Benzie (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Benzie (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Benzie (MI)
11,438
Total Investors in Benzie (MI)
4,893
Investor Owned SFR in Benzie (MI)
3,717(32.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,797
SFR Owned
2,734
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,096
SFR Owned
1,126
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,717 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Benzie County sees no Q4 activity; mom-and-pop landlords dominate cash-heavy rental market
Benzie County's SFR market shows a high investor penetration of 32.5%, with 3,717 landlord-owned properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.6% of this portfolio, with individual investors owning 73.6% of properties. Notably, Q4 2025 recorded no landlord purchase or transaction activity, and 2024 saw landlords as strong net buyers with a 7.23x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Benzie County's 3,717 landlord-owned SFR properties are 73.6% individual-owned, 30.3% company-owned
A significant 99.2% of investor-owned properties are rented, reflecting a strong rental market focus. Furthermore, 87.8% of these holdings were acquired with cash, indicating a preference for debt-free investments.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 or recent acquisition pricing data available for Benzie County
Due to a lack of recorded purchase data (0 properties acquired) in Q4 2025, Year 2024, and Years 2020-2023, no landlord acquisition prices or homeowner price comparisons can be reported. The historical price gap trends between landlords and homeowners are also unavailable.
Current Quarter Purchases
Benzie County recorded no SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025 for landlords or other buyers
With 0 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, no landlord purchases were recorded, making their share 0.0% of the market. Similarly, mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Benzie County, controlling 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 85.2% of investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold 0.0% of the market, indicating their complete absence from this county's SFR investment landscape. No acquisition pricing data by tier is available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors hold majority across all reported tiers, with parity in Tier 6-10
Individual investors account for 72.0% of properties in Tier 01 and 73.4% in Tier 02. The individual-to-company split reaches a 50.0% parity in the Tier 6-10 segment, suggesting this is the potential crossover point for company majority in larger, unlisted tiers. No acquisition pricing data by owner type or tier is available.
Geographic Distribution
MI-Benzie-49635 leads Benzie County with 1,265 investor-owned properties and a 44.0% rate
This zip code (49635) also boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 44.0%, making it the most concentrated market. Other high-rate regions include MI-Benzie-49630 (43.8%) and MI-Benzie-49628 (43.1%), demonstrating localized investor hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Benzie County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 7.23x buy/sell ratio
Landlords purchased 94 properties while selling only 13 in 2024, indicating significant portfolio expansion. No institutional investor transaction data or inter-landlord transaction percentages are available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Benzie County recorded no landlord transactions in Q4 2025 across all tiers
With 0 total transactions in Q4 2025, landlords completed no transactions, resulting in a 0.0% share. This applies universally across all investor tiers, including mom-and-pop and institutional segments. No average purchase prices by tier are available.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Benzie County's 3,717 landlord-owned SFR properties are 73.6% individual-owned, 30.3% company-owned
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Benzie County own a substantial 3,717 Single Family Residential properties, accounting for 32.5% of the county's total SFR market, indicating a significant investor presence.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned portfolio, holding 2,734 properties (73.6%) compared to company-owned properties at 1,126 (30.3%), challenging narratives of corporate dominance.

The market is highly rental-focused, with 3,687 properties, or 99.2% of the landlord-owned portfolio, classified as rented, underscoring the primary investment strategy for landlords in Benzie County.

A strong preference for cash acquisitions is evident, as 3,263 properties (87.8% of the investor-owned total) were purchased outright with cash, while only 454 properties (12.2%) are currently financed.

The entity count further emphasizes individual ownership, with 3,797 individual landlords making up 77.6% of all 4,893 landlords in the county, alongside 1,096 company landlords (22.4%), illustrating the prevalence of smaller, individual operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 or recent acquisition pricing data available for Benzie County
Detailed Findings

A critical observation for Benzie County is the complete absence of recorded landlord acquisition activity, with 0 properties purchased in Q4 2025, Year 2024, and the 2020-2023 period.

Consequently, there is no available data to compare landlord acquisition prices against traditional homeowners, precluding an analysis of potential discounts or premiums for investors in the current market.

The lack of recent acquisition data also prevents the assessment of price appreciation trends from the pandemic era (2020-2023) to Q4 2025, leaving a gap in understanding market value shifts.

Without recorded purchases, it is impossible to determine how individual and company landlords might differ in their acquisition prices or if a consistent landlord discount has been maintained over time.

This data void suggests either extremely low market activity for SFR acquisitions by landlords or limitations in data capture for these specific timeframes in Benzie County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Benzie County recorded no SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025 for landlords or other buyers
Detailed Findings

Benzie County experienced a complete standstill in the SFR purchase market during Q4 2025, recording 0 total SFR purchases from any buyer type, a significant pause in market activity.

Mirroring the overall market, landlords also made 0 purchases in Q4 2025, resulting in a 0.0% share of market acquisitions for the quarter.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity in Q4 2025, each recording 0 properties purchased and a 0.0% share of landlord acquisitions.

The absence of any Q4 purchase activity across all tiers suggests an unusually quiet period for new investments or an extreme market slowdown specific to Benzie County.

Without purchase volumes, it is impossible to assess the number of new landlords entering the market or determine which investor tiers might typically be most active in this geography.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Benzie County, controlling 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), comprising investors with 1 to 10 properties, command an overwhelming majority, controlling 99.6% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Benzie County.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who owns 3,253 properties, representing a substantial 85.2% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no properties, accounting for 0.0% of the investor-owned market, which defies national trends of corporate investment.

Small landlords (Tiers 03-05, 3-5 properties) and small-medium landlords (Tiers 06-10, 6-10 properties) together contribute 6.3% and 0.5% respectively, further solidifying the small-scale nature of Benzie County's investor market.

A notable absence of data for tier-specific acquisition prices prevents an analysis of whether larger investors, though nonexistent here, might pay more or less than smaller landlords, or how prices have evolved over time across tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors hold majority across all reported tiers, with parity in Tier 6-10
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently form the majority of ownership across the smaller portfolio tiers provided, controlling 72.0% of properties in the single-property Tier 01 and 73.4% in the two-property Tier 02.

The closest point to an ownership crossover between individual and company investors occurs in the Tier 6-10 segment, where both types own an equal share of 10 properties (50.0% each).

In the Tier 3-5 range, individual investors still hold a strong majority at 66.4% (162 properties) compared to companies at 33.6% (82 properties), reinforcing their prevalence in smaller portfolios.

The highest concentration of company ownership, among the tiers with available splits, is observed at 50.0% in the Tier 6-10 segment, indicating that company influence grows with portfolio size, even if not yet a majority in these tiers.

Conversely, the highest individual concentration is found in the two-property Tier 02, where individuals own 73.4% of the properties, highlighting the depth of individual investment in smaller-scale operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
MI-Benzie-49635 leads Benzie County with 1,265 investor-owned properties and a 44.0% rate
Detailed Findings

The zip code MI-Benzie-49635 stands out as Benzie County's primary investor hotspot, leading both in the highest count of investor-owned properties at 1,265 and the highest investor ownership rate at 44.0%.

Following closely in investor-owned property count, MI-Benzie-49617 holds 812 properties (34.0% rate) and MI-Benzie-49640 has 502 properties (38.3% rate), indicating concentrated investment in these specific sub-geographies.

Beyond raw counts, other regions exhibit high investor penetration rates, such as MI-Benzie-49630 with a 43.8% investor-owned rate and MI-Benzie-49628 with 43.1%, signifying strong market appeal for landlords in these areas.

While MI-Benzie-49635 and MI-Benzie-49640 show a direct correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages, other zip codes like MI-Benzie-49630 and 49628 demonstrate high rates even if they don't lead in total investor property numbers, indicating efficiency in market penetration.

The absence of data for acquisition prices across these geographic regions prevents an analysis of how pricing strategies or market values might differ between areas of high and moderate investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Benzie County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 7.23x buy/sell ratio
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Benzie County exhibited robust buying behavior in 2024, acting as strong net buyers with 94 properties purchased against only 13 properties sold, resulting in a high buy-to-sell ratio of 7.23x.

This substantial buy/sell ratio for all landlords suggests an active period of portfolio expansion and confidence in the Benzie County market throughout 2024.

The data does not provide any information regarding institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions, making it impossible to ascertain their net position or compare their activity with the overall landlord trend.

The absence of details on the percentage of buy or sell transactions involving other landlords means inter-landlord trading activity and market liquidity cannot be fully analyzed.

Similarly, average buy prices and average sell prices for 2024 are not available, precluding an assessment of implied profit margins or pricing strategies by landlords during this period of significant acquisition.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Benzie County recorded no landlord transactions in Q4 2025 across all tiers
Detailed Findings

Benzie County experienced a complete cessation of real estate transaction activity in Q4 2025, with 0 total SFR transactions recorded, indicating a frozen market for the quarter.

This market inactivity directly translates to landlords, who also registered 0 transactions in Q4 2025, thus holding a 0.0% share of the transaction market.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transactional presence in Q4 2025, with 0 transactions reported for each segment.

Due to the absence of any Q4 transaction data, it is impossible to determine average purchase prices by tier, assess any price spreads between investor sizes, or identify inter-landlord trading percentages for the quarter.

The universal lack of transaction activity across all tiers and buyer types for Q4 2025 presents a critical finding, signaling an extreme market slowdown or a data reporting anomaly for Benzie County during this period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Benzie County: No Q4 activity, mom-and-pops dominate cash-heavy, rental-focused market
Holdings
Landlords own 3,717 SFR properties in Benzie County, representing a significant 32.5% market penetration. Individual investors account for 2,734 properties (73.6%) while companies hold 1,126 (30.3%), showcasing individual landlord prominence.
Pricing
Benzie County recorded no landlord or homeowner acquisition pricing data for Q4 2025 or other recent timeframes, preventing analysis of landlord discounts or market price trends.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw 0 total SFR purchases in Benzie County, meaning landlords recorded 0 acquisitions (0.0% market share). This lack of activity extends to all investor tiers, though 2024 data shows landlords were net buyers.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.6% of investor housing in Benzie County, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios in Benzie County, holding the majority of properties across Tiers 01-05, with a 50.0% parity in Tier 6-10 suggesting a potential crossover point for company majority in larger tiers not present.
Transactions
Benzie County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 94 properties versus 13 sells, resulting in a 7.23x buy/sell ratio. However, Q4 2025 recorded 0 transactions from all landlords, and institutional investor transaction data is unavailable.
Market Narrative

Benzie County's real estate market exhibits a substantial investor presence, with landlords owning 3,717 Single Family Residential properties, equating to a 32.5% market penetration. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who account for 2,734 properties (73.6%), in stark contrast to company-owned properties at 1,126 (30.3%). The market structure is primarily composed of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.6% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding no discernible market share in the county.

Investor behavior in Benzie County reveals a highly rental-focused strategy, with 99.2% of landlord-owned properties being rented. A significant 87.8% of these properties were acquired with cash, indicating a strong preference for debt-free investment. While no Q4 2025 purchase or transaction activity was recorded, 2024 saw landlords as robust net buyers, expanding their portfolios with a 7.23x buy/sell ratio (94 buys vs 13 sells). The complete absence of Q4 activity across all tiers, including individual and company landlords, suggests an atypical market pause or data reporting gap.

The Benzie County market is characterized by strong localized investor activity, with specific zip codes like MI-Benzie-49635 showing both the highest count of investor properties (1,265) and the highest ownership rate (44.0%). The overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with zero institutional presence and a cash-heavy, rental-oriented approach, defines a resilient, locally-driven investment landscape. The lack of recent transaction and pricing data, however, limits comprehensive insights into current market dynamics and trends in Benzie County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 10:32 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBenzie (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price