Livingston Parish (LA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Livingston Parish (LA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Livingston Parish (LA)
37,120
Total Investors in Livingston Parish (LA)
3,451
Investor Owned SFR in Livingston Parish (LA)
2,955(8.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,994
SFR Owned
2,282
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
457
SFR Owned
686
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,955 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Livingston Parish with 93% of Properties as Institutions Divest
In Livingston Parish, investors own 2,955 single-family properties, making up 8.0% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (93.0%), while large institutional investors own just 1.4%. In Q4, landlords purchased only 2.3% of homes sold, securing them at a significant 21.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors were net sellers, reducing their local footprint.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,955 SFR properties in Livingston Parish, with individuals holding 77.2%.
The majority of investor-owned properties (2,138) are held free and clear as cash assets, compared to just 817 that are financed. Individual landlords (2,994) vastly outnumber company landlords (457), a ratio of more than 6-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords purchased properties for 21.1% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlords secured an average discount of $51,811 per property in Q4 2025 ($194,069 vs $245,880). This significant price advantage has been consistent, with landlords achieving an even larger 28.6% discount in the prior quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired just 2.3% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove the majority of investor activity, accounting for 80.0% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up the remaining 20.0% of acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
'Mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 93.0% of all landlord-held SFRs.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties control a mere 1.4% of the local investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 73.8% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
While individuals own 88.0% of single-property portfolios, companies control 67.0% of portfolios in the 6-10 property tier and 97.7% in the 11-20 property tier. This marks a clear strategic shift as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
The 70726 zip code contains the highest concentration of investor properties with 1,419 units.
While 70726 has the highest raw count, the 70786 zip code has the highest rate of investor ownership at 33.3%. This highlights a key difference between volume and market saturation.
Historical Transactions
Institutional investors are net sellers, while the overall landlord market remains in acquisition mode.
For the full year 2025, institutional investors sold twice as many properties as they bought (16 buys vs. 32 sells). In contrast, the total landlord market was a strong net buyer, acquiring 106 properties while selling only 78.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in just 2.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
In Q4, institutional investors paid 17.4% less per property than new single-property landlords ($159,000 vs $192,588). Additionally, institutions were more likely to acquire property from other landlords, with 33.3% of their purchases coming from this channel.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,955 SFR properties in Livingston Parish, with individuals holding 77.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a total of 2,955 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties in Livingston Parish, representing 8.0% of the area's 37,120 SFRs.

Individual investors are the cornerstone of the local rental market, owning 2,282 properties, which accounts for 77.2% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned portfolios consist of 686 properties, or 23.2% of the total.

The investor market is comprised of 3,451 distinct landlord entities, with a clear dominance of individuals (2,994) over companies (457). This shows that the typical investor is a person or family, not a large corporation.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 2,138 properties owned outright, more than double the 817 properties that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base with low leverage.

A significant 2,831 properties in the investor portfolio are classified as rented, confirming that the vast majority of these homes serve as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords purchased properties for 21.1% less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Livingston Parish demonstrated a strong pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $194,069, a staggering 21.1% less than the $245,880 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap translates to a direct savings of $51,811 per property, highlighting a systematic ability of investors to identify and secure undervalued assets.

The trend of securing properties below market rate is not new. In Q3 2025, the discount was even more pronounced at 28.6% ($75,538), and in Q2 it was 21.2% ($57,647), indicating a consistent pattern of value-oriented purchasing.

While acquisition prices for all buyers have fluctuated, landlords consistently pay less, a strategic advantage that underpins the profitability of their rental investments.

Comparing year-over-year trends, the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($221,239) is notably lower than in 2024 ($269,823), suggesting either a market cooldown or a strategic shift toward lower-priced properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired just 2.3% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring only 10 of the 434 single-family homes sold in Livingston Parish, representing a small 2.3% market share.

Small-scale investors were the primary drivers of this activity. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, were responsible for 8 of the 10 investor purchases (80.0%).

The smallest investors made the biggest splash, with 10 new entities entering the market to acquire 7 single-property portfolios. This signals a continued interest from new, local landlords despite the low overall volume.

In contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties made only 2 purchases, accounting for 20.0% of the quarter's investor activity.

The low purchase volume suggests that investors may be exercising caution, potentially waiting for more favorable market conditions or prices before expanding their portfolios more aggressively.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
'Mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 93.0% of all landlord-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Livingston Parish is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties control 93.0% of all investor-owned single-family homes, demonstrating a highly decentralized market structure.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 2,242 properties, which accounts for 73.8% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of individual, first-time investors.

In stark contrast to the prevalence of small landlords, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a very limited presence, owning just 42 properties, or 1.4% of the investor market. This finding challenges the narrative of large corporations dominating the local housing market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also hold a small fraction of the market, collectively owning 172 properties, which represents just 5.6% of the investor-owned total.

The data clearly shows that the local rental housing supply is primarily provided by small, local investors rather than large, out-of-state institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where companies surpass individuals as the majority owner. This shift occurs once a portfolio reaches the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 67.0% of the properties.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 88.0% of all single-property investor homes and 73.8% of two-property portfolios. This demonstrates that most landlords start as individuals.

As portfolios scale, the ownership structure professionalizes. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership skyrockets to 97.7%, indicating that incorporating becomes standard practice for mid-sized investors seeking liability protection and financial advantages.

Even in the 21-50 property tier, companies maintain a majority stake at 54.7%, reinforcing the trend of corporatization with portfolio growth.

This pattern reveals a clear life cycle for real estate investors in the region: they typically begin as individuals and transition to a corporate structure as their holdings expand beyond a handful of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 70726 zip code contains the highest concentration of investor properties with 1,419 units.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Livingston Parish is geographically concentrated, with the 70726 zip code holding the largest number of investor-owned properties at 1,419 homes.

This area alone accounts for a substantial portion of the parish's total investor portfolio, representing an 8.3% investor ownership rate within that specific zip code.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found elsewhere. The 70786 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 33.3%, meaning one in every three single-family homes there is investor-owned.

Another area with high saturation is the 70769 zip code, where investors own 20.0% of the housing stock.

This distinction between high-volume areas (like 70726) and high-penetration areas (like 70786) reveals different market dynamics and investor strategies across the parish.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Institutional investors are net sellers, while the overall landlord market remains in acquisition mode.
Detailed Findings

A significant divergence in strategy is evident between large institutions and the broader landlord market. While all landlords combined were net buyers in Q4 (15 buys vs. 13 sells), institutional investors were actively divesting, selling 7 properties while only purchasing 3.

This trend of institutional selling is not isolated to the last quarter. For the full year 2025, the 1,000+ tier investors were significant net sellers, with 32 sales against only 16 acquisitions.

This retreat by large players contrasts sharply with their behavior in 2024, when they were aggressive net buyers (55 buys vs. 17 sells). This reversal signals a potential strategic shift or a reaction to changing market conditions in Livingston Parish.

The overall landlord market, heavily influenced by smaller investors, has remained in a net acquisition phase for both 2024 and 2025, indicating continued confidence among mom-and-pop landlords.

This bifurcation suggests that small, local investors are absorbing properties as larger, institutional players exit the market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in just 2.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transaction activity was very subdued in Q4 2025, with investor-involved purchases making up only 15 of the 610 total single-family transactions in Livingston Parish, a market share of just 2.5%.

A clear pricing disparity exists between investor tiers. Institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) demonstrated superior purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average of $159,000.

In contrast, new single-property landlords paid significantly more, with an average purchase price of $192,588. This means the largest investors paid 17.4% less than the smallest, newest market entrants.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated the transaction volume, conducting 12 of the 15 total landlord purchases for the quarter.

Institutional investors were more active in the landlord-to-landlord market. One-third (33.3%) of their acquisitions were from other landlords, while 0% of transactions by the smallest landlords came from this channel, suggesting institutions are more engaged in portfolio trading.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small local landlords control 93% of Livingston Parish rental homes as large institutions retreat from the market.
Holdings
In Livingston Parish, LA, investors own 2,955 single-family properties, representing 8.0% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 2,282 of these homes (77.2%) compared to 686 (23.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4, paying an average of 21.1% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to a substantial discount of $51,811 per property ($194,069 for landlords vs. $245,880 for homeowners).
Activity
Investor purchasing was muted in Q4, with landlords buying just 10 homes, or 2.3% of all market sales. The majority of this activity came from the smallest investors, with 10 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small-scale ownership, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 93.0% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 1.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control 97.7% of portfolios in the 11-20 property tier, marking a clear shift to corporate structures as holdings grow.
Transactions
While the overall landlord market was a slight net buyer in Q4 (15 buys vs. 13 sells), institutional investors were distinct net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired (3 buys vs. 7 sells), signaling a strategic withdrawal.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Livingston Parish, LA is fundamentally local and small-scale. Investors own 2,955 properties, just 8.0% of the total housing stock, a figure that dispels notions of overwhelming corporate control. The market's structure is built on 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who command an impressive 93.0% of all investor-owned homes. This is further reinforced by the ownership split, where individual investors hold 77.2% of properties, dwarfing the 23.2% held by companies. Large-scale institutional investors have a minimal footprint, controlling a mere 1.4% of the rental inventory.

Investor behavior in Q4 revealed both strategic advantages and a cautious posture. Landlords acquired properties at a remarkable 21.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $51,811 per home. However, their overall purchasing was low, accounting for only 2.3% of all sales. A key divergence has emerged in transaction patterns: while the broader market of small investors remains in acquisition mode, institutional players are actively retreating. For the year, institutions have sold twice as many properties as they have purchased, indicating a clear strategy of divestment from Livingston Parish.

The key takeaway for the Livingston Parish housing market is its resilience and dependence on local, individual capital. The narrative is not one of a Wall Street takeover, but of a decentralized network of small investors providing rental housing. The current trend of institutional selling, coupled with continued buying from new and existing small landlords, suggests a transfer of assets from large, remote entities to local owners. This dynamic reinforces the community-based nature of the rental market and indicates that its future will be shaped by the decisions of thousands of individual investors, not a handful of large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 08:03 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLivingston Parish (LA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4