Big Stone (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Big Stone (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Big Stone (MN)
1,881
Total Investors in Big Stone (MN)
740
Investor Owned SFR in Big Stone (MN)
605(32.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
696
SFR Owned
548
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
44
SFR Owned
60
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 605 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Big Stone County Market with 98.5% Ownership and 68.4% of Q4 Purchases
Big Stone County's real estate market is heavily influenced by landlords, who own 605 SFR properties, representing 32.2% of the market. Individual landlords dominate with 90.6% of holdings, and mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 98.5% of the total investor-owned portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 13 properties, making up 68.4% of all SFR purchases, despite often paying a premium over traditional homeowners in recent quarters. Landlords remain strong net buyers in the county, with institutional investors showing no reported activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Dominate Big Stone County, Holding 90.6% of 605 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Of the 605 investor-owned SFR properties, 482 (79.7%) were purchased with cash, while 123 (20.3%) were financed. A significant 98.2% of these landlord-owned properties, totaling 594, are rented, highlighting a strong rental-focused portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Paid 0.8% Premium in Q4, Signaling Narrowing Gap Over Homeowner Prices in Big Stone County
The landlord premium has dramatically decreased from Q2 2025's 219.5% ($127,663) and Q3 2025's 101.4% ($86,183) to a minimal 0.8% ($1,425) in Q4 2025. While Q4 2025 shows landlords paying a premium, earlier quarters in 2025 saw much higher premiums, indicating a shift in pricing dynamics.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Secured 68.4% of All SFR Purchases in Big Stone County During Q4 2025
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove virtually all activity, accounting for 12 of the 13 landlord purchases (92.3%). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no purchases during Q4 2025, underscoring their absence in the local market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.5% of All Investor-Owned SFR in Big Stone County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the cornerstone, owning 81.7% of the total investor portfolio with 501 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no properties in Big Stone County, reinforcing the market's small-investor dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance in Smaller Portfolios
Individual investors hold 93.6% of single-property portfolios, but their share drops to 46.7% in the 6-10 property tier, where companies then own 53.3%. Institutional companies (1000+ properties) own no properties in Big Stone County, indicating their absence across all tiers.
Geographic Distribution
MN-Big Stone-56278 Leads in Investor-Owned Property Count; MN-Big Stone-56225 Has Highest Ownership Rate
MN-Big Stone-56278 boasts the highest count of investor-owned properties at 259, while MN-Big Stone-56225 has the highest investor ownership rate at 55.3%. Both areas show significant investor interest, though their primary concentration metrics differ.
Historical Transactions
Big Stone County Landlords Remain Strong Net Buyers, With an 81x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
Landlords purchased 81 properties while selling only 1 in 2025, continuing a trend of strong accumulation (84 buys vs 3 sells in 2024). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) recorded no transactions in either 2024 or 2025, indicating their complete absence from market activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 62.5% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Big Stone County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove 90.0% of landlord transactions (18 of 20), paying an average of $182,278. No inter-landlord transactions were reported across any tier in Q4, indicating all landlord acquisitions originated from non-landlord sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate Big Stone County, Holding 90.6% of 605 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Big Stone County collectively own 605 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for a substantial 32.2% of the county's total SFR market of 1,881 properties.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 548 SFR properties, which represents 90.6% of the total investor-owned portfolio. Companies, in contrast, own only 60 properties (9.9%), underscoring the prevalence of small-scale investors.

The ownership structure by entity type is highly skewed towards individuals, with 696 individual landlords compared to just 44 company landlords, resulting in a 15.82:1 ratio highlighting the mom-and-pop foundation of the local rental market.

A significant majority of landlord-owned properties, 594 out of 605, are rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income with 98.2% of the portfolio dedicated to non-owner-occupied use.

The mode of acquisition reveals a strong preference for cash purchases among landlords, with 482 properties (79.7%) acquired entirely with cash. Only 123 properties (20.3%) were financed, demonstrating a conservative, equity-rich investment approach.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Paid 0.8% Premium in Q4, Signaling Narrowing Gap Over Homeowner Prices in Big Stone County
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Big Stone County paid an average acquisition price of $170,050, which was a $1,425 premium (0.8%) compared to the average homeowner price of $168,625.

This Q4 premium marks a significant narrowing from earlier in 2025, where landlords paid much higher premiums: 219.5% in Q2 ($185,813 vs $58,150) and 101.4% in Q3 ($171,183 vs $85,000).

The trend reveals that while landlords have consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners throughout 2025, this gap has substantially narrowed, with the Q4 premium being the smallest of the year.

Despite listed average acquisition prices for landlords, the data indicates 0 properties were acquired by landlords in the aggregate for 2024, 2025, and the 2020-2023 period, highlighting very low or specific landlord acquisition activity during those broader timeframes.

The implied price appreciation for landlords from the 2020-2023 period's average of $121,151 to Q4 2025's average of $170,050, represents a significant 40.4% increase, reflecting robust market growth over time.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Secured 68.4% of All SFR Purchases in Big Stone County During Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active in Big Stone County, purchasing 13 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties. This represents 68.4% of the total 19 SFR properties acquired in the county during the quarter, significantly outpacing non-landlord buyers who purchased 7 properties.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) responsible for 12 of the 13 landlord purchases, representing 92.3% of all landlord acquisitions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 11 properties (84.6% of landlord purchases). These purchases were made by 18 distinct entities, signaling a strong entry of new, small-scale investors into the market.

Mid-size landlords also showed activity, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) purchasing 1 property and small-medium landlords (Tier 05-08, 11-20 properties) also purchasing 1 property.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely inactive in Q4 2025, recording 0 purchases and 0.0% of landlord acquisition share, highlighting their non-involvement in the Big Stone County SFR market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.5% of All Investor-Owned SFR in Big Stone County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) are the overwhelming force in Big Stone County's investor-owned SFR market, controlling 596 properties, which constitutes a commanding 98.5% of the total 605 landlord-owned SFR properties.

The market is heavily concentrated in the smallest tiers: Single-property landlords (Tier 01) account for 501 properties (81.7%), while two-property landlords (Tier 02) and small landlords (Tier 03, 3-5 properties) each hold 40 properties (6.5%).

Larger tiers, such as small landlords (Tier 04, 6-10 properties) and small-medium landlords (Tier 05, 11-20 properties), hold significantly fewer properties, with 15 (2.4%) and 11 (1.8%) respectively, further emphasizing the market's fragmentation.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Big Stone County, owning 0 properties and commanding 0.0% of the investor-owned market, directly contradicting narratives of institutional takeover in this geography.

Even the largest active tier, 'Large (101-1000 properties)', holds only 6 properties, representing a mere 1.0% of the total investor-owned portfolio, solidifying Big Stone County as a market for individual and small-scale investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance in Smaller Portfolios
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, holding 93.6% of single-property portfolios (471 properties) and 87.5% of two-property portfolios (35 properties).

A notable crossover point occurs at the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Companies hold 8 properties (53.3%), while individuals own 7 properties (46.7%) in this tier.

Even in slightly larger portfolios like small-medium (11-20 properties), individual investors still retain a strong majority, owning 10 properties (90.9%) compared to companies' single property (9.1%).

This pattern indicates that while individuals are the primary owners of single-digit property portfolios, companies strategically concentrate their limited presence in mid-size portfolios (6-10 properties), rather than the largest institutional tiers where they show no activity.

Across all tiers, institutional companies (1000+ properties) maintain 0 ownership, consistent with the overall absence of institutional investors in the Big Stone County SFR market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MN-Big Stone-56278 Leads in Investor-Owned Property Count; MN-Big Stone-56225 Has Highest Ownership Rate
Detailed Findings

Within Big Stone County, the zip code MN-Big Stone-56278 leads in the sheer volume of investor-owned properties, with 259 SFR properties, demonstrating a key area of investor focus by count.

However, MN-Big Stone-56225 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 55.3%, indicating that over half of its SFR properties are investor-owned, making it the most penetrated market for landlords.

Other significant regions by investor count include MN-Big Stone-56225 with 147 properties and MN-Big Stone-56240 with 83 properties, showcasing distinct pockets of investor activity.

High investor ownership rates are also observed in MN-Big Stone-56211 (48.1%) and MN-Big Stone-56208 (42.9%), highlighting several zip codes where a substantial portion of the housing stock is dedicated to rental purposes.

A strong correlation exists between areas with high property counts and high ownership percentages, as zip codes like MN-Big Stone-56225, MN-Big Stone-56240, and MN-Big Stone-56211 appear prominently on both top lists, indicating concentrated and deep investor engagement.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Big Stone County Landlords Remain Strong Net Buyers, With an 81x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Big Stone County are consistently strong net buyers, acquiring 81 properties in 2025 while selling only 1, resulting in an aggressive 81x buy/sell ratio that indicates a significant accumulation of assets.

This aggressive net buying trend continues from 2024, when landlords bought 84 properties and sold 3, demonstrating a persistent strategy of portfolio expansion in the county.

Total transaction volume saw a slight decrease from 87 transactions (84 buys + 3 sells) in 2024 to 82 transactions (81 buys + 1 sell) in 2025, yet the relative buying intensity increased dramatically as selling activity nearly ceased.

Despite the overall market activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no reported buy or sell transactions in either 2024 or 2025, emphasizing their complete non-participation in Big Stone County's real estate market.

The lack of any inter-landlord transaction data in this section suggests that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-landlord sellers, rather than trading among themselves.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 62.5% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Big Stone County
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in Big Stone County's Q4 2025 market, participating in 20 out of 32 total SFR transactions, representing a significant 62.5% share of all market activity.

The bulk of this activity came from mom-and-pop landlords, particularly single-property investors (Tier 01), who accounted for 18 transactions. This tier alone contributed 90.0% of all landlord transactions in the quarter.

Average purchase prices varied significantly across active tiers: Tier 01 buyers paid the highest at $182,278, while Tier 02 investors paid $110,000, and small-medium investors (Tier 05-08) paid a notably lower average of $10,000, though this was based on only one transaction.

Notably, there were no reported inter-landlord transactions in Q4 2025 for any tier, with 0.0% of properties bought from other landlords. This indicates that all landlord acquisitions were from non-landlord sellers during this period.

The strong transaction volume from Tier 01 investors in Q4 is consistent with their overall dominance in ownership, reinforcing their foundational role in the Big Stone County SFR market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command Big Stone County, Driving 98.5% Ownership and 68.4% of Q4 Purchases
Holdings
Landlords in Big Stone County own 605 SFR properties, constituting 32.2% of the total SFR market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 548 properties (90.6%) compared to 60 properties (9.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $170,050, representing a $1,425 premium (0.8%) over traditional homeowners who paid $168,625. This premium marks a significant narrowing from the 219.5% premium observed in Q2 2025, signaling a shift in pricing dynamics.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords acquire 13 properties, making up 68.4% of all SFR purchases in Big Stone County. New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 18 entities purchasing 11 properties in the quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, holding 98.5% of all investor-owned housing across Big Stone County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain no presence, owning 0.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the vast majority of smaller portfolios (93.6% in Tier 01), but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 53.3% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords overall are strong net buyers with an impressive 81x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (81 buys vs 1 sell), demonstrating continued accumulation. Institutional investors, however, reported no buy or sell transactions in 2025, indicating their complete absence from the market.
Market Narrative

Big Stone County's single-family residential market is significantly shaped by its landlord community, which collectively owns 605 SFR properties, representing a substantial 32.2% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 548 properties (90.6%), reinforcing the prevalence of mom-and-pop landlords. These small-scale investors (1-10 properties) account for a commanding 98.5% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) notably absent from the county's ownership landscape.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw landlords acquire 13 properties, capturing a significant 68.4% of all SFR purchases. This activity was primarily driven by new single-property landlords, with 18 entities entering the market. While landlords have consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners in 2025, the Q4 premium of 0.8% ($1,425) represents a dramatic decrease from the 219.5% premium observed earlier in the year. Landlords continue to be aggressive net buyers, evidenced by an 81x buy/sell ratio in 2025, indicating a strong focus on expansion, with no reported inter-landlord transactions in Q4.

The data unequivocally portrays Big Stone County as a market built on individual and small-scale real estate investment. The complete absence of institutional investors, coupled with the dominant buying and ownership patterns of mom-and-pop landlords, signals a stable, locally-driven market where small investors are key players in providing rental housing. Geographic hotspots like MN-Big Stone-56225 and MN-Big Stone-56278 show concentrated investor interest by both ownership rate and count, highlighting where this localized investment is most impactful within the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 11:44 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBig Stone (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices