Logan (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Logan (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Logan (KS)
979
Total Investors in Logan (KS)
376
Investor Owned SFR in Logan (KS)
323(33.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
342
SFR Owned
285
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
34
SFR Owned
42
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 323 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own 33% of Logan County SFR Market, Dominated by Local Landlords Amidst a Frozen Q4
Investors own 323 single-family properties in Logan County, representing a significant 33.0% of the total market. The landscape is entirely controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 91.1% of the portfolio. The market was completely inactive in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or sales recorded for landlords or homeowners, indicating a period of extreme illiquidity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 33.0% of the SFR market, with individuals holding a dominant 88.2% share.
The entire investor portfolio of 323 properties is owned outright with cash, as there are zero financed properties. Of these, 306 are confirmed rented, highlighting a strong focus on rental income. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of roughly 10-to-1 (342 vs 34).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available due to a complete lack of sales transactions.
The absence of property sales in recent timeframes, including the entirety of the 2020-2023 period, prevents any analysis of pricing trends or comparisons between landlord and homeowner acquisition costs. The market shows no recent transactional price points.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing 0.0% of a non-existent market.
The market was entirely frozen, with zero total SFR purchases recorded for any buyer type. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional investors both recorded zero acquisitions, and no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.1% of investor SFRs, with zero institutional presence.
Single-property landlords alone account for two-thirds (66.5%) of all investor-owned housing in the county. Due to a lack of sales, no pricing analysis by tier is possible. The market is exclusively composed of small and mid-size investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords are the majority owners in every active tier, with no company crossover point.
Even in multi-property tiers, individuals maintain strong control, owning 84.6% of two-property portfolios and 72.1% of 3-5 property portfolios. There are no company-owned properties in the largest active tier (21-50 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 67748 (237 properties), while 67764 has the highest rate (68.2%).
The zip code 67764 shows an exceptionally high investor penetration, with landlords owning more than two-thirds of the housing stock. The top four zip codes account for 100% of the investor-owned properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord trading.
The absence of buy-and-sell records means that key metrics like buy/sell ratios, landlord-to-landlord transaction percentages, and implied profit margins from sales cannot be calculated. Market dynamics remain opaque due to low liquidity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Confirming a frozen market, landlords were involved in zero transactions in Q4 2025.
The 0.0% landlord share of transactions reflects a market where no properties were bought or sold by any party. Consequently, there were no transactions to analyze by tier, no price comparisons to be made, and no inter-landlord trading activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 33.0% of the SFR market, with individuals holding a dominant 88.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial footprint in Logan County, controlling 323 of the 979 single-family properties, a market penetration of 33.0%.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by local, individual ownership rather than corporate investment. Individuals own 285 properties (88.2% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 42 (13.0%).

A defining feature of this market is the complete absence of leverage; 100% of the 323 investor-owned properties are held as cash assets with zero properties recorded as financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 306 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy of long-term holding for cash flow.

The disparity between entity types is stark, with 342 individual landlords compared to only 34 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 pricing data is available due to a complete lack of sales transactions.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Logan County's real estate market is the complete lack of sales activity, resulting in no available acquisition pricing data for Q4 2025.

Without any recorded transactions, it is impossible to compare landlord purchasing prices against those of traditional homeowners. This lack of data suggests an extremely illiquid or stable, hold-oriented market.

Analysis of price appreciation is also not possible, as no average acquisition price could be calculated for the 2020-2023 period or for Q4 2025.

The absence of transactions prevents any insight into whether pricing dynamics differ between individual and company investors.

The data points to a market defined not by price trends and sales volume, but by long-term ownership and a near-total absence of properties being listed or sold.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing 0.0% of a non-existent market.
Detailed Findings

Q4 2025 was marked by a complete standstill in Logan County's real estate market, with landlords making zero single-family property purchases.

This inactivity means landlords captured 0.0% of the market, as the total number of SFR purchases for all buyer types was also zero.

No new investment was observed from any investor segment. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero acquisitions.

The pipeline of new investors has paused, with the number of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entering the market in Q4 being zero.

This lack of activity across all tiers signals a market in a holding pattern, with no transactional momentum from either small-scale or large-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.1% of investor SFRs, with zero institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Logan County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own a combined 91.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

The market's foundation is built on the smallest investors, with the single-property (Tier 01) segment alone comprising 224 properties, or 66.5% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, there is zero presence from institutional investors (Tier 09), who own 0.0% of the market.

The remaining share is held by a small number of mid-size landlords, with the 21-50 property tier accounting for 30 properties (8.9%).

Due to the lack of market transactions, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices may vary between these different investor tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual landlords are the majority owners in every active tier, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of ownership across every single portfolio size in Logan County. Unlike in larger markets, there is no tier at which companies become the majority owners.

In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 203 properties (89.4%) compared to just 24 for companies (10.6%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues into larger portfolio tiers. For two-property owners, individuals hold 33 properties (84.6%), and for landlords with 3-5 properties, they own 31 (72.1%).

Notably, the largest investor tier active in the county (21-50 properties) is composed entirely of individual owners, who hold all 30 properties in that bracket.

This data illustrates a market where scale does not correlate with corporatization; portfolio growth is achieved by individual investors, not companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 67748 (237 properties), while 67764 has the highest rate (68.2%).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Logan County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 67748 contains the largest number of investor-owned homes at 237, though its investor ownership rate is 28.3%.

The most heavily saturated area for investors is zip code 67764, where an extraordinary 68.2% of all single-family properties are investor-owned. This indicates a market segment almost entirely composed of rental housing.

A significant gap exists between the leaders in property count versus ownership rate, with the area holding the most properties (67748) having a much lower saturation than the smaller area of 67764.

Other areas of notable investor presence include 67747 (34.5% rate) and 67761 (50.0% rate), further highlighting pockets of high rental concentration.

Together, just four zip codes house all 323 of the county's investor-owned SFRs, underscoring the hyper-local nature of investment.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord trading.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Logan County makes it impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or net sellers over time.

Metrics on market churn and liquidity, such as the percentage of transactions that occur between two landlords, cannot be assessed.

Similarly, there is no data to compare average buy prices to average sell prices, which would typically provide insight into potential investor profit margins.

This absence of data applies to all landlord types, including the institutional tier, preventing any comparison of their strategies to the broader market.

The key insight from this data gap is that Logan County appears to be a very stable, long-hold rental market with minimal property turnover among investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Confirming a frozen market, landlords were involved in zero transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transactional inactivity in Logan County's housing market for Q4 2025 was absolute, with landlords participating in zero transactions.

As the total number of market transactions was also zero, the landlord share of activity was 0.0%, indicating a complete market-wide pause.

This lack of activity was uniform across all investor sizes; both mom-and-pop landlords and larger operators recorded zero buys or sells.

As a result, it is impossible to analyze Q4 purchasing behavior, such as comparing the average prices paid by different tiers or determining the percentage of properties acquired from other landlords.

The data conclusively shows that the final quarter of 2025 was a period of stasis for the Logan County investor market, with no assets changing hands.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own 33% of Logan County's Housing, a Market Dominated by Mom-and-Pops with Zero Q4 Sales Activity
Holdings
In Logan County, landlords own 323 single-family properties, representing a significant 33.0% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 285 properties (88.2%), compared to just 42 (13.0%) for companies.
Pricing
No pricing analysis is possible for Q4 2025, as a complete lack of sales transactions by landlords or homeowners prevents any comparison of acquisition costs.
Activity
The real estate market in Logan County was at a standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control over the investment landscape, owning 91.1% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Logan County, with no crossover tier where companies become the majority. All properties in the largest active tier (21-50 units) are held by individuals.
Transactions
With zero properties bought or sold in Q4, landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers. The lack of activity was universal, applying to both the overall landlord market and institutional investors, who also recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Logan County, KS, is characterized by high penetration and local, small-scale ownership. Investors control a substantial 33.0% of the county's SFR housing stock, totaling 323 properties. This market is fundamentally driven by individuals, not corporations; 88.2% of these properties are owned by individual landlords. This structure is further reinforced by portfolio size, as 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) control a massive 91.1% share, while institutional capital has zero presence.

Investor behavior in Logan County is defined by long-term holding and a complete absence of recent transactional activity. The market was entirely illiquid in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or sales recorded for any buyer type. This lack of transactions prevents any analysis of pricing, but the underlying portfolio reveals a debt-averse strategy, as 100% of investor-owned properties are held with cash, not financing. This points to a stable, cash-flow-oriented market rather than one focused on speculative appreciation.

The key takeaway is that Logan County operates as a self-contained, insulated rental market disconnected from broader national investment trends. It is a market of stasis, not momentum, where local individuals build and hold small portfolios for the long term. The lack of sales activity is the most significant finding, signaling that this is not a transactional market but a deeply entrenched buy-and-hold environment where rental assets rarely change hands.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 16, 2026 at 05:27 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLogan (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct