Pottawatomie (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pottawatomie (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pottawatomie (KS)
7,232
Total Investors in Pottawatomie (KS)
1,359
Investor Owned SFR in Pottawatomie (KS)
1,098(15.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,213
SFR Owned
862
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
146
SFR Owned
250
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,098 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Pottawatomie County's SFR Market Dominated by Small Investors Amidst Anomalous Q4 Price Surge
In Pottawatomie County, investors own 1,098 Single-Family Residential properties, making up 15.2% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (95.7% of holdings), with individuals owning 78.5% of the portfolio. Q4 2025 saw minimal investor activity but a significant pricing anomaly, where landlords paid an 81.6% premium over traditional homeowners, while institutional investors remained on the sidelines.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,098 SFR properties in Pottawatomie County, with individuals holding 78.5%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 741 paid in cash versus 357 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 1,071 properties (97.5%) are non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (1,213) vastly outnumber company landlords (146).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a staggering 81.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, a $260,678 price difference.
This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from Q3, when landlords enjoyed a 23.8% discount ($81,892). Pricing has been extremely volatile, with a 49.9% premium also recorded in Q2. No landlord property purchases were recorded in 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented just 2.3% of Q4 2025 market activity, purchasing only 2 of 86 total SFRs sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active investors, accounting for 100% of landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no acquisitions in the quarter. These two purchases were made by three new single-property entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Pottawatomie County, controlling 95.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+) have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 1 property, which is only 0.1% of the investor portfolio. The smallest landlords, those with a single property, alone account for 70.6% of all investor-held housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 89.7% of single-property holdings, companies control 56.2% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier and 88.9% in the 11-20 unit tier. No pricing data is available to compare acquisition costs between the two types.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in Wamego's 66547 zip code, home to 337 investor-owned properties.
While Wamego has the highest count, smaller zip codes show extreme investor penetration rates, including 66540 (100.0%), 66407 (44.3%), and 66422 (39.2%). This highlights different types of investor focus across the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Pottawatomie County remain net buyers, while the lone institutional presence is a net seller.
In 2025, landlords collectively purchased 28 properties while selling 22, maintaining an accumulation posture. This contrasts with institutional investors, who sold as many properties as they bought in 2025 (3 buys, 3 sells) and were net sellers in 2024 (2 buys, 3 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity constituted just 2.3% of all 131 SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
All 3 landlord transactions were conducted by the smallest, single-property tier of investors. These new entrants paid a high average price of $579,964 and acquired two-thirds of their properties (66.7%) from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,098 SFR properties in Pottawatomie County, with individuals holding 78.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Pottawatomie County totals 1,098 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 15.2% of the total 7,232 SFRs in the market.

The market is defined by small, independent operators, as individual landlords own 862 properties, a commanding 78.5% share, compared to the 250 properties (22.8%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,213 individual landlords active in the market, far surpassing the 146 company landlords.

A strong indicator of financial stability within the investor community is the preference for cash ownership, with 741 properties owned outright, more than double the 357 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,071 of the 1,098 investor-owned properties classified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring a 97.5% rental focus.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a staggering 81.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, a $260,678 price difference.
Detailed Findings

In a striking market anomaly, landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average acquisition price of $579,964, which is 81.6% higher than the $319,286 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial $260,678 premium per property.

This Q4 pricing behavior is a complete reversal of the prior quarter. In Q3 2025, landlords secured properties at a 23.8% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $261,531 versus the homeowner's $343,423.

The pricing dynamic has been exceptionally volatile throughout the year, swinging from a 49.9% premium in Q2 to a significant discount in Q3, and culminating in the record premium in Q4.

Recent price appreciation appears steep when comparing Q4 2025's average of $579,964 to the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $214,919, though this is based on very low transaction volume.

Investor acquisition activity was sparse, with zero properties purchased by landlords in 2024, followed by a handful of high-priced acquisitions in 2025, driving the volatile price averages.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords represented just 2.3% of Q4 2025 market activity, purchasing only 2 of 86 total SFRs sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Pottawatomie County was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring only 2 of the 86 SFRs sold, capturing a mere 2.3% of the market share.

The entirety of this activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the quarter's investor purchases.

Specifically, new market entrants in the single-property tier were the sole buyers, acquiring 2 properties across 3 distinct entities, suggesting co-ownership on at least one property.

In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making zero purchases during the quarter, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of the market.

The low volume of just 2 properties purchased by investors highlights a significant slowdown in acquisition velocity compared to broader market activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Pottawatomie County, controlling 95.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pottawatomie County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a massive 95.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 804 properties, which represents 70.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The ownership concentration rapidly diminishes in larger tiers. Landlords with 2 properties hold an 8.2% share, while those with 3-5 properties hold 9.0%.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a very limited presence, collectively owning just 4.3% of the investor-owned housing stock in the county.

Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have a negligible impact on the local market, holding only 1 property, which accounts for just 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern of professionalization emerges as portfolio sizes grow, with companies surpassing individuals in ownership at the 6-10 property tier.

In this crossover tier (6-10 properties), companies own 54 properties for a 56.2% majority share, compared to the 42 properties (43.8%) held by individuals.

Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller-scale operations. They own 726 properties (89.7%) in the single-property tier and 55 properties (59.1%) in the two-property tier.

Company dominance becomes even more pronounced in larger portfolios. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 40 properties, representing a commanding 88.9% share.

This data indicates that as investors scale beyond five properties, they increasingly shift to a corporate ownership structure for liability and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in Wamego's 66547 zip code, home to 337 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The highest volume of investor-owned properties is located in the 66547 zip code (Wamego), which contains 337 investor-held SFRs, making it the primary hub for rental housing in Pottawatomie County.

Other areas with significant investor presence by count include Saint George (66536) with 137 properties and Manhattan (66502) with 133 properties.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit the highest investor ownership rates, indicating markets that are heavily saturated with rental properties. The 66540 zip code stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, though this is likely a small area with few total properties.

High penetration rates are also seen in 66407 (44.3%), 66422 (39.2%), and 66520 (38.2%), suggesting these are key targets for investors relative to their market size.

The data reveals a clear distinction between zip codes with a high absolute number of rentals, like 66547, and smaller zips where investors own a disproportionately large share of the housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Pottawatomie County remain net buyers, while the lone institutional presence is a net seller.
Detailed Findings

Overall, landlords in Pottawatomie County continue to expand their portfolios, finishing Q4 2025 as net buyers with 3 purchases against 2 sales.

This trend holds for the full year of 2025, where landlords acquired 28 SFRs and sold 22, resulting in a net gain of 6 properties for the investor community.

The acquisition pace was even stronger in 2024, when landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 53 properties while only selling 21, for a net increase of 32 properties.

In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors (1000+ tier) are either neutral or divesting. In 2025, they sold as many properties as they acquired (3), and in Q2 they were net sellers (1 buy vs 2 sells).

This divergence shows that portfolio growth in the county is driven entirely by smaller landlords, while the largest players are reducing their local footprint or holding steady.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity constituted just 2.3% of all 131 SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a very small role in the Q4 2025 real estate market, with landlord transactions accounting for only 3 of the 131 total SFR transactions, a market share of just 2.3%.

All investor transaction activity was confined to the single-property tier, indicating that new or first-time landlords were the only buyers during the period.

These mom-and-pop buyers paid a notably high average price of $579,964 for their acquisitions, a figure that far exceeds typical market prices and suggests the purchase of premium properties.

A significant portion of this activity involved recycling existing rental stock, as 66.7% of the properties purchased by these new landlords were acquired from other investors.

Larger investors, from mid-size to institutional, recorded zero transactions in Q4, ceding the entire field of play to new entrants at the smallest scale.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Pottawatomie County's SFR Market Dominated by Small Landlords Amidst Anomalous Q4 Price Surge
Holdings
Investors own 1,098 SFR properties, representing 15.2% of Pottawatomie County's market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 862 properties (78.5%) compared to 250 (22.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a highly unusual Q4, landlords paid 81.6% more than homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $579,964 compared to the homeowner average of $319,286, a premium of $260,678 per property.
Activity
Investor purchasing was minimal in Q4, accounting for only 2.3% of sales (2 properties). Activity was driven exclusively by new entrants, with 3 new single-property landlord entities joining the market.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 95.7% of all investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, signaling a trend towards professionalization as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, acquiring 3 properties and selling 2 in Q4. This contrasts with institutional investors, who have been net sellers or neutral over the past two years, indicating divestment from the largest players.
Market Narrative

In Pottawatomie County, Kansas, the single-family rental market is fundamentally a local, small-scale enterprise. Investors own 1,098 properties, comprising 15.2% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The ownership structure is dominated by individuals, who hold 78.5% of these properties (862 homes). This grassroots character is further evidenced by tier distribution, where mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.7% of the investor-owned inventory, while large-scale institutional investors have a negligible presence of just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by low volume but anomalous pricing. Landlords accounted for just 2.3% of all purchases, with all activity coming from new, single-property investors. In a stark departure from typical trends, these investors paid an average of $579,964, a staggering 81.6% premium over traditional homeowners. This spike contrasts with a 23.8% discount seen just one quarter prior, highlighting extreme price volatility on a small number of transactions. While small landlords continue to be net buyers, albeit at a slower pace, the county's institutional presence has been a net seller, signaling a strategic divergence between large and small players.

The key takeaway from Pottawatomie County's market is its resilience as a domain for the small, independent landlord. The narrative of 'Wall Street buying up Main Street' does not apply here. Instead, the market is characterized by individuals and small businesses growing their portfolios, with a clear trend of incorporating as they scale past five properties. The extreme pricing volatility in Q4, coupled with low transaction volume, suggests a market where specific, high-value opportunities are driving averages rather than broad-based bidding wars, presenting a unique landscape for local investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 06:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPottawatomie (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct