Lyon (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lyon (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lyon (MN)
6,802
Total Investors in Lyon (MN)
859
Investor Owned SFR in Lyon (MN)
845(12.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
748
SFR Owned
666
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
111
SFR Owned
211
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 845 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate MN-Lyon County; Securing Deep Discounts
Landlords in MN-Lyon County own 845 SFR properties, comprising 12.4% of the market, with individual investors holding a significant 78.8% share. In Q4 2025, landlords secured an average discount of 32.1% compared to traditional homeowners. All landlords are net buyers, but institutional investors show no presence or activity in this market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 78.8% of 845 landlord-held SFR properties in MN-Lyon County.
A substantial 95.7% (809 properties) of landlord-owned SFR are rented, and 79.1% (668 properties) were acquired with cash. The county sees 6.74 individual landlords for every company landlord.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 32.1% price discount over homeowners in Q4 2025 in MN-Lyon County.
The landlord discount fluctuated wildly quarter-over-quarter, peaking at 57.2% in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have declined by 1.6% from the 2020-2023 average to Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 90.9% of all Q4 2025 investor purchases in MN-Lyon County.
Landlords accounted for 14.3% of total Q4 SFR purchases (11 out of 77 properties). Single-property investors (Tier 01) were the most active, representing 15 entities who purchased 10 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 89.2% of all investor-owned SFR in MN-Lyon County.
Single-property landlords alone hold 58.6% of the investor-owned portfolio (520 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership in MN-Lyon County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority SFR owners from portfolios of 6-10 properties in MN-Lyon County.
Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 89.3% of single-property holdings. Companies achieve their highest concentration in the 21-50 property tier, owning 93.8% of properties.
Geographic Distribution
MN-Lyon-56258 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 392 properties, a 10.6% ownership rate.
MN-Lyon-56178 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 22.2%. The zip code MN-Lyon-56175 is prominent in both count (151 properties) and rate (17.0%).
Historical Transactions
All landlords are net buyers with a 3.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 in MN-Lyon County.
The overall landlord buy/sell ratio significantly decreased from 7.53x in 2024 to 3.0x in 2025. No data is available for institutional investor transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 13.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions in MN-Lyon County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 activity with 15 transactions at an average price of $147,885. This tier purchased 13.3% of its properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 78.8% of 845 landlord-held SFR properties in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in MN-Lyon County collectively own 845 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 12.4% of the total SFR market. This establishes investors as a notable segment within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 666 properties (78.8%) of the landlord-owned portfolio, significantly outpacing company ownership at 211 properties (25.0%). This highlights the prevalence of mom-and-pop investors in the region.

The rental market is robust, with 809 properties (95.7%) of landlord-owned SFR explicitly identified as rented, underscoring a strong focus on income generation from these investments. Only a small fraction is likely owner-occupied or vacant.

Financing trends reveal a preference for cash acquisitions, with 668 properties (79.1%) being cash purchases, while only 177 properties (20.9%) are financed. This indicates a high level of capital liquidity among landlords in MN-Lyon County.

Comparing landlord entities, there are 748 individual landlords versus 111 company landlords, a ratio of approximately 6.74 individual landlords for every company. This entity distribution reinforces the individual-centric nature of the investor market in this county.

The average portfolio size per entity differs significantly; individual landlords hold an average of 0.89 properties each, while company landlords average 1.90 properties. This suggests companies, though fewer in number, tend to manage slightly larger portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 32.1% price discount over homeowners in Q4 2025 in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in MN-Lyon County acquired properties for an average of $149,892, a notable 32.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $220,901. This represents a substantial savings of $71,009 per property for investors.

The landlord discount against homeowner prices has shown significant volatility throughout 2025. While Q1 saw a modest 13.0% discount ($184,300 vs $211,764), this widened dramatically to 57.2% in Q2 ($91,163 vs $213,042) and remained high at 53.5% in Q3 ($115,571 vs $248,294), before narrowing in Q4.

Overall landlord acquisition prices in MN-Lyon County have seen a slight decline from the pandemic-era boom. The average price for 2020-2023 was $152,350, dropping to $145,676 for the full year 2025, and $149,892 in Q4 2025. This indicates a modest depreciation trend from peak years.

Comparing annual trends, landlord average acquisition prices decreased from $189,382 in 2024 to $145,676 in 2025. This 23.1% year-over-year decline suggests a cooling acquisition market for investors in the county.

The significant and fluctuating price gap between landlords and homeowners suggests that landlords in MN-Lyon County are adept at identifying and capitalizing on discounted properties, indicating a strategic advantage in a dynamic market.

Despite the lack of specific acquisition counts for landlords in recent quarters provided (showing '0 properties'), the consistently reported average prices and discounts against homeowner prices reflect the ongoing market dynamics and value proposition for investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 90.9% of all Q4 2025 investor purchases in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords made 11 SFR purchases in MN-Lyon County, comprising 14.3% of the total 77 SFR purchases during the quarter. This indicates a consistent, albeit modest, share of market activity for investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 investor activity, responsible for 10 out of the 11 landlord purchases, equating to 90.9% of all investor acquisitions. This reinforces their foundational role in the county's rental market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, with 15 entities acquiring 10 properties in Q4 2025. This suggests a continued entry of new or expanding small-scale investors into the market, likely seeking their first or second rental property.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the Q4 purchase activity in MN-Lyon County, making 0 acquisitions. This indicates a lack of large-scale corporate interest or presence in this specific geographic market.

The remaining 9.1% of landlord purchases in Q4 came from small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20), with 1 entity acquiring 1 property. This shows a slight diversification but maintains the overall trend of smaller investor dominance.

The high concentration of Q4 activity within the mom-and-pop segment, particularly Tier 01, suggests that market entry barriers remain relatively low, attracting individuals looking to invest in single rental units rather than large portfolio expansions by existing players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 89.2% of all investor-owned SFR in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 792 properties, representing an overwhelming 89.2% of the total 888 investor-owned SFR properties in MN-Lyon County. This firmly establishes small-scale investors as the backbone of the county's rental housing market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the largest segment of this ownership, holding 520 properties, or 58.6% of all investor-owned SFR. This highlights the market's reliance on individuals owning one rental unit.

The distribution of properties beyond Tier 01 shows a rapid decline in concentration; Tier 02 owns 97 properties (10.9%), Tier 03-05 owns 112 properties (12.6%), and Tier 06-10 owns 63 properties (7.1%). This indicates that investors tend to remain small, with few scaling up significantly.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) show no presence in MN-Lyon County, with 0 recorded properties. This absence underscores the highly localized and small-investor driven nature of the county's SFR rental market, completely devoid of large corporate landlord activity.

Medium-sized landlords (Tiers 11-1000) constitute a very small portion of the market, collectively owning only 96 properties (10.8%). This includes 60 properties (6.8%) in Tier 11-20, 16 properties (1.8%) in Tier 21-50, 1 property (0.1%) in Tier 51-100, and 19 properties (2.1%) in Tier 101-1000.

The market structure in MN-Lyon County is thus characterized by a broad base of single-property owners, with diminishing presence as portfolio size increases, and a complete lack of institutional-scale investment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority SFR owners from portfolios of 6-10 properties in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape by tier reveals a distinct crossover point in MN-Lyon County: individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority ownership from the 'Small landlord (6-10 properties)' tier onwards.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are overwhelmingly individual-owned, with 475 properties (89.3%) held by individuals compared to just 57 properties (10.7%) by companies. This pattern continues into the two-property (Tier 02) and small landlord (3-5 properties) tiers.

In the two-property tier, individuals own 74 properties (74.7%) versus companies with 25 properties (25.3%). For 3-5 properties, individuals hold 76 properties (67.3%), while companies own 37 properties (32.7%).

The crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 36 properties (57.1%) compared to individuals who own 27 properties (42.9%). This marks a shift in investment scale and strategy by entity type.

This corporate dominance intensifies in larger tiers; for 11-20 properties, companies own 21 properties (35.0%) while individuals still hold 39 properties (65.0%), indicating that while companies may lead, individual participation is still significant even in larger portfolios.

The highest concentration of company ownership is observed in the 'Small-medium (21-50 properties)' tier, where companies control 15 properties (93.8%), leaving individuals with only 1 property (6.2%). This tier represents the peak of corporate presence within the county's landlord market.

No data is available to compare individual vs. company acquisition prices within each tier or to assess their respective growth patterns over time.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MN-Lyon-56258 leads in investor-owned SFR count with 392 properties, a 10.6% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within MN-Lyon County, the zip code 56258 shows the highest concentration of investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 392 properties, representing a 10.6% investor ownership rate. This indicates it is the primary hub for landlord activity by volume.

While 56258 leads in absolute count, the zip code 56178 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate among valid data points, with 22.2% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This signifies a high market penetration by landlords in this specific area, even if the total count might be lower.

The zip code 56175 stands out as a significant area for investor activity, appearing in both the top 5 by count (151 properties) and top 5 by percentage (17.0%). This suggests a strong correlation between investor presence and market share in this sub-geography.

Other notable sub-geographies by count include MN-Lyon-56115 with 60 investor-owned properties (16.6% rate) and MN-Lyon-56157 with 33 properties (15.3% rate). These areas also show considerable landlord interest.

Data for MN-Lyon-56113 and MN-Lyon-56263 regarding investor-owned properties and rates is either unavailable or invalid, making comprehensive analysis for these areas impossible within this report.

The variation in investor ownership rates, from 10.6% in 56258 to 22.2% in 56178, highlights diverse market conditions and investor appeal across different sub-geographies within MN-Lyon County, suggesting localized investment strategies.

There is no available data to analyze how acquisition prices vary across these specific geographic regions, or the number of landlord entities operating in each top region.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
All landlords are net buyers with a 3.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in MN-Lyon County are consistently net buyers, demonstrating a strong accumulation trend throughout 2025 and 2024. In Q4 2025, landlords bought 16 properties while selling 5, resulting in a healthy net gain of 11 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 3.2x.

This net buying activity has been consistent across quarters in 2025: Q3 saw 13 buys vs 7 sells (net 6), and Q2 recorded 10 buys vs 5 sells (net 5). The positive net position indicates sustained investor confidence and growth in their portfolios.

However, the overall buying intensity has softened from 2024 to 2025. The annual buy/sell ratio dropped from a high of 7.53x in 2024 (226 buys vs 30 sells) to 3.0x in 2025 (54 buys vs 18 sells), indicating a significant slowdown in the rate of net acquisitions.

While the buy-to-sell activity remains strongly positive, the declining ratio suggests that market conditions, such as fewer attractive purchase opportunities or changing investor strategies, may be tempering the pace of portfolio expansion.

No data is available to assess the percentage of buy or sell transactions that occur between landlords (inter-landlord trading), nor are there average buy and sell prices to infer implied margins on transactions.

Crucially, there is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in MN-Lyon County, indicating either a complete absence of institutional activity or a lack of reporting for this segment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 13.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions in MN-Lyon County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 16 transactions during Q4 2025 in MN-Lyon County, accounting for 13.3% of the total 120 SFR transactions observed in the quarter. This indicates a consistent but relatively small share of the overall transaction volume.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment, specifically the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01), which recorded 15 transactions. In contrast, the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier only saw 1 transaction, and institutional investors (Tier 09) had no transactions.

Average purchase prices in Q4 varied by tier: Single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired properties at an average of $147,885, while the single small-medium landlord (Tier 11-20) transaction was at a higher average of $180,000.

This pricing difference suggests that smaller, single-property landlords are securing more affordably priced units, potentially indicating a strategy focused on lower entry points or access to different market segments compared to slightly larger investors.

Inter-landlord trading played a minor role for the most active tier; single-property landlords (Tier 01) bought 2 out of their 15 properties (13.3%) from other landlords. This suggests that the majority of purchases still originate from non-landlord sellers.

The price spread between the highest and lowest active tiers in Q4 was $32,115, reflecting variations in property values or acquisition strategies among different investor sizes.

The dominance of Tier 01 in Q4 transactions (15 transactions) closely aligns with its significant share of overall ownership distribution, reinforcing its critical role in the market's activity and structure.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

MN-Lyon: Mom-and-Pop Investors Reign, Securing Deep Discounts Amidst No Institutional Presence
Holdings
Landlords in MN-Lyon County collectively own 845 SFR properties, representing 12.4% of the market. Individual investors hold 666 properties (78.8%) while companies own 211 properties (25.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $149,892 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial 32.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $220,901, a $71,009 savings. However, landlord acquisition prices have slightly declined by 1.6% from 2020-2023 levels to Q4 2025.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 11 properties, representing 14.3% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, with 15 entities purchasing 10 properties.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 89.2% of investor-owned housing across MN-Lyon County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (e.g., 89.3% of single-property holdings), but companies take majority control in portfolios of 6-10 properties and above, with their highest concentration in the 21-50 property tier (93.8%).
Transactions
Landlords overall are net buyers in MN-Lyon County, with a Q4 2025 buy/sell ratio of 3.2x (16 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors show no transaction activity in this market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in MN-Lyon County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These investors collectively own 845 SFR properties, comprising 12.4% of the total market, with individuals holding a commanding 78.8% share (666 properties) compared to company ownership at 25.0% (211 properties). This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 89.2% of all investor-owned housing, with a complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties), highlighting a localized market built on individual initiatives.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 11 properties, accounting for 14.3% of all SFR sales. These investors demonstrated a significant strategic advantage, securing properties for an average of $149,892 – a substantial 32.1% discount compared to the $220,901 paid by traditional homeowners. While overall landlord acquisition prices have slightly dipped by 1.6% from the 2020-2023 average, landlords in MN-Lyon County remain net buyers, reflecting confidence in the market, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 3.2x. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, with 15 entities purchasing 10 properties, showcasing continued entry and activity within this foundational tier.

This data from MN-Lyon County paints a clear picture of a decentralized and accessible SFR investment market. The prevalence of individual and mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with their ability to secure properties at significant discounts, suggests that this market favors savvy, local investors. The absence of institutional players means less competition from large entities, potentially allowing smaller investors to thrive and accumulate rental portfolios without the intense pressure seen in more institutionalized markets.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLyon (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell