St. Mary Parish (LA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the St. Mary Parish (LA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in St. Mary Parish (LA)
15,446
Total Investors in St. Mary Parish (LA)
2,717
Investor Owned SFR in St. Mary Parish (LA)
3,699(23.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,151
SFR Owned
2,435
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
566
SFR Owned
1,294
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,699 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate St. Mary Parish with 88.4% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 3,699 SFR properties in St. Mary Parish (23.9% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 88.4% versus just 0.3% for institutional investors. In Q4, landlords purchased 20.7% of all homes sold, paying a narrow 2.0% below homeowners. While the broader landlord market remains in a strong net buyer position, institutional investors have shifted to become net sellers in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,699 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 65.8% majority share.
Cash is the dominant financing method, used for 3,451 properties compared to just 248 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,557 properties (96.2%) identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid just 2.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a razor-thin discount of $3,123.
The landlord pricing advantage has eroded dramatically through 2025, shrinking from a 29.7% discount in Q1 and 20.7% in Q3 down to just 2.0% in Q4. Overall, 2025 average prices ($142,990) are significantly below the 2020-2023 boom-era average of $183,727.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 16 of the 17 investor purchases (94.1%). In contrast, institutional investors made only a single purchase, representing just 5.9% of investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 88.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords are the largest segment, owning 50.6% of all investor-held properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a minimal footprint, controlling just 10 properties, or 0.3% of the investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 83.3% of single-property portfolios. The ownership crossover occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies take a 66.1% majority share. This corporate dominance grows to 98.9% in the 51-100 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 70380, which holds 1,437 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is in zip code 70340, where landlords own 50.0% of all SFRs. Just three zip codes—70380, 70538, and 70392—contain 86.5% of all investor-owned properties in the parish.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 5-to-1 ratio in 2025.
Landlord acquisition velocity is increasing, with 181 purchases in 2025 compared to 145 for all of 2024. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have flipped to become net sellers in 2025, divesting more properties than they acquired.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.6% of all Q4 transactions, making 22 purchases.
A clear sourcing pattern emerged by tier: the single institutional purchase came from another landlord (100% inter-landlord), while new mom-and-pop investors bought just 5.0% of their properties from other landlords, relying instead on the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,699 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 65.8% majority share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 23.9% share of the single-family residential market in St. Mary Parish, controlling a total of 3,699 properties.

The market is defined by individual ownership, with 2,151 individual landlords controlling 2,435 properties (65.8% of the investor portfolio), far outnumbering the 566 company landlords who own the remaining 1,294 properties (35.0%).

Cash transactions overwhelmingly dominate investor holdings. A total of 3,451 properties are owned outright, representing 93.3% of the portfolio, while only 248 properties are financed, signaling a market with low leverage and high equity.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 3,557 of the 3,699 properties (96.2%) being rented out. This highlights a clear focus on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

The data paints a clear picture of the typical investor in St. Mary Parish: an individual, cash-heavy landlord focused on a small number of long-term rental properties.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid just 2.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a razor-thin discount of $3,123.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average price of $154,307, only a 2.0% discount compared to the $157,430 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a minimal saving of just $3,123 per property.

The shrinking discount is a powerful trend throughout 2025, indicating a more competitive purchasing environment. The 2.0% Q4 discount is a steep drop from the 20.7% ($36,753) advantage seen in Q3 and the massive 29.7% ($64,532) discount in Q1.

Despite recent quarterly price increases, the average landlord acquisition price for 2025 ($142,990) remains well below the average of $183,727 seen during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom, suggesting a market correction from previous highs.

This erosion of the landlord discount suggests that inventory may be tightening or competition for available properties has intensified, forcing investors to pay closer to retail prices.

While investors historically purchased at a significant discount, the Q4 data indicates this advantage has nearly vanished, forcing a reliance on rental income and long-term appreciation rather than immediate equity gains upon purchase.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a significant force in the Q4 market, with landlords purchasing 17 of the 82 total SFR homes sold, capturing a 20.7% market share.

The quarter was almost entirely defined by small-scale investment, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made 94.1% of all investor acquisitions.

New market entrants were particularly active, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 15 of the 17 purchases (88.2%), signaling strong grassroots interest in the local rental market.

A total of 20 new landlord entities entered the market in the single-property tier, demonstrating a healthy influx of first-time investors.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a negligible impact on Q4 acquisitions, making just one purchase. This minimal activity contrasts sharply with the high volume from new and small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 88.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in St. Mary Parish is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 88.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, alone owning 1,915 properties. This constitutes 50.6% of all investor-held housing, making this tier larger than all other tiers combined.

Conversely, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have a nearly non-existent share, holding just 10 properties, which amounts to only 0.3% of the market.

The ownership distribution is highly skewed towards the smallest players, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) holding 3,345 of the 3,699 investor properties.

This market structure defies the narrative of a corporate takeover, revealing a deeply fragmented ecosystem built upon thousands of small, independent landlords rather than a few large institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern defines ownership structure by portfolio size: individuals dominate entry-level investing, while companies are used for scaling. Individuals own 83.3% of single-property portfolios and 67.7% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs definitively in the 6-10 property tier, where companies control a 66.1% majority of the properties for the first time.

This trend of professionalization accelerates in larger tiers. Company ownership swells to 77.4% for portfolios of 21-50 properties and reaches near-total dominance at 98.9% for the 51-100 property tier.

Even at the smallest scale, corporate structures have a foothold, with companies owning 321 single-property portfolios (16.7%), suggesting some investors use LLCs for liability protection from their very first purchase.

This data illustrates a natural progression in the investor lifecycle, starting with individual ownership and transitioning to a corporate framework as portfolios grow in size and complexity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip code 70380, which holds 1,437 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in St. Mary Parish is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by count (70380, 70538, and 70392) collectively contain 3,198 properties, representing a massive 86.5% of the entire investor portfolio.

By sheer volume, zip code 70380 is the epicenter of investor activity with 1,437 properties, followed by 70538 with 1,226 properties. These two areas alone account for over 70% of all investor holdings.

While 70380 leads in count, zip code 70340 exhibits the highest market penetration, with investors owning 50.0% of the entire SFR housing stock, indicating an extremely saturated rental market.

There is a strong correlation between the areas with high property counts and high ownership rates, as zip codes 70538 (26.7% rate) and 70380 (26.0% rate) both appear as leaders in both volume and concentration.

This intense geographic focus suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods with a favorable combination of affordability, rental demand, and potential for appreciation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 5-to-1 ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The overall landlord market in St. Mary Parish is in a phase of aggressive expansion, with 181 properties purchased versus only 34 sold in 2025. This reflects a strong net buyer position and a high degree of confidence in the local market.

The pace of acquisitions is accelerating. The 181 purchases in 2025 have already surpassed the 145 purchases made during the entire 2024 calendar year, signaling increased capital deployment.

A significant divergence in strategy is visible at the top of the market. While smaller landlords are buying, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have become net sellers in 2025, with 4 buys against 5 sells.

This marks a strategic reversal for institutions, which were net buyers in 2024 with 12 purchases and 8 sales. Their recent activity suggests a period of portfolio optimization or strategic divestment from the area.

This opposing behavior indicates a potential transfer of properties from large, institutional owners to the burgeoning base of smaller, local landlords who are actively growing their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.6% of all Q4 transactions, making 22 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 18.6% of all market activity, conducting 22 of the 118 total SFR transactions in St. Mary Parish.

Transaction volume was overwhelmingly driven by the smallest investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone was responsible for 20 of the 22 landlord transactions, highlighting the impact of new entrants.

Investors in different tiers appear to source properties through different channels. The sole institutional purchase was a landlord-to-landlord transaction, suggesting a preference for curated or off-market deals.

In contrast, new single-property investors primarily sourced from the broader market, with only 1 of their 20 purchases (5.0%) coming from an existing landlord. This indicates they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers.

The average purchase price for these new Tier 01 investors was $157,428, establishing the market rate for entry-level investment properties during the quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Drive St. Mary Parish Market, Controlling 88.4% of Properties as Institutions Divest
Holdings
Landlords own 3,699 SFR properties, representing 23.9% of the market in St. Mary Parish. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 2,435 properties (65.8%), compared to 1,294 (35.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $154,307, a narrow 2.0% discount ($3,123) compared to traditional homeowners at $157,430. This advantage has significantly decreased from the 29.7% discount seen in Q1.
Activity
Investors purchased 20.7% of all homes sold in Q4 (17 properties), with activity overwhelmingly led by the smallest players. During the quarter, 20 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
The investor market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 88.4% of all investor-owned SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible share of just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 66.1% share, a trend that accelerates in larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.67x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (22 buys vs 6 sells). However, institutional investors have become net sellers in 2025, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in St. Mary Parish is a robust, grassroots ecosystem defined by small, independent owners, not large corporations. Investors control a significant 3,699 properties, amounting to 23.9% of the total SFR housing stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual investors (65.8% of holdings) and mom-and-pop landlords (88.4% of properties), while institutional firms with 1,000+ homes have a minimal footprint of just 0.3%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a divergence in strategy between large and small players. Landlords collectively were strong net buyers in 2025 with a buy-to-sell ratio exceeding 5-to-1, capturing 20.7% of all Q4 sales. However, their pricing advantage has nearly evaporated, shrinking to just 2.0% below homeowners in Q4. The most critical trend is the split in activity: while small investors are accelerating purchases, institutional investors have shifted to become net sellers, divesting their local holdings.

The key takeaway for the St. Mary Parish housing market is the ongoing transfer of rental housing from a few institutional hands to a growing base of local landlords. This dynamic suggests a healthy, decentralized rental market where local investors are confident and actively expanding their portfolios. The market's future will be shaped not by Wall Street but by the hundreds of small investors absorbing available inventory and meeting local housing demand.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:15 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySt. Mary Parish (LA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison