Le Sueur (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Le Sueur (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Le Sueur (MN)
9,256
Total Investors in Le Sueur (MN)
326
Investor Owned SFR in Le Sueur (MN)
276(3.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
275
SFR Owned
214
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
51
SFR Owned
64
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 276 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 3% Le Sueur County Investor Market with No Institutional Presence
Landlords in Le Sueur County, MN, own a modest 276 SFR properties, representing just 3.0% of the market, overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (97.5%) with no institutional presence. In Q4, landlords secured properties at a 9.4% discount versus homeowners, engaging in limited but net positive buying activity for the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords own 77.5% of the 276 SFR properties, driving Le Sueur County's investor market.
A strong rental focus is evident, with 93.8% of landlord properties rented, predominantly acquired with cash (215 properties vs. 61 financed). Individual landlords average 0.78 properties, while companies average 1.25 properties per entity.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 9.4% discount ($31,304) vs. homeowners in Q4 2025.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter, ranging from 9.4% in Q4 to a massive 40.0% in Q2. No landlord acquisition activity was recorded for specific timeframes (Year 2025, Year 2024, 2020-2023), indicating low overall transaction volume.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made 4.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, led by new single-property investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 80.0% of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no Q4 activity. Single-property landlords drove new market entrants, with 5 entities purchasing 3 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of investor-owned SFR, with no institutional presence.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent 78.0% of all investor-owned SFR. The absence of tier-specific pricing data prevents analysis of acquisition price variation by portfolio size. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have 0.0% ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate up to 5 properties, but companies control 92.3% of 6-10 property portfolios.
The crossover point where companies become majority owners occurs at the 6-10 property tier. There are no institutional company-owned properties recorded. Individual investors heavily concentrate in smaller portfolios (86.5% of Tier 01, 76.9% of Tier 02).
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 56071 leads with 69 investor-owned properties; 56028 has the highest 8.2% investor rate.
Zip code 56028 shows the highest investor penetration at 8.2%, despite having fewer total properties (42) than 56071. The top three zip codes by count (56071, 56028, 56096) account for over half (51.1%) of Le Sueur County's investor-owned SFR.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are net buyers in 2025 (16 buys vs 13 sells); institutional investors show no transactions.
Quarterly activity shows flux, with landlords being net buyers in Q4 2025 (net 3) but net sellers in Q2 2025 (net -3). Overall, 2025 marks a shift from 2024, when landlords were net sellers (net -3).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for only 4.3% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops made all purchases.
Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $346,800 in Q4, while larger small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20) paid $146,000. No inter-landlord transactions (0.0%) were recorded, indicating acquisitions primarily from non-investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords own 77.5% of the 276 SFR properties, driving Le Sueur County's investor market.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Le Sueur County, MN, own a modest 276 SFR properties, representing only 3.0% of the total 9,256 SFR properties in the market, indicating limited investor penetration.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate ownership, holding 214 properties or 77.5% of all investor-owned SFR, while company-owned properties account for a much smaller 64 properties (23.2%).

A strong rental focus is evident, with 259 (93.8%) of landlord-owned properties identified as rented, underscoring their primary objective as income-generating assets rather than owner-occupied residences.

Cash acquisitions are highly favored among landlords, with 215 properties being cash-owned compared to just 61 properties that are financed, suggesting a preference for debt-free portfolios or conservative investment strategies.

While individuals make up 84.4% (275 out of 326) of all landlord entities, they own 77.5% of properties, translating to an average of 0.78 properties per individual landlord, indicating a prevalence of single-property ownership.

Conversely, company landlords, although fewer in number (51 entities or 15.6% of total landlords), hold an average of 1.25 properties per entity, suggesting slightly larger, albeit still small, portfolios on average.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 9.4% discount ($31,304) vs. homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords paid $300,714 on average, securing a significant 9.4% discount or $31,304 less per property compared to traditional homeowners who paid $332,018.

The landlord discount over homeowners has shown considerable variability across quarters, widening from 9.4% ($31,304) in Q4 to 17.9% ($77,527) in Q3, and reaching a massive 40.0% ($147,913) in Q2, indicating opportunities for landlords to acquire properties at much lower prices during specific periods.

Despite attractive discounts, landlord acquisition activity for specific timeframes such as 2025-Q4, 2025-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2024-Q4, Year 2025, Year 2024, and Years 2020-2023 shows 0 properties purchased, indicating very low or no recorded acquisition activity during these periods for the provided data.

Landlord average acquisition prices have been highly volatile, fluctuating from a low of $222,265 in Q2 to $355,000 in Q3, before settling at $300,714 in Q4, reflecting an inconsistent market for investor purchases.

The trend of the price gap between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated significantly, showing no consistent narrowing or widening over the past three quarters (Q2: 40.0%, Q3: 17.9%, Q4: 9.4%).

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords made 4.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, led by new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for a minimal 4.9% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Le Sueur County, MN, acquiring only 5 out of 102 properties, indicating a very small share of recent market activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated landlord purchasing in Q4, making 4 of the 5 acquisitions and representing a significant 80.0% of all investor buys, with no institutional (Tier 09) activity recorded.

New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, purchasing 3 properties (60.0% of landlord buys) and accounting for all 5 new landlord entities entering the market in Q4, signifying fresh, small-scale investor interest.

Larger investor tiers, including institutional (Tier 09), showed no purchasing activity in Q4; the largest purchases came from the small landlord (3-5 properties) and small-medium tier (11-20 properties), each acquiring just 1 property (20.0% each).

In Q4, the single-property tier saw 3 properties purchased by 5 entities, averaging 0.6 properties per entity, while the small landlord (3-5) and small-medium (11-20) tiers each had 1 entity purchasing 1 property, showing higher buying intensity for larger small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of investor-owned SFR, with no institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 97.5% of all investor-owned SFR in Le Sueur County, MN, totaling 275 properties, cementing their role as the primary owners.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 220 properties, which alone represents 78.0% of all landlord-held SFR.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership in Le Sueur County, MN (0.0%), starkly contrasting with national trends and highlighting a uniquely localized market structure.

While small-to-mid-size landlords dominate, a minimal presence of larger portfolios exists with Tier 21-50 and Tier 101-1000 each holding just 1 property (0.4% each), indicating isolated larger-scale investments.

The data shows a rapid increase in portfolio size from Tier 01 (1 property) to Tier 02 (2 properties), Tier 03-05 (29 properties), and Tier 06-10 (13 properties), illustrating the gradual scaling of local investor portfolios.

The absence of acquisition price data by tier (as the 'TIER PRICES' summary is empty) prevents analysis of whether larger investors pay more or less, suggesting limited or no recent transactions across these specific tiers for pricing comparison.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate up to 5 properties, but companies control 92.3% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 86.5% of single-property (Tier 01) landlords (192 properties) and 76.9% of two-property (Tier 02) landlords (10 properties).

The ownership structure significantly shifts as portfolios grow; companies become the majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they control 92.3% of properties (12 properties) compared to just 7.7% for individuals (1 property).

In the 3-5 property tier, individual ownership still leads with 58.6% (17 properties), but company involvement becomes substantial at 41.4% (12 properties), indicating a more balanced ownership type as portfolios expand beyond single properties.

Consistent with overall holdings, there is no data for company ownership in the institutional (1000+) tier, reinforcing the observation that large-scale corporate investors are absent from this market.

The transition from primarily individual ownership in Tiers 01-05 to dominant company ownership in Tier 06-10 suggests that investors consider formalizing their structures or that different investor profiles enter the market as portfolio size increases.

The provided data does not include pricing differences by owner type or growth patterns across timeframes, limiting further analysis into strategic divergences between individual and company investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 56071 leads with 69 investor-owned properties; 56028 has the highest 8.2% investor rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Le Sueur County, MN, investor-owned properties are most concentrated in zip code 56071 with 69 properties, followed by 56028 with 42 properties, and 56096 with 30 properties, indicating key investor hubs.

Zip code 56028 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 8.2%, closely followed by 56063 at 8.1%, signaling areas with significant landlord presence relative to total SFR housing.

While zip code 56071 has the highest count of investor-owned properties (69), it ranks lower in ownership rate at 3.9%, highlighting that absolute numbers do not always correlate with market penetration density.

The provided data does not include acquisition prices by sub-geographic region, preventing an analysis of price variations across these concentrated investor areas.

The top three zip codes by count (56071, 56028, 56096) collectively account for 141 properties, representing 51.1% of all 276 investor-owned properties in Le Sueur County, MN, demonstrating strong geographic clustering.

The absence of data for several zip codes (e.g., 56011, 56044) suggests either no investor properties or data limitations for those specific sub-geographies within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are net buyers in 2025 (16 buys vs 13 sells); institutional investors show no transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Le Sueur County, MN, are overall net buyers year-to-date in 2025, acquiring 16 properties while selling 13, resulting in a net gain of 3 properties.

Transaction patterns show significant quarterly shifts, with landlords being net buyers in Q4 2025 (7 buys vs. 4 sells, net 3) but net sellers in Q2 2025 (4 buys vs. 7 sells, net -3), indicating market fluidity.

While landlords were net buyers in 2025, the previous year (2024) saw them as net sellers, with 18 buys versus 21 sells (net -3), suggesting a recent shift from divestment to accumulation.

There is no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1000+ tier), indicating their complete absence from the buying and selling landscape in this county.

The provided summary lacks data on average buy/sell prices or the percentage of landlord-to-landlord transactions, preventing a deeper analysis of profitability margins or internal market liquidity.

The total transaction volume for landlords remains moderate, with a total of 29 transactions (16 buys, 13 sells) for Year 2025, reflecting a relatively quiet investor market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for only 4.3% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops made all purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in a mere 4.3% of all Q4 transactions in Le Sueur County, MN, conducting only 7 out of 161 total SFR transactions, underscoring their limited direct market influence.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were responsible for 6 of the 7 landlord transactions in Q4, with single-property (Tier 01) investors leading with 5 transactions, reinforcing their market activity.

Counter-intuitively, the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $346,800 in Q4, while larger small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20) secured properties at a significantly lower average of $146,000, suggesting varying strategies or property types.

None of the Q4 landlord transactions involved purchases from other landlords (0.0%), indicating a market where investors primarily acquire properties from traditional homeowners rather than trading among themselves.

A considerable price spread of $200,800 is observed across active tiers, with Tier 01 paying $346,800 and Tier 11-20 paying $146,000, reflecting diverse property values or potential distressed sales for larger portfolios.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions in Q4, aligning with their overall minimal presence in the county's investor market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 3% Le Sueur County Investor Market with No Institutional Presence
Holdings
Landlords in Le Sueur County, MN, own 276 SFR properties, representing 3.0% of the total market. Individual investors hold 214 properties (77.5%), significantly outnumbering company-owned properties at 64 (23.2%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average of $300,714, a 9.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $332,018, equating to a $31,304 saving per property.
Activity
Landlords made only 5 purchases in Q4, comprising a modest 4.9% of all SFR sales, with single-property (Tier 01) landlords initiating all 5 new landlord entities during this period.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.5% of investor-owned housing in Le Sueur County, MN, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors represent 86.5% of single-property landlords, but companies become the dominant owners, controlling 92.3% of properties, starting at the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers year-to-date in 2025 with a buy/sell ratio of 1.23x (16 buys vs 13 sells), yet institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no recorded transaction activity in the county.
Market Narrative

Le Sueur County, MN's real estate investor market is remarkably small, with landlords owning just 276 SFR properties, accounting for a mere 3.0% of the total market. This landscape is almost entirely dominated by individual investors, who hold 214 properties (77.5% of the total) and comprise 84.4% of all landlord entities. Mom-and-pop landlords (those with 1-10 properties) collectively control an overwhelming 97.5% of the investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone representing 78.0%. Notably, institutional investors with 1000+ properties have no recorded presence in this market.

Landlord activity in Q4 2025 was minimal, with only 5 purchases representing 4.9% of all SFR sales. These investors demonstrated a strategic pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $300,714, a 9.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $332,018. Transaction patterns show landlords were net buyers year-to-date in 2025, with 16 acquisitions against 13 sales, indicating a modest accumulation trend. Interestingly, the highest average purchase prices in Q4 were observed in the single-property tier ($346,800), while larger small-medium landlords (11-20 properties) paid significantly less ($146,000), suggesting varied property types or acquisition strategies.

The data highlights Le Sueur County, MN, as a market characterized by local, small-scale individual investors, largely devoid of institutional influence. The pronounced dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with minimal transaction volumes and attractive acquisition discounts, suggests a market driven by local entrepreneurialism rather than large-scale corporate strategies. The clear shift from individual to company ownership around the 6-10 property tier indicates a point where growing investors may formalize their operations, shaping the future dynamics of this localized, rental-focused market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 12:04 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLe Sueur (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions