Wallace (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wallace (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wallace (KS)
449
Total Investors in Wallace (KS)
300
Investor Owned SFR in Wallace (KS)
237(52.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
267
SFR Owned
206
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
33
SFR Owned
34
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 237 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Wallace County with 52.8% Market Share in an All-Cash, Zero-Transaction Market
Investors own a majority 52.8% of all single-family homes in Wallace County, a portfolio held entirely by mom-and-pop landlords and financed 100% with cash. The market is defined by long-term holds, showing zero purchase or sale transactions in Q4 2025, with individual investors controlling 86.9% of the rental stock.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own a majority 52.8% of SFRs in Wallace County, all held in cash.
Individual investors own 86.9% of the 237 rental properties, with 100% of the portfolio being financed by cash and none by loans. All 237 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price analysis.
The lack of recent transaction data indicates an illiquid market. Historical data from 2020-2023 also shows zero property acquisitions, highlighting a prolonged period of low activity.
Current Quarter Purchases
The investor market was completely inactive, with 0 landlord purchases in Q4 2025.
This lack of activity extends across all investor tiers, with both mom-and-pop and institutional investors recording zero acquisitions. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 76.7% of the rental housing stock (188 properties). There is zero institutional (1000+ properties) ownership in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all small portfolio tiers in the county.
Companies never achieve majority ownership at any tier. For example, in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 87.5% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 67758 holding 87.8% of all investor properties.
The 67758 zip code not only has the highest count (208 properties) but also the highest investor penetration rate at 57.5%. The next largest area, 67762, has only 20 investor properties.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
The absence of data makes it impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or sellers, or to calculate landlord-to-landlord transaction rates.
Current Quarter Transactions
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a completely static market.
This lack of activity means landlords' share of the market was 0.0%. No inter-landlord trading occurred, and no price comparisons between tiers are possible.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own a majority 52.8% of SFRs in Wallace County, all held in cash.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Wallace County is exceptionally high, with landlords controlling 237 of the 449 single-family residential properties, a market penetration of 52.8%.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 206 properties (86.9%), compared to just 34 properties (14.3%) held by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete lack of leverage; 100% of the 237 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero properties reported as financed.

The investor portfolio is entirely focused on generating rental income, as all 237 properties are classified as non-owner-occupied.

The landlord base is broad and fragmented, comprising 300 distinct entities for only 237 properties, with 267 of these being individual landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing price analysis.
Detailed Findings

There was no recorded SFR purchase activity for either landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison impossible.

The absence of transactions in the current quarter suggests a highly illiquid or static real estate market in Wallace County.

This inactivity is not a new phenomenon; data for the 2020-2023 period also shows zero properties were acquired by landlords, indicating a long-term lack of sales velocity.

Without sales data, it is not possible to analyze pricing trends, appreciation, or the typical discount investors might achieve compared to homeowners.

The market's current state appears to be one of stable, long-term holdings rather than active trading or acquisition.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The investor market was completely inactive, with 0 landlord purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing came to a complete standstill in Wallace County during Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero of the zero total SFR properties sold.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes; mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 0.0% of the non-existent purchase volume.

Reflecting the overall market structure, institutional investors (Tier 09) also recorded zero purchases during the quarter.

The lack of single-property purchases (Tier 01) indicates that no new landlords entered the Wallace County rental market in Q4 2025.

The data points to a market characterized by buy-and-hold strategies, with no new inventory being added to investor portfolios in the recent period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Wallace County is exclusively composed of small-scale landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning 100% of the 237 investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with 188 properties (76.7%) held in Tier 01 portfolios.

The entire investor portfolio is concentrated at the smallest end of the scale; Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) account for every single investor-owned property.

There is a complete absence of large-scale or institutional capital, as investors in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) own zero properties in the county.

This ownership structure highlights a highly localized and fragmented market, devoid of the corporate or institutional presence seen in larger metropolitan areas.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all small portfolio tiers in the county.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority control across every single active ownership tier, underscoring their dominance in the Wallace County market.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner; even in the largest portfolios (Tier 04, 6-10 properties), individuals own 7 of the 8 properties (87.5%).

Company ownership remains a small fraction of the market, holding just 28 of 188 properties (14.7%) in the single-property tier and 3 of 14 properties (21.4%) in the 3-5 property tier.

The data consistently shows that as portfolio sizes increase slightly, the overwhelming majority owner remains individuals, not corporate entities.

This pattern reinforces the characterization of Wallace County as a market driven by local, individual landlords rather than formalized business investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 67758 holding 87.8% of all investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Wallace County is geographically hyper-concentrated, with the 67758 zip code alone accounting for 208 of the 237 investor-owned properties (87.8%).

The 67758 zip code also has the highest rate of investor penetration, where 57.5% of all single-family residential properties are investor-owned.

The remaining investor properties are sparsely distributed, with the 67762 zip code holding a distant second place with only 20 properties.

In this market, the areas with the highest count of investor properties are also the areas with the highest ownership rates, showing a strong correlation.

This concentration suggests that a specific town or community within the 67758 zip code is the primary hub for rental housing in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of long-term buy/sell trends.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data for landlords in Wallace County is unavailable, which prevents a long-term analysis of market dynamics.

It is not possible to determine the historical buy/sell ratio to assess whether landlords have been net accumulators or sellers of property over time.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not feasible, so the percentage of transactions occurring between investors cannot be calculated.

Similarly, a comparison of historical average buy prices versus sell prices to infer potential profit margins cannot be performed.

The market appears to be characterized by long-term holds, as evidenced by both the lack of historical transaction data and zero recent activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a completely static market.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Wallace County was dormant in Q4 2025, with zero transactions recorded for landlords out of zero total market transactions.

As a result, the landlord share of all transactions for the quarter was 0.0%, indicating no properties changed hands among investors or from other seller types.

Activity was non-existent across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest mom-and-pop landlords in the county.

With no purchases made, the level of inter-landlord trading was zero, meaning no properties were bought from other landlords.

The absence of sales prevents any analysis of purchase prices by tier, reinforcing the picture of a buy-and-hold rental market with very low liquidity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords own a staggering 52.8% of Wallace County's SFR market, all held in cash.
Holdings
In Wallace County, landlords own 237 single-family properties, representing a majority 52.8% of the market, with individual investors holding 206 (86.9%) and companies owning just 34 (14.3%).
Pricing
No SFR sales were recorded in Q4 2025 for either landlords or homeowners, indicating a frozen market and making price comparisons impossible.
Activity
Q4 2025 was completely static, with landlords purchasing 0 properties (0.0% of all sales) and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control, owning 100% of investor housing, while institutional investors have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, holding 86.9% of rental properties; companies never become the majority owner at any tier.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells in Q4 2025, the market showed no transactional activity, precluding any analysis of net buyer or seller status.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Wallace County, Kansas, is defined by an extraordinary concentration of small-scale investor ownership. Landlords control 237 properties, a staggering 52.8% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is the exclusive domain of mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the rental portfolio, with no institutional presence whatsoever. Ownership is further characterized by individual investors, who hold 206 properties (86.9%), and a remarkable reliance on cash, as 100% of these homes are owned outright without financing.

Investor behavior in Wallace County is characterized by stability and a complete lack of transactional activity. In Q4 2025, there were zero purchases by investors and zero total transactions in the market, signaling an environment of long-term holds rather than active trading. This inactivity prevents any analysis of pricing, but it underscores a market where properties are held as stable, income-generating assets. The absence of new entrants or sales activity suggests a mature, settled rental landscape.

The key takeaway from this data is that Wallace County represents a unique, self-contained rental ecosystem driven entirely by local, individual capital. The high penetration rate, combined with all-cash holdings and zero market churn, paints a picture of housing as a primary, unleveraged wealth-holding vehicle for community members. This stands in stark contrast to more dynamic urban markets, highlighting a rural model of real estate investment based on stability and long-term ownership rather than speculation or rapid growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWallace (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct