Plymouth (MA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Plymouth (MA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Plymouth (MA)
143,934
Total Investors in Plymouth (MA)
28,332
Investor Owned SFR in Plymouth (MA)
19,492(13.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
24,625
SFR Owned
17,168
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,707
SFR Owned
3,918
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 19,492 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Comprise 99.7% of Investor Market in Plymouth County, Acquiring Homes at a 7-to-1 Rate
Investors own 19,492 SFR properties in Plymouth County (13.5% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 99.7% of this portfolio versus a near-zero institutional presence. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers—acquiring over 7 homes for every 1 sold—and purchased 19.2% of all properties on the market at a 10.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 19,492 SFRs in Plymouth County, with individuals dominating ownership of 88.1% of properties.
Investors own their properties with cash over financing at a nearly 2-to-1 ratio (12,009 cash vs 7,483 financed). The vast majority of the portfolio, 99.0% (19,302 properties), is non-owner-occupied and operated as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 10.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant average discount of $80,149 per property.
The landlord discount narrowed in Q4 from a high of 14.7% in Q1 2025, suggesting increased competition. Average acquisition prices of $707,421 in Q4 represent a 15.8% appreciation from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $610,681.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing a total of 244 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active buyers, accounting for 100% of all investor purchases. The market saw 301 new single-property landlords emerge, who alone bought 82.3% of all investor-acquired homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a staggering 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Plymouth County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 91.2% of the entire investor portfolio, holding 18,162 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have virtually no presence, owning just a single property (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties, signaling a shift as investors scale.
Individual investors own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, including 83.4% of all single-property holdings. Companies assert control as portfolios grow, owning 86.2% of properties in the 6-10 tier and 92.9% in the 21-50 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with Plymouth's 02360 zip code holding the most properties at 3,333.
Some areas show extreme investor penetration, with zip codes like Wareham (02571) and Marion (02739) having high ownership rates of 37.5% and 34.0% respectively. The top five zip codes by count contain nearly half (49.4%) of all investor properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Plymouth County, acquiring 7.04 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This accumulation trend has accelerated, with the Q4 buy-to-sell ratio of 7.04 far exceeding the 2024 average of 5.54. In total for 2025, landlords have purchased 1,492 properties while selling only 258.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.8% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, making 352 purchases.
A clear pattern emerged where new, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $698,005. Larger landlords paid significantly less and were more likely to acquire properties from other investors, sourcing 42.9% of their purchases this way in the 11-20 property tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 19,492 SFRs in Plymouth County, with individuals dominating ownership of 88.1% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Plymouth County, landlords hold a significant 13.5% share of the single-family residential market, owning a total of 19,492 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, with individuals owning or co-owning 17,168 properties, representing 88.1% of the investor-held housing stock. Companies, in contrast, own or co-own 3,918 properties (20.1%).

The entity count further underscores the dominance of small-scale investors, with 24,625 individual landlords compared to just 3,707 company landlords.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, as 12,009 properties (61.6%) are owned outright without financing, compared to 7,483 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 19,302 properties (99.0%) classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary business focus of these property owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 10.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant average discount of $80,149 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Plymouth County consistently acquire properties at a lower cost than traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $707,421, which is a 10.2% discount compared to the homeowner average of $787,570, saving $80,149 per home.

While the discount remains substantial, it has tightened throughout the year. The 10.2% Q4 discount is the narrowest of 2025, down from a peak of 14.7% ($111,974) in Q1, indicating a more competitive purchasing environment.

The market has seen significant price appreciation since the post-pandemic period. The Q4 2025 average landlord price of $707,421 is 15.8% higher than the average price of $610,681 paid between 2020 and 2023.

This sustained ability to purchase below market rate, even in an appreciating market, points to investors' strategic advantages, such as cash offers, faster closing times, or a focus on properties requiring renovation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing a total of 244 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a substantial portion of market activity in Q4, purchasing 244 of the 1,272 single-family homes sold, which translates to a 19.2% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who acquired 100% of the 244 properties. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases.

A significant influx of new investors occurred this quarter, with 301 new single-property entities entering the Plymouth County market. These first-time landlords were the most active group, buying 204 properties, or 82.3% of all investor acquisitions.

This data reveals that the growth in investor-owned housing is being driven exclusively by small-scale, local buyers, rather than large corporations.

The concentration of buying power in the smallest tier highlights a highly fragmented and decentralized investor market, with new entrants continually fueling demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a staggering 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Plymouth County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Plymouth County is unequivocally dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control 99.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR housing stock.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 18,162 homes, which constitutes 91.2% of all investor-owned properties.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) represent a tiny fraction of the market, collectively owning less than 0.4% of the portfolio.

The narrative of large, corporate landlords is unsupported by the data in this county. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a near-zero footprint, with a portfolio consisting of only one property.

This distribution underscores a market structure built on thousands of individual investors rather than a handful of large players, shaping local housing dynamics and landlord-tenant relationships.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties, signaling a shift as investors scale.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts decisively from individual to corporate as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate smaller tiers, companies become the majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier.

In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals are the overwhelming majority, owning 16,266 properties (83.4%) compared to 3,244 owned by companies.

The clear crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property portfolio size. In this tier, company ownership surges to 86.2%, indicating that investors tend to incorporate as their operations scale beyond a handful of properties.

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. For portfolios of 21-50 properties, companies own 13 of the 14 properties, a 92.9% share.

The data suggests a natural lifecycle for real estate investors: starting as individuals and formalizing into corporate entities for liability and operational efficiency as their holdings grow.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with Plymouth's 02360 zip code holding the most properties at 3,333.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Plymouth County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The top five areas by property count hold 9,627 properties, representing 49.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in the county.

The zip code 02360 in Plymouth is the epicenter of investor activity, with 3,333 investor-owned properties, far surpassing any other area.

High investor ownership rates are notable in several communities. Wareham (02571) has a 37.5% investor ownership rate across 2,009 properties, while Marion (02739) has a 34.0% rate with 1,058 properties, indicating significant rental market presence in these areas.

The data also reveals several smaller zip codes with 100% investor ownership, such as 02059 and 02303. These are likely outliers representing specific housing developments or data anomalies rather than widespread market takeovers.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as strong rental demand, attractive property values, or local economic conditions.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Plymouth County, acquiring 7.04 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Plymouth County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 352 properties while only selling 50, a net gain of 302 properties for the rental market.

The buy-to-sell ratio reached an impressive 7.04 in Q4, meaning more than seven properties were acquired for every one sold. This demonstrates strong confidence in the local market.

This aggressive buying posture has intensified over time. The 2025 year-to-date buy/sell ratio of 5.78 (1,492 buys vs. 258 sells) is an increase over the 2024 ratio of 5.54 (1,401 buys vs. 253 sells).

The consistent net-positive acquisition trend indicates a growing investor footprint in the county, expanding the overall stock of single-family rental housing.

Data for institutional-level transactions was unavailable, aligning with their near-zero ownership and activity in the county's market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.8% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, making 352 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords participated in 16.8% of all SFR transactions in Plymouth County, with a total of 352 acquisitions. This activity was almost entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for 345 of these transactions.

A distinct inverse relationship exists between portfolio size and purchase price. New single-property landlords paid the most, averaging $698,005 per home. In contrast, landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid significantly less at $423,121.

This price difference suggests differing acquisition strategies: new entrants likely compete on the open market, while more experienced investors may target off-market deals or distressed properties.

Larger investors are more likely to purchase from other landlords. While only 2.7% of purchases by single-property landlords came from other investors, this figure jumped to 20.0% for the 3-5 tier and 42.9% for the 11-20 tier.

This indicates the development of an internal market where established investors trade properties among themselves, potentially providing more liquidity and specialized deal flow outside of the traditional consumer market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Plymouth County with 99.7% Ownership as Aggressive Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 19,492 SFR properties, 13.5% of the market in Plymouth County, MA. Individual investors own or co-own 88.1% of these homes (17,168 properties), while companies own or co-own 20.1% (3,918 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 10.2% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $80,149 per property ($707,421 vs $787,570).
Activity
Landlords bought 19.2% of all homes sold in Q4 (244 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors. The quarter saw an influx of 301 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.7% of all investor-owned housing in Plymouth County. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no footprint, owning just 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, where they control 86.2% of the housing stock within that tier.
Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4 with a 7.04x buy-to-sell ratio (352 buys vs 50 sells). Institutional investors were entirely inactive, showing no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Plymouth County, MA, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale investment. Landlords own 19,492 properties, representing 13.5% of the total SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 99.7% of the investor-owned housing stock. Individual investors comprise the vast majority of owners, holding 88.1% of properties. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors with over 1,000 homes have virtually no presence, owning just a single property.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 underscored these trends. Landlords were highly active, purchasing 19.2% of all homes sold while demonstrating strong market confidence as aggressive net buyers, acquiring over seven homes for every one they sold. This activity was fueled by an influx of 301 new, single-property landlords. These investors consistently purchase properties at a significant 10.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners, though new entrants tend to pay higher prices than their more established counterparts, who increasingly trade properties among themselves.

The key takeaway for the Plymouth County housing market is that it is shaped not by Wall Street corporations, but by thousands of individual and small company investors. The market is decentralized, with growth driven by a continuous stream of new entrants. This structure suggests a rental market characterized by local ownership and management, where competitive pressures and opportunities are defined by on-the-ground, small-scale operational dynamics rather than large-scale institutional strategies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 09:45 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPlymouth (MA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions