Franklin Parish (LA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin Parish (LA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin Parish (LA)
5,768
Total Investors in Franklin Parish (LA)
1,007
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin Parish (LA)
1,218(21.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
893
SFR Owned
951
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
114
SFR Owned
279
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,218 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Franklin Parish's Investor Market: A Buy-and-Hold Fortress Dominated by Cash-Rich, Mom-and-Pop Landlords
Investors own 1,218 SFR properties in Franklin Parish, representing 21.1% of the market. This landscape is controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (88.9% of holdings), with a staggering 97.0% of properties owned outright in cash. The market shows extreme stability, with zero recorded purchase or sale transactions in Q4 2025, underscoring a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy prevalent among local investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,218 SFRs in Franklin Parish, with individual landlords owning a 78.1% majority.
The market is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 1,182 properties (97.0%) owned outright and only 36 financed. Reflecting a strong rental focus, 1,127 properties (92.5%) are classified as rented, non-owner-occupied homes.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison.
The absence of recent transactional data for both landlords and traditional homeowners indicates an extremely illiquid or stagnant market. Historical data from 2020-2023 also shows zero property acquisitions, making trend analysis impossible.
Current Quarter Purchases
The Franklin Parish market was completely inactive, with 0% of Q4 2025 purchases made by landlords.
There were zero total SFR purchases recorded in the parish during the fourth quarter. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional landlords alike acquired no new properties, reflecting a market-wide pause in activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) assert near-total control, owning 88.9% of all investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 65.6% of the investor housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible presence, owning just one property, or 0.1% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes dominant in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
While individuals own over 90% of single-property portfolios, companies represent 50.0% of the 6-10 property tier and grow to a 61.4% majority in the 11-20 property tier. No pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 71219 zip code with 37 properties, while 71378 has the highest rate at 33.4%.
The top areas for investor ownership by sheer count are distinct from those with the highest percentage. This highlights different market dynamics, with some areas having high rental density in a smaller housing market.
Historical Transactions
A complete lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buying and selling patterns.
No data is available for buy or sell transactions for any timeframe, making it impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. There is no information on inter-landlord trading or price margins.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q4 2025 transactions, as no sales were recorded in the market.
The market was entirely dormant in the fourth quarter, with zero transactions across all investor tiers. Consequently, there is no data to compare pricing or inter-landlord trading activity between mom-and-pop and institutional investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,218 SFRs in Franklin Parish, with individual landlords owning a 78.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Franklin Parish, real estate investors hold a significant 21.1% of the Single-Family Residential market, totaling 1,218 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of this market, owning 951 properties, which constitutes a commanding 78.1% share of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 279 properties, or 22.9%.

A defining characteristic of this market is its reliance on cash. An overwhelming 97.0% of investor-owned properties (1,182) are owned free and clear, with only 36 properties carrying financing. This indicates a low-leverage, high-equity investor base.

The investor portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 1,127 properties (92.5%) actively rented and non-owner-occupied.

By entity count, the dominance of small investors is even more pronounced. There are 1,007 distinct landlords in the parish, of which 893 are individuals and 114 are companies, a ratio of nearly 8 to 1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing is not possible for Franklin Parish due to a complete absence of recorded purchase transactions in Q4 2025 for both landlords and traditional homeowners.

The lack of recent sales activity prevents any direct comparison of prices paid by investors versus those paid by owner-occupants.

No pricing trends can be established, as there were no landlord acquisitions recorded in Q3 2025, the full year of 2025, or the full year of 2024 to compare against.

This absence of data is itself a significant finding, pointing to a highly stable, low-turnover market where properties are rarely traded.

The historical data for the 2020-2023 period also reflects zero properties purchased by landlords, suggesting this low-liquidity environment has been a long-term characteristic of the market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The Franklin Parish market was completely inactive, with 0% of Q4 2025 purchases made by landlords.
Detailed Findings

Landlords made no new acquisitions in Franklin Parish during Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of a market that saw zero total SFR purchases.

The lack of activity was universal across all investor types, with both small and large-scale landlords remaining on the sidelines.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired zero properties, representing 0.0% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) also recorded zero purchases, reflecting the market's complete stagnation.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, as the single-property tier saw no new acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) assert near-total control, owning 88.9% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Franklin Parish is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 88.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property investors (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 814 properties, which accounts for 65.6% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on grassroots investment.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) hold a combined 11.1% of the properties, indicating a steep drop-off in portfolio size after the initial tiers.

The presence of institutional capital is virtually nonexistent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the market share.

Due to the lack of recent transaction data, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier or if ownership distribution has changed over time.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes dominant in portfolios of 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the vast majority of ownership in smaller portfolios, holding 90.8% of single-property (Tier 01) and 89.3% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios.

The balance of ownership begins to shift in the small landlord tiers. In the 6-10 property range, ownership is split evenly, with both individuals and companies holding 50.0% of the properties.

The clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners occurs in the 11-20 property tier. In this segment, companies own 35 properties (61.4%), while individuals own 22 properties (38.6%).

This pattern indicates that while individuals are the primary drivers of market entry, scaling a portfolio beyond 10 properties in Franklin Parish is more commonly done under a corporate structure.

Pricing analysis between individual and company buyers is unavailable due to the absence of transactional data across all tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 71219 zip code with 37 properties, while 71378 has the highest rate at 33.4%.
Detailed Findings

The highest absolute number of investor-owned properties in Franklin Parish is found in the 71219 zip code, which contains 37 landlord-owned homes.

Other areas with a notable volume of investor properties include 71232 with 30 properties and 71243 with 9 properties.

However, when measured by ownership rate, a different picture emerges. The 71378 zip code has the highest concentration of investors, where 33.4% of all SFRs are landlord-owned.

High investor penetration is also seen in 71336 (27.1% ownership rate) and 71295 (19.4% ownership rate), indicating these are significant rental submarkets relative to their size.

The distinction between top regions by count versus by percentage suggests that investor strategy varies across the parish, targeting both larger housing markets and smaller, rental-dense communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
A complete lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buying and selling patterns.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data for Franklin Parish is empty, indicating an extremely low-turnover market or gaps in data collection for this area.

It is not possible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or net sellers, as no buy or sell transaction counts are available for any recorded timeframe (Q4 2025, Q3 2025, etc.).

Analysis of inter-landlord activity cannot be performed. The data does not show what percentage of transactions occurred between landlords.

Similarly, institutional investor (1,000+ tier) transaction patterns cannot be assessed, as their historical transaction data is also unavailable.

Without buy and sell prices, calculating implied margins or tracking price trends over time is not feasible. The absence of this data strongly reinforces the narrative of a static, buy-and-hold investor market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q4 2025 transactions, as no sales were recorded in the market.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw no transactional activity involving landlords in Franklin Parish, resulting in a 0.0% market share of a total transaction volume of zero.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes, from single-property landlords to the largest institutional tiers.

Because no properties were transacted, there is no average purchase price data available to compare pricing strategies between different tiers.

No inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter, as the number of properties bought from other landlords was zero across the board.

The complete halt in transactions in Q4 aligns with historical data, portraying Franklin Parish as a market characterized by long-term holds rather than frequent trading.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Franklin Parish's investor market is a static, cash-rich stronghold for small landlords, with 88.9% mom-and-pop control and zero recent market activity.
Holdings
In Franklin Parish, landlords own 1,218 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 21.1% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 78.1% of this portfolio (951 properties), compared to 22.9% for companies (279 properties).
Pricing
No landlord or homeowner purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, making a pricing comparison impossible and highlighting the market's extremely low liquidity.
Activity
There was zero SFR purchase activity in Franklin Parish during Q4 2025. Consequently, landlords acquired no properties, and no new investors entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 88.9% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, with just 0.1% of the market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties and larger, marking a clear strategic crossover.
Transactions
The market was completely illiquid in Q4 2025, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded for any landlord type. It is impossible to determine a net buyer or seller status.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Franklin Parish, Louisiana, is a portrait of stability and local control. Investors hold 1,218 SFR properties, a significant 21.1% of the parish's housing stock. This market is fundamentally shaped by small-scale investors, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) owning a massive 88.9% of the portfolio. Individual owners hold 78.1% of all properties, while institutional investors have virtually no presence, controlling just a single property (0.1%). This structure defies the common narrative of corporate dominance and points to a deeply rooted local investor base.

Investor behavior in Franklin Parish is characterized by long-term, unleveraged holding strategies. A remarkable 97.0% of the investor portfolio is owned outright with cash, signaling a financially conservative and stable owner base. This buy-and-hold mentality is reflected in the market's activity, or lack thereof; there were zero recorded SFR purchases or sales transactions in Q4 2025. This inactivity prevents any analysis of pricing advantages but strongly suggests that properties are acquired for long-term rental income rather than short-term capital gains.

The key takeaway from Franklin Parish is its insulation from the volatile, high-turnover dynamics seen in other markets. It operates as a closed-loop ecosystem where local, cash-rich individuals acquire and hold properties for the long haul. While companies do take a majority stake in portfolios larger than 10 properties, the market's foundation is built on single-property landlords. For the foreseeable future, this parish is likely to remain a predictable, low-liquidity rental market driven by grassroots capital, not institutional speculation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:58 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFranklin Parish (LA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct