Perry (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Perry (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Perry (KY)
2,913
Total Investors in Perry (KY)
120
Investor Owned SFR in Perry (KY)
88(3.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
114
SFR Owned
84
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
6
SFR Owned
6
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 88 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Perry County's market, capturing 40% of Q4 sales at a 42% discount.
Investors own 88 SFRs (3.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 97.7% of this portfolio. In Q4, landlords were highly active net buyers, securing properties for 42.4% less than homeowners, a trend driven by new single-property investors entering the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 95.5% of the 88 landlord-held SFRs in Perry County.
Cash purchases (65) outpace financed ones (23) by nearly 3-to-1. Almost the entire portfolio is rented, with 86 of 88 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a staggering 42.4% discount in Q4, paying $78,143 less than homeowners.
The price gap has been volatile, peaking at a 50.8% discount ($115,142) in Q3 after being only 3.9% ($4,270) in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices remained relatively stable around $106,000-$111,000 over the last three quarters.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured a massive 40.0% of all Q4 home sales, purchasing 6 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 5 of the 6 purchases (83.3%). The market saw an influx of new investors, with 6 new single-property entities entering in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors command 97.7% of all landlord-owned homes in Perry County.
The market is hyper-concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords alone owning 83 homes (94.3%). Institutional investors have a negligible presence, holding just one property, or 1.1% of the investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own nearly all properties, controlling 95.3% of the dominant single-property tier.
In Perry County, there is no tier where companies become the majority owner; individuals control 100% of properties in both the two-property and 3-5 property tiers. The 4 company-owned properties are all within the single-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with 58% of all properties in zip code 41701.
The 41701 zip code contains 51 of the 88 total investor-owned properties in Perry County. Data for other zip codes is sparse, reinforcing 41701 as the central hub for rental investment.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 25 properties while selling only 7, remaining consistent net buyers. The small institutional segment was also a net buyer for the year, acquiring 3 properties and selling 2.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 29.2% of all Q4 market transactions, a total of 7 deals.
Activity was led by the smallest investors, who conducted 6 of the 7 transactions. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating investors are exclusively buying from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 95.5% of the 88 landlord-held SFRs in Perry County.
Detailed Findings

In Perry County, investors hold a modest 88 Single Family Residential properties, representing just 3.0% of the total 2,913 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 84 of the 88 properties (95.5%), leaving companies with a minimal footprint of just 6 properties (6.8%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 114 individual landlords compared to only 6 company landlords, indicating a market driven by small-scale, local investment.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 65 properties held free of financing, more than double the 23 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, as 86 of the 88 investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies rather than speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a staggering 42.4% discount in Q4, paying $78,143 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Perry County acquired properties at a remarkable discount, paying an average of $106,000 while traditional homeowners paid $184,143. This represents a 42.4% price advantage, saving investors an average of $78,143 per home.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been significant but volatile. The Q4 discount follows an even larger 50.8% gap in Q3 (a $115,142 difference), but is a sharp increase from the minimal 3.9% discount observed in Q2.

While homeowner prices fluctuated dramatically, from $226,542 in Q3 down to $184,143 in Q4, landlord acquisition prices remained relatively consistent, hovering between $105,644 and $111,400 over the past three quarters.

The data suggests landlords are adept at finding undervalued properties, consistently purchasing assets for significantly less than the prevailing market rate paid by owner-occupiers.

Comparing recent activity to historical data, the average landlord purchase price of $108,901 in 2025 is lower than the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $122,333, indicating a potential cooling in the prices investors are willing to pay.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured a massive 40.0% of all Q4 home sales, purchasing 6 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated significant market influence in Q4 2025, purchasing 6 of the 15 total SFRs sold in Perry County, capturing an outsized 40.0% market share.

The bulk of this purchasing power came from small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) responsible for 5 of the 6 acquisitions, or 83.3% of all landlord activity.

New market entrants were the primary driver, as 6 entities in the single-property tier acquired 5 homes, signaling fresh capital and new landlords joining the local rental market.

Despite the dominance of small investors, a single institutional purchase (16.7% of landlord activity) indicates that even larger players have some presence in the county.

This high concentration of Q4 activity among new and small landlords highlights a grassroots expansion of the rental market rather than a corporate-led takeover.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors command 97.7% of all landlord-owned homes in Perry County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Perry County is definitively controlled by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) owning 97.7% of the entire investor-held SFR portfolio.

This concentration is most pronounced in the single-property tier, where landlords with just one rental property hold 83 homes, accounting for an overwhelming 94.3% of all investor-owned real estate.

The mid-size investor category is virtually non-existent, with only a handful of properties held by landlords with 2 to 50 homes.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a minimal footprint, controlling only a single property, which represents just 1.1% of the local investor market.

This distribution underscores a market defined by local, small-time landlords rather than large, out-of-state corporations, with the barrier to entry seemingly low for first-time investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own nearly all properties, controlling 95.3% of the dominant single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain overwhelming control across all smaller portfolio tiers in Perry County, effectively shaping the entire ownership landscape.

In the largest and most dominant tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 81 of 85 properties, a 95.3% share, compared to just 4 properties held by companies.

The trend of individual dominance intensifies in slightly larger portfolios, with individuals owning 100% of the properties in both the two-property and 3-to-5 property tiers.

Unlike larger metropolitan markets, there is no crossover point where company ownership becomes prevalent in Perry County; the market remains firmly in the hands of private individuals.

This data indicates that the typical investor journey in this region involves personal ownership rather than forming a corporate entity, even as portfolios begin to grow.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with 58% of all properties in zip code 41701.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investment in Perry County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated within a single geographic area.

The vast majority of activity is found in the 41701 zip code, which contains 51 investor-owned SFR properties, representing 58% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

Within this key zip code, the investor ownership rate is 3.1%, closely mirroring the county-wide average and indicating this area is representative of the broader market.

Data for other zip codes such as 41348, 41367, and 41712 is insufficient for comparison, which further elevates the significance of 41701 as the primary and most transparent sub-market for investment.

This geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting a specific community, likely driven by localized factors such as employment, amenities, or housing stock characteristics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Perry County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers across all recent timeframes.

In Q4 2025, this trend was particularly pronounced, with landlords purchasing 7 properties and selling only 1, resulting in a robust 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 6 properties.

This aggressive buying behavior extends throughout the year, as investors acquired 25 homes while only divesting 7 in 2025, for a net portfolio growth of 18 properties.

The momentum appears to be increasing, with 25 purchases in 2025 nearly doubling the 13 purchases made in all of 2024.

Even the institutional segment, despite its small size, contributed to this growth, ending 2025 as a net buyer with 3 acquisitions versus 2 sales.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 29.2% of all Q4 market transactions, a total of 7 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 7 of the 24 total transactions for a 29.2% share of all activity.

The transaction volume was heavily weighted towards the entry-level, with single-property landlords responsible for 6 of the 7 investor deals.

A key finding from Q4 is the complete absence of inter-landlord trading; 0% of properties acquired by investors were purchased from other landlords, signaling that portfolio growth comes from acquiring homeowner-occupied or vacant properties.

The average purchase price for new single-property landlords was $106,000, consistent with the significant discounts observed compared to the general market.

This pattern of acquiring properties from outside the investor pool suggests landlords are actively expanding the rental housing stock in Perry County rather than trading existing rental assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Perry County's market, capturing 40% of Q4 sales at a 42% discount.
Holdings
Investors own 88 SFR properties, just 3.0% of Perry County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 84 of those homes (95.5%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid 42.4% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $78,143 per property ($106,000 vs $184,143).
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 6 properties for a 40.0% share of all sales, with activity driven by 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control virtually the entire investor market with a 97.7% ownership share, while institutional investors own just one property (1.1%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes in Perry County, with no crossover point to company majority. Individuals own 100% of portfolios in the 2-5 property range.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (7 buys vs 1 sell), a trend mirrored by the small institutional segment which was a net buyer in 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Perry County, KY, is defined by small-scale, individual ownership. Investors hold a modest portfolio of 88 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 3.0% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by private individuals, who own 95.5% of these homes (84 properties). The market structure is hyper-concentrated at the lowest end, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 97.7% of all investor-owned housing, leaving institutional investors with a negligible footprint of just a single property.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. Landlords captured an outsized 40.0% share of all market purchases, driven almost entirely by new, single-property investors. They demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure value, paying an average of $106,000—a 42.4% discount compared to the $184,143 paid by traditional homeowners. This activity reflects a strong accumulation phase, with investors acting as net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the fourth quarter, exclusively acquiring properties from the general market rather than from other investors.

The key takeaway from Perry County is that its rental market is being built from the ground up by local, individual investors, not by large corporations. The combination of high market share in recent purchases, significant price discounts, and a consistent net-buying position signals a growing, yet still small, investor community that is expanding the local rental stock. This dynamic defies the common narrative of corporate dominance and points to a market where individuals can still effectively compete and find value.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 07:30 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPerry (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions