with large corporate or institutional players, maintaining a highly traditional and fragmented ownership structure.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:10 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyRed Lake (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail